"Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74760894 United Kingdom 07/12/2019 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Miss Bunny Swan User ID: 77759132 Australia 07/12/2019 10:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AkashicRecord® (OP) User ID: 50330480 United States 07/12/2019 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72376376 United States 07/12/2019 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74760894 United Kingdom 07/12/2019 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SoberLife User ID: 12906714 United States 07/12/2019 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77145571 Iceland 07/12/2019 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54749076 Australia 07/12/2019 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77344644 United States 07/12/2019 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77344644 United States 07/12/2019 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Deplorable Busterhymen User ID: 77755236 United States 07/12/2019 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? FCK the WEF! Keep your hands off my country! |
dukusprime User ID: 72896344 United States 07/12/2019 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77812251 United States 07/12/2019 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) I was deeply interested in this subject years ago, but I failed to posess the necessary mathematical "chutzpah" necessary to really pursue it: Quoting: AkashicRecord® [link to youtu.be (secure)] But, my recent interest in quantum computing leads me to believe that we can now more extensively study this field, because we haven't really been able to...until now. (Current methods of testing these "CDT/qsf" theories have resulted in requiring time-consuming 'Monte Carlo' simulations, and I expect this can be largely ameliorated by execution upon a quantum processor, aka: QPU...) While this seems to be a potentially realistic explanation with which one might model the observable universe, there remains the problem of there needing to be some 'space' to model it in the first place (where did this come from and how did it make itself available for the points to triangulate themselves in?)! And then there is the issue of what exactly are the 'points' being connected and what stimulates/initiates this process? This brings us right back to the original enigma... And also, the 'Universe' cannot be 'finite', for if it is, it must reside in relation to some other 'thing' -is this not part of the universe as well? I think what we have here are some really smart physicists who do not have the capacity(background) necessary to integrate the necessary philosophical requisite with their ideas/observations. Pretty cool though, haven't heard of this theory before, thanks for sharing! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77145571 Iceland 07/12/2019 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? No I am saying that the closer one comes to seeing the indivisible the more blind you ultimately become due to a perceptual mesochronik fugue state. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73617035 United States 07/12/2019 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) I was deeply interested in this subject years ago, but I failed to posess the necessary mathematical "chutzpah" necessary to really pursue it: Quoting: AkashicRecord® [link to youtu.be (secure)] But, my recent interest in quantum computing leads me to believe that we can now more extensively study this field, because we haven't really been able to...until now. (Current methods of testing these "CDT/qsf" theories have resulted in requiring time-consuming 'Monte Carlo' simulations, and I expect this can be largely ameliorated by execution upon a quantum processor, aka: QPU...) While this seems to be a potentially realistic explanation with which one might model the observable universe, there remains the problem of there needing to be some 'space' to model it in the first place (where did this come from and how did it make itself available for the points to triangulate themselves in?)! And then there is the issue of what exactly are the 'points' being connected and what stimulates/initiates this process? This brings us right back to the original enigma... And also, the 'Universe' cannot be 'finite', for if it is, it must reside in relation to some other 'thing' -is this not part of the universe as well? I think what we have here are some really smart physicists who do not have the capacity(background) necessary to integrate the necessary philosophical requisite with their ideas/observations. 100% |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77812251 United States 07/12/2019 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? No I am saying that the closer one comes to seeing the indivisible the more blind you ultimately become due to a perceptual mesochronik fugue state. Essentially, what I get out of your statement is: how can our observations be trusted, as they are reliant upon the perspective of an non-falsifiable phenomenon (ourselves/physical senses). |
AkashicRecord® (OP) User ID: 50330480 United States 07/12/2019 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) I was deeply interested in this subject years ago, but I failed to posess the necessary mathematical "chutzpah" necessary to really pursue it: Quoting: AkashicRecord® [link to youtu.be (secure)] But, my recent interest in quantum computing leads me to believe that we can now more extensively study this field, because we haven't really been able to...until now. (Current methods of testing these "CDT/qsf" theories have resulted in requiring time-consuming 'Monte Carlo' simulations, and I expect this can be largely ameliorated by execution upon a quantum processor, aka: QPU...) While this seems to be a potentially realistic explanation with which one might model the observable universe, there remains the problem of there needing to be some 'space' to model it in the first place (where did this come from and how did it make itself available for the points to triangulate themselves in?)! And then there is the issue of what exactly are the 'points' being connected and what stimulates/initiates this process? This brings us right back to the original enigma... And also, the 'Universe' cannot be 'finite', for if it is, it must reside in relation to some other 'thing' -is this not part of the universe as well? I think what we have here are some really smart physicists who do not have the capacity(background) necessary to integrate the necessary philosophical requisite with their ideas/observations. Pretty cool though, haven't heard of this theory before, thanks for sharing! You're welcome! This is one of the best (and most logical) replies I've had. :D Sorry, that message is no longer in the database. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77145571 Iceland 07/12/2019 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? No I am saying that the closer one comes to seeing the indivisible the more blind you ultimately become due to a perceptual mesochronik fugue state. Essentially, what I get out of your statement is: how can our observations be trusted, as they are reliant upon the perspective of an non-falsifiable phenomenon (ourselves/physical senses). One you can nuance the smallest Quantum cog you are staring at a still life with zero extrapolative perspective. Hypothetically you would need to conduct a second set of experiments at this juncture but your metrics would be unfathomable shadows. |
catnahalf Deplorables assemble User ID: 71790446 United States 07/12/2019 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77457727 United States 07/12/2019 11:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77457727 United States 07/12/2019 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77812251 United States 07/12/2019 11:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) ... Quoting: Deplorable Busterhymen Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? No I am saying that the closer one comes to seeing the indivisible the more blind you ultimately become due to a perceptual mesochronik fugue state. Essentially, what I get out of your statement is: how can our observations be trusted, as they are reliant upon the perspective of an non-falsifiable phenomenon (ourselves/physical senses). One you can nuance the smallest Quantum cog you are staring at a still life with zero extrapolative perspective. Hypothetically you would need to conduct a second set of experiments at this juncture but your metrics would be unfathomable shadows. Shadows cast by... what? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77812251 United States 07/12/2019 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71489818 United States 07/12/2019 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) The powers that be really, really, REALLY want us believing in their occult religion They’ve replaced God with science and the self-proclaimed “experts” who continually present different “scientific breakthroughs”....such as the Sim theory, Quantum physics, etc. But the Truth is...there is ZERO proof of any of these theories. All the New Age and quantum physics mumbo-jumbo are all just repackaged lies of the Zohar and Kabbalah. Their main goal is to manipulate the masses into accepting the new age doctrines of moral relativism, Law of Attraction and, most of all, the satanic tenets including “Do What Thou Wilt” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75919846 United States 07/12/2019 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2154157 United States 07/13/2019 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? No I am saying that the closer one comes to seeing the indivisible the more blind you ultimately become due to a perceptual mesochronik fugue state. Some examples: 1. Heisenberg, uncertainty, and the scanning tunneling microscope [link to arxiv.org (secure)] We show by a statistical analysis of high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) experiments, that the interpretation of the density of electron charge as a statistical quantity leads to a conflict with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. 2. Open timelike curves violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle [link to arxiv.org (secure)] We consider the special case in which there is no interaction inside the CTC, referred to as an open timelike curve (OTC), for which the only local effect is to increase the time elapsed by a clock carried by the system. Remarkably, circuits with access to OTCs are shown to violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, allowing perfect state discrimination and perfect cloning of coherent states. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2154157 United States 07/13/2019 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) I was deeply interested in this subject years ago, but I failed to posess the necessary mathematical "chutzpah" necessary to really pursue it: Quoting: AkashicRecord® [link to youtu.be (secure)] But, my recent interest in quantum computing leads me to believe that we can now more extensively study this field, because we haven't really been able to...until now. (Current methods of testing these "CDT/qsf" theories have resulted in requiring time-consuming 'Monte Carlo' simulations, and I expect this can be largely ameliorated by execution upon a quantum processor, aka: QPU...) And here's where our current Quantum Processors stand: I wanted to include these on-site videos from the D-WAVE lab because I found them tremendously interesting... Quoting: AkashicRecord® It's almost like "real life" sci-fi,.. QPU Infrastructure: [link to youtu.be (secure)] QPU Cooling: [link to youtu.be (secure)] QPU Design & Fabrication: [link to youtu.be (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77812251 United States 07/13/2019 12:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) The powers that be really, really, REALLY want us believing in their occult religion Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71489818 They’ve replaced God with science and the self-proclaimed “experts” who continually present different “scientific breakthroughs”....such as the Sim theory, Quantum physics, etc. But the Truth is...there is ZERO proof of any of these theories. All the New Age and quantum physics mumbo-jumbo are all just repackaged lies of the Zohar and Kabbalah. Their main goal is to manipulate the masses into accepting the new age doctrines of moral relativism, Law of Attraction and, most of all, the satanic tenets including “Do What Thou Wilt” It's called logic... betta axe sumbody. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77145571 Iceland 07/13/2019 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 No I am saying that the closer one comes to seeing the indivisible the more blind you ultimately become due to a perceptual mesochronik fugue state. Essentially, what I get out of your statement is: how can our observations be trusted, as they are reliant upon the perspective of an non-falsifiable phenomenon (ourselves/physical senses). One you can nuance the smallest Quantum cog you are staring at a still life with zero extrapolative perspective. Hypothetically you would need to conduct a second set of experiments at this juncture but your metrics would be unfathomable shadows. Shadows cast by... what? Not cast but intuited as a phantom fraction of the irreducible. One would need to create a resource world at this scale to supply the observational mechanics to induce a meander about the frozen state allowing perspective to be reintroduced via multi-state coordinates. It will never appreciably happen. I can't see the end of me My whole expanse, I cannot see I formulate infinity And store it deep inside of me |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31126728 United States 07/13/2019 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: "Causal Dynamical Triangulation" and quantum spin foam(s)... (aka: how our universe possibly works) Quantum hi-jinks are ultimately a waste of time because as the experimental mechanics resolve toward parity with the Gott Maschinenzeit the less observable they become due to an apparent frozen state of zero discernability. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77145571 Are you saying that anything that we actually observe involving quantum mechanics is skewed simply because we are observing, which affects the results? I think it was Heisenberg who said that. |
1 | Working on Earthquake triangulation | 03/26/12 |