A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... | |
Hydra User ID: 74885842 Germany 08/07/2019 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... As expected: bullshit video #51 Quoting: Hydra Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? The mountains should not be visible, if the curve were true (your having a functional disconnect here). But they are, which means, there is no curve. Refraction or not, it would not cause the entire mountain range that would be behind a curve to magically appear over the horizon. Refraction/mirages do not work that way at all. The only thing visible at that camera altitude if we were on a globe, would be a section of the top of the mountains - but instead we can clearly see it way more than just the peak, ... I gave you the link to a correct calculator for calculating what part of an object is hidden and what is visible: [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Only if atmospheric refraction is not taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible. Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible. And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] (I hope you can convert meters into feet.) ... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan Does that gibberish make any sense? No. I don't get why so many refuse to see that, the end result is better anyway and more logical, God is real. Would you rather God not be real and us a random speck like they want to sell you, because the price ain't worth it. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan So your god can only create a pizza earth? My God can create a complete universe from a single, tiny point. A universe that develops itself into galaxies, stars, planets, .... You should feel intense shame that you diminish God by claiming, he can only create a pizza-earth. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Doctor Manhattan User ID: 77435031 United States 08/07/2019 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... As expected: bullshit video #51 Quoting: Hydra Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? The mountains should not be visible, if the curve were true (your having a functional disconnect here). But they are, which means, there is no curve. Refraction or not, it would not cause the entire mountain range that would be behind a curve to magically appear over the horizon. Refraction/mirages do not work that way at all. The only thing visible at that camera altitude if we were on a globe, would be a section of the top of the mountains - but instead we can clearly see it way more than just the peak, ... I gave you the link to a correct calculator for calculating what part of an object is hidden and what is visible: [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Only if atmospheric refraction is not taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible. Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible. And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] (I hope you can convert meters into feet.) ... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan Does that gibberish make any sense? No. I don't get why so many refuse to see that, the end result is better anyway and more logical, God is real. Would you rather God not be real and us a random speck like they want to sell you, because the price ain't worth it. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan So your god can only create a pizza earth? My God can create a complete universe from a single, tiny point. A universe that develops itself into galaxies, stars, planets, .... You should feel intense shame that you diminish God by claiming, he can only create a pizza-earth. . Your mocking shit you don't understand at all. "a pizza earth" Guess what, that "pizza earth" is providing everything right now, its your existence, so you can mock all you want. Your god is nothing but CGI and AI, and the elite controlling pawns like you. If fine dude, believe the earth is round, because they tell you, ignore reality. |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/07/2019 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... As expected: bullshit video #51 Quoting: Hydra Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? The mountains should not be visible, if the curve were true (your having a functional disconnect here). But they are, which means, there is no curve. Refraction or not, it would not cause the entire mountain range that would be behind a curve to magically appear over the horizon. Refraction/mirages do not work that way at all. The only thing visible at that camera altitude if we were on a globe, would be a section of the top of the mountains - but instead we can clearly see it way more than just the peak, ... I gave you the link to a correct calculator for calculating what part of an object is hidden and what is visible: [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Only if atmospheric refraction is not taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible. Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible. And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] (I hope you can convert meters into feet.) ... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan Does that gibberish make any sense? No. I don't get why so many refuse to see that, the end result is better anyway and more logical, God is real. Would you rather God not be real and us a random speck like they want to sell you, because the price ain't worth it. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan So your god can only create a pizza earth? My God can create a complete universe from a single, tiny point. A universe that develops itself into galaxies, stars, planets, .... You should feel intense shame that you diminish God by claiming, he can only create a pizza-earth. Your mocking shit you don't understand at all. "a pizza earth" Guess what, that "pizza earth" is providing everything right now, its your existence, so you can mock all you want. No comment on the calculation of the visible part of the mountain? Yep, I blew up your funny video. Bullshit flat earth video #51, bullshit like all the other 50 bullshit videos. If fine dude, believe the earth is round, because they tell you, ignore reality. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan Reality shows me that a German equatorial telescope mount works fine on a globe earth - care to explain how it works on a flat earth. Reality shows me that the linear scale on the Samrat Yantra in Jaipur works fine on a globe earth - care to explain how it works on a flat earth. Reality shows me that the height of Polaris above the north pole works fine on a globe earth - care to explain how it works on a flat earth. . Last Edited by Hydra on 08/07/2019 09:16 PM :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7941847 United States 08/07/2019 09:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... You cant walk off the edge. Its protected by the dome. Plus..no one can reach unlessntheybwant toning a body bag. Earth is flat if you believe the bible and history. JS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77749705 The bible does NOT say tye earth is flat. But you satanic illuminati stooges want to make any and all christians a laughing stock by repeating this lie. And as jo one ever really reads the bible lots of them beleive the lie. For lack of knowledge. What you dont know CAN hurt you. ""And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day." (Genesis 1:6-8 KJV) A Firmament, is flat. Anything other lie you wnat to spew, shitbag? And once again: The Bible is not a scientific book, God didn't write the Bible, it was written by men that were not even on the scientific level of that time (otherwise they would have known, that rabbits don't chew the cud, that insects don't have four legs but six and the pi isn't = 3) Bullshit In Bookform Lacking Evidence . Rabbits: [link to www.google.com (secure)] Insects: [link to www.google.com (secure)] Does Pi equal 3: [link to www.google.com (secure)] |
Doctor Manhattan User ID: 77435031 United States 08/07/2019 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... As expected: bullshit video #51 Quoting: Hydra Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? The mountains should not be visible, if the curve were true (your having a functional disconnect here). But they are, which means, there is no curve. Refraction or not, it would not cause the entire mountain range that would be behind a curve to magically appear over the horizon. Refraction/mirages do not work that way at all. The only thing visible at that camera altitude if we were on a globe, would be a section of the top of the mountains - but instead we can clearly see it way more than just the peak, ... I gave you the link to a correct calculator for calculating what part of an object is hidden and what is visible: [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Only if atmospheric refraction is not taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible. Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible. And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] (I hope you can convert meters into feet.) ... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan Does that gibberish make any sense? No. I don't get why so many refuse to see that, the end result is better anyway and more logical, God is real. Would you rather God not be real and us a random speck like they want to sell you, because the price ain't worth it. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan So your god can only create a pizza earth? My God can create a complete universe from a single, tiny point. A universe that develops itself into galaxies, stars, planets, .... You should feel intense shame that you diminish God by claiming, he can only create a pizza-earth. . Your mocking shit you don't understand at all. "a pizza earth" Guess what, that "pizza earth" is providing everything right now, its your existence, so you can mock all you want. Your god is nothing but CGI and AI, and the elite controlling pawns like you. If fine dude, believe the earth is round, because they tell you, ignore reality. and this part, I was just typing too fast and annoyed by ignorant cunts like yourself, I deal with oblivious people all the time you're no different. Quoting: Hydra "... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared." what I was wanting to write was , ...some of it is hidden obviously because of distance (more distance, the more the visual drop of an object behind the horizon/over the curve), also right above the buildings where the buildings and mountains meet at the horizon level, theres a small section thats cut off visually because its too far to visually render the base of the mountain where it meets the top of the buildings at the horizon level. In a mirage, you can clearly see the horizon line by the mirroring effect, which is literally non existant in the infrared video. Aside from very small compression - which won't "lift" the mountain's into view. Sorry, that is not logical at all. Refraction means nothing in the infrared video which is the point i was trying to make. Changing optics won't make the mountains magically appear, using any of your words, just because. It would only show a small portion/peak right over the buildings, but you don't understand that. The only way for the mountain to be in view like it was in the video, if we were on a Globe, the camera altitude would have had to been few thousand feet up. But the Camera is at ground level, and we see the mountain... (this is where your common sense should kick in) especially since theres no/minimal refraction/optical illusions to hide behind. Again, going back to, we see too far. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50592849 United States 08/07/2019 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70960909 United States 08/07/2019 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... I bet my buddy Jimmy Hoffa $50 he couldnt walk off the edge either, back in 1975...havent seen the fukr since, or my fiddy. Itz gotta be flat bruh. He gone. Jimmy wouldnt let fiddy slip by, no way. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77897882 United States 08/07/2019 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... Nothing to ad, it is pointless, really. It won't matter what others think, it is only one way. Maybe they will fall off since that is there belief? History shows us, people were told the earth is flat and they will fall off so the slaves would not leave the kingdoms. pht |
BTBIC User ID: 6660082 United Kingdom 08/08/2019 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... ... Quoting: BTBIC 6660082 I never claimed the earth was flat fuckwit. You highlight a quote I made " I do, however, know how water behaves - it always displays a flat surface despite what is underneath it, it can't bend, it can't display convexity of a shape on the surface. This is the experience of every single person alive or indeed everyone whom has ever lived. This common knowledge of how water behaves denies a globular earth. Of course you are freely open to challenge but you must display evidence of said claim. The claim of a globe Earth deny this practical reality." You deny this? You: I've made no claims Also you: I do, however, know how water behaves - it always displays a flat surface despite what is underneath it, it can't bend, it can't display convexity of a shape on the surface. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] You claim: Water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity. Three claims - why do you lie? Btw.: Prove that Water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. Taken out of context... Taken out of context? You wrote: I've made no claims - You didn't write: I've made no claims that earth is flat. You in general said: I've made no claims thus it isn't out of context. I'll make a claim :- water can't display convexity of a shape upon its surface.........ever. Prove this wrong we'll go from there, prove how intellectually honest you are. Quoting: BTBIC 11911557 Thank you for admitting that you made the above claim. You know the rules: I don't have to prove anything - the burden of proof is at the claimant. Prove that water always displays a flat surface, that water can't bend and that water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. . I was talking to someone who asked me to prove the earth was flat when I said I made no claims. Now the person I was responding too didn't include posts made elsewhere. That's you manipulating the conversation.....of course I made that claim. Separately. Completely unrelated to the post I responded too. It's all dancing in circles with you to avoid the statements you hand wave away and the questions you can't answer. Buh bye Charlatan, I can see right through you. |
JADR+ User ID: 77870150 Australia 08/08/2019 04:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... Excellent well thought out response. Quoting: BTBIC 6660082 Still, the proof bit...........nope, still nothing. The proof is so simple any half wit can run the experiment: All you need is a camera with a sun filter. 1) Take a picture of the sun every hour from sunrise to sunset using the sun filter 2) compare the relative size of the sun on every picture. You will notice to your amazement that the sun's relative size does not change throughout the day Consequences: The relative distance between your camera and the sun throughout the day is always the same. This means: ->The sun does not move relative to the earth. ->The sun is very far away from the earth ->the earth cannot be a flat pancake ->Only possible shape the earth can be is a rotating globe. Last Edited by JADR+ on 08/08/2019 04:18 AM I'm a J & proud zio. OrangeManBad NFTs: [link to opensea.io (secure)] FE Challenge: Provide a formula which calculates the exact distance between 2 GPS coordinates that does not use the Earth's radius of 6,371 km in it's assumptions JADR+ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73158164 United States 08/08/2019 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... What is on the other side of the flat Earth? What is holding it up? If you say it is a giant God called Atlas, you are definitely a medium grade moron. Also, what happens to stuff that falls off the edge? Where does the sun go when it sets? Why do days get shorter or longer by season? Have you ever done math with a base of Pi? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72184971 United States 08/08/2019 04:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... Ever since I flew from Australia to New York and had to stop in friggin Japan.. to GET TO NEW YORK as in East Coast of USA not West Coast I looked it up later and it's a straight shot on a flat surface... I don't know man I just don't know for sure anymore |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 07:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... And once again: The Bible is not a scientific book, God didn't write the Bible, it was written by men that were not even on the scientific level of that time (otherwise they would have known, that rabbits don't chew the cud, that insects don't have four legs but six and the pi isn't = 3) Quoting: Hydra Bullshit In Bookform Lacking Evidence Rabbits: [link to www.google.com (secure)] Insects: [link to www.google.com (secure)] Does Pi equal 3: [link to www.google.com (secure)] So animals that occasionally eat their own shit are ruminants? Then my dog is a ruminant, too. And insects have four walking legs and two hindlegs for hopping? I guess kangaroos are bipeds then. Have you ever watched an insect walking? And pi = 3 is just a rounding error (I have seen more intelligent excuses for this than yours). You bible tards are real funny. - What about talking animals? Will you tell me that animals could talk 3500 years ago? . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 07:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... As expected: bullshit video #51 Quoting: Hydra Distance = 123 miles Observer height = 63 meters (Point Dume, Malibu) Target height = 3302 meters (Mt. San Jacinto) Applying standard refraction 1880 meters of Mt. San Jacinto is hidden and 1422 meters are visible. The buildings visible in the foreground are from the Marina del Rey at a distance of 31 km. Given the observers height, less then 10 cm are hidden of the buildings. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Why do these flat-earth-distance-fuckwits never take atmospheric refraction into account? Is it on purpose, to deliberately deceive the watchers, or is it stupidity? I gave you the link to a correct calculator for calculating what part of an object is hidden and what is visible: [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] Only if atmospheric refraction is not taken into account, only a small part of the mountain should be visible. Unfortunately, for the flattards, atmospheric refraction is real - and applying standard refraction, from the 3302 meter high mountain 1880 meters are hidden and 1422 meters are visible. And, isn't it funny, that it fits with the numbers (in feet) given in the video at 5:00. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] (I hope you can convert meters into feet.) ... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan Does that gibberish make any sense? No. and this part, I was just typing too fast and annoyed by ignorant cunts like yourself, I deal with oblivious people all the time you're no different. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan "... some of it hidden obviously because of distance and where the sky meets the land horizon line, but at that distance its called convergence and the image gets so tiny it gets compressed visually but nothing drastic like a mirage, and it certainly would not magically lift a mountain over the horizon because were using infared." what I was wanting to write was , ...some of it is hidden obviously because of distance (more distance, the more the visual drop of an object behind the horizon/over the curve), also right above the buildings where the buildings and mountains meet at the horizon level, theres a small section thats cut off visually because its too far to visually render the base of the mountain where it meets the top of the buildings at the horizon level. So the base of the mointain isn't visible because it is to far but the more distant peak of the mountain is well visible? Did you think that up yourelf or is the gibberish a lesson from the University of YouTube? In a mirage, you can clearly see the horizon line by the mirroring effect, which is literally non existant in the infrared video. Aside from very small compression - which won't "lift" the mountain's into view. Sorry, that is not logical at all. Refraction means nothing in the infrared video which is the point i was trying to make. Changing optics won't make the mountains magically appear, using any of your words, just because. It would only show a small portion/peak right over the buildings, but you don't understand that. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan How do you come to the conclusion that refraction means nothing in the near infrared between 800 nm and 1000 nm? Another gibberish lesson from the UoY? The drop in the refraction index in the visible range of light is just 0.01 per mille: 1.000299 at 400 nm and 1.000291 at 800 nm. [link to aty.sdsu.edu (secure)] If you claim that the drop is significant heigher in the near infrared range, you have to provide evidence for your claim. The only way for the mountain to be in view like it was in the video, if we were on a Globe, the camera altitude would have had to been few thousand feet up. But the Camera is at ground level, and we see the mountain... (this is where your common sense should kick in) especially since theres no/minimal refraction/optical illusions to hide behind. Quoting: Doctor Manhattan You didn't have a look at the calculator I linked too, did you? [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] No, you didn't since it would burst you flat bubble. Btw.: The camera was not at ground level but at 60 meters (197 feet), a big difference in what you see and what you don't see. And again: If you claim that refraction does not apply in the near infrared range, you have to provide evidence for your claim. Wrong. We see exactly what we should see given the distance, the observer height and the target height, regardless of visible light or near infrared. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 07:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... Ever since I flew from Australia to New York and had to stop in friggin Japan.. to GET TO NEW YORK as in East Coast of USA not West Coast Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72184971 I looked it up later and it's a straight shot on a flat surface... I don't know man I just don't know for sure anymore Take a flight from Sydney to Santiago de Chile (or from Sydney to Johannesburg, QF63). :fesydscl: Then ask yourself why you don't fly above North and Middle America. Ask yourself, if the 747 in use for these flights, is a supersonic aircraft (more than 30,000km in about 15 hours). And ask yourself why you see so much ice during the flight. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
blue leaf User ID: 11852964 United Kingdom 08/08/2019 08:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... You: I've made no claims Quoting: Hydra Also you: I do, however, know how water behaves - it always displays a flat surface despite what is underneath it, it can't bend, it can't display convexity of a shape on the surface. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] You claim: Water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity. Three claims - why do you lie? Btw.: Prove that Water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. Taken out of context... Taken out of context? You wrote: I've made no claims - You didn't write: I've made no claims that earth is flat. You in general said: I've made no claims thus it isn't out of context. I'll make a claim :- water can't display convexity of a shape upon its surface.........ever. Prove this wrong we'll go from there, prove how intellectually honest you are. Quoting: BTBIC 11911557 Thank you for admitting that you made the above claim. You know the rules: I don't have to prove anything - the burden of proof is at the claimant. Prove that water always displays a flat surface, that water can't bend and that water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. I was talking to someone who asked me to prove the earth was flat when I said I made no claims. Now the person I was responding too didn't include posts made elsewhere. That's you manipulating the conversation.....of course I made that claim. Separately. Completely unrelated to the post I responded too. It's all dancing in circles with you to avoid the statements you hand wave away and the questions you can't answer. Buh bye Charlatan, I can see right through you. Again, henhouse dweller: You wrote: I've made no claims - You didn't write: I've made no claims that earth is flat. How about being specific the next time. And since you admitted that you made three claims in another thread - water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity - we are waiting for your proof. Prove that water always displays a flat surface, that water can't bend and that water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. Buh bye henhouse dweller, I can see right through your lame try to distract from your failure to prove your claims. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77197203 United States 08/08/2019 08:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 08:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... It's very easy to prove flat, Simply hold a straight edge up to the horizon, if it's flat, level, straight = earth flat. See ANY curve, = globe.. She flat folks... Quoting: blue leaf 11852964 straight edge: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I grabbed one of the guys and tried to hold him up to the horizon. He was furious fighting me and at the end I gave up and released him. Do you have any other prove for a flat earth? Even if you get a small guy, it's difficult to hold them up to the horizon, they just won't stay level. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
blue leaf User ID: 11852964 United Kingdom 08/08/2019 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... It's very easy to prove flat, Simply hold a straight edge up to the horizon, if it's flat, level, straight = earth flat. See ANY curve, = globe.. She flat folks... Quoting: blue leaf 11852964 straight edge: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I grabbed one of the guys and tried to hold him up to the horizon. He was furious fighting me and at the end I gave up and released him. Do you have any other prove for a flat earth? Even if you get a small guy, it's difficult to hold them up to the horizon, they just won't stay level. . Notice no counter argument from u.. There is none... BOOM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46676488 United States 08/08/2019 08:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... It's very easy to prove flat, Simply hold a straight edge up to the horizon, if it's flat, level, straight = earth flat. See ANY curve, = globe.. She flat folks... Quoting: blue leaf 11852964 straight edge: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I grabbed one of the guys and tried to hold him up to the horizon. He was furious fighting me and at the end I gave up and released him. Do you have any other prove for a flat earth? Even if you get a small guy, it's difficult to hold them up to the horizon, they just won't stay level. . Notice no counter argument from u.. There is none... BOOM It’s funny isn’t it. They expect you to believe a ship starts to go over the horizon/curve at about 3 to 4 mi out Yet, I can set a rule out to the horizon, and 10-15 miles of horizon 4 to 5 miles out there is not curve. Seriously strange ball we live on??? Jk, it’s not a ball Also, if water curved 8” in a mile i should be able to measure a curve in my swimming pool or fish tank, albeit very small. Should still be measurable |
blk.coffee User ID: 47283581 United States 08/08/2019 08:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... ... Quoting: Hydra You: I've made no claims Also you: I do, however, know how water behaves - it always displays a flat surface despite what is underneath it, it can't bend, it can't display convexity of a shape on the surface. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] You claim: Water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity. Three claims - why do you lie? Btw.: Prove that Water always displays a flat surface and water can't bend and water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. Taken out of context... Taken out of context? You wrote: I've made no claims - You didn't write: I've made no claims that earth is flat. You in general said: I've made no claims thus it isn't out of context. I'll make a claim :- water can't display convexity of a shape upon its surface.........ever. Prove this wrong we'll go from there, prove how intellectually honest you are. Quoting: Dell the Daft Cunt 11911557 Thank you for admitting that you made the above claim. You know the rules: I don't have to prove anything - the burden of proof is at the claimant. Prove that water always displays a flat surface, that water can't bend and that water can't display convexity. Practical demonstration of the claims made. Simple. No pseudo science. . I was talking to someone who asked me to prove the earth was flat when I said I made no claims. Now the person I was responding too didn't include posts made elsewhere. That's you manipulating the conversation.....of course I made that claim. Separately. Completely unrelated to the post I responded too. It's all dancing in circles with you to avoid the statements you hand wave away and the questions you can't answer. Buh bye Charlatan, I can see right through you. Careful there Dell. You might stroke out roid raging in your mom's shed like that. Last Edited by blk.coffee on 08/08/2019 08:27 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70960909 United States 08/08/2019 08:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70960909 United States 08/08/2019 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70960909 United States 08/08/2019 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... I have a couple of questions for all the brain dead flat Earth folks. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73158164 What is on the other side of the flat Earth? What is holding it up? If you say it is a giant God called Atlas, you are definitely a medium grade moron. Also, what happens to stuff that falls off the edge? Where does the sun go when it sets? Why do days get shorter or longer by season? Have you ever done math with a base of Pi? Fuk your white supremacy azz. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70960909 United States 08/08/2019 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... I have a couple of questions for all the brain dead flat Earth folks. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73158164 What is on the other side of the flat Earth? What is holding it up? If you say it is a giant God called Atlas, you are definitely a medium grade moron. Also, what happens to stuff that falls off the edge? Where does the sun go when it sets? Why do days get shorter or longer by season? Have you ever done math with a base of Pi? Fuk your white supremacy azz. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75725610 United States 08/08/2019 08:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 08:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... It's very easy to prove flat, Simply hold a straight edge up to the horizon, if it's flat, level, straight = earth flat. See ANY curve, = globe.. She flat folks... Quoting: blue leaf 11852964 straight edge: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] I grabbed one of the guys and tried to hold him up to the horizon. He was furious fighting me and at the end I gave up and released him. Do you have any other prove for a flat earth? Even if you get a small guy, it's difficult to hold them up to the horizon, they just won't stay level. Notice no counter argument from u.. There is none... BOOM How long is a "straightedge" (yes, sometimes orthography matters)? 30 centimetres? May be 50 centimetres? Now tell me: What is the angular size of a straightedge, held at arm length, at the horizon? How many kilometres or what part of the circumference of earth does that represent at the horizon? What's the height of the resulting circular segment? Should you be able to see it? I hope you can do some simple trigonometry (but I guess "no" - otherwise you wouldn't be a flattard). . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46676488 United States 08/08/2019 08:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... Why would a person hang around and use complex maths to argue with people it considers “retards”? That is really one way to find out who is a disinformation shill Nobody with any sense argues with retards That makes that person an idiot Hydra doesn’t think you’re a retard. It’s a tool of propaganda. Hydra is trying to keep stupid people stupid by refuting thinking people using rhetoric and confusing maths mixed with moving goal posts asking for impossible proofs to any laymen You’re welcome. You’re better off not responding to it |
Hydra User ID: 62518367 Germany 08/08/2019 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: A friend of mine believes that the Earth is flat. I challenged him to prove it by walking off the edge... Why would a person hang around and use complex maths to argue with people it considers “retards”? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46676488 That is really one way to find out who is a disinformation shill Nobody with any sense argues with retards That makes that person an idiot Hydra doesn’t think you’re a retard. It’s a tool of propaganda. Hydra is trying to keep stupid people stupid by refuting thinking people using rhetoric and confusing maths mixed with moving goal posts asking for impossible proofs to any laymen You’re welcome. You’re better off not responding to it Ad hominem noted. Any real arguments? No? Thought so. Oh, and the shill gambit. Yep that's for losers - you lost, flattie. . :ase26122019: Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India |