Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,726 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,075,143
Pageviews Today: 1,694,404Threads Today: 539Posts Today: 11,466
05:35 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS

 
ROSH CHODESH (OP)
User ID: 273183
United States
08/03/2007 10:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
Dear Ac 274285:


WHY IS IT THAT THE HEBREW LANGUAGE CLAIMS TO BE THE MOST DETAILED AND METICULOUS LANGUAGE ON THE PLANET, SOMETIMES DEFINING ONE WORD IN DOZENS OF WAYS, YET YOU CANNOT FATHOM MY REQUEST THAT YOU BE RATIONAL, YOU SLIPPERY WEASEL?

AND DON'T BE SO PRESUMPTUOUS AS TO INFER THAT I NEED YOU OR YOUR GOD TO SHINE ANYTHING UPON ME, AS I LACK NOTHING AND I RESENT YOUR VEILED INSULTS, YOU PRESUMPTUOUS THARTAC.

AND HERE IS THE REQUIRED DEFINITION:

THARTAC:

AN EGYPTIAN GOD PORTRAYED AS A MAN WITH A CLOAK, A BOOK AND THE HEAD OF AN ASS. THIS FIGURE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO THE IGNORANT EXPONENTS OF 'THE VULGAR FAITH', NAMELY LITERAL MYTHOLOGY.


WHY IS IT THAT THE HEBREW LANGUAGE CLAIMS TO BE THE MOST DETAILED AND METICULOUS LANGUAGE ON THE PLANET,


Hebrew, being a language in and by itself makes no such claims. If you were to examine a standard concordance, such as “Strongs Concordance” you would find the Biblical Hebrew employed only about 8,500 words. It is however, the language of Heaven: The Apostle Paul was fluent in Biblical Hebrew and he said: NKJ 1 Corinthians 13:1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal.”.

As for presumptuousness, many seem to have an abundance of it. Giving the names of God is not presumptuous; you obviously read the title of the post before you posted. No one twisted your arm off to read it. Since you cannot get into anyone else’s mind, you and all others are not qualified to unequivocally deem who is and who is not presumptuous, so don’t sit there behind your keyboard and pretend to take on that task.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 274285
United States
08/04/2007 12:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
Dear Ac 274285:


WHY IS IT THAT THE HEBREW LANGUAGE CLAIMS TO BE THE MOST DETAILED AND METICULOUS LANGUAGE ON THE PLANET, SOMETIMES DEFINING ONE WORD IN DOZENS OF WAYS, YET YOU CANNOT FATHOM MY REQUEST THAT YOU BE RATIONAL, YOU SLIPPERY WEASEL?

AND DON'T BE SO PRESUMPTUOUS AS TO INFER THAT I NEED YOU OR YOUR GOD TO SHINE ANYTHING UPON ME, AS I LACK NOTHING AND I RESENT YOUR VEILED INSULTS, YOU PRESUMPTUOUS THARTAC.

AND HERE IS THE REQUIRED DEFINITION:

THARTAC:

AN EGYPTIAN GOD PORTRAYED AS A MAN WITH A CLOAK, A BOOK AND THE HEAD OF AN ASS. THIS FIGURE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO THE IGNORANT EXPONENTS OF 'THE VULGAR FAITH', NAMELY LITERAL MYTHOLOGY.


WHY IS IT THAT THE HEBREW LANGUAGE CLAIMS TO BE THE MOST DETAILED AND METICULOUS LANGUAGE ON THE PLANET,


Hebrew, being a language in and by itself makes no such claims. If you were to examine a standard concordance, such as “Strongs Concordance” you would find the Biblical Hebrew employed only about 8,500 words. It is however, the language of Heaven: The Apostle Paul was fluent in Biblical Hebrew and he said: NKJ 1 Corinthians 13:1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become sounding brass or a clanging cymbal.”.

As for presumptuousness, many seem to have an abundance of it. Giving the names of God is not presumptuous; you obviously read the title of the post before you posted. No one twisted your arm off to read it. Since you cannot get into anyone else’s mind, you and all others are not qualified to unequivocally deem who is and who is not presumptuous, so don’t sit there behind your keyboard and pretend to take on that task.
 Quoting: ROSH CHODESH 273183


IT IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE AMONG SCHOLARS THAT THE HEBREW LANGUAGE IS METICULOUS IN DEFINING ITS WORDS. WHO CARES WHO CLAIMS.

AND PLEASE DEFINE 'ALL OTHERS'. IS THIS US GOY, WHOM YOU ARE BOUND TO LIE TO, ACCORDING TO THE DICTATES OF YOUR TALMUD?

AND PLEASE DEFINE, "It (HEBREW, I ASSUME) is however, the language of Heaven". JUST PUT IT IN PLAIN LANGUAGE FOR US IGNORANT AND DEATH DESERVING GOY. BY THE WAY, I ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTION SO DON'T GET TRICKY, JEW, OR I'LL SLAUGHTER YOUR ANSWER LIKE I DID IN MY OTHER THREADS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 112664
Portugal
08/04/2007 12:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
THIS IS ALL INVALID.

(...) THIS IS CIRCULAR REASONING AND IT IS INVALIDATED.

YOU MUST RELATE THE CONCEPT OF GOD TO SCIENTIFIC TERMS FOR IT TO HAVE MEANING.

(...)

AND ENTER YOUR RELATED DEFINITION THERE OR WE WILL REGARD ANY UNDEFINED TERM AS USELESS AND OF NO WORTH.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 274285

You are asking for a "definition" of the infinite. That is a foolish atempt, a contradiction in terms. You can go on "defining" ad eternum and never harvest or communicate anything. That is a form of madness, albeit a apparently "rational" one...

You have to be open to light and understanding or it is you who will travel in circles forever...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 112664
Portugal
08/04/2007 12:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
(...)OR I'LL SLAUGHTER YOUR ANSWER LIKE I DID IN MY OTHER THREADS.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 274285

Wow, what a bad boy you are!

Doesn't the fact of being presumptuous in public bring some perturbation to you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 252303
United States
08/04/2007 07:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
THIS IS ALL INVALID.

(...) THIS IS CIRCULAR REASONING AND IT IS INVALIDATED.

YOU MUST RELATE THE CONCEPT OF GOD TO SCIENTIFIC TERMS FOR IT TO HAVE MEANING.

(...)

AND ENTER YOUR RELATED DEFINITION THERE OR WE WILL REGARD ANY UNDEFINED TERM AS USELESS AND OF NO WORTH.

You are asking for a "definition" of the infinite. That is a foolish atempt, a contradiction in terms. You can go on "defining" ad eternum and never harvest or communicate anything. That is a form of madness, albeit a apparently "rational" one...

You have to be open to light and understanding or it is you who will travel in circles forever...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 112664


HERE'S SOME LIGHT FOR YOU, JEW. YOU POSE AS A PEACEMAKER WHILE YOU ARE A WARMAKER. WE ARE FINISHED WITH YOUR RELIGIOUS CIRCULAR LOGIC AND YOUR IMPOTENCE IN DEFINING WHAT YOU SO UNWORTHILY REGARD AS G_D. SUCH REVERENCE AND SUCH IGNORANCE AT SUCH REVERENCE.

NEXT TIME YOU LIE TO US, WE'RE GOING TO KICK YOUR JEW ASS FROM ONE SIDE OF THE EARTH TO THE OTHER.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 252303
United States
08/04/2007 07:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
You have to be open to light and understanding or it is you who will travel in circles forever...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 112664


WE ALSO KNOW THE ANSWER TO 'TRAVELING IN CIRCLES FOREVER'.

AND IT'S NOT A CIRCLE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 277290
United States
08/04/2007 07:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
YER A FUCKING IDIOT
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 92671
United States
08/04/2007 07:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
Thank you. Blessed be his names. Shabbat Shalom!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 277285
Australia
08/04/2007 08:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
I like the name Jesus the best.
hf
 Quoting: Bugs 7867

jesus is coming.
look busy 5a
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 262762
United States
08/04/2007 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: THE NAMES OF GOD DEFINE WHO HE IS
Thank you. Blessed be his names. Shabbat Shalom!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 92671


AND YOU CAN TAKE YOUR GOY KILLING TALMUD AND STUFF THAT UP YER JEW ASS TOO.

News