Britain's Royal Family

Consider this. I used to maintain a blog. My blog had anonymous comments enabled so people could post at will whenever they wanted. When I proposed that Prince Charles could be the anti-christ, I started getting threats on my blog. Whoever it was said that they knew where I lived and that they were going to video record the outside of my house and put it on youtube for me to watch just to prove that they knew. Freaked me out and I stopped posting on my blog after that.

Frightening.

I've seen a short video alleging that either Prince Charles or William is the anti-christ. Who knows? Anything's possible.

lol..and you believed them? What was your old blog? Would love to read it

** Does he receive a retainer or his services or only take tips? Sorry I couldn't he;p myself.

You should STILL doubt it, because it's clearly bullshit.

I can trace my lineage to David and back. I am a descendant of the Plantagenants and most European royal houses . Diana was a fifth cousin. We had a common Grandfather. Harry and William would have the same lineage back to David.

The best thing to do would be to ask an ex girlfriend of any of the prices.

Make that princes.

so you're a fucking jew

thass right


they`re german and greek

*****************
No. I am not a Jew. I am a Christian.

Read Tim Cohen's book,

"The Anti-Christ and a
Cup of Tea"

The royal crest has all
of the beasts together
mentioned in Revelation.


Charles has already had a
statue built that called
him the savior of the world.

Time will tell....

That’s really odd. The Queen is head of the Anglican Church. I can understand the circumcision, but why would they have a Mohel perform a bris?


Btw - William is the anti-christ.

Most of the european royality claim to be descendants of biblical protagonists, that's how they justified their position of privilege and power.

In Ireland, I was told by 'Irish Republican Army members' that the Royals were just part of the aristocrat set from Europe who invaded Britain. They had the most money, the most ruthless private army & literally bullied their way to the position they have now. They're just gangsters..!

Umm, that site you link to says "This is a satire site".

Britain means land of the covanent in hebrew. All of the hebrew rabbis must be able to see this. The Vikings came from Israel.

I wrote this one in 08...

In 2008, the Chinese year of the Rat, I've been enjoying reading the books of Judaism. I recently learnt that the first five books of the Bible are in fact known as the Torah. The Torah is the most sacred and precious book of Judaism, in fact each Torah is hand written and unlike most old books they are never thrown out or destroyed. Some people even say that Jesus was sentenced to death for trying to steal a copy of the Torah from the temple in Jerusalem.

What I have learnt more than anything else about Judaism, is that they had a prophet-like person that delivered a message, pretty much around the same time that Jesus was preaching his message of truth. The person's name was Hillel, his extraordinary message was pretty much, ‘The Torah can be broken down into two rules, respect God and love your neighbor, the rest is just comment'. As soon as I found this, I felt as though I had found an ally in at least Hillel, perhaps Judaism.

Now as many people probably know, I don't mind a bit of conspiracy theory, in fact I suggest that there is probably as much truth in conspiracy theories as there is in the books that we were taught with at school. A lot of conspiracy theory on the internet is concerned with Judaism or Jews. As much as the news gives us their daily bite size parcels of information concerning the Israel/Palestinian conflict, the internet provides a return volley of voluminous opinion regularly accompanied with a generous dose of venom.

But after reading about Judaism, I started to wonder...Is Israel actually run by Jews, Hillel’s Jews? And if not, who is running it? Because there is no way the Jews of the Judaist faith are running Israel. As an introduction, it's a fact that the state of Israel is one of the most secretive, militaristic, most serious human right violators in the world. In fact I presume that at the time of the Iraq invasion in 2003, that there were probably just as many, if not significant breaches of UN resolutions owned by Israel as was owned by Iraq.

In addition to the above, Israel have the biggest undeclared nuclear arsenal in the world. While the world badgers countries of the Middle East about ambitions of creating just one nuclear warhead, Jerusalem is one of four nations that are not members of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, of which Tehran and Damascus are. Besides the hypocrisy of Western powers that openly support the Israel governments and foreign lobbies, the question begs to be asked; if Jews are not running Israel? Who is?

The answer is much simpler than you would expect; the two governments that are running the state of Israel are the United Kingdom and the United States. How could this be possible? To understand this you need to go back to the start of Israel's current incarnation, and after that you need to go all the way back to the Bible to understand why England claims a Royal bloodline stretching back to the mythical King David.

When people see the phrase ‘September 11', their mind automatically jumps to 2001, and that fateful day when we're told that a dozen or so Arabs successfully hijacked four aircraft and flew three of them into American landmarks. But if you are an Arab, there is a very good chance that you relate the date of September 11 with an event that occurred much earlier than 2001. On September 11, 1922 an amendment was made to the British Mandate of Palestine, to include the establishment of a Jewish state.

This Mandate was the United Kingdom's first public acknowledgement of their plans to establish a Jewish state right in the middle and on top of Arab land. Only in the aftermath of the first Great War was the United Kingdom, basking in their victory and asserting some power from the newly established League of Nations; that the United Kingdom was able to even suggest such a bold plan. The amended mandate over Palestine remained in place up until the Arab-Israel War in 1948.

Now between the time of 1922 and 1948, I couldn't say for certain, but I'm pretty sure that the Jewish Rabbis were not planning to establish a state of Israel right on top of Palestine. Certainly the Jewish Rabbis would have felt vindicated by the setting up of Israel in 1948, but they were as bound as any Jew by the two golden rules handed down to them nearly two thousand years ago by Hillel, which included love your neighbor.

If the Jewish Rabbis and the peaceful God fearing Jewish families were unable to forcibly set up their Jewish State in 1948, one has to look at whom politically, conceived the idea in 1922. Once the State of Israel was created, it was the British and their WWII successor in arms the United States that had to start encouraging Jews to settle in the new state. The only way this was possible, was by massive grants and loans from the United States of America.

Who could blame the Jews? Who could blame the Rabbis for wanting their temple back? Who could blame the Jewish families for wanting a place to call their home? Who could blame the world for wanting to right the atrocities committed in the War? It was all to perfect, so perfect that both innocent Jews and Palestinians have been paying with their collective blood from the very first day that the United Kingdom and United States sponsored nation was set up

So where did the United Kingdom's audacity and authority come from, how on earth could they have believed that they were entitled to the Israeli state right in the middle of the Arab's oil rich land? To understand this you need to understand the claimed bloodline of the English Royal Family. We are told that the British Royal family can trace their bloodline all the way back to the Old Testament; astonishingly starting all way back to Abraham and all the way up to Queen Elizabeth II.

The Judah bloodline is known as the Lion, there are numerous references throughout the Old and New Testament; needless to say the Royal Family is well represented with this symbol. But from the House of Judah, we have David, then Solomon, Zedekiah, Princess Tamah-Tephi, Irish Royals, Scottish Royals, the Stewarts, the Hanoverians, the Saxe Coburgs, King George, King George VI and finally Queen Elizabeth II. Some very long jumps indeed, but this is the story.

If you need to understand how important this blood line is to the Royals of the United Kingdom, you need only consider the following story. As the heir apparent (Queen Elizabeth II) was put to bed as a child she would have been told a story by her father that every other heir to the throne would have been told. If Jesus Christ returned to the world during her reign as Queen, she would be required to step aside and make way for the Messiah to take his throne as a descendant of King David.

Do you think the Queen took this story seriously, well if the next story is anything to go by, perhaps she did. Because when her coronation came in 1953, apparently all hell broke lose when something couldn't be found. That item was not her favorite Scepter or Golden Orb; it was the Stone of Scone or Jacob's Pillow. Jacob's Pillow enjoyed a similar path as the Royal bloodline from Israel; arriving originally in Ireland, then moving to Scotland before finally being stolen by Edward the First for English coronation ceremonies.

Rumors abound of the whereabouts of the stone before the coronation of the Queen, but what the incident revealed was that the Queen took very seriously the stories that her Father had told her as an infant. How was she going to abdicate her title and throne to Jesus Christ if she was never rightfully declared a Queen in the absence of Jacob's Royal stone? But more importantly what this demonstrates is the grandest of connections between the Old Testament, Judah (Israel) and the Royal Family of the United Kingdom.

And what it means is that the United Kingdom believed in 1922 that it had a right to possess that land known as Palestine. And that in 1948 it was blessed by God in supporting the Arab-Israeli War and subsequent establishment of the Jewish state of Israel. But I can tell you that many participants of this prophetic development know that their homes are built on the blood of innocent men and women. And more than anyone else, the Jewish Rabbis could tell you that the setting up of the Israel is in direct contravention of at least one of the two golden rules handed down to them by Hillel nearly two thousand years ago.

Many of you may know that the Chinese calendar follows a sixty year cycle; apparently the events that shaped the world sixty years ago have a very funny way of rearing their head again sixty years later. Sixty years ago in the Year of the Rat, amongst international turmoil and turbulence Israel was established as a nation state. I suggest that the 2008 version of the Rat will have similar international turmoil and turbulence, and I have a sneaking suspicion that it will have a lot to with what was established in the 1948 version.

THAT is simply asinine garbage, they ARE of German heritage.\

The House of Windsor is the current Royal House of the United Kingdom and each of the other Commonwealth realms. The royal house was created from the British branch of the German House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha by George V by a royal proclamation in 1917. The House of Windsor remains one of the few dynasties to have ruled over lands on all continents of the world simultaneously. The current head of the House of Windsor is Elizabeth II, the reigning monarch over the Commonwealth realms.


.

It means NO such thing. The Romans called it Brittania, and that's no shortened to Britian. London was Londinium to the Romans.


.

Have you seen their noses and ears? They're definitely Jewish. I can't believe the British people put up with this nonsense.

Three overturns


In Ezekiel 21:26-27


, God declared that Zedekiah was to "remove the diadem and take off the crown: This shall not be the same [a change or transfer was occurring]; exalt him that is low [the Zarhite ruler in Israel] and abase him that is high [Zedekiah of the line of Perez]. I will overturn, overturn, overturn it [the crown, that is, the throne]; and it shall be no more [overturned] until HE come whose right it is; and I will give it HIM [Christ]" (KJV).

Notice that the final "overturned" was added in brackets for the sake of clarity. Some see this verse as a prophecy of the overthrow of the crown—that it would "be no more" (meaning no longer exist) until Christ came to claim it. Yet this cannot be the meaning of this prophecy or God would be breaking His unbreakable promise to David of an unbreakable dynasty. So the overturning must refer to removing the throne from one nation and raising it up in another. And the mentioning of overturn three times would certainly seem to be saying that such overturning would occur three times—that three times the throne would be transferred to another nation and that it wouldn’t be transferred again until Jesus Christ’s coming in power and glory to take it over.

When was the last time another country’s monarchy was transplanted into the throne’s present location in England? The answer is 1603, when King James VI of Scotland became King James I of Great Britain (the one who commissioned the King James Bible). This is obviously the last overturn to have taken place. Because of it, today’s British monarchs are of Scottish royal descent.

Prior to that, was another country’s throne ever transplanted into Scotland? Yes. The throne of the Scoti (as the Irish were anciently called) was moved from Ireland into southwest Scotland in the late fifth century—their kingdom of Dalriada in that area, centered at Iona (a name perhaps related to Ionia of Greece), eventually growing to envelop what is now Scotland. This was clearly the previous overturn—which is why Scotland’s monarchy, which became Britain’s monarchy, was actually Irish.

Now since these were the last two overturns of three, there can only have been one other—the first. And that first overturn had to have been the transfer of the throne from Judah. Thus it should be clear that this transfer must have been from Judah to Ireland. Had the throne been transferred from Judah to some other country before later being reestablished in Ireland, that would add a fourth overturn—when Scripture appears to allow for only three. By simple deduction, the three overturns must have been: 1) Judah to Ireland; 2) Ireland to Scotland; 3) Scotland to England.

It should be mentioned, though, that in the first overturn it is possible that the daughter of Zedekiah married into the Milesian Zerah line in Spain or elsewhere around the time it was in the process of assuming control over Ireland. This would not be adding another overturn from Spain to Ireland, as it would all be part of the same overturn. Whether or not this happened, however, is dependent on exactly when the Milesians from Spain took over Ireland, which is not entirely clear. They may have already become established in Ireland before Jeremiah’s journey—though perhaps still maintaining control over part of Spain when he arrived. Again, however, it is possible that Zedekiah’s daughter and Jeremiah actually accompanied the Milesians in their invasion of Ireland from Spain.

The whole Bible is a lie and their never was such a person as David. Read blacksun666pdf
[link to www.general-files.com]

She has already refused.

Repeatedly.

Good point, also can't believe that Christians accept the family as head of the church.

"At the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953, It was an unforgettable moment when the Archbishop of Cantebury, Dr Geoffrey Fisher, extended to Her Majesty the crown in the historic ceremony which states, 'I give thee, O Sovereign Lady, this crown to wear, until He who reserves the right to wear it shall return."

We know that the British Royal Line descends from Transylvania. Now, the question is, is there a Jewish connection to Transylvania? That's where you'd really find an answer.

So I'm an Anonomous Coward am I my name is John Sholtes and the cowards who censor and monitor this site banned me on my first post here because the cowards who own Godlike productions are jew shills.

Yes they say they are jews, and they also say princess Diana was a merovigian, the holy grail, ahahah, fucking liars, use the translator and see the proof:
[link to www.nunes3373.com]

"“ Also, once he becomes king, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge will be the first British Monarch to have descended from Charles I for 300 years since Queen Anne, as his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales descended 5 times from the Stuart kings from the lines of both Charles II and James II"
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

WILLIAM IS THE ANTICHRIST 100% PROOF!!!

i adore their cute costumes