| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144 | APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!??
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:12 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Just 3 |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:12 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
What river runs through Shreveport? |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:12 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
How many towns make it up? |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:14 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
What's the name of the Army post near there? |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:14 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Or is it Air Force?
Navy?
Which one suits your reality? |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:14 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
If only you had a brain. Just like everything else you've posted, you think you know everything. You're showing your 'hairy ass' right now.
You're the fucking idiot. Go back and self-educate some more... Quoting: AlienAbductee
Idiots occupy the left hand side of the bell curve right there next to you, not the extreme right. You wont be able to convince anyone that yours was an honest statement, so why make such a transparently false claim? |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:15 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Red river, bossier and shreveport, and barksdale, respectively |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:15 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Cool, we're neighbors! |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:17 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Some free advice:
You know those pills in your medicine cabinet that you haven't taken in a long time. Might want to crack the bottle open again. It may make the guys in the white van parked outside your house go away... |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:18 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Now we're getting somewhere. I've finally gotten a straight answer.
Now that that's done. How did the capsule escape detection between 300 and 400 miles for the amount of time you claim? ISS is fairly conspicuous at 200, not that the sizes are all that comparable. But reflectiveness and speed may have been. |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:21 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Some free advice:
You know those pills in your medicine cabinet that you haven't taken in a long time. Might want to crack the bottle open again. It may make the guys in the white van parked outside your house go away... Quoting: AlienAbductee
Maybe the pills are your problem?
Drugs dont make things more real, idiot. You think so because you believe in mainstream "medicine" and I think your a fucking idiot.
People were alot more grounded in reality before they though they needed pharmaceuticals to be normal. I have a sugegstion, GET OFF whatever your on, it makes you into a fucktard. |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:25 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
So let me get this right. Everyone's wrong except you about everything?
Man I need to get an IDW-ometer to tell me what the truth is about everything... (sigh) |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:27 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Now we're getting somewhere. I've finally gotten a straight answer.
Now that that's done. How did the capsule escape detection between 300 and 400 miles for the amount of time you claim? ISS is fairly conspicuous at 200, not that the sizes are all that comparable. But reflectiveness and speed may have been. Quoting: AlienAbductee
Well, one of theings that made me suspicious in the first place was NASAs waffling on the actual trans lunar injection path. For one situation it was a polar orbital path, and the only way it (translunar injection} was possible was an equatorial orbit.
I'll let you knaw on that one a bit while I eat, dont try to overtax me with nonsense or I simply will not respond to it. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:28 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
So let me get this right. Everyone's wrong except you about everything?
Man I need to get an IDW-ometer to tell me what the truth is about everything... (sigh) Quoting: AlienAbductee
{sigh} sound familiar?
Idiot |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:29 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
BTW,
I have a relative who's a behavior analyst. We were watching the interview you guys were talking about. The astronauts weren't displaying deceptive behavior.
According to him, he's a trained crisis counselor who has counseled kidnap and other trauma victims, those guys were in a mild stage of isolation disorder (that term is me paraphrasing, I can't remember what he called it). They had been only interacting with each other in total isolation and were overwhelmed by all of the attention. He used to see it all the time on guys who were discharged from sub duty in the Navy.
I'll post a reference if I can find one online. |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:29 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Now we're getting somewhere. I've finally gotten a straight answer.
Now that that's done. How did the capsule escape detection between 300 and 400 miles for the amount of time you claim? ISS is fairly conspicuous at 200, not that the sizes are all that comparable. But reflectiveness and speed may have been.
Well, one of theings that made me suspicious in the first place was NASAs waffling on the actual trans lunar injection path. For one situation it was a polar orbital path, and the only way it (translunar injection} was possible was an equatorial orbit.
I'll let you knaw on that one a bit while I eat, dont try to overtax me with nonsense or I simply will not respond to it. Quoting: IDW 313865
There was an error in this post, the actual orbit would need to be off axis with the equator but in the orbital plain of the moon. |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:36 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
I don't have a good response to that. I'm not an orbital physicist, I'm a trucking instructor. My best guess is that they would have to shoot ahead of the moon like leading a moving target when shooting a gun. I don't believe you could aim straight for where the moon is right now and hit it.
With that in mind, I think the only way a polar orbit would work is if the pole was aligned with where the moon would be in however many days. Never heard the one about the polar orbit. |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:45 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
BTW,
They had been only interacting with each other in total isolation and were overwhelmed by all of the attention. Quoting: AlienAbductee
So I guess they wernt expecting any attention when they reentered and splashed down? They seemed different in the radio transmissions before splashdown than they did in the isolation trailer.
I noticed that at the time. ANd yes, I WAS listening .
Most of us believed the reentry and splashdown were the most critical and dangerous parts of the mission because thats what we were told. Shortly before rentry Apollo 11 was booming on the DB meter, and the astronauts were acting like one would expect. |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:47 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Don't look at me, I wasn't even born yet. |
| AlienAbductee
User ID: 312874
10/17/2007 11:50 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Well, that's enough fun for me.
Tell the guys that have your house bugged goodnight for me.
Paranoid fruitcake. |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/17/2007 11:52 PM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
I don't have a good response to that. I'm not an orbital physicist, I'm a trucking instructor. My best guess is that they would have to shoot ahead of the moon like leading a moving target when shooting a gun. I don't believe you could aim straight for where the moon is right now and hit it.
With that in mind, I think the only way a polar orbit would work is if the pole was aligned with where the moon would be in however many days. Never heard the one about the polar orbit. Quoting: AlienAbductee
Then you need to go back to where we were discussing the van allen radiation belts, and how they were avoided. I couldnt believe theyd be that dumb, myself.The translunar injection was obviously actually a high orbit of the earth that intersected an orbital trajectory around the moon, and HAD to be in the same plane as the orbit of the moon to succeed. |
| IDW
User ID: 313865
10/18/2007 12:02 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
In fatc, as I have pointed out before, the only plausable translunar injection trajectory would have to be through the thickest and most energetic portion of the radiation belts, where high energy particles are trapped in a magnetic field. |
| nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 313713
10/18/2007 12:10 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Oh, look, IDW wised up.
He finally figured we are all Duncan Kuntz.
Except me. My real name is Anwar Sadat. The assassination was phony (as I've explained.)
(Now all I need is for IDW to say it is so. By the magic of his infallible intellect, it will then become so.) |
| nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 313713
10/18/2007 12:26 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
"The molecular science that deals primarily with materials constructed of carbon and hydrogen atoms."
[link to www.pcmag.com]
"(Science: chemistry) A branch of chemistry that deals specifically with the structures, synthesis and reactions of carbon-containing compounds."
[link to www.biology-online.org]
"Chemistry, Organic, branch of chemistry in which carbon compounds and their reactions are studied. A wide variety of classes of substances—such as..."
[link to encarta.msn.com]
"The branch of chemistry dealing with carbon-based molecules."
[link to www.biochem.northwestern.edu]
"The branch of chemistry dealing with carbon-based molecules. Hence it is also called as 'carbon chemistry.'"
[link to www.everythingbio.com]
"organic chemistry
n : the chemistry of compounds containing carbon (originally defined as the chemistry of substances produced by living organisms but now extended to substances synthesized artificially)"
[link to dict.die.net]
"The chemistry of carbon compounds."
[link to www.answers.com]
"<chemistry> A branch of chemistry that deals specifically with the structures, synthesis and reactions of carbon-containing compounds."
[link to cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk] |
| Barls Knarkley
User ID: 177477
10/18/2007 12:34 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Organic Chemistry by definition is intended to concern STRICTLY materials of biological origin or process. Quoting: IDW 313758
STRICTLY, eh?
[link to organic-chemistry.suite101.com]
Hydrocarbons, Benzene, Alcohol, Plastic, Amines are all organic, carbon-containing chemicals...An organic chemical is any chemical which contains a carbon-hydrogen bond Quoting: link
[link to www.indexdirect.com]
Organic chemistry is the chemistry, structure, and applications of compounds of carbon (with some exceptions). The exceptions to the rule are carbon alone, carbonic acids and its salts, carbides, cyanides and the oxides and sulfides of carbon are not considered organic. Usually an organic compound must contain carbon and usually hydrogen...As previously stated, 9 million of the 10 million known compounds are ORGANIC. These compounds don't all have the same properties. The properties range from high explosives to strong plastics to even your muscle tissue and your brain. The pesticides we use on our fields to protect against insects like aphids are produced from organic chemistry. The ritalin for hyper ADT patients take is derived through organic chemistry. The propane you cook your hamburgers with and that you flip with your plastic spatula are all organic. The leather seats in your car, the gasoline that your car uses are all organic. Your nylon shirt is a synthetic organic material. As you see they all don't have the same uses they have many numerous uses. Quoting: link
If organic chemistry is STRICTLY, as you emphasise, regarding materials of biological origin, can you please show me a picture of a high explosive tree or ritalin monkey? |
| nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 313713
10/18/2007 12:44 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
haha, beat you that time Barls!
....what, you mean like a Larry Niven "Stage Tree?" |
| Barls Knarkley
User ID: 177477
10/18/2007 12:54 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
Dammit! Ninja posted!
Stage trees are cool, though I think my father, who spent 40 years as a forester, would have a few words to say about fire management. |
| nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 313713
10/18/2007 1:10 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
What do you think about his contention that the Bell Rocket Belt is not a rocket, and that voltage remains the same at all points in a series circuit? |
| Barls Knarkley
User ID: 177477
10/18/2007 1:20 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
I must have missed the Bell jet belt one. Given his...idiosyncratic notion of electromagnetic theory, nothing about his views on circuit analysis would surprise me. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 216563
10/18/2007 1:26 AM | | Re: APOLLO MOON LANDINGS ------- FAKED OR REAL !!?? | Quote |
I apologize for typos and misformatting above - had to type these passages manually from the magazine itself, no "copy and past" was available, and I am a bad typist, lol... Quoting: Lt. 287683
ha, your typing is excellent, you just need to lower your vibrational frequency so as not to appear *invisible* but why do that ?
some of us can see you, rofl
*** |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144 | |
|
