UFO in BBC News Footage? Edited VIDEO, stops at the significant scenes!

Astronaut John Glenn saw similar ET critters and called them fireflies...

Glenn later recalled for Life magazine a magical scene that took place during one of his orbits: "There, spread out as far as I could see were literally thousands of tiny luminous objects that glowed in the black sky like fireflies.

"I was riding slowly through them, and the sensation was like walking backwards through a pasture where someone had waved a wand and made all the fireflies stop right where they were and glow steadily."

[link to www.cnn.com]

Well when you see this sort of stuff, I have seen it kinda of the same before, you have to say why are BBC showing it?

It could be to distract us from something/
It could be because there is something going to happen in the next few weeks and they will blame it on these light like things.

There is something going on OP and I think it will come to light before long.

they are the consciousness of mother earth. Her consciousness is much different from ours, it can separate into many smaller piece differing in shape and size. Can also move anywhere at any speed.

they are the consciousness of mother earth. Her consciousness is much different from ours, it can separate into many smaller piece differing in shape and size. Can also move anywhere at any speed.

Scratches in the canopy. Break the footage apart in frames and do an analysis on the ones where the bigger anomaly and the jet "collide". It all makes sense and also explains why such seemingly controversial footage would be allowed to be shown on national tv.

Idol is a shill.

I am sad to say, that I have to agree with this statement.

I hadn't been here at GLP very long when Idol started posting again recently. I am not aware of the past debates.

In my opinion, forums are all about communication. True communication is when you read someones opinions, take in the information, analyze, and return in kind. Everyone gets to learn from each other. Without opposing opinions and presentation of new facts, there can be no progress and we are just preaching to the choir.

So then Idol shows up. I thought GREAT! She posted it seemed with logic and forethought, without unnecessary vulgarity and backlash against the dorks that did use it. What a great chance for communication and possible learning.

However, in observing her behavior and examining her posts I see only one pattern. That is to negate at all times any others that do not think 'inside the box'. In one thread it would seem that she is only trying to think logically, yet in another she would jump on the bandwagon for the most illogical things. Only one thing is constant in her behavior, and it appears to be that of defending mainstream ideas and will absolutely not take in and learn from any other people that do not support that agenda.

What a waste.
(so bummed)

I agree A GIRL. I am newish to G.L.P. and had never heard of Idol.

Motive , who knows . Now it`s recognised, who cares ?

These 'scratches' would show up on half of the vid if you were correct.

you dont notice how the scratches(supposed ufo) move directly in sync with the other smaller imperfections in the canopy as he is turning around with the camera??? watch the little white dots along with the "ufo" lol ..

These 'scratches' would show up on half of the vid if you were correct.



you dont notice how the scratches(supposed ufo) move directly in sync with the other smaller imperfections in the canopy as he is turning around with the camera??? watch the little white dots along with the "ufo" lol .. seriously man , where are your powers of observation?? and they would not show up on half of the vid unless the cameras were pointing at them, and i say cameras because there was probably one in each jet, and for viewing sake, the videos were edited to pan between them for different shots. i really do wish it was a ufo, but its clearly not.

The "UFOs" are unfocused. Given the camera is focused at infinity (the fighter jets in the far are focused), they would show up as focused objects too. This means that the "UFOs" are at close distance from the camera.

Scratches in the canopy. Break the footage apart in frames and do an analysis on the ones where the bigger anomaly and the jet "collide". It all makes sense and also explains why such seemingly controversial footage would be allowed to be shown on national tv.

The "UFOs" are unfocused. Given the camera is focused at infinity (the fighter jets in the far are focused), they would show up as focused objects too. This means that the "UFOs" are at close distance from the camera.

Ever thought that the objects appear blurred cause of the speed they are passing by? They are too fast to make a clear shape during the exposure time of the stills.