Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,188 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 30,268
Pageviews Today: 49,176Threads Today: 12Posts Today: 327
12:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 188423
United States
01/04/2008 09:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
deadhorse
Haven't we beaten this horse to death yet?
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz


Yes, but it looks like at least a couple of bunkers haven't figured it out yet.
Tomek
User ID: 189887
Poland
01/04/2008 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
I am just recovering from this awful bug! I first got it very suddenly at bedtime on 30th December and was pretty much bed ridden for 3 days. It's not to be taken lightly and where possible, contact with others should be avoided. I'm still feeling the after effects now, having lost over half a stone in weight and am still struggling to eat as my stomach has shrunk and everything I eat makes me very queasy. I returned to work today but as far as no spreading the virus, I've managed to pass it to my partner and mother! Oops! Avoid at all costs.
Joanne , Woking BBC news
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
01/04/2008 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
deadhorse
Haven't we beaten this horse to death yet?
book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz

as long as anyone answers (instead of letting Nelle talk to herself) it is not dead.
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
01/04/2008 12:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
All of the earthquake data represented in this thread have been for larger earthquakes ie. those over 5 and also those over 7.

The installation of more monitoring stations have nothing to do with the increasing stats in those years. Why must the debunkers trot out so damn much bullshit ... spin?

Who are they defending?
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 01:10 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
All of the earthquake data represented in this thread have been for larger earthquakes ie. those over 5 and also those over 7.
 Quoting: User # 78/68


You said earthquakes are increasing. You were shown that isn't the case. Then you said earthquakes greater than 7 were increasing. Yes, there were 12 magnitude 7+ earthquakes in 2006 and 20 in 2007. So, yes, that is an increase from the years prior. However, ONE YEAR does not constitute a trend. AND, data was provided that shows quake activity between 1934 to 1950 were extremely active with a peak of 41 magnitude 7 or higher quakes in 1943. For the third time; was this activity caused by "Planet X?" And notice that in 1930 there were only 13 strong quakes and the next year there were 26! In 1933 there were only 14 magnitude 7 or greater quakes and then the number jumped to 22 and stayed over 20 for almost 20 years!! Why don't you try to explain that, Loser. And if you look average the total number of 7 or greater quakes per year for the time frame shown in the data, you get 19.5 quakes per year with a magnitude 7 or greater. Wow, and to think there were 20 such quakes in 2007. What an increase. A whopping whole .5...wohoo!!

The installation of more monitoring stations have nothing to do with the increasing stats in those years. Why must the debunkers trot out so damn much bullshit ... spin?

Who are they defending?
 Quoting: User # 78/68


A link was provided that states there has been no increase in small magnitude earthquakes, only that the increased number of sensors gives the appearance of an increase as more quakes are now detected. You say this is false, and yet, when pressed for evidence of this, you come up empty handed. Instead you spew insults and then run away. Why must you trot out so damn much bullshit and then continue spinning it? Why not just be man enough to admit you're wrong? Who are you defending? Oh yeah, Nancy...because you're paid to do so.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 01:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
All of the earthquake data represented in this thread have been for larger earthquakes ie. those over 5 and also those over 7.

The installation of more monitoring stations have nothing to do with the increasing stats in those years. Why must the debunkers trot out so damn much bullshit ... spin?

Who are they defending?
 Quoting: User # 78/68


None of us has EVER said that there are not, were not, more actual quakes in some years than others. That means, technically, that if there were 22 quakes in one year and 24 the next, that is an INCREASE since one number is clearly LARGER than the other. DUH!

Happy now?

However, there has been NO overall increase in quakes when long-term stats are included. As I asked you before, and you ignored, why don't you scream about an "increase" when there is a quake on one day when there wasn't one the day before?

Don't worry. I won't expect an answer. The point is made.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 188423
United States
01/04/2008 01:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Let;'s ask YOU the same question...Why must the bunkers trot out so damn much bullshit ... spin?

Who are they defending?
 Quoting: User # 78/68
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Circuit Breaker Would you post a link to the Quake page. Interesting to see where in 1943 the 41 countries that where struck.

41 countries? What are you talking about? The data shows there were 41 magnitude 7 or greater quakes detected. There's no mention of countries.


Also quakes are suppose to be on the increase according to the USGS web site. It says the increase is due to the fact that more installations of quake recording stations are installed.

They never said any such thing as there being an increase. What they said, and you didn't comprehend, is that the increase in sensors is detecting smaller magnitude earthquakes that went undetected before. These smaller earthquakes were always there...they just weren't detected or recorded. Large quakes aren't a problem for a smaller network of sensors.


Something does not fit the pic with that statement.

Everything fits just fine...you just don't understand the information.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

So no link ??
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
All of the earthquake data represented in this thread have been for larger earthquakes ie. those over 5 and also those over 7.

The installation of more monitoring stations have nothing to do with the increasing stats in those years. Why must the debunkers trot out so damn much bullshit ... spin?

Who are they defending?


You said earthquakes are increasing. You were shown that isn't the case. Then you said earthquakes greater than 7 were increasing. You've been shown that activity in the 1930s and 40s was far higher and that current activity isn't any higher than has been recorded in the past. A link was provided that states there has been no increase in small magnitude earthquakes, only that the increased number of sensors gives the appearance of an increase as more quakes are now detected. You say this is false, and yet, when pressed for evidence of this you come up empty handed and instead spew insults and then run away.

Who are you defending? Oh yeah, Nancy...because you're paid to do so.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

I said Quakes greater than seven..
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 03:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
So no link ??
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


A link to what? You said something about 41 countries. I never posted any information about 41 countries. But since you apparently aren't capable of doing a search for yourself, here you go:

[link to neic.usgs.gov]
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
OK Thanks. Now look back at the last 20 years here. The 8,0 and over Quakes have Quadrupled. Which means The most sever Quakes have appeared in 2007.
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Recent quote from freestore, who is apparently now worshiping Nancy Lieder as if she is a Jesus-like saviour:


********************
Free Store
User ID: 142947
1/4/2008 1:20 AM

Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun Quote

Nancy Loves you, Menow. Keep that in mind.
*********************

Now THAT is creepy!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
[link to wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov]
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Recent quote from freestore, who is apparently now worshiping Nancy Lieder as if she is a Jesus-like saviour:


********************
Free Store
User ID: 142947
1/4/2008 1:20 AM

Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun Quote

Nancy Loves you, Menow. Keep that in mind.
*********************

Now THAT is creepy!!
 Quoting: Menow 174322

I feel sorry for you Menow.
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 03:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Recent quote from freestore, who is apparently now worshiping Nancy Lieder as if she is a Jesus-like saviour:


********************
Free Store
User ID: 142947
1/4/2008 1:20 AM

Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun Quote

Nancy Loves you, Menow. Keep that in mind.
*********************

Now THAT is creepy!!

I feel sorry for you Menow.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


How special.

You are a true freakazoid.
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
I guess your at that age where girls are icky. :>
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 03:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
I guess your at that age where girls are icky. :>
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Free Store
User ID: 142947
1/4/2008 1:20 AM

hmm... "free store" seems to be posting under different ID's. Isn't that supposed to be a sign of a shill operation? Been kicked out of GLP lately, lover boy?
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 03:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Isn't it a sign you know nothing?
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 04:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
OK Thanks. Now look back at the last 20 years here. The 8,0 and over Quakes have Quadrupled. Which means The most sever Quakes have appeared in 2007.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Wow. There were four in 2007. But your link only goes back a few years. How do you know there weren't more before that? One year (2007) hardly constitutes a trend. And why weren't there 4 or more in the years prior when "Planet X" arrived and caused us to "halt in orbit?"
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 04:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Here's one. Might be the same one. Don't know.

[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 04:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Nope- it's different. Shows more years, but you have to add for yourself.
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
01/04/2008 04:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Two years constitutes a trend, does it not CB?

Earthquakes over richter 5 did indeed increase for at least 2 years in a row ... 2004 and 2005. A trend.

Now, why is it that you claimed earthquakes had not increased during these years ... originally, in those years?


Why the lies about that ... then? (we all know richter 5 earthquakes are not smaller earthquakes)
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 04:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
OK Thanks. Now look back at the last 20 years here. The 8,0 and over Quakes have Quadrupled. Which means The most sever Quakes have appeared in 2007.


Wow. There were four in 2007. But your link only goes back a few years. How do you know there weren't more before that? One year (2007) hardly constitutes a trend. And why weren't there 4 or more in the years prior when "Planet X" arrived and caused us to "halt in orbit?"
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

In the middle of the page is for the 1990's. Planet X history of Effects on the Earth is more to the point for us.
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 04:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Two years constitutes a trend, does it not CB?

Earthquakes over richter 5 did indeed increase for at least 2 years in a row ... 2004 and 2005. A trend.

Now, why is it that you claimed earthquakes had not increased during these years ... originally, in those years?


Why the lies about that ... then? (we all know richter 5 earthquakes are not smaller earthquakes)
 Quoting: User # 78/68


No, lameass, 2 years does NOT constitute a trend. If it DOES, then why are you ignoring the most recent two years?

How many times are you going to ignore the idea that none of us EVER said that EQ's had not increased from one year to the next, or even over 2 years?

Are you familiar with the term "grasping at straws"? You have to go back and try to find some debunker error from several years ago?? How about Nancy's latest claim of PX Moons near the Sun? Why don't you try to defend that? You can start by explaining why there are just, allegedly, "moons" in the image and NO mother planet.
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 04:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
OK Thanks. Now look back at the last 20 years here. The 8,0 and over Quakes have Quadrupled. Which means The most sever Quakes have appeared in 2007.


Wow. There were four in 2007. But your link only goes back a few years. How do you know there weren't more before that? One year (2007) hardly constitutes a trend. And why weren't there 4 or more in the years prior when "Planet X" arrived and caused us to "halt in orbit?"

In the middle of the page is for the 1990's. Planet X history of Effects on the Earth is more to the point for us.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Er... and those effects would allegedly be?
Menow
User ID: 174322
United States
01/04/2008 04:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
OK Thanks. Now look back at the last 20 years here. The 8,0 and over Quakes have Quadrupled. Which means The most sever Quakes have appeared in 2007.


Wow. There were four in 2007. But your link only goes back a few years. How do you know there weren't more before that? One year (2007) hardly constitutes a trend. And why weren't there 4 or more in the years prior when "Planet X" arrived and caused us to "halt in orbit?"

In the middle of the page is for the 1990's. Planet X history of Effects on the Earth is more to the point for us.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978



And this "Planet X" is exactly where, allegedly?
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 04:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Coming on with gusto. You see the change since 2004. The smaller plentiful Quakes are subsiding and becoming Earth Biblical nightmare Quakes.Since coming around the Sun.
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 04:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Menow still hasn't figured out how the internet works.

Shows you.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 05:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Two years constitutes a trend, does it not CB?

Earthquakes over richter 5 did indeed increase for at least 2 years in a row ... 2004 and 2005. A trend.

Now, why is it that you claimed earthquakes had not increased during these years ... originally, in those years?


Why the lies about that ... then? (we all know richter 5 earthquakes are not smaller earthquakes)
 Quoting: User # 78/68

Still trying to put a spin on it, eh, Loser? Now you're going to rant and rave about anything over magnitude 5? Talk about grasping at straws. What about all that activity between 1934 and 1951? Why are you ignoring it? What about 1943 when there were 41 magnitude 7 or greater earthquakes? Are you going to say "Planet X" was responsible? Why are you so afraid to answer?
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 05:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
In the middle of the page is for the 1990's. Planet X history of Effects on the Earth is more to the point for us.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Okay, so between 1934 and 1951 all those earthquakes were caused by "Planet X?" What about the 41 quakes 7 or greater in 1943? Let me guess...."Planet X" was swinging through the solar system then, too, huh? And if you say it wasn't responsible, then how do you know "Planet X" is responsible for any earthquake today? Come on, Free Store....show us.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.