Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,916 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,132,586
Pageviews Today: 1,734,517Threads Today: 534Posts Today: 11,366
01:45 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer

 
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 05:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Menow still hasn't figured out how the internet works.

Shows you.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978

LOL!!! That's funny considering who's saying that.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented.

Is it coming through?
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 05:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Menow still hasn't figured out how the internet works.

Shows you.

LOL!!! That's funny considering who's saying that.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Even funnier from you :>
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 05:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented.

Is it coming through?
 Quoting: Free Store 143978

How do you know? How far back does your data go? What? Only into the 90s? Then how do you know there weren't more than 4 8 magnitude quakes in the past? Come on, Free Store...prove your point. Provide data showing that there have NEVER been 4 or more magnitude 8 quakes before.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 05:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Even funnier from you :>
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Only funny to you because you can't support your claims with anything.

Explain why there weren't 4 or more magnitude 8 earthquakes in 2003 when "Planet X" came roaring into the solar system and caused us to "halt in orbit."
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 05:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented.

Is it coming through?

How do you know? How far back does your data go? What? Only into the 90s? Then how do you know there weren't more than 4 8 magnitude quakes in the past? Come on, Free Store...prove your point. Provide data showing that there have NEVER been 4 or more magnitude 8 quakes before.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

You have no records yourself. :>

Lets stay in the recent Planet X era.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 05:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
You have no records yourself. :>

Lets stay in the recent Planet X era.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Just as I thought. You can't back up your claims.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Free Store
User ID: 143978
Canada
01/04/2008 05:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
So the data says thata.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 06:03 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
So the data says thata.
 Quoting: Free Store 143978

Says what?
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
01/04/2008 07:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145.

Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame.

But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT!



Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 09:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145.

Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame.

But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT!



Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again!
 Quoting: User # 78/68

And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling.

Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!!
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
***ZetaMax***

User ID: 266466
United States
01/04/2008 09:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145.

Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame.

But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT!



Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again!

And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling.

Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!!
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

herring
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.

ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
 [link to www.zetatalk.com] 

ZetaMax
The Lone Ranger

User ID: 345915
New Zealand
01/04/2008 10:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
You have no records yourself. :>

Lets stay in the recent Planet X era.


Just as I thought. You can't back up your claims.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


That's no surprise though, CB.

FrEaKy cannot even locate the ecliptic correctly. Backing up his assertions with FACTUAL data here would cause the Old Timer to maybe have a meltdown......and lose ALL his credibility...... lol4me
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
Menow
User ID: 223772
United States
01/04/2008 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145.

Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame.

But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT!



Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again!
 Quoting: User # 78/68



Quotes?


Thought not.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/04/2008 11:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
:paid:

:maxi:
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 255583
Canada
01/05/2008 12:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145.

Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame.

But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT!



Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again!

And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling.

Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!!
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

They key word that the bunkers are trying to bury is "exponential", which is how Nancy qualified the supposed increase in quakes. Do you guys know what exponential means? The data clearly shows that while some years there are more and other years there are fewer quakes, there is no exponential increase or decrease.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 350330
United States
01/05/2008 01:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented.

Is it coming through?
 Quoting: Free Store 143978


Not quite.
Otto Nuttli, however, has postulated another strong earthquake in Arkansas on December 16 at 18:00 UTC (MSn 8.0). This would make a total of five earthquakes of magnitude MSn 8.0 or higher occurring in the period December 16, 1811 through February 7, 1812.[/qoute]

[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
01/05/2008 11:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
The bunkers again show that they are incapable of researching things on their own. Hey freaky, was px around way back then?
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
01/05/2008 12:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Quotes? ... yer kidding right?


Ask them? to back their words. We all know what they were saying then.

The lying shills never cease to amaze.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 297320
United States
01/05/2008 01:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Quotes? ... yer kidding right?


Ask them? to back their words. We all know what they were saying then.

The lying shills never cease to amaze.
 Quoting: User # 78/68

And then there's you...who doesn't back up anything you claim. You offer no supporting evidence. All you do is spew insults and run away.

The lying shill, Loser, never ceases to amaze.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
The Lone Ranger

User ID: 345915
New Zealand
01/05/2008 02:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Quotes? ... yer kidding right?


Ask them? to back their words. We all know what they were saying then.

The lying shills never cease to amaze.
 Quoting: User # 78/68


You work hard on being a FOOL, don't ya!!

It Has been increasingly obvious that the ONLY true SHILL on these threads is YOU.

lol4me But your government employer must be sooooo disappointed at your LACK of effectiveness against the debunkers. They only lol4me at you increasingly......because YOU are even easier to "fly squat" than your stupid mate, Free Store.

Keep it up though.......your useless jibes against those FAR SUPERIOR here in critical thinking....must be affecting you mentally by now.

You KNOW that the 100percent is 100% correct here each day and every day. Your DENIAL of this fact is overwhelmingly hilarious.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308776
Canada
01/05/2008 02:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Show me where the supposed increase is exponential and then we'll talk. Truth is that there is no significant increase. Earthquakes happen. If they had increased exponentially since 2003, the big quakes would be almost constant by now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
01/05/2008 04:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Quotes? ... yer kidding right?


Ask them? to back their words. We all know what they were saying then.

The lying shills never cease to amaze.
 Quoting: User # 78/68


How about those earthquake numbers, Luser? Decreasing, eh?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 348411
United States
01/05/2008 05:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145.

Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame.

But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT!



Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again!

And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling.

Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!!

They key word that the bunkers are trying to bury is "exponential", which is how Nancy qualified the supposed increase in quakes. Do you guys know what exponential means? The data clearly shows that while some years there are more and other years there are fewer quakes, there is no exponential increase or decrease.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 255583


Exponential as in:

"On Oct 28, 2006 the Zetas warned that the lineal increase in earthquakes was about to become an exponential increase. By Dec 15, 2006 they stated that this point had arrived."

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

"Where such activity was more lineal in years past, it will become exponential at some point, and this turning point has already arrived."

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Of course she uses images from the internet seismic server that support her claims. Unfortunately, she doesn't realize that those were the screwed up stations. She conveniently ignored the other fifty-odd seismograms.
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
01/06/2008 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
BUT ... but ... what about your obvious lies in 2004 and 2005 Circuit Liar?

What about those?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 255583
Canada
01/06/2008 02:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
But, but , but, what about the exponential increase that Nancy has been predicting for so many years? Would you agree User that if there has been an increase (which has not been shown) that it is not exponential in nature? Would you be willing to accept that the increase, if any, is very small?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 255583
Canada
01/06/2008 02:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
BUT ... but ... what about your obvious lies in 2004 and 2005 Circuit Liar?

What about those?
 Quoting: User # 78/68

So why is it ok for Nancy to lie, you can accuse others of lying. Nancy has been lying since the mid 90's, week after week, but you don't get down on her. Just asking.
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
01/08/2008 11:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
The debunkers love to talk about lies ... watching their lies makes em pretty damn uncomfortable.

THe agency twerps are getting restless, it seems!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 139944
United States
01/08/2008 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
The debunkers love to talk about lies ... watching their lies makes em pretty damn uncomfortable.

THe agency twerps are getting restless, it seems!
 Quoting: User # 78/68


The only exponential change here is the exponential increase in bullshit from the bunkers.

So where's Nancy's Christmas Hammer these days? At first she was claiming it occurs around 0800 UTC then when that didn't last, she started claiming 1200 UTC. What's next, 1600 UTC?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 352130
Canada
01/08/2008 12:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
The debunkers love to talk about lies ... watching their lies makes em pretty damn uncomfortable.

THe agency twerps are getting restless, it seems!
 Quoting: User # 78/68

You started talking lies, not me. I just countered you. Unlike your empty accusation about Menow, which you did not back up with evidence, my suggestion that Nancy lies is easily backed up on this very thread. Try again, User.

News