ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer

The debunkers love to talk about lies ... watching their lies makes em pretty damn uncomfortable.

THe agency twerps are getting restless, it seems!

"Thus far, you've shown NOTHING about which the debunkers have supposedly lied...absolutely NOTHING. On the other hand, we have YOU and the rest of the bunkers claiming increasing earthquakes when that is obviously NOT the case. So, who is it that lies? Methinks you need to look in the mirror when you speak of liars."


Deflunker ... must you LIE about this, too?

Earthquakes DID increase during 2004 AND 2005. ALL of the deflunkers claimed otherwise. BUT, the stats speak for themselves, don't they?

"Thus far, you've shown NOTHING about which the debunkers have supposedly lied...absolutely NOTHING. On the other hand, we have YOU and the rest of the bunkers claiming increasing earthquakes when that is obviously NOT the case. So, who is it that lies? Methinks you need to look in the mirror when you speak of liars."


Deflunker ... must you LIE about this, too?

Earthquakes DID increase during 2004 AND 2005. ALL of the deflunkers claimed otherwise. BUT, the stats speak for themselves, don't they?

"with a dip in the numbers in the 90's and an increase in 2004...with a peak in 2005...two years AFTER Nancy's make believe "planet" was supposed to be here. And then the numbers started going down again."


Kind of makes a fool out of you again, eh, CB?


They don't call you Circuit Stupid for nothing!

Really? I see now that you've been proven wrong, you're ranting and raving about magnitude 7 and greater earthquakes and claiming that they're on the increase. Funny how your data only goes back so far. Let's go back further shall we?

1900 13
1901 14
1902 8
1903 10
1904 16
1905 26
1906 32
1907 27
1908 18
1909 32
1910 36
1911 24
1912 22
1913 23
1914 22
1915 18
1916 25
1917 21
1918 21
1919 14
1920 8
1921 11
1922 14
1923 23
1924 18
1925 17
1926 19
1927 20
1928 22
1929 19
1930 13
1931 26
1932 13
1933 14
1934 22
1935 24
1936 21
1937 22
1938 26
1939 21
1940 23
1941 24
1942 27
1943 41 OMG!! It MUST be Planet X!!
1944 31
1945 27
1946 35
1947 26
1948 28
1949 36
1950 39
1951 21
1952 17
1953 22
1954 17
1955 19
1956 15
1957 34
1958 10
1959 15
1960 22
1961 18
1962 15
1963 20
1964 15
1965 22
1966 19
1967 16
1968 30
1969 27
1970 29
1971 23
1972 20
1973 16
1974 21
1975 21
1976 25
1977 16
1978 18
1979 15
1980 18
1981 14
1982 10
1983 15
1984 8
1985 15
1986 6
1987 11
1988 8
1989 7
1990 18
1991 16
1992 13
1993 12
1994 13
1995 20
1996 15
1997 10
1998 12
1999 18
2000 15
2001 16
2002 13
2005 11
2004 16
2003 15
2004 16
2005 12
2006 12
2007 20

Wow, 20 7 or greater magnitude earthquakes in 2007. But wait!! Look at the years that I've bolded. Why, those years have more magnitude 7 quakes than 2007. How can that be Loser? Is the data wrong? And look at the years in the 30s and 40s!! Was "Planet X" responsible for them? Or were you just cherry picking data?

Let us know when you're done cleaning yourself up. You have a lot of mud on your face. I guess it's because you're a simple...ton. Ouch!! It's okay, Loser, don't cry. But, we do call you Loser for a reason.

Earthquakes are not in the decline since yesterday a powerful quakes destroyed part of my garden. Nevertheless, it was not registered on any official seismic web sites.

Earthquakes are not in the decline since yesterday a powerful quakes destroyed part of my garden. Nevertheless, it was not registered on any official seismic web sites.

353005, maybe the deflunkers can explain this anomalie for you.

But, Liars will be liars, won't they?

"Thus far, you've shown NOTHING about which the debunkers have supposedly lied...absolutely NOTHING. On the other hand, we have YOU and the rest of the bunkers claiming increasing earthquakes when that is obviously NOT the case. So, who is it that lies? Methinks you need to look in the mirror when you speak of liars."


Deflunker ... must you LIE about this, too?

Earthquakes DID increase during 2004 AND 2005. ALL of the deflunkers claimed otherwise. BUT, the stats speak for themselves, don't they?

You are just another PAID CHEAP ASSHOLE SHILL.

Use you Liar LIEDer "logic" to refute that, shillboy.

Like I said before ... the government bought and paid for "boys" (shills) are getting shriller.


The fear is strong in "them".

353005, maybe the deflunkers can explain this anomalie for you.

But, Liars will be liars, won't they?

Like I said before ... the government bought and paid for "boys" (shills) are getting shriller.


The fear is strong in "them".

So getting back to the topic, what happened to the Christmas Hammer? Another failed prediction I'd say. Or maybe Nancy meant to say that the Zetas were gonna get hammered at Christmas. Even the pumpkin heads need to blow off some steam now and again.

Yup, Nancy and the zetas wrong again. Nothing catastrophic happened at Christmas. When it didn't happen before Christmas, she extended the timeline by saying she meant the Christmas season. And now that has come and gone and still no disaster. The Nancy effect in action. If she predicts it, it won't happen. I gotta hand it to Nancy. It is almost as hard to be wrong 100% of the time as it is to be right all the time. Even the best charlatans like Silvia Browne get some things right sometimes. Nancy deserves a round of applause for her perfect failure record.

Yup, Nancy and the zetas wrong again. Nothing catastrophic happened at Christmas. When it didn't happen before Christmas, she extended the timeline by saying she meant the Christmas season. And now that has come and gone and still no disaster. The Nancy effect in action. If she predicts it, it won't happen. I gotta hand it to Nancy. It is almost as hard to be wrong 100% of the time as it is to be right all the time. Even the best charlatans like Silvia Browne get some things right sometimes. Nancy deserves a round of applause for her perfect failure record.


I might be wrong, but isn't she claiming that this alleged "discovery" of PX moons near the Sun was some sort of dramatic event? I wouldn't put it past her to do that and claim that fulfilled the prediction.

Where does USGS say Earthquakes are based on averages?

Where does USGS say Earthquakes are based on averages?

Where does USGS say Earthquakes are based on averages?

Don't change the subject, Free Store. This thread is about the Christmas Hammer that never happened.