Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,372 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,084,297
Pageviews Today: 1,412,792Threads Today: 263Posts Today: 4,853
10:25 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 255583
Canada
12/22/2007 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there... conjunct Jupiter at 0 degrees Capricorn, Mercury at 2 degrees Capricorn, and Pluto at 28 degrees Sagittarius.

I expected to find the Moon at 0 degrees Cancer ~ and to my great astonishment, the Moon is at 4 degrees Gemini 56 minutes ~ way off.

Mars is at 3 degrees Cancer 38 minutes retro, and I expected to find the Moon conjunct it. I didn't.

Libra rises at 14 degrees 36 minutes at that time ~ which strikes me as a tad "off" as well. I am using Kepler 7 astrological software, based upon planetary ephemerides.

Thank you for all your info, Nancy, and that of the Zeta's. I am paying close attention. Wasayo
 Quoting: astrolabe 343400

This is why astrologers can be utter morons. Apparently you don't know that astrology and astronomy are not the same thing. Apparently you don't know that the positions used by astrologers are not accurate for naked eye observation. When you say sun in Capricorn, is is really in Sagittarius. The positions you use were accurate about 2000 years ago. Mars is visible in the constellation Gemini, even though astrology puts it in Cancer. It is called precession of the equinoxes. Everything is where it is, that is, if you know where it is supposed to be in the first place.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 09:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there... conjunct Jupiter at 0 degrees Capricorn, Mercury at 2 degrees Capricorn, and Pluto at 28 degrees Sagittarius.

I expected to find the Moon at 0 degrees Cancer ~ and to my great astonishment, the Moon is at 4 degrees Gemini 56 minutes ~ way off.

Mars is at 3 degrees Cancer 38 minutes retro, and I expected to find the Moon conjunct it. I didn't.

Libra rises at 14 degrees 36 minutes at that time ~ which strikes me as a tad "off" as well. I am using Kepler 7 astrological software, based upon planetary ephemerides.

Thank you for all your info, Nancy, and that of the Zeta's. I am paying close attention. Wasayo

This is why astrologers can be utter morons. Apparently you don't know that astrology and astronomy are not the same thing. Apparently you don't know that the positions used by astrologers are not accurate for naked eye observation. When you say sun in Capricorn, is is really in Sagittarius. The positions you use were accurate about 2000 years ago. Mars is visible in the constellation Gemini, even though astrology puts it in Cancer. It is called precession of the equinoxes. Everything is where it is, that is, if you know where it is supposed to be in the first place.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 255583


Well stated. She got off on the wrong foot by saying Mars is in Cancer, when it is clearly in Gemini.

Again, all these people have to do is to spend a little time studying real astronomy. There are lots of free online interactive sky maps. They don't have to use 2000 year old ephemerides.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 340430
United States
12/22/2007 09:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Planet X position is static between Earth and the Sun, because since Dec 2003 the Earth has halted in its orbit (seasons simulated by tilting the Earth done by benign aliens). Thus it tends to block OUT the magnetic field of the Sun, which is normally dominant.

Thus, Earth is affected by the magnetism of Planet X!
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder



Do you have any idea of just how preposterous this assertion is? You do realize that you couldn't prove such a wild theory as this one in a thousand lifetimes, don't you?

Am I getting this right in that there are people that actually believe this nonsense? I am entirely incapable of grasping the abject stupidity and lack of discernment that would be required in order to entertain hogwash of this magnitude as fact.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 09:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
if as the astronomers say, that the Cosmic Cross, that occurred when the planets lined up in 1999 did not have enough magnetic energy to affect us...how could one planet that is so far invisible, be effecting us ?



Because it is closer that the big gravity planets. It is within the orbit of Venus, close to the Sun, and heading right at us. A little more than 1 AU away.

Planet X is a magnet, 4 times the diameter of Earth and 23 times its mass. The other planets that is a magnet and close to use is Mercury, which is tiny. Same for Mars with any magnetic field it has. It's smaller than Earth.

Planet X position is static between Earth and the Sun, because since Dec 2003 the Earth has halted in its orbit (seasons simulated by tilting the Earth done by benign aliens). Thus it tends to block OUT the magnetic field of the Sun, which is normally dominant.

Thus, Earth is affected by the magnetism of Planet X!
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder


Nancy, you show you complete ignorance of basic astonomy more with everypost.

How can your imaginary planet ex be between the earth and the sun, if it is more than 1 AU away? Also, why has it not affected the orbits of Mercury and Venus in even the slightest?

Your answer will no doubt be highly comical.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Planet X position is static between Earth and the Sun, because since Dec 2003 the Earth has halted in its orbit (seasons simulated by tilting the Earth done by benign aliens). Thus it tends to block OUT the magnetic field of the Sun, which is normally dominant.

Thus, Earth is affected by the magnetism of Planet X!



Do you have any idea of just how preposterous this assertion is? You do realize that you couldn't prove such a wild theory as this one in a thousand lifetimes, don't you?

Am I getting this right in that there are people that actually believe this nonsense? I am entirely incapable of grasping the abject stupidity and lack of discernment that would be required in order to entertain hogwash of this magnitude as fact.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 340430


Unfortunately, there are those who CLAIM to believe this crap, but when pushed to provide even one astronomical claim or prediction from Nancy that they themselves would defend, they clam up. It is a cult and Nancy has them all brainwashed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Am I getting this right in that there are people that actually believe this nonsense? I am entirely incapable of grasping the abject stupidity and lack of discernment that would be required in order to entertain hogwash of this magnitude as fact.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 340430


If you want some real entertainment, come back tonight and watch her live chat with her sheep. They just lap this stuff up like it was syrup and beg for more.
Bucephalus
User ID: 337655
United States
12/22/2007 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Good Morn, sister, Merry X-mass/solstice, etal
Right/ wrong either, you have our blessings and support for TRYING to make a diff.
Your elder brothers are so in situ it is ALL down hill now...Your work is nearly done, Exhale, relax...Love US!!!
Prof-Rabbit
User ID: 148352
Australia
12/22/2007 10:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Planet X position is static between Earth and the Sun, because since Dec 2003 the Earth has halted in its orbit (seasons simulated by tilting the Earth done by benign aliens). Thus it tends to block OUT the magnetic field of the Sun, which is normally dominant.

Thus, Earth is affected by the magnetism of Planet X!



Do you have any idea of just how preposterous this assertion is? You do realize that you couldn't prove such a wild theory as this one in a thousand lifetimes, don't you?

Am I getting this right in that there are people that actually believe this nonsense? I am entirely incapable of grasping the abject stupidity and lack of discernment that would be required in order to entertain hogwash of this magnitude as fact.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 340430


Well there is Nancy and three believers, (far more people believe the earth is flat) there are some sock puppets that Nancy puts on every so often, and that's it, Nancy is quite simply mentally unbalanced.

That being said there are those who might consider Nancy's folly without using common sense, we hope they see reason.

Lastly there is the entertainment of seeing Nancy write stuff that is so funny you just have to duck in for a laugh.
angelpbj

User ID: 343778
Brazil
12/22/2007 11:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Can't wait for Zeta talk 12/22.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20060

I think the really decisive one will be the talk of 12/29, AFTER christmas and AFTER the fatidic 12/23... i believe many are waiting to see what will happen!
hiding
-"Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past." George Orwell ("1984")
-"Thought creates. I believe the greatest secret is that life is not a process of discovery, but a process of creation" -
Katherine Brooks (movie director)
User # 78/68

User ID: 341591
Canada
12/22/2007 11:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
The lowly government paid-for debunkers are probably strengthening their "troops" as we speak.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark, it seems.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
As always...no facts, no debate, no actual support for ZT from 78.68...only more insults. Pitiful.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Can't wait for Zeta talk 12/22.

I think the really decisive one will be the talk of 12/29, AFTER christmas and AFTER the fatidic 12/23... i believe many are waiting to see what will happen!
hiding
 Quoting: angelpbj


What's supposed to happen on 12/23?
Menow
User ID: 175186
United States
12/22/2007 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
if as the astronomers say, that the Cosmic Cross, that occurred when the planets lined up in 1999 did not have enough magnetic energy to affect us...how could one planet that is so far invisible, be effecting us ?



Because it is closer that the big gravity planets. It is within the orbit of Venus, close to the Sun, and heading right at us. A little more than 1 AU away.
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder


Nancy. 1AU is, by definition, the distance from Earth to Sun. [link to en.wikipedia.org]

If your imaginary planet was between Earth and Sun, it could not be "A little more than 1 AU away", as you claim.
How can you get such simple things so WRONG?

Planet X is a magnet, 4 times the diameter of Earth and 23 times its mass. The other planets that is a magnet and close to use is Mercury, which is tiny. Same for Mars with any magnetic field it has. It's smaller than Earth.

Planet X position is static between Earth and the Sun, because since Dec 2003 the Earth has halted in its orbit (seasons simulated by tilting the Earth done by benign aliens). Thus it tends to block OUT the magnetic field of the Sun, which is normally dominant.

Thus, Earth is affected by the magnetism of Planet X!
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder


So your imaginary planet is BOTH "heading right at us" AND "static between Earth and the Sun"?? Don't you realize that those are contradictory statements?
Menow
User ID: 175186
United States
12/22/2007 11:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Look!!!!! Planet X!!!!!!!!!!


[link to img406.imageshack.us]


bsflag


Look, look! Planet X!
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder


Why is your imaginary planet, which you claim is between Earth and Sun, nowhere NEAR the Sun in that pic?
astrolabe
User ID: 343785
United States
12/22/2007 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there...


And you determined this how?



conjunct Jupiter at 0 degrees Capricorn, Mercury at 2 degrees Capricorn, and Pluto at 28 degrees Sagittarius.

I expected to find the Moon at 0 degrees Cancer ~ and to my great astonishment, the Moon is at 4 degrees Gemini 56 minutes ~ way off.


And you determined this how?


Mars is at 3 degrees Cancer 38 minutes retro, and I expected to find the Moon conjunct it. I didn't.


And you determined this how?


Libra rises at 14 degrees 36 minutes at that time ~ which strikes me as a tad "off" as well.


And you determined this how?


I am using Kepler 7 astrological software, based upon planetary ephemerides.


And you are using WHAT to determine actual physical locations of sky objects?


Thank you for all your info, Nancy, and that of the Zeta's. I am paying close attention. Wasayo

 Quoting: Menow 223772



I have already answered your taunt ~ "and you determined this how" ~ but you chose not to read it.

FYI, I used Kepler 7 astrology software which is based upon planetary Ephemerides. The program comes from Switzerland, [link to www.astrosoftware.com]

No, I am not an astronomer ~ I wish I were. But have astronomers explained Comet Holmes? No. I am simply a watcher. Wasayo
astrolabe
User ID: 343785
United States
12/22/2007 11:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
And to address the other taunts on this thread... that Mars is in Gemini, not Cancer ~ I am well aware of that, and of Sidereal Astrology and Heliocentric Astrology for that matter.

I am also well aware of the Precession of the Equinoxes. Don't use me to kill Nancy and the Zeta's, okay? I am only an observer. Wasayo
Menow
User ID: 175186
United States
12/22/2007 11:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there... conjunct Jupiter at 0 degrees Capricorn, Mercury at 2 degrees Capricorn, and Pluto at 28 degrees Sagittarius.

I expected to find the Moon at 0 degrees Cancer ~ and to my great astonishment, the Moon is at 4 degrees Gemini 56 minutes ~ way off.

Mars is at 3 degrees Cancer 38 minutes retro, and I expected to find the Moon conjunct it. I didn't.

Libra rises at 14 degrees 36 minutes at that time ~ which strikes me as a tad "off" as well. I am using Kepler 7 astrological software, based upon planetary ephemerides.

Thank you for all your info, Nancy, and that of the Zeta's. I am paying close attention. Wasayo


Rather than paying attention to your kook astrology "charts" why not look at an actual planetarium program. There's lots of them online. The moon is EXACTLY where it is supposed to be as witnessed by occultations I observed Monday night.


Bull roar. The moon has had an aberant orbit since early 2004. Documented by many.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder



"Documented", Nancy? By that, you mean you typed some silly, unconfirmed "report" onto your website?

Not ONE person has ever shown that they knew where the Moon was SUPPOSED to be in the sky and how to properly measure it's location who said it was "out of place". Not a single ONE!
Menow
User ID: 175186
United States
12/22/2007 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
I have already answered your taunt ~ "and you determined this how" ~ but you chose not to read it.

FYI, I used Kepler 7 astrology software which is based upon planetary Ephemerides. The program comes from Switzerland, [link to www.astrosoftware.com]

No, I am not an astronomer ~ I wish I were. But have astronomers explained Comet Holmes? No. I am simply a watcher. Wasayo
 Quoting: astrolabe 343785


You were claiming to have determined the physical locations of objects in the sky. I asked you how you determined those positions. My question need not be considered a "taunt".

I can only go on to ask how your astrology software was able to ascertain the physical locations of objects in the sky for you. How?
Menow
User ID: 175186
United States
12/22/2007 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
And to address the other taunts on this thread... that Mars is in Gemini, not Cancer ~ I am well aware of that, and of Sidereal Astrology and Heliocentric Astrology for that matter.

I am also well aware of the Precession of the Equinoxes. Don't use me to kill Nancy and the Zeta's, okay? I am only an observer. Wasayo
 Quoting: astrolabe 343785


Then why don't you explain how you made your alleged "observations" that certain objects were, or were not where they belong in the sky? What happened with your proposed observation of Moonrise yesterday?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Bull roar. The moon has had an aberant orbit since early 2004. Documented by many.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder


Wrong again Nancy. Only documented by your minions who haven't a clue as to where it's supposed to be. For the rest of us with GOTO telescopes, accurate measuring equipment, and observational experience, it's PRECISELY where it should be.
angelpbj

User ID: 343778
Brazil
12/22/2007 12:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Can't wait for Zeta talk 12/22.

I think the really decisive one will be the talk of 12/29, AFTER christmas and AFTER the fatidic 12/23... i believe many are waiting to see what will happen!
hiding


What's supposed to happen on 12/23?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 88145

according to a brazilian seer there will be a large earthquake in Indonesia

[link to theparanormalreport.com]

[link to mysteriousuniverse.org]

another related message (translated from Portuguese) dated back to 09/11/2005 is the following

[link to 72.14.203.104]
-"Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past." George Orwell ("1984")
-"Thought creates. I believe the greatest secret is that life is not a process of discovery, but a process of creation" -
Katherine Brooks (movie director)
angelpbj

User ID: 343778
Brazil
12/22/2007 12:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
What's supposed to happen on 12/23?

according to a brazilian seer there will be a large earthquake in Indonesia

[link to theparanormalreport.com]

another related message (translated from Portuguese) dated back to 09/11/2005 is the following

[link to 72.14.203.104]
 Quoting: angelpbj

the zetas also predict something "global" happening in this Christmas season:

Question: Will anything happen this Christmas season? Will there be a disaster of some kind? A disaster that will affect the whole world.

ZetaTalk Answer 12/1/2007: Yes, but just what it will be, we cannot say. We are not being specific to date or time, nor what such a disaster might be. Be mindful that sloshing tides have inundated Indonesia and the UK simultaneously recently, and this is something we consider a whole world disaster. Earthquakes are increasing in magnitude, and ricochet all over the world, also becoming a global disaster if strong enough.

ZetaTalk Answer 12/8/2007: What we are predicting might be just existing trends such as high tides or a stronger wobble or more earthquakes, or it might be something new. As we stated, we will not reveal what we know. The fact that the Earth leans as it does, both poles pointing out into space away from the Sun at the winter solstice, is not an accident. We have explained that Planet X leaves the vicinity suddenly, leaving its imprint on the Earth when it does so. This is why the Earth has its tilt, with magnetic and geographic poles not quite lined up with each other. The key is 23°, and indeed there is something out beyond the solar system in the direction the Earth's winter solstice N Poles point to that tugs at the Earth each Christmas season. This is why the most recent massive earthquake, a 9.5 on December 26, 2004 occurred. This is also a factor in the disasters we expect this forthcoming Christmas season.
-"Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past." George Orwell ("1984")
-"Thought creates. I believe the greatest secret is that life is not a process of discovery, but a process of creation" -
Katherine Brooks (movie director)
*~Cosmogenesis~*

User ID: 343711
Portugal
12/22/2007 01:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there... conjunct Jupiter at 0 degrees Capricorn, Mercury at 2 degrees Capricorn, and Pluto at 28 degrees Sagittarius.

I expected to find the Moon at 0 degrees Cancer ~ and to my great astonishment, the Moon is at 4 degrees Gemini 56 minutes ~ way off.

Mars is at 3 degrees Cancer 38 minutes retro, and I expected to find the Moon conjunct it. I didn't.

Libra rises at 14 degrees 36 minutes at that time ~ which strikes me as a tad "off" as well. I am using Kepler 7 astrological software, based upon planetary ephemerides.

Thank you for all your info, Nancy, and that of the Zeta's. I am paying close attention. Wasayo

This is why astrologers can be utter morons. Apparently you don't know that astrology and astronomy are not the same thing. Apparently you don't know that the positions used by astrologers are not accurate for naked eye observation. When you say sun in Capricorn, is is really in Sagittarius. The positions you use were accurate about 2000 years ago. Mars is visible in the constellation Gemini, even though astrology puts it in Cancer. It is called precession of the equinoxes. Everything is where it is, that is, if you know where it is supposed to be in the first place.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 255583



So... and u are a very expert anomimous can explain to the people what is the precession of equinoxes????

Smells me u dont have a Clue...


I do a beat
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 01:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
What's supposed to happen on 12/23?

according to a brazilian seer there will be a large earthquake in Indonesia

[link to theparanormalreport.com]

another related message (translated from Portuguese) dated back to 09/11/2005 is the following

[link to 72.14.203.104]

the zetas also predict something "global" happening in this Christmas season:

Question: Will anything happen this Christmas season? Will there be a disaster of some kind? A disaster that will affect the whole world.

ZetaTalk Answer 12/1/2007: Yes, but just what it will be, we cannot say. We are not being specific to date or time, nor what such a disaster might be.
 Quoting: angelpbj


How convenient. I guess Nancy learned her lesson with May 2003.

Be mindful that sloshing tides have inundated Indonesia and the UK simultaneously recently, and this is something we consider a whole world disaster.
 Quoting: angelpbj


A "whole world disaster"? No unusual tides here? Funny definition of a "whole world disaster"!

Earthquakes are increasing in magnitude, and ricochet all over the world, also becoming a global disaster if strong enough.
 Quoting: angelpbj


Unfortunately, this is NOT true. There is NO statistically significant evidence to suggest that earthquakes are increasing. Nancy keeps on saying that, but as usual, never provides any data to back up her claims. And you just keep falling for it.

ZetaTalk Answer 12/8/2007: What we are predicting might be just existing trends such as high tides or a stronger wobble or more earthquakes, or it might be something new.
 Quoting: angelpbj



Again, there is NO evidence to suggest that any ofthis is true. More of Nancy's lies.

As we stated, we will not reveal what we know.
 Quoting: angelpbj


Again, how convenient. So what good are they?

The fact that the Earth leans as it does, both poles pointing out into space away from the Sun at the winter solstice, is not an accident.
 Quoting: angelpbj


What? This is simply ridiculous. At the winter solstice, the earth's south pole does indeed point generally in the direction of the sun...that's the DEFINITION of winter solstice. Nancy shows her unmatched ignorance of basic astronomy with every post.


We have explained that Planet X leaves the vicinity suddenly, leaving its imprint on the Earth when it does so. This is why the Earth has its tilt, with magnetic and geographic poles not quite lined up with each other. The key is 23°, and indeed there is something out beyond the solar system in the direction the Earth's winter solstice N Poles point to that tugs at the Earth each Christmas season. This is why the most recent massive earthquake, a 9.5 on December 26, 2004 occurred. This is also a factor in the disasters we expect this forthcoming Christmas season.
 Quoting: angelpbj


What a complete heap of steaming bullshit. If you believe this crap, I have some great swampland to sell you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 342606
United States
12/22/2007 01:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Bull roar. The moon has had an aberant orbit since early 2004. Documented by many.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]


Wrong again Nancy. Only documented by your minions who haven't a clue as to where it's supposed to be. For the rest of us with GOTO telescopes, accurate measuring equipment, and observational experience, it's PRECISELY where it should be.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 88145


...and to further prove that the Moon is where it's supposed to be, there is a total lunar eclipse on February 21, 2008. This one will be visible in North and South America, parts of Africa and Europe.

[link to sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 342606
United States
12/22/2007 01:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Pathetic.

Nancy doesn't even know how to read the graphs.

The graphs show the 7:24 UTC earthquake in Alaska. Note that the earliest trace is from the ADK station in Alaska which matches the reported Alaskan earthquake at 7:24 UTC.

It would appear that Nancy selectively looks that the graphs and picks the one that matches her beliefs the best.


Please learn to READ. What the Zetas said (above):

This occurs at approximately 8:00 UTC, the point at which the European lean occurs during the daily wobble.
 Quoting: Nancy Lieder


That's a load of BS Nancy.

European lean? What is that supposed to mean? You make up odd phrases that have no meaning.

Are you going to make the same claim about today's 6.1 and 5.8 earthquakes?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Bull roar. The moon has had an aberant orbit since early 2004. Documented by many.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]


Wrong again Nancy. Only documented by your minions who haven't a clue as to where it's supposed to be. For the rest of us with GOTO telescopes, accurate measuring equipment, and observational experience, it's PRECISELY where it should be.


...and to further prove that the Moon is where it's supposed to be, there is a total lunar eclipse on February 21, 2008. This one will be visible in North and South America, parts of Africa and Europe.

[link to sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 342606


Furthermore, there will be several occultations of planets by the moon in 2008. Here is a list...

[link to lunar-occultations.com]

If what Nancy claims were true, this could not happen. If she only knew one-tenth as much as she thinks she knows...
Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
United States
12/22/2007 02:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
With all of this BullShit, did anyone ever consider the Bull?

go ahead and raise the flag.....state your alliance with a pile of shit. Isn't that what a flag was designed for? Representation of a group/class/nation through symbology.

lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 02:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Also, the moon will be occulting the Pleiades cluster both in January and again in February for viewers in some locations.

[link to lunar-occultations.com]

Again, this would be impossible to predict if what Nancy claims were even remotely true.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
12/22/2007 02:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Look at the staggering amount of detail that can be predicted about the occultations on January 8th.

[link to www.lunar-occultations.com]

Nancy is simply naive to the detail with which the moon's orbit can be predicted. Of course, she also expects those who would believe her to be even more naive to these facts.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!