ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer

"Dear Nancy,

Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.


What's the matter 88145, is this information too much for you to handle?

Who's the kook now, 88145?

Your shill spots are showing again ... along with your government paid-for lies.

What's the matter 88145, is this information too much for you to handle?

This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there...

I think you who post bs flags...have closed mind, and are either NOT capable of having a discussion or offering a solution ... and dwell in the constant state of DENIAL

at least Nancy is providing us the opportunity to investigate our own feeling on this...and not just biting the pillow

Hmmmmm. Nancy is right about these earthquakes, it seems. The shills are becoming more shrill as their lies are exposed at every turn. Fittingly!

Hmmmmm. Nancy is right about these earthquakes, it seems. The shills are becoming more shrill as their lies are exposed at every turn. Fittingly!

No, Nancy doesn't know how to read the seismos. Nancy's paid shills will say anything to earn their meager wages...that's how desperate they are.

interesting....dec. 21-23 might prove to pivotal to us all..
thanks nancy for the heads up

interesting....dec. 21-23 might prove to pivotal to us all..
thanks nancy for the heads up

Hmmmmm. Nancy is right about these earthquakes, it seems. The shills are becoming more shrill as their lies are exposed at every turn. Fittingly!

No, Nancy doesn't know how to read the seismos. Nancy's paid shills will say anything to earn their meager wages...that's how desperate they are.

now i'm getting paid??? boy.....i wished!!! LOL....LOL...damn!! i could buy that welder i've been drooling for!!!... thanks Ciruit Breaker...helleva, xmas !!!!

As the N Pole of Earth leans to the left, those gazing at the sunset from Europe see the Sun in a more northerly position because the equator has dipped down to point toward the south.

There is an increase in EQS, patterns as in "clustering" and also magnitude, along with more shallower depths...

Its all hood!

But, then again, wait and see mode for some? Thats okay...
You need big one after big one and maybe some tsunamis or something eh?

Or Calli to have the big one finally...

What would it take for you to believe the EQs have increased? The history in EQs of past and I mean even yesterday show it, and by the way...
they dont post every one of um, and somethimes downgrade the strength, the mag man... do some agree to that? We could have different sources providing different mags for the same quake? Say its not so but it does happen ALOT!

Peace to ALL!

Pathetic.

Nancy doesn't even know how to read the graphs.

The graphs show the 7:24 UTC earthquake in Alaska. Note that the earliest trace is from the ADK station in Alaska which matches the reported Alaskan earthquake at 7:24 UTC.

It would appear that Nancy selectively looks that the graphs and picks the one that matches her beliefs the best.

if as the astronomers say, that the Cosmic Cross, that occurred when the planets lined up in 1999 did not have enough magnetic energy to affect us...how could one planet that is so far invisible, be effecting us ?

Look!!!!! Planet X!!!!!!!!!!


[link to img406.imageshack.us]

This is now on the web at [link to www.zetatalk.com]



Dear Nancy,


Thank you so much for posting this. When the Moon rises tonight (December 21st), my husband and I plan to watch "where" it actually is. Last night it looked to be about 45 degrees off (to the North). We are in Southern California.

I'm an astrologer, and I just did an astro chart for Winter Solstice 2007. The date and time given were 22 December 2007 at 1:08 a.m. E.S.T., so I cast a chart for New York City.

The Sun at 0 degrees Capricorn is to be expected, and it is indeed there... conjunct Jupiter at 0 degrees Capricorn, Mercury at 2 degrees Capricorn, and Pluto at 28 degrees Sagittarius.

I expected to find the Moon at 0 degrees Cancer ~ and to my great astonishment, the Moon is at 4 degrees Gemini 56 minutes ~ way off.

Mars is at 3 degrees Cancer 38 minutes retro, and I expected to find the Moon conjunct it. I didn't.

Libra rises at 14 degrees 36 minutes at that time ~ which strikes me as a tad "off" as well. I am using Kepler 7 astrological software, based upon planetary ephemerides.

Thank you for all your info, Nancy, and that of the Zeta's. I am paying close attention. Wasayo


Rather than paying attention to your kook astrology "charts" why not look at an actual planetarium program. There's lots of them online. The moon is EXACTLY where it is supposed to be as witnessed by occultations I observed Monday night.

I have a question for everyone.Im kinda new in this fourm having just recently found it. Is Nancy and this MJ one and the same. ????