Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,725 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 744,388
Pageviews Today: 1,201,083Threads Today: 482Posts Today: 7,216
12:48 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer
Poster Handle Free Store
Post Content
"with a dip in the numbers in the 90's and an increase in 2004...with a peak in 2005...two years AFTER Nancy's make believe "planet" was supposed to be here. And then the numbers started going down again."


Kind of makes a fool out of you again, eh, CB?


They don't call you Circuit Stupid for nothing!

Really? I see now that you've been proven wrong, you're ranting and raving about magnitude 7 and greater earthquakes and claiming that they're on the increase. Funny how your data only goes back so far. Let's go back further shall we?

1900 13
1901 14
1902 8
1903 10
1904 16
1905 26
1906 32
1907 27
1908 18
1909 32
1910 36
1911 24
1912 22
1913 23
1914 22
1915 18
1916 25
1917 21
1918 21
1919 14
1920 8
1921 11
1922 14
1923 23
1924 18
1925 17
1926 19
1927 20
1928 22
1929 19
1930 13
1931 26
1932 13
1933 14
1934 22
1935 24
1936 21
1937 22
1938 26
1939 21
1940 23
1941 24
1942 27
1943 41 OMG!! It MUST be Planet X!!
1944 31
1945 27
1946 35
1947 26
1948 28
1949 36
1950 39
1951 21
1952 17
1953 22
1954 17
1955 19
1956 15
1957 34
1958 10
1959 15
1960 22
1961 18
1962 15
1963 20
1964 15
1965 22
1966 19
1967 16
1968 30
1969 27
1970 29
1971 23
1972 20
1973 16
1974 21
1975 21
1976 25
1977 16
1978 18
1979 15
1980 18
1981 14
1982 10
1983 15
1984 8
1985 15
1986 6
1987 11
1988 8
1989 7
1990 18
1991 16
1992 13
1993 12
1994 13
1995 20
1996 15
1997 10
1998 12
1999 18
2000 15
2001 16
2002 13
2005 11
2004 16
2003 15
2004 16
2005 12
2006 12
2007 20

Wow, 20 7 or greater magnitude earthquakes in 2007. But wait!! Look at the years that I've bolded. Why, those years have more magnitude 7 quakes than 2007. How can that be Loser? Is the data wrong? And look at the years in the 30s and 40s!! Was "Planet X" responsible for them? Or were you just cherry picking data?

Let us know when you're done cleaning yourself up. You have a lot of mud on your face. I guess it's because you're a simple...ton. Ouch!! It's okay, Loser, don't cry. But, we do call you Loser for a reason.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

How did they record more Earthquakes back 60 yrs with far fewer Quake recording stations then. Rudimentary low tech to boot compared to now.

Some of the numbers from a USGS site differ though. Compare the two.

I don't recall hearing of Tsunami's during the war.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP