ZetaTalk: Christmas Hammer | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Free Store User ID: 143978 Canada 01/04/2008 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Free Store User ID: 143978 Canada 01/04/2008 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented. Quoting: Free Store 143978Is it coming through? How do you know? How far back does your data go? What? Only into the 90s? Then how do you know there weren't more than 4 8 magnitude quakes in the past? Come on, Free Store...prove your point. Provide data showing that there have NEVER been 4 or more magnitude 8 quakes before. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even funnier from you :> Quoting: Free Store 143978Only funny to you because you can't support your claims with anything. Explain why there weren't 4 or more magnitude 8 earthquakes in 2003 when "Planet X" came roaring into the solar system and caused us to "halt in orbit." A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Free Store User ID: 143978 Canada 01/04/2008 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented. Quoting: Circuit BreakerIs it coming through? How do you know? How far back does your data go? What? Only into the 90s? Then how do you know there weren't more than 4 8 magnitude quakes in the past? Come on, Free Store...prove your point. Provide data showing that there have NEVER been 4 or more magnitude 8 quakes before. You have no records yourself. :> Lets stay in the recent Planet X era. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Free Store User ID: 143978 Canada 01/04/2008 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
User # 78/68 User ID: 341591 Canada 01/04/2008 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145. Quoting: User # 78/68Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame. But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT! Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again! And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling. Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!! A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
***ZetaMax*** User ID: 266466 United States 01/04/2008 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145. Quoting: Circuit BreakerEvery single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame. But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT! Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again! And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling. Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!! The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations. ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997. [link to www.zetatalk.com] ZetaMax |
The Lone Ranger User ID: 345915 New Zealand 01/04/2008 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You have no records yourself. :> Quoting: Circuit BreakerLets stay in the recent Planet X era. Just as I thought. You can't back up your claims. That's no surprise though, CB. FrEaKy cannot even locate the ecliptic correctly. Backing up his assertions with FACTUAL data here would cause the Old Timer to maybe have a meltdown......and lose ALL his credibility...... Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Menow User ID: 223772 United States 01/04/2008 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145. Quoting: User # 78/68Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame. But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT! Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again! Quotes? Thought not. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/04/2008 11:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 255583 Canada 01/05/2008 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145. Quoting: Circuit BreakerEvery single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame. But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT! Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again! And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling. Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!! They key word that the bunkers are trying to bury is "exponential", which is how Nancy qualified the supposed increase in quakes. Do you guys know what exponential means? The data clearly shows that while some years there are more and other years there are fewer quakes, there is no exponential increase or decrease. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 350330 United States 01/05/2008 01:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Four 8.+ Quakes in one year is new and unprecedented. Quoting: Free Store 143978Is it coming through? Not quite. Otto Nuttli, however, has postulated another strong earthquake in Arkansas on December 16 at 18:00 UTC (MSn 8.0). This would make a total of five earthquakes of magnitude MSn 8.0 or higher occurring in the period December 16, 1811 through February 7, 1812.[/qoute] [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 88145 United States 01/05/2008 11:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
User # 78/68 User ID: 341591 Canada 01/05/2008 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 297320 United States 01/05/2008 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quotes? ... yer kidding right? Quoting: User # 78/68Ask them? to back their words. We all know what they were saying then. The lying shills never cease to amaze. And then there's you...who doesn't back up anything you claim. You offer no supporting evidence. All you do is spew insults and run away. The lying shill, Loser, never ceases to amaze. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
The Lone Ranger User ID: 345915 New Zealand 01/05/2008 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quotes? ... yer kidding right? Quoting: User # 78/68Ask them? to back their words. We all know what they were saying then. The lying shills never cease to amaze. You work hard on being a FOOL, don't ya!! It Has been increasingly obvious that the ONLY true SHILL on these threads is YOU. But your government employer must be sooooo disappointed at your LACK of effectiveness against the debunkers. They only at you increasingly......because YOU are even easier to "fly squat" than your stupid mate, Free Store. Keep it up though.......your useless jibes against those FAR SUPERIOR here in critical thinking....must be affecting you mentally by now. You KNOW that the is 100% correct here each day and every day. Your DENIAL of this fact is overwhelmingly hilarious. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 308776 Canada 01/05/2008 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 88145 United States 01/05/2008 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 348411 United States 01/05/2008 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My point is simple CB, Menow, User# 88145. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 255583Every single debunker in 2004 and 2005 said earthquakes had NOT increased in that time frame. But, the data showed that they did increase ... statistical anomaly or NOT! Now, the debunkers are proven liars ... yet again! And you said earthquakes ARE increasing. You said nothing about there being just an increase for those two years. Nice attempt at back pedaling. Now, Loser is a proven liar....yet again!! They key word that the bunkers are trying to bury is "exponential", which is how Nancy qualified the supposed increase in quakes. Do you guys know what exponential means? The data clearly shows that while some years there are more and other years there are fewer quakes, there is no exponential increase or decrease. Exponential as in: "On Oct 28, 2006 the Zetas warned that the lineal increase in earthquakes was about to become an exponential increase. By Dec 15, 2006 they stated that this point had arrived." [link to www.zetatalk.com] "Where such activity was more lineal in years past, it will become exponential at some point, and this turning point has already arrived." [link to www.zetatalk.com] Of course she uses images from the internet seismic server that support her claims. Unfortunately, she doesn't realize that those were the screwed up stations. She conveniently ignored the other fifty-odd seismograms. |
User # 78/68 User ID: 341591 Canada 01/06/2008 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 255583 Canada 01/06/2008 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 255583 Canada 01/06/2008 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BUT ... but ... what about your obvious lies in 2004 and 2005 Circuit Liar? Quoting: User # 78/68What about those? So why is it ok for Nancy to lie, you can accuse others of lying. Nancy has been lying since the mid 90's, week after week, but you don't get down on her. Just asking. |
User # 78/68 User ID: 341591 Canada 01/08/2008 11:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 139944 United States 01/08/2008 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The debunkers love to talk about lies ... watching their lies makes em pretty damn uncomfortable. Quoting: User # 78/68THe agency twerps are getting restless, it seems! The only exponential change here is the exponential increase in bullshit from the bunkers. So where's Nancy's Christmas Hammer these days? At first she was claiming it occurs around 0800 UTC then when that didn't last, she started claiming 1200 UTC. What's next, 1600 UTC? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 352130 Canada 01/08/2008 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The debunkers love to talk about lies ... watching their lies makes em pretty damn uncomfortable. Quoting: User # 78/68THe agency twerps are getting restless, it seems! You started talking lies, not me. I just countered you. Unlike your empty accusation about Menow, which you did not back up with evidence, my suggestion that Nancy lies is easily backed up on this very thread. Try again, User. |