Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,710 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 772,759
Pageviews Today: 984,141Threads Today: 159Posts Today: 3,241
07:23 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Mercury Danger in Fluorescent Bulbs

 
Saw the Light
User ID: 62603
United States
12/27/2007 03:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Mercury Danger in Fluorescent Bulbs
One of the provisions of the energy bill passed last week was the phase out over the next 10 years of the incandescent light bulb. These are to be replaced with the fluorescent (CFL) bulbs.

Perhaps fluorescent bulbs save some energy, but I really hate them and plan to purchase a lifetime supply of good old fashioned incandescent bulbs while I still can.

But why doesn't anyone ever mention the fact that fluorescent bulbs contain mercury and disposal of them is considered hazardous waste? What happens to the environment in the future when millions of these are being discarded every year. See following article:

The CFL mercury nightmare
Steven Milloy, Financial Post
Published: Saturday, April 28, 2007

How much money does it take to screw in a compact fluorescent light bulb? About US$4.28 for the bulb and labour -- unless you break the bulb. Then you, like Brandy Bridges of Ellsworth, Maine, could be looking at a cost of about US$2,004.28, which doesn't include the costs of frayed nerves and risks to health.

Sound crazy? Perhaps no more than the stampede to ban the incandescent light bulb in favour of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs).

According to an April 12 article in The Ellsworth American, Bridges had the misfortune of breaking a CFL during installation in her daughter's bedroom: It dropped and shattered on the carpeted floor.

Aware that CFLs contain potentially hazardous substances, Bridges called her local Home Depot for advice. The store told her that the CFL contained mercury and that she should call the Poison Control hotline, which in turn directed her to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.

The DEP sent a specialist to Bridges' house to test for mercury contamination. The specialist found mercury levels in the bedroom in excess of six times the state's "safe" level for mercury contamination of 300 billionths of a gram per cubic meter. The DEP specialist recommended that Bridges call an environmental cleanup firm, which reportedly gave her a "low-ball" estimate of US$2,000 to clean up the room. The room then was sealed off with plastic and Bridges began "gathering finances" to pay for the US$2,000 cleaning. Reportedly, her insurance company wouldn't cover the cleanup costs because mercury is a pollutant.

Given that the replacement of incandescent bulbs with CFLs in the average U.S. household is touted as saving as much as US$180 annually in energy costs -- and assuming that Bridges doesn't break any more CFLs -- it will take her more than 11 years to recoup the cleanup costs in the form of energy savings.

The potentially hazardous CFL is being pushed by companies such as Wal-Mart, which wants to sell 100 million CFLs at five times the cost of incandescent bulbs during 2007, and, surprisingly, environmentalists.

It's quite odd that environmentalists have embraced the CFL, which cannot now and will not in the foreseeable future be made without mercury. Given that there are about five billion light bulb sockets in North American households, we're looking at the possibility of creating billions of hazardous waste sites such as the Bridges' bedroom.

Usually, environmentalists want hazardous materials out of, not in, our homes. These are the same people who go berserk at the thought of mercury being emitted from power plants and the presence of mercury in seafood. Environmentalists have whipped up so much fear of mercury among the public that many local governments have even launched mercury thermometer exchange programs.

As the activist group Environmental Defense urges us to buy CFLs, it defines mercury on a separate part of its Web site as a "highly toxic heavy metal that can cause brain damage and learning disabilities in fetuses and children" and as "one of the most poisonous forms of pollution."

Greenpeace also recommends CFLs while simultaneously bemoaning contamination caused by a mercury-thermometer factory in India. But where are mercury-containing CFLs made? Not in the United States, under strict environmental regulation. CFLs are made in India and China, where environmental standards are virtually non-existent.

And let's not forget about the regulatory nightmare in the U.S. known as the Superfund law, the EPA regulatory program best known for requiring expensive but often needless cleanup of toxic waste sites, along with endless litigation over such cleanups.

We'll eventually be disposing billions and billions of CFL mercury bombs. Much of the mercury from discarded and/or broken CFLs is bound to make its way into the environment and give rise to Superfund liability, which in the past has needlessly disrupted many lives, cost tens of billions of dollars and sent many businesses into bankruptcy.

As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL. While CFL vendors and environmentalists tout the energy cost savings of CFLs, they conveniently omit the personal and societal costs of CFL disposal.

Not only are CFLs much more expensive than incandescent bulbs and emit light that many regard as inferior to incandescent bulbs, they pose a nightmare if they break and require special disposal procedures. Yet governments (egged on by environmentalists and the Wal-Marts of the world) are imposing on us such higher costs, denial of lighting choice, disposal hassles and breakage risks in the name of saving a few dollars every year on the electric bill? -
Shitty Flourescent Bulbs
User ID: 115
United States
12/27/2007 10:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mercury Danger in Fluorescent Bulbs
I broke one in my bedroom. No wonder I feel like I am mercury poisoned.

Those BASTARDS!!!
TX Patriot
User ID: 332571
United States
12/29/2007 05:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mercury Danger in Fluorescent Bulbs
bump for awareness and health
Parksy
User ID: 131494
United States
12/29/2007 07:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mercury Danger in Fluorescent Bulbs
Thats nothing, the stardard flourescent starters contain radio active Tritium.
Scarey PDF Link.
[link to www.elcfed.org]

News