If anyone seriously thinks that this is one of Nibiru's Moons,
Wheres the big chap himself then?
Would he not be visible in the Night skies being this close to the Sun?
I have received an email telling me it is a secret US Space Patrol craft, but i do not know.
If anyone seriously thinks that this is one of Nibiru's Moons,
Wheres the big chap himself then?
Would he not be visible in the Night skies being this close to the Sun?
I have received an email telling me it is a secret US Space Patrol craft, but i do not know.
As appeared on Dec 23, 2007 to the right of the Sun. Note the trailing dust cloud, which moves off to the LEFT. Right to LEFT is the direction of the wafting tail with moons we are discussing.
Please try to keep up. First they ignore you,
then they ridicule you,
then they fight you,
then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 345362 1/1/2008 11:59 AM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
Here are some of DunDawnn's threads, as you can see they are very well attended...lots of "important" info here:
Advanced Search - UID "271268"
Thread Posted by Replies Views Rating Posted Updated
Do you have to register by 12/31/07 to vote in 2008? SunDawnn 3 32 N/A 12/29/07
12:24 PM 12/29/07
12:35 PM
You say 'conspiracy' but................ SunDawnn 0 23
(1 votes) 12/28/07
6:43 PM 12/28/07
5:33 PM
It's the end of the world as we know it. SunDawnn
'Werewolf boy' - who snarls and bites - on the run SunDawnn 4 74 N/A 12/22/07
9:01 AM 12/22/07
10:29 AM
Santa Claus Delivers 37,000+ Copies of Constitution to President Bush SunDawnn 1 33 N/A 12/22/07
12:45 AM 12/22/07
1:03 AM
Pinning reason SunDawnn 0 39 N/A 12/22/07
12:08 AM 12/22/07
12:08 AM
My husband is planning an accident in my car (Princess Di) SunDawnn 1 62
(1 votes) 12/20/07
3:22 PM 12/20/07
8:32 PM
Awesome Guitarist Finger/Rhythm unbelievable SunDawnn 10 157 N/A 12/19/07
12:18 AM 12/19/07
9:37 AM
Jennifer? One or two N's? SunDawnn 3 45 N/A 12/16/07
10:17 PM 12/16/07
10:37 PM
Mystery Of Greenland 'Object' Solved SunDawnn 2 166 N/A 12/15/07
11:04 PM 12/16/07
2:52 AM
THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION SunDawnn 0 45 N/A 12/12/07
8:33 PM 12/12/07
8:33 PM
4:37 PM
Doctors baffled by green sweat SunDawnn 6 119 N/A 12/11/07
4:45 PM 12/11/07
9:18 PM
Amazing Kreskin Knows Who'll Be Next In The White House SunDawnn 0 35 N/A 12/11/07
4:43 PM 12/11/07
4:43 PM
Flying saucers’ around Saturn explained SunDawnn 0 32 N/A 12/11/07
4:36 PM 12/11/07
4:36 PM
What Is Triangle in Western Australia's ?????? SunDawnn 2 61 N/A 12/06/07
1:07 AM 12/06/07
1:40 AM
Who else is suffering from chronic headaches? SunDawnn 4 67 N/A 12/05/07
9:49 PM 12/05/07
10:28 PM
2:09 PM
Bracelet Found in Chicken After 25 Years SunDawnn 2 104 N/A 12/02/07
3:20 PM 12/02/07
5:01 PM
Strange Snow Circles In Russian City SunDawnn 13 424
(3 votes) 12/02/07
2:44 PM 12/02/07
10:06 PM
Amazing Poker hand SunDawnn 6 119
(2 votes) 11/29/07
9:40 PM 11/30/07
12:54 AM
What is that thing? SunDawnn 6 213
(3 votes) 11/29/07
11:40 AM 11/29/07
2:00 PM
Amazingly Intelligent Crow.
Page 1, 2 Anonymous Coward 55 1139
(12 votes) 11/29/07
12:05 AM 11/29/07
8:31 PM
Suicide concern over drug to stop smoking Anonymous Coward 1 37 N/A 11/28/07
9:57 PM 11/28/07
10:01 PM
Michael St Clair reknowned futurist and visionary [vid] Anonymous Coward 0 25 N/A 11/28/07
9:11 PM 11/28/07
9:11 PM
Picture of Inter-dimensional Being ? (short video) Anonymous Coward 0 47 N/A 11/28/07
5:28 PM 11/28/07
5:28 PM
Gary McKinnon hacking into NASA computers Anonymous Coward 2 66 N/A 11/27/07
10:22 PM 11/27/07
10:36 PM
If anyone seriously thinks that this is one of Nibiru's Moons,
Wheres the big chap himself then?
Would he not be visible in the Night skies being this close to the Sun?
I have received an email telling me it is a secret US Space Patrol craft, but i do not know.
As appeared on Dec 23, 2007 to the right of the Sun. Note the trailing dust cloud, which moves off to the LEFT. Right to LEFT is the direction of the wafting tail with moons we are discussing.
Please try to keep up.
Quoting: Nancy Lieder
I would love to bite your arm of with that date, after my other threads.
I just could never trust you, so i prefer to set my own pace, its fast enough and i am on the right track, instead of being led down the Garden path.
Everywhere you go, you contaminate.
We are talking about what we are seeing with our own eyes.
What are you talking about, rays changing our DNA and
(I have received an email telling me it is a secret US Space Patrol craft, but i do not know.)
be serious!! Be smart and exaime what you are seeing and tell me what you think the object is. Do you really think something that large is a US made space craft?_ You have until 2016 to get your Act together! Be Wise!
Nancy, is it time for some ZT? Are we seeing Thor's hammer?
Let's hear what they have to say. Thanks...
She's already told you what 'they' have to say. These are the moons of PX. This scenario will be played and the moons will be moved out of sight shortly. Truth is, if you read what nancy says, it amounts to nothing concrete. It's vague and shifty. Always has been and always will be.
Ha! Aren't you the same Boomerang that took GLP through 2 or 3 years of bullshit postings on the total bullshit "Dan Burisch and the aliens" thread?!!
Did you think no one here remembers that tripe that got your friends deported from Canada and turned out to be a total hoax, just as Nancy and the Zetas told you from day 1?
You are a fucking idiot.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 345362
Yep, same one.
The saga was fantastical and remains so. Dan Burisch is still offering his stories to those that wish to listen. Speaking for myself, I discovered that lies were being told by some of the participants and said so. From that point onwards I have distanced myself from Dan and Co. You have a problem with this?
As appeared on Dec 23, 2007 to the right of the Sun. Note the trailing dust cloud, which moves off to the LEFT. Right to LEFT is the direction of the wafting tail with moons we are discussing.
It is not my intent to be unkind, but you are really not serious about that picture are you? It is so distorted one cannot really tell what it is.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 342753 1/1/2008 12:02 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
Hate to say this, but after four pages, NO ONE has really looked at the original sequence, IMHO !
The object indeed seems to revolve, BUT, in my estimation it is NOT round ( an orb ). Check it again, especially near the end, and note the right side seems FLAT for a moment.
Eagle ... Peace
AH finally someone else noticed...it is triangular in shape..more like an asteroid than something planetary in nature or lunar for that matter...
I think it can probably be identified on this map..
ZetaTalk: Swirling Moons
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Where spin on the surface of a planet is dictated by the moving core of the planet, pulling or pushing on an object free to move on the surface, spin in space is dictated by whatever the spinning object is bound to. This is not explored by man, who strives to move directly in space and treats any spin in an object under their control as a problem to be corrected promptly, as in "the probe has developed a spin and is threatening to spin out of control". The reasons for the spin having developed in the first place is treated as an irrelevancy, and the only issue whether or not the probe is under control. The spin is suppressed by the little jets that allow man to control his probes when their trajectory needs to be corrected, and this thus allows mankind to feel smug about his knowledge of how things work. The moons of Planet X, which trail it like a string of pearls out in space, have no such little jets, so nature, not man, rules, and the full result of a spin out in space can be observed. Why do the moons trail, and spin in a slow whirlwind behind Planet X, rather than orbit the planet?
Moons in orbit around planets in a relatively circular orbit around a sun have more than their planet affecting their behavior. They are of a mass that prevents their plummeting to the planet, as they are evoking the gravitational repulsion force between themselves and their planet. They are moving, not stationary, not because of the attraction to the planet, which is at a standstill, but because of attractions to other elements in the solar system. Like a liquid core of a rotating body, they are moving toward what attracts them, overshooting the point where they are closest to the attractant, moving around to the far point because of momentum, and proceeding to approach the attractant again. Where there are a number of moons orbiting a planet, they position themselves like the planets around a sun, at a comfortable distance from each other to avoid collision, as the repulsion force is in operation between the moons, which are of relatively equal size, too.
Where it would seems that an orbit, in an orbital plane, around a sun or an planet is the natural outcome, this is disrupted during the swift passage that Planet X makes past one of its foci, the sun or its dead twin some 18.74 Sun-Pluto lengths away. Planet X moves away from its moons, pulling forward with increasing speed, at the same time that it is passing one of its suns and any planets that are orbiting that sun. The moons have conflicting dictates.
* Their primary allegiance is to Planet X, due to the flow of gravity particles which force it toward Planet X, which they are thus bound to. They are thus trying to catch up to Planet X, even when Planet X leaves them behind.
* The secondary influence over the moons is momentum, which continues to cause them to overshoot a reach for an attractant in the vicinity, to return to the far point of their spin whence they start back again toward the attractant. Thus, they continue the rotation or orbit pattern, even when not in a tight orbit around their planet.
* The third influence, which comes to interfere with a return to a tight orbit around Planet X, is each other. Moons around a planet that does not move rapidly away from its moons have established their positions in part because the moons arrive one at a time! Each new arrival finds an orbit plane taken, and assumes another or displaces the first, but the factors that dictate position are more static than moons traveling behind a rapidly moving planet. In essence, the positions are determined because one moon says "I am larger than you, and I wish this position of closeness to the planet, so you have to move."
Moons that have arrived in a whirlwind behind a rapidly traveling planet have a new dictate to deal with, in that they find other moons directly in the path they wish to take toward their gravitational giant, in this case Planet X. They are trying to catch the planet, while caught in momentum that their circular chase toward other attractants in the vicinity has created, but during their approach to their planet they find other moons in the way and this causes a fourth dictate, a bump away from their traveling planet.
* In moons around a static or slowly orbiting planet, the moons have opportunity to snug closer to the planet when competing moons are on the opposite side of the planet. When such moons encounter each other, having assumed the same orbital plane, the smaller gets bumped out of the path of the larger, either below the path of the larger moon, or most often farther away from the planet.
* In moons that have found themselves trailing their planet, this bumping takes the form of increased circular motion. The moons are already moving in a circular path, caused as we have mentioned by attractants in the vicinity which they are chasing toward and overshooting while still bound to their gravitational master. The swirling is increased as each time a larger moon attempts to approach its planet, it encounters other moons directly in its path which have nowhere to go but round and round, so they go faster. Collisions are avoided by more rapid motion, and none of the moons can place themselves on the opposite side of the planet. They are all stuck in a corridor behind the planet, not able to leave, not able to pass each other, and not able to catch the planet to reinstated a circular orbit around it.
Why would such a moon pattern perpetuate itself? Does Planet X not come to a virtual stop at the mid-point between its two foci? Having established a swirl behind the planet, the moons have two factors preventing a return to the normal orbital pattern of moons around a planet. First, their swirl perpetuates itself. The speed is dictated not only by the normal rotation around a gravitational master that attractants in the vicinity would create, it is dictated by the need to move away from the other moons in the swirl. Second, the larger moons in the cluster are perpetually trying to reach a closer proximity to their planet, the point where the repulsion force between the moon and its planet creates a stalemate. Being the larger moons, they push smaller moons away from their path, but this pushing action, in space, has the effect of causing them both to move, thus not only increasing and perpetuating their swirling motion, but also pushing the larger moon away from the planet it seeks to come closer to.
Thus, the moons of Planet X, having assumed a swirl that perpetuates itself, remain in a dance behind Planet X even during its dither point between its two foci. Planet X moves, however slowly, at its dither point, so the swirl is always positioned between Planet X and the foci it is leaving. This swirl, unique to man in any comets or planets it observes, is what caused the ancients to call the passing monster, red in the sky because of its illuminated red dust cloud, a dragon, lashing its tail, the swirl of moons.
swirling moons... are you with children in your head?
We are talking about what we are seeing with our own eyes.
What are you talking about, rays changing our DNA and
(I have received an email telling me it is a secret US Space Patrol craft, but i do not know.)
be serious!! Be smart and exaime what you are seeing and tell me what you think the object is. Do you really think something that large is a US made space craft?_
Quoting: Ice
No, i do not.
But about the DNA, it will be obvious before long.
It is 100% real, it is the truth behind Alchemy
Anonymous Coward User ID: 345362 1/1/2008 12:03 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
Nancy, is it time for some ZT? Are we seeing Thor's hammer?
Let's hear what they have to say. Thanks...
She's already told you what 'they' have to say. These are the moons of PX. This scenario will be played and the moons will be moved out of sight shortly. Truth is, if you read what nancy says, it amounts to nothing concrete. It's vague and shifty. Always has been and always will be.
Ha! Aren't you the same Boomerang that took GLP through 2 or 3 years of bullshit postings on the total bullshit "Dan Burisch and the aliens" thread?!!
Did you think no one here remembers that tripe that got your friends deported from Canada and turned out to be a total hoax, just as Nancy and the Zetas told you from day 1?
You are a fucking idiot.
Yep, same one.
The saga was fantastical and remains so. Dan Burisch is still offering his stories to those that wish to listen. Speaking for myself, I discovered that lies were being told by some of the participants and said so. From that point onwards I have distanced myself from Dan and Co. You have a problem with this?
Quoting: Boomerang
"Truth is, if you read what nancy says, it amounts to nothing concrete. It's vague and shifty. Always has been and always will be."
So, how do you think you are qualified to say what "truth is"? You proved yourself to be a moron taken in by a hoax, and it continued for a very long time after you dismissed the explanation given by Nancy and ZT...they were right and you were wrong...admit it.
MATT.. User ID: 331690 1/1/2008 12:09 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
If the main object was actually brightened by the flare, it stands to reason that it was close. The C3 (blue) plates tell us that the flare was actually so small that it hardly went beyond the edges of the central covering occultation disc in front the the Sun.
Because the stereo ahead craft is in front of us by about 22 degrees in our orbit, it will still show Mercury as being in the field of view even though it is out of SOHO's.
"Dec 02 - Dec 31 Mercury -1.2mag Right to Left" "It is surprising that supposedly intelligent people can make such asinine statements." -Definition of Asinine, www.Dictionary.com
If the main object was actually brightened by the flare, it stands to reason that it was close. The C3 (blue) plates tell us that the flare was actually so small that it hardly went beyond the edges of the central covering occultation disc in front the the Sun.
Truth is, if you read what nancy says, it amounts to nothing concrete. It's vague and shifty. Always has been and always will be."
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Stop and take a time out. We are all humans with all the same weakness. We judge and file so just stop it. MJ has made some good points and time will tell. Nancy has always been a total loon as far as my judgement goes but come on.
Tell me what the object are???? Either we are not seeing what we think we see and someone got drunk they went to the public and should not have or its something.
If it is something what is it. Nancy has been talking about this very thing for ever. You that stupid not to look at this with a open mind. come on!
stop throwing mud and bogging down thread
ice You have until 2016 to get your Act together! Be Wise!
Anonymous Coward User ID: 345362 1/1/2008 12:14 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
If the main object was actually brightened by the flare, it stands to reason that it was close. The C3 (blue) plates tell us that the flare was actually so small that it hardly went beyond the edges of the central covering occultation disc in front the the Sun.
in the c3 movie the "anomaly" object isn´t even visible...
in the links op provided the object seems to glide under the sun at approx 3 sun radiuses away, so it should be visible in the c3 video. the c2 is zoomed too much. out of range.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 345362 1/1/2008 12:20 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
Here are some of DunDawnn's threads, as you can see they are very well attended...lots of "important" info here:
Is it this thread is dying down and you need to direct this somewhere else?
oooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Do I pose a threat to you in some fashion based on some facts I know?
oooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Is it my name contains the word Sun and you think I am causing the solar problems?
I am just real sorry to the OP in wasting his/her bandwidth and space with left-field nonsense like this!
This AC twarp ought to be banned!
Quoting: SunDawnn
You called me out and I smacked you down, using your own drivel...tough shit little girl. Your own words provided the that just buried you. Maybe you can cry to the mods now, but I'm done with you.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 346036 1/1/2008 12:21 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
If the main object was actually brightened by the flare, it stands to reason that it was close. The C3 (blue) plates tell us that the flare was actually so small that it hardly went beyond the edges of the central covering occultation disc in front the the Sun.
in the c3 movie the "anomaly" object isn´t even visible...
in the links op provided the object seems to glide under the sun at approx 3 sun radiuses away, so it should be visible in the c3 video. the c2 is zoomed too much. out of range.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 342753
it can only be seen when it wants too.its both spiritual and physical...dont ask me lol
Eastside45 User ID: 269684 1/1/2008 12:21 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
I think MJ and Nancy both have something to offer. This is serious shit here people. Check out the link above for confirmation that there is something there. If you look back to images from 12/11/2007 forward, you will see the progression of this image, specifically in the two sided images and the Carrington images. Seems we forgot the Swan images. Peace out people! No one can deny that something is going on around us, a definite shift in the energy. Don't lose yourselves in what is going on now or what is going to happen. Maintain your focus on the endgame, when all is said and done. Imagine the good outcome that always follows chaos. Hang onto the hope that something better is coming and ride the wave with grace and empathy! When all is said and done, nothing we have and will experience will matter anymore. Got to believe that all of this BS WAS for something greater!!!
I'm starting to feel like I'm that guy in one of those cheesy made for TV scifi flicks and guardian angel rehashes that knows the answer to the problem, but no one can see or hear him.
Seriously, my opinion of humanity is dropping like a rock. "It is surprising that supposedly intelligent people can make such asinine statements." -Definition of Asinine, www.Dictionary.com
Nancy, is it time for some ZT? Are we seeing Thor's hammer?
Let's hear what they have to say. Thanks...
She's already told you what 'they' have to say. These are the moons of PX. This scenario will be played and the moons will be moved out of sight shortly. Truth is, if you read what nancy says, it amounts to nothing concrete. It's vague and shifty. Always has been and always will be.
Ha! Aren't you the same Boomerang that took GLP through 2 or 3 years of bullshit postings on the total bullshit "Dan Burisch and the aliens" thread?!!
Did you think no one here remembers that tripe that got your friends deported from Canada and turned out to be a total hoax, just as Nancy and the Zetas told you from day 1?
You are a fucking idiot.
Yep, same one.
The saga was fantastical and remains so. Dan Burisch is still offering his stories to those that wish to listen. Speaking for myself, I discovered that lies were being told by some of the participants and said so. From that point onwards I have distanced myself from Dan and Co. You have a problem with this?
"Truth is, if you read what nancy says, it amounts to nothing concrete. It's vague and shifty. Always has been and always will be."
So, how do you think you are qualified to say what "truth is"? You proved yourself to be a moron taken in by a hoax, and it continued for a very long time after you dismissed the explanation given by Nancy and ZT...they were right and you were wrong...admit it.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 345362
I gave Dan Burisch the benefit of doubt until evidence turned up that discounted him. When I discovered lies I withdrew from the discussions.
Dan Burisch calls Nancys planet X shit.
Nancy calls Dan Burischs' story shit.
They are both correct.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 346036 1/1/2008 12:23 PM
Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
Disclaimer: This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every
effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually
review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.
The content of post
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in
no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of
the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or
administration of GodlikeProductions.
This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.
Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.
