|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 | Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 348549
1/1/2008 2:52 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Hiding behind a proxy server.... DAMNIT YOU CAUGHT ME!  |
| Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
1/1/2008 2:53 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
At about 7oclock on this pic, there is what looks like a red Star..
Anyone know what it is?
as for the Spammer that keeps posting Jupiter, it is he that is a disinfo artist, Jupiter past on the 23rd and is nowhere near the Sun now, it also has a disc through the middle of it.
This is definitely not Jupiter, anyone with half a brain knows that. Quoting: MJ 340335
true, even more so it is not any planet due to the lack of disc. Including planet X or Nibiru possibilities.
Now, a brown dwarf invading our system, theres a wild idea. who knows at this point.
As long as it logically can not be explained as a planet, it is interesting and note worthy of attention. |
| RAMS
User ID: 339020
1/1/2008 2:53 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Quick conference with the SOHO Project Office Management Office reveals this anomaly was a standard large outburst and that is common about every 5 months in an outgassing affair associated with Sol's normal corona function.
The 'Object' near it is star 433.115
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Hope that is helpful.
RAMS
Robert A.M. Stephens, LLC ®
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
[link to www.behold-the-rage.com]
________________________________
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel |
| MJ
User ID: 340335
1/1/2008 2:53 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Or it is 2007 TU24, set to skim earth at 1.4 LD Jan 29 2008 400meters.
If JLP was up, hmmm, you could see it rides next to earth for a short time as it passes. It wont fly by very fast since were both traveling more similar directions and speeds of orbit.
But only 400 meters and 28 days away still. Im not sure if this could be it. Just an idea thrown out there. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
I do not see how that could be possible, this object is huge, also as you state it is still nearly a Month away.
No, this is something different.
You know what the shape reminded me of?
One of the UFO's that the Pilots flying to and fro from Guernsey saw earlier last year.
Certainly does not look Lunar like to me.
The fact that the Sun did not affect its gravity should suggest that. |
| ***ZetaMax*** 
Getting The Truth Out
User ID: 266466
1/1/2008 2:54 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Quick conference with the SOHO Project Office Management Office reveals this anomaly was a standard large outburst and that is common about every 5 months in an outgassing affair associated with Sol's normal corona function.
The 'Object' near it is star 433.115
[ link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Hope that is helpful.
RAMS
Robert A.M. Stephens, LLC ®
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
[ link to www.behold-the-rage.com]
________________________________
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel
Quick conference??
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.
ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
ZetaMax |
| MJ
User ID: 340335
1/1/2008 2:56 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Quick conference with the SOHO Project Office Management Office reveals this anomaly was a standard large outburst and that is common about every 5 months in an outgassing affair associated with Sol's normal corona function.
The 'Object' near it is star 433.115
[ link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Hope that is helpful.
RAMS
Robert A.M. Stephens, LLC ®
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
[ link to www.behold-the-rage.com]
________________________________
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel
You are joking right?
Absolute BS, that is no Star!!
If it is a Star, it is in between us and the Sun.
I suggest better research RAMS, i expected better from you. |
| picesnator
User ID: 318318
1/1/2008 2:58 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Quick conference with the SOHO Project Office Management Office reveals this anomaly was a standard large outburst and that is common about every 5 months in an outgassing affair associated with Sol's normal corona function.
The 'Object' near it is star 433.115
[ link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Hope that is helpful.
RAMS
Robert A.M. Stephens, LLC ®
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
[ link to www.behold-the-rage.com]
________________________________
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel
You are joking right?
Absolute BS, that is no Star!!
If it is a Star, it is in between us and the Sun.
I suggest better research RAMS, i expected better from you.
if it is a star....i thought i saw it reflected some the energy...maybe it is a star...like u said...but not 433.115 |
| MJ
User ID: 340335
1/1/2008 2:58 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
At about 7oclock on this pic, there is what looks like a red Star..
Anyone know what it is?
as for the Spammer that keeps posting Jupiter, it is he that is a disinfo artist, Jupiter past on the 23rd and is nowhere near the Sun now, it also has a disc through the middle of it.
This is definitely not Jupiter, anyone with half a brain knows that.
true, even more so it is not any planet due to the lack of disc. Including planet X or Nibiru possibilities.
Now, a brown dwarf invading our system, theres a wild idea. who knows at this point.
As long as it logically can not be explained as a planet, it is interesting and note worthy of attention. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
I feel that it must be some kind of Space Craft. Surely if it was an Asteroid or a Moon it would be affected by the Suns gravity.
as it did not seem to affect it at all, we should be able to rule them out, no? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 283256
1/1/2008 3:00 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Very interesting. Sometime in the last 7-10 days there was an image at SDAC-umbra with sun blocked that had a nearly perfect black 'circle' defined in the rays emanating from the sun. The black circle was about 30-40% the size of blocked out sun. Somethings up and the government could not tell the truth about the sun rising if their existence depended on it. |
| SolarMax
User ID: 348556
1/1/2008 3:00 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Haha
I knew there would be some doom going on over here.
The fruitcakes are back in action!
What did you talk about for the past 6 months? |
| The Lone Ranger
"Chat" campaign Adviser!!
User ID: 345915
1/1/2008 3:01 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Oh, hey look. Someone hiding behind a proxy server so they can act like a jackass.
Dont get mad fag. It's the internet.
So true. So true.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160454
1/1/2008 3:01 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Quick conference with the SOHO Project Office Management Office reveals this anomaly was a standard large outburst and that is common about every 5 months in an outgassing affair associated with Sol's normal corona function.
The 'Object' near it is star 433.115
[ link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Hope that is helpful.
RAMS
Robert A.M. Stephens, LLC ®
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
[ link to www.behold-the-rage.com]
________________________________
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel
Not helpful at all, really.
Why bother posting that link? |
| MJ
User ID: 340335
1/1/2008 3:01 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Quick conference with the SOHO Project Office Management Office reveals this anomaly was a standard large outburst and that is common about every 5 months in an outgassing affair associated with Sol's normal corona function.
The 'Object' near it is star 433.115
[ link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]
Hope that is helpful.
RAMS
Robert A.M. Stephens, LLC ®
NASA Fine Art Documentation Program
Vision Motion Dynamic-FX-FX
[ link to www.behold-the-rage.com]
________________________________
Have Jeep, Have Heart, Will Travel
You are joking right?
Absolute BS, that is no Star!!
If it is a Star, it is in between us and the Sun.
I suggest better research RAMS, i expected better from you.
if it is a star....i thought i saw it reflected some the energy...maybe it is a star...like u said...but not 433.115
How can it be a Star, in between us and the Sun?
Does not look like a Star, but brown dwarf? i have no idea.
I wanna see some pictures of this thing.
Gridkeeper, JLW.. Prove that you are genuine, take pics of this object. Astronomers, anyone with the capabilities, can we not ID this huge Anomaly? |
| habjabdoobab
User ID: 336011
1/1/2008 3:02 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
near-Earth asteroids: toro 1685, 2007 TU24
It has become common practice in studies of the thermal emission from near-Earth asteroids to employ thermal models developed on the basis of infrared observations of large, main-belt asteroids. However, near-Earth asteroids are relatively small and are expected to have less dusty, “rockier,” surfaces with higher thermal inertias than main-belt asteroids. Furthermore, they tend to have irregular shapes and are often observed at large solar phase angles, compared to main-belt objects.
[link to www.sciencedirect.com]
'large solar phase angles'
phase angle
For an object in the solar system, the angle "Sun-object-Earth" that is, the angle between the Sun and the observer as seen from the given object. It is 0° when the object is fully illuminated, 90° when the object is half-illuminated (like the Moon at first quarter and last quarter), and 180° when the object is between Earth and the Sun (like the Moon at new moon)
[link to www.daviddarling.info]
From my understanding from this toro 1685 and 2007 TU24 would be poorly illuminated?!? |
| The Lone Ranger
"Chat" campaign Adviser!!
User ID: 345915
1/1/2008 3:03 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Haha
I knew there would be some doom going on over here.
The fruitcakes are back in action!
What did you talk about for the past 6 months? Quoting: SolarMax
Are you related to ZetaMax by any chance??
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160454
1/1/2008 3:04 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Not a star.
Either RAMS hasn't checked the images referred to or he's, dare I say - clueless as to what a star looks like. |
| Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
1/1/2008 3:04 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Who knows, maybe the Sumerians, Z.S., all that stuff is real. And Nibiru is gonna swing by soon.
I'll say one thing....Living in such a universe so vast and powerful yet subtle, I expect anything possible. Is human reality any more or less just as strange as a large planet swinging by us every 3,600 yrs? |
| SolarMax
User ID: 348556
1/1/2008 3:06 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
I only see a few nicks in here I recognize.
Everybody changed their nick? or it this a new batch of fruitcakes? Dilatoriness are you there? :) |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 348560
1/1/2008 3:07 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
 |
| ***ZetaMax***
Getting The Truth Out
User ID: 266466
1/1/2008 3:07 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
At about 7oclock on this pic, there is what looks like a red Star..
Anyone know what it is?
as for the Spammer that keeps posting Jupiter, it is he that is a disinfo artist, Jupiter past on the 23rd and is nowhere near the Sun now, it also has a disc through the middle of it.
This is definitely not Jupiter, anyone with half a brain knows that.
true, even more so it is not any planet due to the lack of disc. Including planet X or Nibiru possibilities.
Now, a brown dwarf invading our system, theres a wild idea. who knows at this point.
As long as it logically can not be explained as a planet, it is interesting and note worthy of attention.
I feel that it must be some kind of Space Craft. Surely if it was an Asteroid or a Moon it would be affected by the Suns gravity.
as it did not seem to affect it at all, we should be able to rule them out, no? Quoting: MJ 340335
Nancy and the Zetas explanations are SPOT ON for the observed phenomena. Whether you want to admit it OR NOT!
A large smoldering brown dwarf with it's own gravity field and dominence of it's immediate environment in a gravitational standoff with the sun via the repulsion force speculated by science:
DECONSTRUCTING THE [BIG] BANG
WHAT BANGED? [Answer - GRAVITATIONAL REPULSION FORCE]
A common misconception is that the big bang provides a theory of cosmic origins. It doesn't. The big bang is a theory, partly described in the last two chapters, that deliniates cosmic evolution from a split second after whatever happened to bring the universe into existence, but it says nothing at all about zero time itself. And since, according to the big bang theory, the bang is what is supposed to have happened at the beginning, the big bang leaves out the bang. It tells us nothing about banged, why it banged, how it banged, or, frankly, whether it ever really banged at all. In fact if you think about it for a moment, you’ll realize that the big bang presents us with quite a puzzle. At the huge densities of matter and energy characteristic of the universe’s earliest moments, gravity was by far the dominant force. But gravity is an attractive force. It impels things to come together. So what could possibly be responsible for the outward force that drove space to expand? It would seem that some kind of powerful repulsive force must have played a critical role at the time of the bang, but which of nature’s forces could that possibly be?
For many decades this most basic of all cosmological questions went unanswered. Then, in the 1980s, an old observation of Einstein’s was resurrected in a sparkling new form, giving rise to what has become known as inflationary cosmology. And with this discovery, credit for the bang could finally be bestowed on the deserving force: gravity. It’s surprising, but physicists realized that in just the right environment gravity can be repulsive …
Brian R. Greene, The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality,
Vintage Books – A division of Random House, Inc., New York, 2004, pgs. 272-273.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force
Note: written on Sep 15, 1995.
Scientists are acutely aware of the attraction force inherent in gravity, as are folks in general. The babe learns about this early, while taking his first few steps. Oops. Ouch! It is assumed that gravity has only an attractive force, and that the planets, in orbit around the Sun, are held in place by their momentum. Does this make sense? What caused the momentum in the first place? Children play with a ball on the end of a string, swinging it around and around their head. As long as the arm is tugging, the ball maintains its orbit, else stops. Why would the planets not drift into the Sun? Are the orbits all that swift so that centrifugal force is extreme?
The reason Mankind is Unaware of a repulsive force, also inherent in gravity, is that for this to become evident there must be a semblance of equality in size and weight, i.e. the mass of the objects, and freedom of movement such as exists in space, and lack of undue influence from other nearby objects. Objects on the surface of the Earth have none of these. They are infinitesimal in proportion to the Earth itself, and thus any repulsion the Earth may have toward a tiny speck on its surface is also infinitesimal. Proportionally, its all gravity, a one way trip. The object on the surface, pushing away, is overwhelmed by the Earth's gravitational pull, the attraction. The repulsion force is generated as a result of two bodies exerting a gravitational force on each other. In the case of a tiny object on the surface of the Earth, its gravitational pull on the Earth is scarcely noticed by the Earth. A gnat or mite. A nothing. Where the repulsion force has not been invoked within the Earth by any objects placed on the surface of the Earth, this is in play between the Earth and her Moon. The repulsion force is invoked between objects on the surface of the Earth, incessantly, but this is masked by the intense force of gravity the Earth presents and other factors such as surface tension or friction or chemical bonding so that the repulsion force cannot be recognized.
The gravitational force exists first. It is the static condition. The repulsion phenomena only manifests when, as we said, the objects are of equal size, are free to move, and dominate the immediate environment. Where the repulsion force comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs from gravity. Humans have calculated the force of gravity, which at first they assumed was equal for all objects but lately have come to understand is stronger for larger objects. They have formulas for the force of gravity which have proved accurate on the face of their home planet. These formulas are incomplete, and would not work as expected elsewhere, however. The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact. For experimental purposes, one would have to be almost at the point of contact for it to come into play at all, and this in an environment where other factors are eliminated or negated. To examine the phenomena, Earth scientists would have to set up a lab in space, far enough away from any planetary body so that free movement is possible. Place two balls in a cage. Put one in motion toward another. Microscopically examine the interchange. They do not touch. They do not bounce off one another. They do not touch.
Zetas RIGHT Again !
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.
ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
ZetaMax |
| IDW
User ID: 348561
1/1/2008 3:08 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
A c8 flare is not even noteworthy, and no one would even have noticed if it wasnt during the solar minimum. During the last solar maximum, the BASELINE readings were generally in the c range of the scale.
Lets put this in perspective.
A c8 flare is only 1/10 as powerful as a m-8 flare, which is only 1/10 as powerful as an x-8 flare. That is to say an x-8 flare is 100 times as powerful as this c-8.
During the last solar maximum , a flare so powerful occured that a new classification had to be added, the y . This flare was probably 1000 times as powerful as the latest.We had dozens of x class flares, sometimes withen hours of each other and Earth directed. This flare may or may not herald the begining of a new solar cycle.
Wait until 2010-2012, then things will heat up, literally.
It will be interesting to see if this "sunspot" ever emerges. If it was the same one that appeared around the 10th, it should be already in view.That is to say I have my doubts whether or not a sunspot caused it, as I said before. |
| FightingSpirit
User ID: 348562
1/1/2008 3:08 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
And the illusion continues to lift...As we continue to approach the end... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 348549
1/1/2008 3:11 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
im sorry asinine |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 348549
1/1/2008 3:11 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 160454
1/1/2008 3:11 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Nobody knows what anybody else is talking about, do they? |
| Hold the Phone
User ID: 330765
1/1/2008 3:13 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Stop this one at 11  20 and look real close. I can distinctly see a planet shaped object. About two thirds of it are in sunlight and the bottom third is in darkness and you can see a coronal type glow around the dark side of the object. My first inclination is that it is one of the planets.
The thing is definitely moving from right to left in the frame and is not stationary. If it was on the path of it's orbit and moving either nearly directly towards or away from the point of viewing, it would appear to be almost stationary.
Question: how many miles are we looking at from the edge of the solar mask to the edge of the field of view?
I posted earlier. It's Mercury. It's C3 transit for SOHO is done but the solar obeservatory Stereo, while it shares Earth's orbit around the sun, it is about 22 degrees in front and behind (2 craft). It has a different viewing angle and distance than SOHO.
That is what I was thinking from the very beginning. Look at this sky map : [link to www.fourmilab.ch] |
| SolarMax
User ID: 348556
1/1/2008 3:13 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Hiya IDW
The flare was from ar980, certainly from the spot seen on this GONG magnetogram:
[link to gong.nso.edu] |
| The Lone Ranger
"Chat" campaign Adviser!!
User ID: 345915
1/1/2008 3:16 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
I only see a few nicks in here I recognize.
Everybody changed their nick? or it this a new batch of fruitcakes? Dilatoriness are you there? :) Quoting: SolarMax
Dil has morphed into another nick!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
| habjabdoobab
User ID: 336011
1/1/2008 3:17 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Nobody knows what anybody else is talking about, do they? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 160454
does seem like a free for all, we're all seeing what we want to see, apparently. |
| Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
1/1/2008 3:18 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
This is a wild concept but bear with me, it trys to explain all sides.
Our suns solar winds push space dust beyond pluto.
A brown dwarf, not having any where near strong enough solar winds to push the dust away, but does have a very strong gravitic pull.
This would create a dust/debris cocoon around the brown dwarf. The weak solar wind keeps the dust at a much closer, yet not all the way, distance.
This would prevent or reduce the visible light detectable from the brown dwarf. However, the infrared spectrum passes through heating objects.
As delicate a system we live in, an oscilating eliptical orbit of a brown dwarf would create ice ages at its furthest and warm ages at its closest.
CO2 is a result of warming, not the catalysts. CO2 natural increases from the oceans during a warming trend.
Every planet with an atmosphere is warming up equally with us. No joke, look it up.
Reason why, the Suns little brother brown dwarf is at its nearest, hence all this warming and orbital disturbances in the gas giants and Pluto.
Straight from nasa, 80% of 'normal stars' like our own have little dwarf stars orbiting it.
But don't expect dwarf stars to orbit like planets. They NEED a more drastic orbit to coexist with the sun due to increased gravity interactions. Otherwise the sun and the dwarf would collide.
Wild theory! But think about it. Really, is it really that illogical? Unlikely yes, but not impossible and thats the thing. Are we capable of accepting such a fate?
As far as the Nibiru theory...I'll let that play out. Prepare for any disaster, not just a specific one. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 | |
|
