|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 | Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
| Rerun Oddgun
User ID: 346371
1/2/2008 3:53 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Then why don't you take it to an astronomy forum where they can give you real answers?
Would you mind to post one of those real answers or link specific to the OP's object if you have it. Its a sincere request and I'm not sarcastic. I Need clearer answers to, its been a roller-coaster ride.
The objects have been identified as Mercury and an asteroid. As far as Nancy's claim of "moons" and "dust clouds"? It's just more of her usual PX fantasy bullshit.
I suggest you subscribe to an astronomy forum where they actually know what they are talking about and tell the truth. Quoting: Menow 185796
You lose me every time you say that so factually despite no response to my prior arguments. I would be real easy to convince if anyone would answer those questions. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 331010
1/2/2008 3:53 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
.. |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 3:56 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Im not convinced a dust cloud would make Mercury look 1000x larger than any other vid of Mercury in reference to the Sun.
That is why I am still wondering what this is....
But no one...since page 33 of this fricken thread....
can answer this with ANY degreee of logic and data...
it's either "the Zeta's said...", or "If you knew anything about real astronomy"....look ...I do know something about real astronomy, and THAT is why I can't understand Mercury as being this large compared to the Sun, ESPECIALLY while it is farther away from us (at least 28,000,000mi).
Please...no more opinion or crap ...fact...link...so we can be done here and move on to the next part...
No one is joining any cults even if we prove this thing to Be planet X with the "gods" of mythology on it with an ultrasound of me in their wallet.
I'm not arguing ANY of these points...just want some sense....ANYONE? Quoting: Rerun Oddgun 346371
A little bit of the history of how Nancy and "zetas" lie about images of PX.
[link to de.geocities.com]
[link to m1.aol.com]
[link to www.geocities.com] |
| A question for Nancy
User ID: 103699
1/2/2008 3:57 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
<<<<<<Kinda hopin the strange object destroys the Zetas so we can: strongly disagree
A.) Have a clue as to what it REALLY is : bravo
B.) Stop the input in this thread from known liars and disinformation sources : bravo
We are conducting the best investigation we know how and there are quite a few in here giving good info that helps us get to the bottom of it and either prove or disprove (you know who you are and I'm grateful for you)...but everything doen't haveta be X...and if it is let's let the facts lead us to that conclusion rather than an outside source inputting without fact and substance..
We've had enough disinfo and this is how it stops Quoting: Rerun Oddgun 346371
Well..... if it's not a known planet, star, asteroid, probe, then what else could it be ? Perhaps if all the obvious "things" have been proven to be wrong, what ever is left how crazy it may seem must be the truth ?
In any case is this thing affecting the weather in the usa this week , major cold/high winds in the se usa today ? |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 3:57 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Come on, Menow, your truth is different From Nancy's truth. If you agree, debate correctly, where people DO learn, as you so much desire. Not to offend anyone, but this flaming Nancy IS bringing more people to listen to her. If this isn't what you want, you might want to jump this thread. Bye Bye Quoting: Anonymous Coward 160058
What have I said that is incorrect? Be specific. |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:02 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Im not convinced a dust cloud would make Mercury look 1000x larger than any other vid of Mercury in reference to the Sun.
That is why I am still wondering what this is....
But no one...since page 33 of this fricken thread....
can answer this with ANY degreee of logic and data...
it's either "the Zeta's said...", or "If you knew anything about real astronomy"....look ...I do know something about real astronomy, and THAT is why I can't understand Mercury as being this large compared to the Sun, ESPECIALLY while it is farther away from us (at least 28,000,000mi).
Please...no more opinion or crap ...fact...link...so we can be done here and move on to the next part...
No one is joining any cults even if we prove this thing to Be planet X with the "gods" of mythology on it with an ultrasound of me in their wallet.
I'm not arguing ANY of these points...just want some sense....ANYONE?
I have no facts but the only logic input I have was that if that object was Mercury appearing so large then my logic conclusion was that somehow its or earths orbit had changed and it caused me to freak out which I apologized for. I'm no rocket scientist or astro-physics expert but relied on common sense however insufficient that is. At this stage I'm more inclined to believe the dust cloud causing it to appear larger then to believe the orbits have changed. I don't know why but I'm more comfortable with that explanation. Just being honest. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 308272
Honesty is good. Keep it up.
Earth's orbit is not changed and there is no "dust cloud". Consult with people who know about those cameras and images to find out why objects would appear as they do. |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:05 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
btw - whom ever said it was a star, bullshit and I just realized this. Watch any soho video. Stars move from left to right. The object moved right to left.
Couple that with the obvious visual proof its not a planet either. Remember still, there is no disc around it. All planets seen in these videos have discs that appear to rotate. An optical illusion seen on all planets.
Not a star
Not a planet
Try to debunk that, you won't be able to. It's obvious. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
You expect, after what, a few hours, to have learned all about astrophotogaphy? |
| Sock Puppet
User ID: 313091
1/2/2008 4:07 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Im not convinced a dust cloud would make Mercury look 1000x larger than any other vid of Mercury in reference to the Sun.
That is why I am still wondering what this is....
But no one...since page 33 of this fricken thread....
can answer this with ANY degreee of logic and data...
it's either "the Zeta's said...", or "If you knew anything about real astronomy"....look ...I do know something about real astronomy, and THAT is why I can't understand Mercury as being this large compared to the Sun, ESPECIALLY while it is farther away from us (at least 28,000,000mi).
Please...no more opinion or crap ...fact...link...so we can be done here and move on to the next part...
No one is joining any cults even if we prove this thing to Be planet X with the "gods" of mythology on it with an ultrasound of me in their wallet.
I'm not arguing ANY of these points...just want some sense....ANYONE?
I have no facts but the only logic input I have was that if that object was Mercury appearing so large then my logic conclusion was that somehow its or earths orbit had changed and it caused me to freak out which I apologized for. I'm no rocket scientist or astro-physics expert but relied on common sense however insufficient that is. At this stage I'm more inclined to believe the dust cloud causing it to appear larger then to believe the orbits have changed. I don't know why but I'm more comfortable with that explanation. Just being honest.
Honesty is good. Keep it up.
Earth's orbit is not changed and there is no "dust cloud". Consult with people who know about those cameras and images to find out why objects would appear as they do. Quoting: Menow 185796
We have - that's why everyone wants Nancy's input. |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:08 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
NOW, what is it? Not a star and not a planet! Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
Why, because you are suddenly an expert in astrophotography?
Which "it"? One was identified as Mercury and one as an asteroid? Haven't you read the thread? |
| Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
1/2/2008 4:10 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
you know, astronomical fact is a very vague concept. Our only understanding of the stars and such is from observations leading to an educated guess half the time.
Knowing that, the opinions of GLP users aren't that far from the credibility of astronomical scientists. They have big toys, yet we all get to see the data. So who is right?
This is why I can't rule out even the wildest theories. Could you? When was the last time an astronaut stepped on a comet and radioed home what he saw? never. And until we reach that level of technological sophistication, its nearly everyones guess. Except for the obvious idiots of course. But even they may be right sometimes.
And now I've been sucked into the defense of theory rather then helping the discovery of this object.
And if it has been 'newely' discovered, who gets to name it? |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:11 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to m1.aol.com]
they all "learned" and realized that you were WRONG!
REALLY?? And I bet you beleive ice ages and interstacials as well!!
What does that have to do with the fact that Nancy's "image expert", JW DEll, admitted that PX was never imaged at Nancy's coordinates? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 282813
1/2/2008 4:12 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
.
.
Rerun,
No one seems to be getting that the SOHO C3 image from 31 Dec is not Mercury. However, the STEREO A image in the OP's post, is of Mercury.
So then, what is the object in the 31 Dec SOHO image?
Please look at the SOHO sequence between 13 Dec and 31 Dec.
It is still my contention that the "second" object is the asteroid Toro. It has the same trajectory -- downward-left-to-right (relative to SOHO). Keep in mind that SOHO is 1,500,000 km from Earth and that Toro is between 80,000,000 km and 45,000,000 km from Earth -- Toro is very close to SOHO.
SOHO 13 Dec: Mercury BOTTOM CENTER, 2nd Object ABOVE-MIDDLE LEFT
[ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
SOHO 25 Dec: Mercury BOTTOM KEFT, 2nd Object MIDDLE CENTER
[ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
SOHO 31 Dec: Mercury [gone], 2nd Object BELOW-MIDDLE RIGHT
[ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
Trajectory ... trajectory ... trajectory ..
What is not right, however, is the timing of Toro. Perhaps Toro has arrived early.
.
.
I see two problems with that. One..the obvious trajectory of "Toro" is different than that of the object in Stereo...which isnt shown on this SOHO shot of Dec.31..
Nor is Mercury
unless the camera is upside down from that of stereo...but the flare comes from the same side as stereo...
And the object in stereo is on the other side of the sun....
And therefore would be too far away to view Mercury as this large...so it definately couldnt be a 3.4km asteroid
.
.
Rerun,
Forget about the STEREO images for a while.
Focus only the SOHO C3 images from 13 Dec to 31 Dec.
I'm suggesting that "Toro's" trajectory matches the SOHO data -- not STEREO's.
If it's not Toro in the SOHO images from Dec 13-31, then what is the 2nd object that is transitting diagonally from left-to-right -- above Mercury, which is transitting from right-to-left?
Is the jury still out on the second object?
(It's not Jupiter, unless Jupiter has changed direction.)
A good reference point is SOHO C3 on 20 Dec, which shows Mercury and the 2nd object to have nearly the same RA/Dec.
.
. |
| Sock Puppet
User ID: 313091
1/2/2008 4:12 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to m1.aol.com]
they all "learned" and realized that you were WRONG!
REALLY?? And I bet you beleive ice ages and interstacials as well!!
What does that have to do with the fact that Nancy's "image expert", JW DEll, admitted that PX was never imaged at Nancy's coordinates?
Nothing - JUST LIKE YOUR OFFERINGS!! |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:13 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
I see two problems with that. One..the obvious trajectory of "Toro" is different than that of the object in Stereo...which isnt shown on this SOHO shot of Dec.31..
Nor is Mercury
unless the camera is upside down from that of stereo...but the flare comes from the same side as stereo...
And the object in stereo is on the other side of the sun....
And therefore would be too far away to view Mercury as this large...so it definately couldnt be a 3.4km asteroid Quoting: Rerun Oddgun 346371
I suggest that you stop proclaiming what is "obvious" in astrophotogaphy, since you don't really know what you are talking about. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 308272
1/2/2008 4:14 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Come on, Menow, your truth is different From Nancy's truth. If you agree, debate correctly, where people DO learn, as you so much desire. Not to offend anyone, but this flaming Nancy IS bringing more people to listen to her. If this isn't what you want, you might want to jump this thread. Bye Bye
What have I said that is incorrect? Be specific. Quoting: Menow 185796
Menow menow me me me look its me yes its me me al this is about me me me menow
My God We Get it! You don't like Nancy and believe she is a charlatan full of lies and whatever. We get it OK.
SO FOR GODS SAKE MOVE ON AND GET A LIFE. You accuse Nancy of the same conduct which you yourself are now doing and even are far worse at it. Haven't you heard there is no such thing as bad promotion. All you are doing is just giving her more promotion with your insidious replies. Your getting the opposite effect to what you think you are trying to achieve. Through your continuous moronic one sentence posting you've lost all credibility |
| Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
1/2/2008 4:17 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
NOW, what is it? Not a star and not a planet!
Why, because you are suddenly an expert in astrophotography?
Which "it"? One was identified as Mercury and one as an asteroid? Haven't you read the thread? Quoting: Menow 185796
yes ive read the thread. All too much actually. And I have, for myself, proven its not a planet or a star.
I'll say it one more time, then im done explaining things over and over.
1.Stars move from left to right in the videos. The object moves right to left. NOT A STAR
2.All planets in these videos have an optical illusion appearing like a horizontal disc that seems to rotate as it moves across the screen. This optical illusion is NOT present. NOT A PLANET
ALSO, the object is far to south and the video was not flipped, thanks to the flare allowing confirmation of such positioning.
my case is rested. Your reality is up to you.
I mean this in the best regards |
| the alphalphas
User ID: 349052
1/2/2008 4:17 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Perhaps this is a hoax. . . a ploy designed to inflame and distract. . . . Can anyone think of a reason why such a situation might be useful? :) This is just a suggestion now. . . so no need to be insulting or vulgar. . .
The Universe is a vast and Mysterious place.
The Universe sustains You.
Faith or Fear?
You Choose.
n.a.n.c.y. is a gov/psyop.
...
the alphalphas |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:18 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Then why don't you take it to an astronomy forum where they can give you real answers?
Would you mind to post one of those real answers or link specific to the OP's object if you have it. Its a sincere request and I'm not sarcastic. I Need clearer answers to, its been a roller-coaster ride.
The objects have been identified as Mercury and an asteroid. As far as Nancy's claim of "moons" and "dust clouds"? It's just more of her usual PX fantasy bullshit.
I suggest you subscribe to an astronomy forum where they actually know what they are talking about and tell the truth.
You lose me every time you say that so factually despite no response to my prior arguments. I would be real easy to convince if anyone would answer those questions. Quoting: Rerun Oddgun 346371
People have already gone to the trouble(several times) to explain why those two objects are Mercury and a known asteroid. It wasn't me who did it, so I can't refer easily to those aprticular posts. Review the thread. Try page 9 and up from there.
I say things "factually" about Nancy because I have watched her play her games for several years. I gave links to Nancy's past games with images. Read them. |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:20 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
<<<<<<Kinda hopin the strange object destroys the Zetas so we can: strongly disagree
A.) Have a clue as to what it REALLY is : bravo
B.) Stop the input in this thread from known liars and disinformation sources : bravo
We are conducting the best investigation we know how and there are quite a few in here giving good info that helps us get to the bottom of it and either prove or disprove (you know who you are and I'm grateful for you)...but everything doen't haveta be X...and if it is let's let the facts lead us to that conclusion rather than an outside source inputting without fact and substance..
We've had enough disinfo and this is how it stops
Well..... if it's not a known planet, star, asteroid, probe, then what else could it be ? Perhaps if all the obvious "things" have been proven to be wrong, what ever is left how crazy it may seem must be the truth ? Quoting: A question for Nancy 103699
They HAVE been shown to be a known asteroid and a planet-MERCURY! Read the thread!? |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:22 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Honesty is good. Keep it up.
Earth's orbit is not changed and there is no "dust cloud". Consult with people who know about those cameras and images to find out why objects would appear as they do.
We have - that's why everyone wants Nancy's input. Quoting: Sock Puppet
Nancy, by her own admission, doesn't know "which end of a telescope to look through". |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:30 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
you know, astronomical fact is a very vague concept.
{/quote]
No. It is not. Nancy just wants you to THINK that. There are lots of things we DO REALLY KNOW.
Our only understanding of the stars and such is from observations leading to an educated guess half the time. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
We are not talking about distant stars, here.
Knowing that, the opinions of GLP users aren't that far from the credibility of astronomical scientists. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
That is a totally ridiculous statement. Just because YOU don't know much about astronomy, that doesn't mean that NOBODY does.
They have big toys, yet we all get to see the data. So who is right? Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
What are the choices? Real astronomers or Nancy Lieder? Surely you jest.
This is why I can't rule out even the wildest theories. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
Yes, you can. Nancy's PX does NOT exist. Earth is NOT halted in orbit.
Could you? When was the last time an astronaut stepped on a comet and radioed home what he saw? never. And until we reach that level of technological sophistication, its nearly everyones guess. Except for the obvious idiots of course. But even they may be right sometimes. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
Just because someone once ridiculed a theory which later turned out to be true, doesn't mean that all ridiculous theories are true.
And now I've been sucked into the defense of theory rather then helping the discovery of this object. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
The objects have been identified as Mercury and an asteroid. Nancy's "moons" and "dust" don't exist at all.
And if it has been 'newely' discovered, who gets to name it? Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
It isn't. You really think that real astronomers missed seeing a new object while some boob on GLP found it? |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:31 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to m1.aol.com]
they all "learned" and realized that you were WRONG!
REALLY?? And I bet you beleive ice ages and interstacials as well!!
What does that have to do with the fact that Nancy's "image expert", JW DEll, admitted that PX was never imaged at Nancy's coordinates?
Nothing - JUST LIKE YOUR OFFERINGS!!
Right. Totally unable to have an actual discussion. Why did I bother? |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:35 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
You accuse Nancy of the same conduct which you yourself are now doing and even are far worse at it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 308272
I have accused Nancy of lying. Where am I allegedly "worse at it"?
Haven't you heard there is no such thing as bad promotion. All you are doing is just giving her more promotion with your insidious replies. Your getting the opposite effect to what you think you are trying to achieve. Through your continuous moronic one sentence posting you've lost all credibility Quoting: Anonymous Coward 308272
What is allegedly "moronic" about what I have posted? What is allegedly "moronic" about one sentence posts? |
| Menow
User ID: 185796
1/2/2008 4:39 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
NOW, what is it? Not a star and not a planet!
Why, because you are suddenly an expert in astrophotography?
Which "it"? One was identified as Mercury and one as an asteroid? Haven't you read the thread?
yes ive read the thread. All too much actually. And I have, for myself, proven its not a planet or a star.
I'll say it one more time, then im done explaining things over and over.
1.Stars move from left to right in the videos. The object moves right to left. NOT A STAR
2.All planets in these videos have an optical illusion appearing like a horizontal disc that seems to rotate as it moves across the screen. This optical illusion is NOT present. NOT A PLANET
ALSO, the object is far to south and the video was not flipped, thanks to the flare allowing confirmation of such positioning.
my case is rested. Your reality is up to you.
I mean this in the best regards Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
Do you not understand the concept of retrograde motion?
I see you didn't even answer this question: Which "it"? One was identified as Mercury and one as an asteroid?
Rest your case.
Enjoy your doom. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 346036
1/2/2008 4:41 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Im not convinced a dust cloud would make Mercury look 1000x larger than any other vid of Mercury in reference to the Sun.
That is why I am still wondering what this is....
But no one...since page 33 of this fricken thread....
can answer this with ANY degreee of logic and data...
it's either "the Zeta's said...", or "If you knew anything about real astronomy"....look ...I do know something about real astronomy, and THAT is why I can't understand Mercury as being this large compared to the Sun, ESPECIALLY while it is farther away from us (at least 28,000,000mi).
Please...no more opinion or crap ...fact...link...so we can be done here and move on to the next part...
No one is joining any cults even if we prove this thing to Be planet X with the "gods" of mythology on it with an ultrasound of me in their wallet.
I'm not arguing ANY of these points...just want some sense....ANYONE?
I have no facts but the only logic input I have was that if that object was Mercury appearing so large then my logic conclusion was that somehow its or earths orbit had changed and it caused me to freak out which I apologized for. I'm no rocket scientist or astro-physics expert but relied on common sense however insufficient that is. At this stage I'm more inclined to believe the dust cloud causing it to appear larger then to believe the orbits have changed. I don't know why but I'm more comfortable with that explanation. Just being honest.
Honesty is good. Keep it up.
Earth's orbit is not changed and there is no "dust cloud". Consult with people who know about those cameras and images to find out why objects would appear as they do.
We have - that's why everyone wants Nancy's input. Quoting: Sock Puppet
Thats was funny enough without coming from a Sock Puppet bwahahah |
| Schmieder22
User ID: 324203
1/2/2008 4:41 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
On another note, I will say this.
Scientists have siad most stars like ours, about 80%, have smaller star companions. Like brown and red dwarfs. This puts us at a 8/10 chance we have one of our own. If so, the orbit has to be very large compared to regular planets due to the larger gravitational forces involved, or they'll crash into our sun.
This can easily and reasonably explain the Earths shifting from Ice age to warm ages in cycle. As delicate as our system is, the slightest decrease in distance from a brown dwarf would result in heating. All planets in our solar system which have atmospheres are heating up equally with us.
It also explains the driving actions behind periodic comets and asteroid junk, plutos akward orbit, neptunes sideways spin, asteroid belts along with the fact all planets are slightly deviated from a perfect orbit and spin around the sun. All planets in our system are subjected to the same forces, just weaker as distance dictates. This would mean all orbits and spin should be rational to each other. Well, all planets travel the same direction around the sun. Maybe cause the brown dwarf isnt powerful enough to change rotation direction.
Also stated by NASA scientists is dust is more prevelant at the outer reaches of space far away from any stars solar winds. We have such a boundary beyond pluto. Brown dwarfs however, do not have the solar wind strength to dispel such dust but do have the gravitational forces to attract them. With a weak solar wind, it creates a dust cocoon surrounding the brown dwarf. This is why scientists have had a hard time finding brown dwarfs until Infrared astrophotography was developed well enough to detect them several years ago. Visible light can not penetrate the dusty cocoon yet, infrared can. Which is why we receive heat from the brown dwarf but not the visible light.
Can this also explain the orbital deviations of the outer gas giants and pluto? It seems reasonable.
When one examines these theories, planetX/Nibiru/Ect doesnt seem so far fetched after all.
The problem with Nancy is she uses tactics of informing that are really strange and seemingly dilusional, no insult intended. This leads me to theorize she is a disinfo artist for the government. Not sure but suspicious of.
What better way to hide the truth then to put it right in front of you and add a little crazyness to dispell the truth.
Its not a crazy theory at all, once you examine the facts. |
| A question for Nancy
User ID: 103699
1/2/2008 4:42 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Menow
User ID: 185796
POST # 152 AND COUNTING . BRO GIVE IT A REST . YOU ARE TRYING WAY TO HARD TO DISCREDIT NANCY . YOU ARE MAKING YOUR SELF LOOK LIKE A DIS INFO BLA BLA BLA ! |
| Sock Puppet
User ID: 313091
1/2/2008 4:45 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
You really think that real astronomers missed seeing a new object while some boob on GLP found it? Quoting: Menow 185796
It's called a "COVER UP" - a concept that is "unkown" to you. |
| Sock Puppet
User ID: 313091
1/2/2008 4:46 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Menow
User ID: 185796
POST # 152 AND COUNTING . BRO GIVE IT A REST . YOU ARE TRYING WAY TO HARD TO DISCREDIT NANCY . YOU ARE MAKING YOUR SELF LOOK LIKE A DIS INFO BLA BLA BLA ! Quoting: A question for Nancy 103699
He doesn't have to "try" - HE IS!!! |
| A question for Nancy
User ID: 103699
1/2/2008 4:49 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Sorcha Foul is now selling us property in the mountains.......classic !
perhaps we should buy some before px destroys us ?
Snip begin :
A onetime payment of $300.00 secures your right to live, build upon, grow crops upon, and keep animals upon, no less than 100 acres of land.
All land is held by a Trust which your payment secures your membership and ownership rights.
Your Trust Rights are yours to keep for your lifetime and pass on to your heirs, however, your Trust Rights can never be sold to anyone at anytime.
A yearly fee of $100.00 is payable by all Trust Members for communal property needs, which include: Payment of taxes and insurance, Purchase and maintenance of farm equipment, common animal shelters, etc.
snip end :
[link to www.whatdoesitmean.com] |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 | |
|
