|
| |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 | Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 339268
1/2/2008 8:34 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
well this chap just posted a thread with new pics of 'mercury'
Check it out:
ID2268
User ID: 347076
1/2/2008 6:25 PM
Report abusive post
latest pic of 'mystery' object by the sun
Quote
its glowing, what does that mean?
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov] |
| Ice 
User ID: 3701
1/2/2008 8:34 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
so this object at 8 am is Mercury ?
I think this is the last image taken, its new to me. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 339268
1/2/2008 8:37 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
yeah new to me as well...
I don't know Ice, but the 'mercury' explanation doesn't explain the size of this object. |
| Boomerang
User ID: 299985
1/2/2008 8:40 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
From its location (and has anyone checked where the stereo A/B scopes are placed relative to the ecliptic?) IMHO........It is most likely Mercury.
Is it possible that the CME actually made contact with Mercury? |
| Ice
User ID: 3701
1/2/2008 8:42 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
yep,
its hard to say its not Mercury since most bubbas know Mercury should be there!!!!
I have same concern about size and I don't understand why they are not making big deal about Mercury transion as history files show.
Of course if its not Mercury why would they put it up unless they want it to be seen. So logic tells you it must be Mercury! |
| AC282813
User ID: 282813
1/2/2008 8:43 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Ice,
Several pages ago we determined the object in the STEREO image to be Mercury.
The "latest" STEREO image is nothing new and was expected.
Now ...
==> What about the SOHO C3 images from 13 Dec to 31 Dec?
What is the 2nd object above Mercury?
.
. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 344410
1/2/2008 8:45 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
They HAVE been shown to be a known asteroid and a planet-MERCURY! Read the thread!?
Menow lies again. It was shown to NOT be 1685Torro. Not anywhere near in the line of sight of the Stereo Ahead. Nowhere near.
It has been ASSERTED by many to be this tiny asteroid. And rejected by all who checked the facts.
According to YOU? I can't imagine a less credible source. I see that you are still ignoring where I provided the link to your statement that PX is more than 1 AU from Earth.
You must be kidding Meow.....
Kidding about what? Please be specific.
Maybe you should open another window and do some research for yourself, then you would see what the rest of us have seen. It's out there. Just find out for yourself if you don't believe what is printed here on the links.
Excuse me? WHAT is out there?
The proof of the research. Be blind if you wish. Not our problem.
I suppose you think the moon is made of cheese and that our earth is actually flat?
No. I don't think that. Whatever gave you that idea?
By your blatant disregard. We think you do. And the responder said he 'supposed'. What gives that idea is that you have it set in your mind that no one else's opinion matters. Don't you agree?
These things have been scientifically proven.
What things. Please be specific.
Obviously you haven't learned to do research. If you had, you would know by now that the scientific community has proven many of the things mentioned in those links that were referred to. You merely wish to be confrontational. So be it. Your argument has no impact on what the rest here are discussing.
All we are doing is speculating, not shoving it down anyone's throat.
No. Nancy lieder has been "shoving it down throats" for years. That is why you think you "know" what you think you "know".
Again you have misinterpreted and proven yourself a curmudgeon and a cad. The responder does not reference 'Nancy' and merely states it is speculation being discussed. Quoting: Menow 156952 |
| Oxygen
User ID: 300487
1/2/2008 8:45 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
First of all this is a open forum so you get what you get!
Second is that we are talking about something that is based on info that is hard to nail down exact data. I have said since the beginning that if the object is not Mercury we have a major problem. After reading the last 10 pages posted since I have gone to work I still do not see how Mercury has been proved.
I have been able to blow up object and slow down video to see major CCW spin with debris field. This causes me concern until I saw some of this look from a 06 transion file showing Mercury do some of the same thing except Mercury looked so much smaller. I am sure this is where those of you that have a true concern of what this object might be vs a life is good and all is normal tude!
I want everything to be fine but I still have a gut check on saying this object was Mercury. Believe me I want it to be. I guess we need the second hammer to fall and if this thing is not Mercury the second hammer has got to fall soon. I just hope a image slips through again.
ice Quoting: Ice
Regarding the size issue (which is the only reasonable question left), take a look at
[link to secchi.nrl.navy.mil]
The bright dot is Mercury even if it is smaller than the object in the OP's movie. Both OP's movie and this image show the same thing.
Besides, as stated in the secchi site:
[Image Gallery
Daily images are available for Cor2 A and Cor2 B, typically 2 days after they are acquired onboard the spacecraft. These gallery images have a background subtracted to enhance the observed active regions such as streamers and CMEs.]
Do you think, these images and videos would be public after 2 days of editing if something unexpected and that big was there? |
| Oxygen
User ID: 300487
1/2/2008 8:52 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
so this object at 8 am is Mercury ?
I think this is the last image taken, its new to me.
Ice,
Several pages ago we determined the object in the STEREO image to be Mercury.
The "latest" STEREO image is nothing new and was expected.
Now ...
==> What about the SOHO C3 images from 13 Dec to 31 Dec?
What is the 2nd object above Mercury?
.
.
Dear AC282813, do you have any source about the exact location SOHO C3 Images were taken from? I can't really find anything. |
| flowerpot
User ID: 347045
1/2/2008 8:52 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
ok guys please forgive my ignorance,but if that object is mercury should'nt it be more spherical in shape??
Did the iron in your blood and calcium in your bones come from a long-ago supernova? Astronomer and writer Carl Sagan thought so. "We are star stuff", Sagan once said. |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 8:54 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Thats is right Menow. An empty post about you. Now about your claim..GOT any back up.
I see that you are just going to ramble, as always, and refuse to make any real point.
My point made Menow, you can't claim diddly squat. Why is that. Is it all talk or what? Back something up you make as a claim.
You challenge me to defend a claim that you now demand I make?
OK. I have "claimed" that you don't know what you are talking about when you say that the Moon is too far from the ecliptic. I have backed that up many times and you have run away or just commenced to babbling each time.
Hows that?
That is good if you were beyond five yrs of age but you aren't by not showing anything worth digesting;
Subject Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun  Was that Earth's Moon in the pic or what are you claiming?
I told you what I was claiming. I see that, as usual, you have no real response. |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 8:58 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
That other planets are warming up, is a fact...
And, if true, this would mean what, to you?
You're right about at least one of the many sources confirming that warming is occuring on all of the planets of the solar system is a definite woo woo group, known for total incompetence , unreliability and dishonesty. Quoting: IDW 349111
Of course, I never said that. Care to respond to anything I actually DID say?
What makes you think I differ with that opinion? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 282813
1/2/2008 9:10 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
so this object at 8 am is Mercury ?
I think this is the last image taken, its new to me.
Ice,
Several pages ago we determined the object in the STEREO image to be Mercury.
The "latest" STEREO image is nothing new and was expected.
Now ...
==> What about the SOHO C3 images from 13 Dec to 31 Dec?
What is the 2nd object above Mercury?
.
.
Dear AC282813, do you have any source about the exact location SOHO C3 Images were taken from? I can't really find anything.
.
.
Ice,
Thanks for the reply.
Concerning the SOHO C3 images, note that the OP included a link to SpaceWeather.com [below "Not Mercury"], and that link was to a SOHO C3 video from 31 Dec.
Here is a link to all of the SOHO C3 vids:
--> [link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
I am interested in the vids from 13 Dec to 31 Dec. These show a second object transitting diagonally from left-to-right -- above Mercury, which is transtitting right-to-left.
-->13 DEC SOHO: [link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
-->25 DEC SOHO: [link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
-->31 DEC SOHO: [link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
No one has been able to comment on this. Not Nancy, not Rerun, not Ice, not hababdaboo ..
I'd love to see some discussion of this object.
.
. |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:12 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
This actually does little to back up the many assertions on your list. How about Pluto's orbit? How about my questions on the large gas planets' orbits you claimed are somehow out of whack?
****************
do you actually believe plutos orbit is comparable to the rest of the planets? Any 1st grader knows it has a much more extreme in angle and is much more eliptical. Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
Why do you say I believe that and why is it relevent?
And you contend this is due to what?
1988 The Naval Observatory confirmed distortions in the orbits of Neptune, Uranus and Pluto confirming the existance of a large body roughly 3-4 times the size of earth. Here is a link buddy, and this was the latest release from the Us Naval Observatory on Nov 4 2007. Read it and weep you helpless prick! Quoting: Schmieder22 324203
1988? That is the latest data you can cite? In case you didn't know, that idea has been revised, quite some time ago.
[ link to www.springerlink.com]
quoted from this link...
Neptune and Pluto were discovered because of predictions derived from the differences between the observations and ephemerides of Uranus, but Pluto wasn't the predicted planet and the discrepancies still exist. This continuing existence of systematic differences between the observations and ephemerides of Uranus and Neptune has led to predictions of a Planet X. The demise of the dinosaurs and the existence of comets have been cited as additional evidence for another celestial object.
Therefore, possible bodies have been hypothesized in the outer part of the solar system, or out beyond the solar system, including a binary companion, Nemesis. The theory of relativity and the incompleteness of the law of gravity have also been suggested as explanations for the outer planet discrepancies. Predictions of the possible locations of planet X have been made, with rather large uncertainties, and selected searches of some regions have yielded nothing. IRAS and Pioneer observations exist as additional sources of useful observational data.
Really. Then why is this not from the U.S. Naval observatory site and dated Nov 4 2007?
Tich tich... Blatant misrepresentation... You have taken a page from Nancy's book. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 344410
1/2/2008 9:13 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Thats is right Menow. An empty post about you. Now about your claim..GOT any back up.
I see that you are just going to ramble, as always, and refuse to make any real point.
My point made Menow, you can't claim diddly squat. Why is that. Is it all talk or what? Back something up you make as a claim.
You challenge me to defend a claim that you now demand I make?
OK. I have "claimed" that you don't know what you are talking about when you say that the Moon is too far from the ecliptic. I have backed that up many times and you have run away or just commenced to babbling each time.
Hows that?
That is good if you were beyond five yrs of age but you aren't by not showing anything worth digesting;
Subject Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun Was that Earth's Moon in the pic or what are you claiming?
I told you what I was claiming. I see that, as usual, you have no real response.
Apparently you are senile or merely a fool. Maybe you should address that instead of being confrontational.
I think folks are tired of addressing you.
I will pray for you.
Meanwhile the rest will continue to discuss this event in a civilized and cultrured manner. |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:14 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Anyone else ready for Nancy to start a new thread, and delete all these clowns? She has to much to offer, along with so many others, but no one can make any headway with these punks taking jabs at every post. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 160058
Really. Care to name any astronomical claim she has ever made which you can support? How about you start with Earth halted in orbit? |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:16 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Mainstream scientists are starting to wake up to facts, including climatologists.
It is said the "brightness" of the Sun has increased only a fraction of a percent since 96, but the total amount of solar energy reaching the Earth and the planets CANNOT be accuratel calculated that way.
The reason why we are seeing cooling now is simple, we are currently at the solar minimum.
When calculating the total heating potential from the Sun, ALL forms of radiation emenating from it must be included, which is what the idiots are intentionally avoiding.
These other sources include solar x ray storms, proton storms, increased electron and proton flux readings , and even cosmic radiation. All of these are energy, and all are being left out of the "calculations", either out of ignorance or incompetence [widespread in the scientific community], or outright lying . Quoting: IDW 349111
And this relates, how, to Nancy's false claims that there are moons of PX shown in those recent images, or that Earth is halted in orbit? |
| picesnator
User ID: 318318
1/2/2008 9:17 PM
 | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
so this object at 8 am is Mercury ?
I think this is the last image taken, its new to me.
Ice,
Several pages ago we determined the object in the STEREO image to be Mercury.
The "latest" STEREO image is nothing new and was expected.
Now ...
==> What about the SOHO C3 images from 13 Dec to 31 Dec?
What is the 2nd object above Mercury?
.
.
Dear AC282813, do you have any source about the exact location SOHO C3 Images were taken from? I can't really find anything.
.
.
Ice,
Thanks for the reply.
Concerning the SOHO C3 images, note that the OP included a link to SpaceWeather.com [below "Not Mercury"], and that link was to a SOHO C3 video from 31 Dec.
Here is a link to all of the SOHO C3 vids:
--> [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
I am interested in the vids from 13 Dec to 31 Dec. These show a second object transitting diagonally from left-to-right -- above Mercury, which is transtitting right-to-left.
-->13 DEC SOHO: [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
-->25 DEC SOHO: [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
-->31 DEC SOHO: [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
No one has been able to comment on this. Not Nancy, not Rerun, not Ice, not hababdaboo ..
I'd love to see some discussion of this object.
.
.
YEAH!! what is that coming around from the back???? |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:19 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Anyone else ready for Nancy to start a new thread, and delete all these clowns? She has to much to offer, along with so many others, but no one can make any headway with these punks taking jabs at every post.
Their shift is over for the time being, and they have successfully helped us all realize we are just paranoid or might want to use out brains and figure out whatever TPTB want us to miss or ignore...and hijack the thread away from the open minded ones here. Notice how every post with a thought outside of the typical excuse, oh it's a star or it's a flare or it's a lens flare of the LASCO camera, is all crazy!? They try and try to get this thread off track...but still no sucess. Guess they will have to resort to shutting down the SOHO and LASCO sites temporarily until the 'objects' pass-I'm sure they are thinking that now... Quoting: CO SKY WATCHER
And what was it that you were claiming just the other day? I forget... Was it you who said that according you your astrology program, that the Sun was out of place, or did you have yet another woowoo claim? You will have to remind me. It was on another of Nancy's threads recently. When we challenged you to explain your silly claim, you melted away... |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:21 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
This actually does little to back up the many assertions on your list. How about Pluto's orbit? How about my questions on the large gas planets' orbits you claimed are somehow out of whack?
do you actually believe plutos orbit is comparable to the rest of the planets? Any 1st grader knows it has a much more extreme in angle and is much more eliptical.
1988 The Naval Observatory confirmed distortions in the orbits of Neptune, Uranus and Pluto confirming the existance of a large body roughly 3-4 times the size of earth. Here is a link buddy, and this was the latest release from the Us Naval Observatory on Nov 4 2007. Read it and weep you helpless prick!
[ link to www.springerlink.com]
quoted from this link...
Neptune and Pluto were discovered because of predictions derived from the differences between the observations and ephemerides of Uranus, but Pluto wasn't the predicted planet and the discrepancies still exist. This continuing existence of systematic differences between the observations and ephemerides of Uranus and Neptune has led to predictions of a Planet X. The demise of the dinosaurs and the existence of comets have been cited as additional evidence for another celestial object.
Therefore, possible bodies have been hypothesized in the outer part of the solar system, or out beyond the solar system, including a binary companion, Nemesis. The theory of relativity and the incompleteness of the law of gravity have also been suggested as explanations for the outer planet discrepancies. Predictions of the possible locations of planet X have been made, with rather large uncertainties, and selected searches of some regions have yielded nothing. IRAS and Pioneer observations exist as additional sources of useful observational data.
There is nothing in that article or its summation that confirms the existance of another large body in the Solar System affecting Uranus, Neptune or Pluto.
Of course not. It's all just a mountain of empty innuendo. As always. |
| Ice
User ID: 4599
1/2/2008 9:21 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
[ link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
so this object at 8 am is Mercury ?
I think this is the last image taken, its new to me.
Ice,
Several pages ago we determined the object in the STEREO image to be Mercury.
The "latest" STEREO image is nothing new and was expected.
Now ...
==> What about the SOHO C3 images from 13 Dec to 31 Dec?
What is the 2nd object above Mercury?
.
.
Dear AC282813, do you have any source about the exact location SOHO C3 Images were taken from? I can't really find anything.
.
.
Ice,
Thanks for the reply.
Concerning the SOHO C3 images, note that the OP included a link to SpaceWeather.com [below "Not Mercury"], and that link was to a SOHO C3 video from 31 Dec.
Here is a link to all of the SOHO C3 vids:
--> [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
I am interested in the vids from 13 Dec to 31 Dec. These show a second object transitting diagonally from left-to-right -- above Mercury, which is transtitting right-to-left.
-->13 DEC SOHO: [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
-->25 DEC SOHO: [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
-->31 DEC SOHO: [ link to lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil]
No one has been able to comment on this. Not Nancy, not Rerun, not Ice, not hababdaboo ..
I'd love to see some discussion of this object.
.
.
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
I think you can see a second object here lower area small bight spot a about 6:30 |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:22 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Amen to that
Anyone else ready for Nancy to start a new thread, and delete all these clowns? She has to much to offer, along with so many others, but no one can make any headway with these punks taking jabs at every post.
So how about you? Care to outline why you believe any of Nancy's astronomical claims? Please start with "Earth halted in orbit". |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:26 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
well now iv been follwing this whole situation and while i dont know a huge amount about astronomy nor astrophyics Quoting: CaptiveRiticuli 349162
Then why do you go on to offer conclusions you are not qualified to make?
i have studied the pictures and it is clear that the sun has been impacted by sumthing huge. The impact is near on the size of a planet but i dont have any idea what the object which is seen orbiting the sun could be. Iv not read to much into persons comments here and while there are sum interesting comments from people who seem clued up on matters its difficult to assertain what is correct and what isnt, Quoting: CaptiveRiticuli 349162
Then why are you concluding what is correct?
after all no1 here can really provide there credentials so we just read the words and decide from there. But i do get very fed up with all the arguing and such over each persons comments, our civilisation could be coming to a close at anytime soon so why not agree to disagree or sumthing. Not a great deal else to say apart from il be keeping an eye on things in this feild and hoping that things turn out ok otherwise maybe its time to die. I just worry 4 all the little animals who are trully innocent and i have even come to learn lately that even cakes have souls. We the people tho are expendable or so it would seem thank u very much mr illuminati. See u in the next life my people, be kind.
its such that i dont find contemplation a gender of insanity but simply put i do wonder. Quoting: CaptiveRiticuli 349162
Why don't you ask a real astronomer, of your choice, what is what? |
| Ice
User ID: 4599
1/2/2008 9:27 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
wow me
change your handle to its allaboutme
give it a rest
thanks
ice |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:28 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
First of all this is a open forum so you get what you get!
Second is that we are talking about something that is based on info that is hard to nail down exact data. I have said since the beginning that if the object is not Mercury we have a major problem. After reading the last 10 pages posted since I have gone to work I still do not see how Mercury has been proved.
I have been able to blow up object and slow down video to see major CCW spin with debris field. Quoting: Ice
You have the expertise in astrophotography to determine this?
This causes me concern until I saw some of this look from a 06 transion file showing Mercury do some of the same thing except Mercury looked so much smaller. I am sure this is where those of you that have a true concern of what this object might be vs a life is good and all is normal tude!
I want everything to be fine but I still have a gut check on saying this object was Mercury. Believe me I want it to be. I guess we need the second hammer to fall and if this thing is not Mercury the second hammer has got to fall soon. I just hope a image slips through again.
ice Quoting: Ice
Why don't just you ask a real astronomer? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 344410
1/2/2008 9:29 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
Space anamoly perhaps.
Maybe it is a brown dwarf or something we do not yet understand.
Whatever the case, it seems coincidentally to be affecting the sun.
Now we need to watch this particular sunspot closely and monitor its activity as it turns earthward. |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:29 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
well this chap just posted a thread with new pics of 'mercury'
Check it out:
ID2268
User ID: 347076
1/2/2008 6:25 PM
Report abusive post
latest pic of 'mystery' object by the sun
Quote
its glowing, what does that mean?
[link to stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 339268
I'm sure it means we are all doomed. |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:31 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
yeah new to me as well...
I don't know Ice, but the 'mercury' explanation doesn't explain the size of this object. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 339268
So you think that objects in images are "actual size"? |
| picesnator
User ID: 318318
1/2/2008 9:32 PM
| | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
First of all this is a open forum so you get what you get!
Second is that we are talking about something that is based on info that is hard to nail down exact data. I have said since the beginning that if the object is not Mercury we have a major problem. After reading the last 10 pages posted since I have gone to work I still do not see how Mercury has been proved.
I have been able to blow up object and slow down video to see major CCW spin with debris field.
You have the expertise in astrophotography to determine this?
This causes me concern until I saw some of this look from a 06 transion file showing Mercury do some of the same thing except Mercury looked so much smaller. I am sure this is where those of you that have a true concern of what this object might be vs a life is good and all is normal tude!
I want everything to be fine but I still have a gut check on saying this object was Mercury. Believe me I want it to be. I guess we need the second hammer to fall and if this thing is not Mercury the second hammer has got to fall soon. I just hope a image slips through again.
ice
Why don't just you ask a real astronomer? Quoting: Menow 197318
DAMN... menow...i can understand going after Nancy...but this??? let'em debate...that is the fun of discovery...u make educated guesses...and a lot of times it is wrong...once in a while u are right...the deunkers are getting overboard here... |
| Menow
User ID: 197318
1/2/2008 9:34 PM | | Re: Breaking *** NASA ** Sunspot C-class explosion , shows a strange object orbiting the Sun | Quote |
It's amazing to watch people imagine that they can easily conjure up theories and confirm "facts" that are better than people who have actually studied astronomy formally for their entire lives.
Is plutos orbit different? YES
are planets other then us also warming? YES
are there distortions in the orbits of the gas giants leading astronomers to beleive their is another object 3-4 times the size of earth? YES
Do stars like our own have 80% chance of having companion dwarfs? YES
Do brown dwarfs exist? YES
Is it IMPOSSIBLE for a brown dwarf to graze our slar system? NO
I can also say GLP is an internet based forum where people get together to share ideas, stories and the such and call that fact. But you may not believe me. What rubbish!
You are practically on the verge of making yourself look like a complete fool, or paid dis-info artist.
There, I tried to be nice but.....
AND THE WINNER IS ...............Schmieder22 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 103699
Funny how easy it is to "win" when you don't include any of the responses. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 | |
|
