Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,406 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 333,464
Pageviews Today: 377,399Threads Today: 32Posts Today: 877
01:32 AM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 153544
United Kingdom
01/03/2008 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
AIR USE: Source: [link to www.stevepavlina.com]

Making Decisions That Stick »
Overcoming News Addiction
September 26th, 2006 by Steve Pavlina

A little over 30 days ago, I decided to go on a news fast, using my trusty 30-day trial method. I had already dropped TV news and newspapers, but I still had the habit of checking Yahoo News or CNN every day or two, so for 30 days I decided to drop all news sources and go totally news-free. In this article Iíll share what I learned from this experiment. It went well enough that I intend to remain free of the habit of daily news checking.

Motivation to begin a news fast

I know well enough how negatively biased popular news sources are, but despite this drawback, I figured some news was still better than no news at all. Checking the news was the lesser of two evils. Isnít it important to keep up on current events? If I dropped all news sources, wouldnít I be living in darkness, cut off from the rest of humanity?

On the other hand, I always tell people, ďYou never know whatís on the other side of a belief until you test it for yourself.Ē I figured it was worth a 30-day trial to find out what news-free living was like. It seemed unlikely Iíd miss anything earth-shattering, and I could always catch up afterwards.

Uncovering news addiction

I was surprised at how difficult this trial was from the very beginning. Throughout the first day, I was just itching to check the news. I wanted to find out what was going on in the world. What were the latest updates on the various news threads Iíd been following? I was able to stick to my news fast without cheating, but it felt very uncomfortable. I had to delete my news bookmarks to prevent myself from subconsciously checking the news out of habit.

After several more days, I was still itching to check the news. It felt like a craving. I soon realized I wasnít just dealing with a habit ó I was actually tackling an addiction.

Addictions are a deeper form of habit because they fill a need. The need is often important and shouldnít remain unfilled, but what makes an addiction negative is its destructive side effects. The need my news addiction filled was that it gave me a sense of groundedness by connecting me with what was going on in the world. But the negative side effect was that it was conditioning me to become more negative and fear-based in my thinking.

Control and substitution

The basic solution for overcoming an addiction is control and substitution. First, get temporary control of the addiction, such as by initiating a 30-day period of total abstinence. Secondly, identify the need being filled by the addiction, and find an alternate, non-destructive way to fill that need to at least the same degree.

When I began my 30-day news fast, I didnít realize Iíd be dealing with an addiction. I just thought it was an ingrained habit, so I didnít make any plans for substitution. However, the substitute behavior naturally fell into place near the end of the 30 days. Iíll get to that in a minute, but first Iíll share some of the realizations I had during the fasting period itself.

Reassessing news reading

After a couple weeks without news, I got past the hump and wasnít craving it so much anymore. At this point I began reflecting on the habit from a distance, and I made the following observations:

1. News is predominantly negative. Which headline gets your attention: ďAnother blissful dayĒ or ďMurderous rampage on the subwayĒ? In order to keep you plugged in, news has to shock you out of your complacency. In practice that means it usually has to scare or worry you. Newsí primary marketing method is fear.
2. News is addictive. If youíre a daily news junkie, try giving it up for 30 days, and youíll see what I mean. Even when I just planned to quickly scan the headlines, Iíd often get sucked into reading sensationalized articles that provided no real value.
3. News is myopic. News provides the illusion of completeness, but in truth its coverage is ridiculously narrow. There are many fascinating happenings in the world that never make the news. After getting your daily update on current events, you think you know whatís going on in the world. But with billions of people on this planet, youíre sorely mistaken. You donít have a clue.
4. News is marketing. Think this; donít think that. Fear this; worry about that. Yes, yes, weíre all gonna die. Make me feel afraid, so then Iíll buy the sponsorsí products to feel better. Global warming wonít seem so bad when Iím driving my new car and popping my anti-depressants. Pump me full of fear; then sell me the cure.
5. News is shallow. Complex topics are reduced to sound bites and simplistic platitudes. Even the ďin-depthĒ stories are unbelievably shallow. Skip the news and read books instead.
6. News is untrustworthy. Start looking for the political and corporate agendas behind the stories, and youíll see them oozing out of every nook and cranny.
7. News is thought conditioning. Hereís how to think, so youíll fit in like a good little human.
8. News is trivia. What passes for important is actually far from it. How much of todayís news will you remember next year? Can you even remember last monthís news? Your brain discards the news because itís trivial; what you internalize is the fear-based conditioning.
9. News is redundant. Most news stories are repetitive, redundant, and say the same things twice. Very few stories are actually fresh and new. News should really be called ďolds.Ē
10. News is irrelevant. How many news stories are relevant to you personally? Virtually none.
11. News isnít actionable. How many news stories are actionable for you right now? Less than none.
12. News is problem-obsessed. The news loves to report problems. It will tell you all the things that are wrong in gory detail. How many of those problems have you actually solved? Which ones are you hard at work solving right now? The news conditions you to worry about problems but not to actually solve them. Thatís because youíre encouraged to worry about unsolvable problems and then buy the sponsorsí products to assuage your fears. Drop the news for a while, and youíll find you naturally spend more time solving problems than worrying about them.
13. News is a waste of time. Try to quantify youíre real gain from news consumption compared to other activities, and youíll see just how worthless it really is. 10 minutes of news checking per day = 61 hours per year. Over a 50-year period, thatís huge. If you consume 30 minutes of daily news, itís 183 hours per year Ė about 23 eight-hour days. Thatís a full working month out of every year. Yikes! Was your last year of news consumption worth that much to you? How about a month long vacation instead?

When I stepped back and looked at the big picture, I realized that news was worse than worthless to me. It provides the compelling illusion of valuable, factual information, but when you bite into it, you get nothing but poisoned air. Iím making generalizations here of course, but in my experience theyíve been true much more often than false.

How will I ever live without it?

Maybe news is a predominantly negative influence in its current forms, but whatís the alternative? Donít we need to keep up on current events? What about ďpracticalĒ news like technology and science? Even stuff thatís made to seem important really isnít. Consider some of the stories you might assume are importantÖ.

A new breakthrough cancer treatment? I donít have cancer, nor does anyone in my family. If I did have cancer and was being treated for it, Iíd hear about treatments from more intelligent sources than the general news outlets. The news coverage of such treatments is too shallow and pharmaceutical advertiser biased anyway.

A new planet discovered? Iím not an astronaut or an astronomer, so even though this seems like important knowledge, from my perspective itís still non-actionable trivia. Surely itís important to NASA, but whatís important for NASA isnít necessarily relevant to my life purpose. When Iím genuinely interested in improving my astronomy knowledge, I read books written by astrophysicists. Regular news offers astronomy for preschoolers.

A new electronic gadget? New gadgets are nice, but Iíll see friends using them soon enough, or Iíll notice them in local stores. Thereís no need to wade through tons of forgettable fluff to learn about one gadget I might someday want. When I feel the need for a new gadget, I can research it proactively and avoid the fluff.

A war update? The combatants involved in various conflicts are neither my enemies nor my allies. Knowing which people killed which other people in which particular manner is useless knowledge to me. War is a complex issue, and the shallow news coverage doesnít do justice to the true intentions behind the fighting. The information that comes through the news pipe is too biased to be useful.

A major disaster? A normal day on this planet will see 150,000 people die Ė over a million in a normal week. So how does an earthquake that kills 1000 people compare? Thatís not even 1% of one dayís total. A disaster that requires my personal attention will be discovered without the news. During the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the violent shaking of my apartment was a good indication that something was amiss. The news was just as surprised as I was.

There are very few news items that would qualify as a genuine must-read. Sure there are some interesting articles now and then, but Iíve no need for the daily habit of news scanning. The genuinely critical items are nearly nonexistent. If something truly earth-shattering happens, Iím certain to hear about it from someone else anyway.

Substitute behavior

I mentioned earlier that I naturally fell into a substitute behavior that filled the same need as my news addiction. For me that turned out to be spending time in nature. This discovery happened largely by accident Ė or perhaps by synchronicity.

During my 30-day trial, Erin and I took a vacation trip to Sedona, Arizona. Sedona is one of the most beautiful places Iíve ever visited. I did some hiking, went on a tour with an American Indian guide, and meditated at four of the so-called Sedona energy vortexes (they call them vortexes instead of vortices). It was a wonderful trip, and when it was over, I didnít want to leave.

On this trip it became obvious that spending more time in nature was a great way to feel grounded. Iíd been using the news as a means of grounding myself, but spending time in nature was much more effective. It provided a deeper, more intuitive level of connection than the newsí what-you-donít-know-might-kill-you approach.

Sedona is 300 miles from Las Vegas, but fortunately Red Rock Canyon is only a 20-minute drive from my house. The week we returned from Sedona, I went hiking in RRC. Itís not as pretty as Sedona, and there are no special energy vortexes, but itís an effective substitute.

The last time I went hiking (far off trail), I stumbled upon a desert rock that was naturally shaped like a heart. It looked like the surrounding rocks, but it was so obviously heart-shaped that I couldnít be sure it wasnít human-chiseled. I decided to take it as a sign, so I put it in my office as a reminder of my connection to the world through nature.

The news cravings are gone now. Instead of feeling connected to the world through current events, I feel connected to the world through the timelessness of nature. This sense of groundedness has much deeper roots, roots that arenít easily disturbed or manipulated. Standing alone in a natural setting with no man-made structures in sight is a feast for the soul.

News-free living

Perhaps the biggest risk of news-free living is that someday Iíll be lost in my daily routine, completely oblivious to the fact that everyone is evacuating the planet without me. Because I didnít jack in for months on end, Iíll be totally left behindÖ just me and my heart-shaped rock. :(

So in the event of a sudden global evacuation, I ask that you send me a quick courtesy email to let me know. Once that risk is covered, I can comfortably enjoy the rest of my days on this planet sans news media.

User ID: 165856
01/03/2008 11:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
i did it with drugs and alcohol!

User ID: 349479
United States
01/03/2008 11:58 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Lots of food for thought! I know I spend too much time on GLP and that I need to be doing some other things in 2008!
Unanimous Sarcasm
User ID: 339881
United States
01/03/2008 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
You're a rock stealer and you should be ashamed.
Blooming HaHa

User ID: 74048
01/04/2008 12:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Consuming news is not an addiction. I don't know anyone who gets withdrawal symptoms when deprived of their daily fix of newsbytes. Most people read news in their spare time or when they get bored with whatever they are doing.

The solution that Steve offers is kinda silly. For how long can one stare at a heart-shaped rock without getting bored? Standing alone in wilderness and soaking in nature might fill you with momentary bliss, but it is not an activity that can fill counless hours that make up life.

Most people who don't follow news-media get addicted to gossip and waste their time following activities and affairs of neighbours and relatives.

Is learning about alternate cancer cures or latest research on DNA worse than gossipping or watching stupid shows on television?
The honest man must be a perpetual renegade.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 348369
01/04/2008 12:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
GLP Addiction - Another one for the rule book

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 298368
United States
01/04/2008 01:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation

Sooner or later we all get to feeling a little of that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 349833
01/04/2008 01:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
this should be with the thread about porn addiction
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 372795
02/13/2008 04:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Bump for those challenged.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 372922
United States
02/13/2008 04:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
don't be a damn sissy!

Truth is not for the faint of heart.

If you gave up TV your doing OK.

Don't quit reading as well.

User ID: 368994
United States
02/13/2008 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
i understand. but i always comes back, and im not ashamed. i love these people.
the "emperors" have no clothes!