|
WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES
|
Quaker
User ID: 141703
1/5/2008 9:21 PM
Report abusive post | WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES
| Quote |
MAG DATE LOCAL-TIME LAT LON DEPTH LOCATION
y/m/d h:m:s deg deg km
4.0 2008/01/05 04:03:36 39.905N 118.351W 16.0 32 km (20 mi) SSE of Lovelock, NV
4.2 2008/01/05 03:54:25 39.483N 117.933W 16.0 26 km (16 mi) SSE of Dixie Valley, NV
3.8 2008/01/05 02:42:35 39.543N 117.647W 16.0 19 km (12 mi) W of Petersons Mill, NV
I posted a thread obout it...why did they do it? [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Does the USGS Gerry Rig the Number?? [link to quake.wr.usgs.gov] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 350499
1/5/2008 9:25 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
cos they are ''SEE YOU NEXT TUESDAY''s , that's why!
OK? |
|
Quaker
User ID: 141703 (OP)
1/5/2008 10:10 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
And'and'and people Canada down graded the Queen Charlotte's 6+ Qhakes to just 2+ and are listed as Sandspit. Which is a town on the island.
Date Time Lat. Long. Depth Mag. Felt? Region
---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ------
2008/01/04 15:05:11 48.64N 123.05W 55.7 1.3ML 25 km E of Sidney,BC
2008/01/04 12:49:59 52.07N 132.02W 20.0* 2.1ML 132 km S of Sandspit,BC
2008/01/04 12:46:57 52.05N 132.00W 20.0* 2.2ML 133 km S of Sandspit,BC
2008/01/04 10:04:53 49.60N 127.53W 17.4 2.2ML 103 km W of Gold R.,BC
2008/01/04 05:59:55 47.35N 70.39W 23.9 0.7MN CHARLEVOIX SEISMIC ZONE,QC.
2008/01/04 00:58:54 47.77N 69.93W 10.2 0.9MN CHARLEVOIX SEISMIC ZONE,QC.
2008/01/03 23:00:18 52.06N 131.55W 20.0* 2.5ML 133 km SSE of Sandspit,BC [link to earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca]
The Iris monitor Quake site has the original DATA of five big ones on the fifth of Jan. and a new one as of the sixth of Jan.
DATE LAT LON MAG DEPTH km REGION
06-JAN-2008 00:20:33 51.46 -131.17 5.0 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 20:01:56 5.47 94.70 5.4 69.0 NORTHERN SUMATERA, INDONESIA
05-JAN-2008 19:51:24 -6.81 153.28 4.9 52.0 NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.
05-JAN-2008 17:16:05 51.34 -130.51 4.1 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 12:00:19 51.55 -130.80 5.0 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 11:44:48 51.17 -130.56 6.5 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 11:01:05 51.30 -130.71 6.5 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 10:39:15 51.40 -130.25 5.3 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
[link to www.iris.edu]
[link to www.iris.edu]
OOOOPS is all I can say. Now at least the proof is stored in the GLP Data Base for later use in a debate, anyone? :> |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 350499
1/5/2008 10:18 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
And'and'and people Canada down graded the Queen Charlotte's 6+ Qhakes to just 2+ and are listed as Sandspit. Which is a town on the island.
Date Time Lat. Long. Depth Mag. Felt? Region
---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ------
2008/01/04 15:05:11 48.64N 123.05W 55.7 1.3ML 25 km E of Sidney,BC
2008/01/04 12:49:59 52.07N 132.02W 20.0* 2.1ML 132 km S of Sandspit,BC
2008/01/04 12:46:57 52.05N 132.00W 20.0* 2.2ML 133 km S of Sandspit,BC
2008/01/04 10:04:53 49.60N 127.53W 17.4 2.2ML 103 km W of Gold R.,BC
2008/01/04 05:59:55 47.35N 70.39W 23.9 0.7MN CHARLEVOIX SEISMIC ZONE,QC.
2008/01/04 00:58:54 47.77N 69.93W 10.2 0.9MN CHARLEVOIX SEISMIC ZONE,QC.
2008/01/03 23:00:18 52.06N 131.55W 20.0* 2.5ML 133 km SSE of Sandspit,BC [ link to earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca]
The Iris monitor Quake site has the original DATA of five big ones on the fifth of Jan. and a new one as of the sixth of Jan.
DATE LAT LON MAG DEPTH km REGION
06-JAN-2008 00:20:33 51.46 -131.17 5.0 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 20:01:56 5.47 94.70 5.4 69.0 NORTHERN SUMATERA, INDONESIA
05-JAN-2008 19:51:24 -6.81 153.28 4.9 52.0 NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.
05-JAN-2008 17:16:05 51.34 -130.51 4.1 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 12:00:19 51.55 -130.80 5.0 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 11:44:48 51.17 -130.56 6.5 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 11:01:05 51.30 -130.71 6.5 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
05-JAN-2008 10:39:15 51.40 -130.25 5.3 10.0 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION
[ link to www.iris.edu]
[ link to www.iris.edu]
OOOOPS is all I can say. Now at least the proof is stored in the GLP Data Base for later use in a debate, anyone? :>
you're a bit confused with your dates there Q
that first series of quakes was on the 3/4 of January.
S'OK though, we all make mistakes.
 |
|
* <----star of destiny
User ID: 279402
1/5/2008 10:24 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Because the USGS was told to lie to the people by the PTB to keep business as usual rolling along for as long as they can. They think if they keep the masses asleep then they can make it all go away LOL ...haaaaa there is no way to stop the massive changes in heaven and Earth that will come and are happening right now and will only get worse and worse. The people MUST wake up.
Politics LOL ..they are worried about total bullshit and nonsense. |
|
Quaker
User ID: 141703 (OP)
1/5/2008 10:24 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Good eye. I 'll let Canada have twenty four hrs to update. The Igloo must be leaking. Chuckle Not mine. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 327180
1/5/2008 10:28 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
[link to www.seismo.ethz.ch]
Earthquake Lists: Swiss Global Magnitude>6 SED Homepage
In the following list only seismic events grouped with at least one manual or two automatic locations do occur and represent an actual seismic event. Consequently, both the automatically updated Swiss epicenter plot as well as the world-wide epicenter plot contain only epicenters based on at least one manual or two automatic locations. Only events with an average magnitude larger/equal than 3 are listed.
Click on the highlighted latest Swiss location and see the recorded seismograms. --- Disclaimer ---
NOTE: automatic locations are fast, but often not accurate and sometimes completely false!
D a t e Time (UTC) Location Dep Magni. T AGY R e g i o n
06Jan2008 00:20:43.1 50.9N 123.3W 10 mb=5.2 *ROM BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA 0236
06Jan2008 00:20:29.9 51.1N 132.1W 10 mb=5.2 A*EMS QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE0127
05Jan2008 20:01:50.6 4.1N 94.4E 60 mb=5.8 M*ROM OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SU0036
05Jan2008 20:01:56.2 5.5N 94.7E 69 M =5.4 M*NEI NORTHERN SUMATERA, INDONES2146
05Jan2008 20:01:56.4 5.6N 94.7E 80 mb=5.6 M*GSR NORTHERN SUMATERA, INDONES2058
05Jan2008 20:01:57.5 5.5N 94.7E 79 M =5.5 M*NEI NORTHERN SUMATERA, INDONES2020
Signals recorded in Switzerland
05Jan2008 19:51:25.8 6.8S 153.3E 80 mb=4.8 A*EMS NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.2202
05Jan2008 19:51:21.5 7.0S 153.6E 50 mb=4.6 M*GSR NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.2032
05Jan2008 19:06:39.1 52.6N 168.7W 20 mb=4.5 A*EMS FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLA2013
05Jan2008 19:06:41.1 52.5N 168.6W 33 mb=4.6 M*GSR FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLA2004
05Jan2008 18 35.0 45.1N 22.7E 18 ML=2.1 M ROM ROMANIA 0037
05Jan2008 12:00:17.8 51.5N 131.4W 10 No Mag A*EMS QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1613
05Jan2008 12:00:16.8 51.3N 131.1W 10 mb=5.1 M*GSR QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1545
05Jan2008 11:44:55.3 51.3N 129.3W 30 mb=5.7 *ROM QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1717
05Jan2008 11:44:45.7 51.0N 130.6W 10 MS=6.4 M*GSR QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1459
05Jan2008 11:44:48.2 51.2N 130.6W 10 M =6.5 M*NEI QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1201
05Jan2008 11:01:08.7 50.6N 130.0W 30 mb=5.6 *ROM VANCOUVER ISLAND REGION 1718
05Jan2008 11:01:05.1 51.4N 130.9W 10 MS=6.6 M*GSR QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1354
05Jan2008 11:01:05.4 51.3N 130.7W 10 M =6.5 M*NEI QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1117
05Jan2008 10:58:17.8 44.6N 25.7E 3 ML=2.2 M ROM ROMANIA 1542
05Jan2008 10:39:15.1 51.3N 130.4W 10 mb=5.2 M*GSR QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS RE1306
05Jan2008 09:13:35.3 14.2N 124.6E100 mb=4.7 M*GSR LUZON, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS 1204
05Jan2008 09:00:34.5 52.3N 168.8W 60 mb=4.8 M*GSR FOX ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLA1142
05Jan2008 08:07:53.8 31.4N 49.3E 33 mb=4.6 M*GSR WESTERN IRAN 1058
05Jan2008 07:29:31.1 22.8S 68.5W 90 mb=6.0 M*GSR NORTHERN CHILE 0918
05Jan2008 07:29:33.8 22.7S 68.4W102 M =5.9 M*NEI NORTHERN CHILE 0757
05Jan2008 06:18:45.2 14.6N 126.2E 30 mb=5.5 *ROM PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION 1148
05Jan2008 06:18:43.5 14.3N 124.6E 12 mb=5.4 A*EMS LUZON, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS 0727
05Jan2008 06:18:47.0 14.4N 124.6E 33 mb=5.6 M*GSR LUZON, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS 0707
05Jan2008 06:02:20.2 13.5N 125.6E 30 mb=5.1 *ROM PHILIPPINE ISLANDS REGION 1148
05Jan2008 06:02:27.0 14.3N 124.6E 60 mb=5.1 A*EMS LUZON, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS 0712
05Jan2008 06:02:29.4 14.7N 124.4E 60 mb=5.3 M*GSR LUZON, PHILIPPINE ISLANDS 0649
05Jan2008 05:26:44.6 23.3N 20.0E 46 mb=3.6 M ROM LIBYA 1148
05Jan2008 05:22:04.3 38.6N 25.7E 10 MS=4.1 M*ROM AEGEAN SEA 1148
05Jan2008 0500.8 38.5N 26.9E 10 ML=3.6 M*ROM AEGEAN SEA 1147
05Jan2008 01:56:50.1 14.5N 91.2W100 mb=5.8 M*GSR GUATEMALA 0626
05Jan2008 01:56:50.6 14.2N 91.4W108 M =5.6 M*NEI GUATEMALA 0216
05Jan2008 01:54:17.1 47.1N 154.4E 10 mb=4.0 M GSR KURIL ISLANDS 0602
05Jan2008 00:37:38.9 26.8N 54.8E 40 No Mag A*EMS SOUTHERN IRAN 0547
05Jan2008 00:37:36.8 26.5N 55.0E 33 mb=4.6 M*GSR SOUTHERN IRAN 0538 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 327180
1/5/2008 10:29 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Dang.
The pig in the hat indicates the number 11. |
|
Free Store
User ID: 141703 (OP)
1/5/2008 10:42 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
It's nice having a little proof the Gov loads the die..
Makes you think of other sacred things. |
|
The Lone Ranger 
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 345915
1/5/2008 10:45 PM
 | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
It's nice having a little proof the Gov loads the die..
Makes you think of other sacred things. Quoting: Free Store 141703
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 129376
1/5/2008 11:00 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Why do post stupid questions like this ?
If you really were curious why some information might be missing or changed, why don't you ask the USGS themselves, instead of creating stupid conspiracy theories.
I'm sure they would be perfectly happy to respond to a question. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 336627
1/5/2008 11:02 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Its a vast right wing conspiracy. and even worse, Dick is in charge of it. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 350322
1/6/2008 1:12 AM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
corruption has no bounds for the self important. |
|
Quaker
User ID: 141703 (OP)
1/6/2008 2:35 AM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Bingo ! I found a European Quake site giving honest recordings of the USGS deleated quakes. Woo Whoo
53459 USGS 1/5/2008 12:03:36 PM Nevada -118.35 39.91 4.0 1,177 0 The event is not under water
53460 EMSC 1/5/2008 12:00:01 PM Queen Charlotte Islands Region -130.79 51.55 5.0 -1,907 1 Magnitude too low to generate a Tsunami
53457 USGS 1/5/2008 11:54:25 AM Nevada -117.93 39.48 4.2 1,876 0 The event is not under water
53455 USGS 1/5/2008 11:44:48 AM Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada region -130.54 51.22 6.5 -2,046 1 Magnitude too low to generate a Tsunami
53456 EMSC 1/5/2008 11:17:00 AM Central Kazakhstan 72.15 53.67 3.0 132 0 The event is not under water
53454 USGS 1/5/2008 11:01:08 AM Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada region -130.67 51.40 6.7 -2,052 2 C Low Probability of Tsunami
53466 EMSC 1/5/2008 10:58:01 AM Romania 25.74 44.61 2.2 113 0 The event is not under water
53452 USGS 1/5/2008 10:42:35 AM Nevada -117.65 39.54 3.8 2,077 0 The event is not under water
[link to tsunami.jrc.it] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 350847
1/6/2008 3:27 AM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
If the USGS is so hung up about deleting quakes, why add them in the first place? Why not ignore them altogether? |
|
Quaker
User ID: 141703 (OP)
1/6/2008 3:39 AM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
It's fun to catch them. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 336915
1/6/2008 5:08 AM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
There used to be all kinds of big quakes recorded
around China Lake, Calif, right before the first
Gulf War. It turned out that was where the fuel air/
"bunker busters" were being tested for effect. |
|
Doc Zombie
User ID: 348834
1/6/2008 5:13 AM
 | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
If the USGS is so hung up about deleting quakes, why add them in the first place? Why not ignore them altogether? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 350847
Once they learn it was the result of nuclear tunnel drillers and not a natural occurence, it's no longer usefull in their data sheets. |
|
Quaker
User ID: 143574
1/6/2008 6:43 AM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
When you have to second guess technology and the wizards and what it was ment for we have a right to be told the truth. Can you argue me or agree with me.
I get what little comfort I can find. |
|
SubarcticBeef
Two Legged Wrecking Machine
User ID: 221410
1/6/2008 7:05 AM
 | |
Quaker
User ID: 147033
1/6/2008 2:59 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
OOps sorry Nevadaites. |
|
Quaker
User ID: 141361
1/6/2008 11:09 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
Is
it relevant anymore? Some say why bother. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 351271
1/6/2008 11:12 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
If the USGS is so hung up about deleting quakes, why add them in the first place? Why not ignore them altogether?
Once they learn it was the result of nuclear tunnel drillers and not a natural occurence, it's no longer usefull in their data sheets. Quoting: Doc Zombie
cha ching! |
|
Quaker
User ID: 145398
1/7/2008 7:32 PM | | Re: WHY DID USGS DELEATE THE THREE NAVADA QUAKES | Quote |
heup, all is quiet. |
|
|
