Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,939 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,235,856
Pageviews Today: 1,909,874Threads Today: 596Posts Today: 12,639
02:59 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

David Wilcock sucks balls

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 503526
United States
09/18/2008 08:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Firstly, he starts his talk off with a series of obscure fotos of himself, his friends and family, that are supposed to look like Edgar Cayce and his former friends. Those fotos look more like the Adams family than Edgar Cayces old mates.

Then he goes on about the pineal gland being so special as if none of us were aware of this fact or that it was the third eye (in fact he also left out tonnes of info about the tiny crystals on the pineal gland and how those crystals were used with ancient crystal technology)

Then the final straw was "and thats why the Americans invaded Iraq, because Saddam was going to blow the world up with the stargate"

Oh, right, and the Americans arent run by the Vatican hmmm? Saddams the bad guy, USA!! USA!! USA!!

This video may be ok for novice conspiracists but for anyone with half a brain - get the fuck outta here....
 Quoting: Tman 384284


i wanna see your youtube channel favorite, and see what your into
spacetime

User ID: 505940
Canada
09/18/2008 03:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
[link to projectcamelot.org]


Dear Sweet Jesus, that guy is an idiot, goin on about the yellow pages tellin the future....

which reminds me...David Wilcock saying that they used the "Time Machine" to go forward in time to see which key states were problematic and thats how Bush beat Kerry and Gore....

Yeh - thats why you'd need a time machine alrite....you disinformationalist fuckin moron...theres far more entertaining disino merchants out there than him, start with Alex Jones....(more of a fear mongerer tho, his info is normally spot on)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 384284


You miss the point, how else can you possibly explain the hanging chads, and now the disenfranchised democrats in two states? Finally, for a country that is supposed to be free, wouldn't the fact the US voted for bush twice and is even -considering- mccain and palin evidence of something out of whack?

There is no logical reason for Americans to even consider people such as mccain and palin, if not for any reason than their intelligence is far far far below even anyone on this board and we all know that as fact.

I -know- the palin family personally and i can assure you without prejudice (i'm a conservative but not a republican) that mrs palin's brains are amount as large as a pea. Yet, you have millions of people rallying behind her... for what? You see, there is something amiss. It's akin to 1,000 elephants voting for a mouse. It doesn't make sense. To the entire world republicans are controlled people, but they cannot see it. They KNOW it, but they cannot say it. It's a consipracy of some sort and David Wilcock makes a lot more sense than so-calle intelligent people voting for a 'war hero' who was really too much of a coward to go kamikaze, and a nit wit who calls herself a 'pitbull' with pride, whereas many countries actually BAN pit bulls.

Conspiracy? Mind control? There is no other explanation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 513249
Canada
09/29/2008 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
if you check the link below, you will see a clear example of David's commitment to an objective discussion.

I personally sent the 'rebuttal' that follows David's presentation on Aug 16 crop circles. It was polite, but as you will see cited apparent weaknesses in what he had written.
The fact that it was NOT posted indicates to me that DW is playing the New Age game, trying to build a cult of devoted and paying **followers who are fed only certain selected information as a means of attaining this devotion**.


[link to www.evpreversespeaking.com]

HERE IS MY COMMENT, which was sent several times but never posted..

Okay, it has now been 4 days since I sent the following critique to the Wilcock site, and if you scroll down to the comment section, you will see that it is NOT in there, and that the only comments accepted were the praiseworthy one. Do take a close look at that.

From this, we can conclude, that DW is NOT interested in a reasonable discussion of his ideas. I further conclude that now that this is clearly established, it will be a short amount of time that his believers start to see this other side.

Here is the page. As you scroll down, refer to the image of the ‘Infinity Crop Circle’.

[link to divinecosmos.com]

David uses this image by telling others that it is a CC used to represent the moon’s movements in Aug 2008. This is part of a larger theory where he strings together ‘various’ CCs that all do the same. Yet no other CCs are provided. DW’s followers are just told to accept as fact his statement that there are other such circles.

So, let’s see what he comes up with with the one sample

I have lost the original critique I sent, but these comments adequately describe the overall assessment. Ask yourself if anybody who was truly interested in spirituality and The Truth would keep such criticisms off of his site…

A. If you look at the CC, you will see that there is nothing intuitively obvious about this even being a ‘lunar’ CC. We have the suggestion of some sort of celestial body, perhaps orbiting some central body, perhaps indicated the phases of some celestial body, but there is nothing definitive at all about the image this way.

B. DW puts it alongside a picture of the phases of the moon, but this is where things start to really break down. There are a total of 45 circles in the Infinity CC, or 44 surrounding a central hub circle.

Yet if this were intended to represent our moon, in any month, wouldn’t it be better to

1 - have 28 or so circles instead of 45, in order to make it much more intuitively obvious that the CC does in fact reference our moon? Alternatively, 56 circles might be LOT better than 45, as this would be about exactly double the actual number of days in an earthly lunar cycle.

2 - would it be better of the CCers, if they were to,rather than just make circles, actually have partial ones that went all the way down to crescent shapes, in order to mimic the actual phases of the moon as we see them?

There is no sense of ‘occulting’ in the Infinity CC at all, and therefore no obvious reason to suggest that this CC represents the moon as it begins to fade from view as it goes from full to crescent and back and forth.

C. If we dismiss all of the above, then it is just a small matter of making the center circle represent Aug 16. All DW does then is count back 15 circles in order to MAKE THE FIT. But in doing so he must ignore 7 of the other circles in both the top and bottom halves of the image. That is too arbitrary.

CONCLUSIONS

For David Wilcock to not only NOT mention this, but to make sure that it stays off of the cited page above, is tantamount do spiritual deceit.

From this I conclude that, reverse speech aside, DW is at best a somewhat polluted channel who, through acting in his own self interest, is willing to obfuscate The Truth from those who follow his ‘teachings’. All of this deception will be noted by those who are transmitting the information, and for this he will probably have to pay much more dearly than he thinks.

But as for those who would pay - for his cruise, for his speaking engagements, and all the rest, I say BUYER BEWARE, DAVID WILCOCK HAS SOME SERIOUS CHARACTER ISSUES.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 512663
Belgium
09/29/2008 11:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
in his latest interview he states that cheney and bush are the controllers
WTF??
Fucking bullshit
he never talks about the vatican
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 380178
United States
09/29/2008 11:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
I like him!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 512530
United States
09/29/2008 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
David Wilballs sucks cock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 503777
Canada
09/29/2008 11:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Burisch is dis info right from majestic.. Wilcock just happens to find his stories interesting due to thescience involved and mentions it.. wilcock imo is genuine, but being purposely targeted and mislead by certain people..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 465375
United States
09/29/2008 11:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
First time I watched one of his seminar vids I was quickly struck by discomfort...like...this guy is completely full of shit and ripping info from about 10 other people with a sprinkle of "I'm Edgar Cayce" on top of it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 503777
Canada
09/29/2008 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
First time I watched one of his seminar vids I was quickly struck by discomfort...like...this guy is completely full of shit and ripping info from about 10 other people with a sprinkle of "I'm Edgar Cayce" on top of it.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 465375

Can yuo cite these other people so I can read up on their stuff thanks..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 513272
United States
09/29/2008 11:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
OP...grow up, your title makes me avoid reading anything you post.... barf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 380553
United States
09/29/2008 12:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Regardless of who it is once you start looking into paranormal/conspiracy research you'll find that a lot of the material cross-references each other with little verifiable source material.

Non corroborated "eyewitnesses" that only echo other dubiously sourced material doesn't count either.

So that bugs me about Wilcock. On the other hand he's getting the Law of One material out there and I have a good sense about the underlying message there so he does have some value.

It's more that he comes across as a guy who thinks he has to keep "producing" material to stay relevant or whatever and that's led to some pretty shaky superstructure built on the more solid foundation of Law of One.
33dave
User ID: 518907
United States
10/06/2008 02:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Fuck yeah! Now THIS is what I am talking about! A thread dedicated to bashing David Wilcock! Google 33dave. You will see that I have a ton of sweet videos that I have made, splicing the shit that Dave W. has said and turning it into him making more of an idiot of himself then he has already!

O.k., I agree %100! David Wilcock is a wannabe conspirarist that is trying to etch his name in with the big dogs like Jordan Maxwell or David Icke! David Wilcock is no more good than taking the info that others have researched and then turning it around and present it from his wacked out perspective.

GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK! Yeah, America went into to stop Saddam because he had a "Looking Glass" device! What a fucking crock of horse shit! Dave needs to make up something original or he would be like presenting the news a day late. All of the shit that he is talking about Jordan Maxwell or David Icke already have talked about FOR YEARS!

So, when he does come up with something original, IT IS FUCKING RETARDED!

Here is a question: Why is David Wilcock so privy to this information? Did the aliens tell him! Hahahahahahaha! What a fucking moron! Like we don't see that he is trying to sit at home and collect donations off his website! Dave W. has made claim after claim that he doesn't want to work a normal job. So, he has made himself king in his own fantasy land! He just sits around all day checking to see if anyone retarded enough has bought into his crazy ideas enough to send him thousands of dollars! FUCK!

GET A LIFE, MR WILCOCK!
GET A DAY JOB WHERE YOU MAY GET YOUR HANDS DIRTY FROM TIME TO TIME!

The notorious!

33DAVE

P.S. - Youtube 33dave..........you will find sweet Dave W. bashing videos!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 397975
United States
10/06/2008 02:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
This has got to be some of the most piss-poor trolling I've ever seen. Just terrible. You sir, are an embarrassment to all the talented trolls on GLP.

For shame!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 511963
United States
10/06/2008 02:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
well, I followed him for years...but lately it is like his ego double inflated and he is completely self promoting and taking himself far to seriously...

yesterday took the cake, when he refused to even listen to some interview by Deagle and judged him as a false prophet because HE WASN"T informed (first) so it couldn't be true

I like Project camelot cause they leave all conclusions up to the reader and Kerry and Bill ask the same questions I would...I think they are somewhat irritated with DW too but can't say much because he is the hand that feeds them
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 336435
United States
10/06/2008 02:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
yesterday took the cake, when he refused to even listen to some interview by Deagle and judged him as a false prophet because HE WASN"T informed (first) so it couldn't be true


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 511963


The real story is with this DEAGLE guy.....What he was saying really scared the shit out of me.

Im just south of Los Angeles....If a NUke went off there, I would die a slow and painful death....
The Monk
User ID: 515245
United States
10/06/2008 02:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Firstly, he starts his talk off with a series of obscure fotos of himself, his friends and family, that are supposed to look like Edgar Cayce and his former friends. Those fotos look more like the Adams family than Edgar Cayces old mates.

Then he goes on about the pineal gland being so special as if none of us were aware of this fact or that it was the third eye (in fact he also left out tonnes of info about the tiny crystals on the pineal gland and how those crystals were used with ancient crystal technology)

Then the final straw was "and thats why the Americans invaded Iraq, because Saddam was going to blow the world up with the stargate"

Oh, right, and the Americans arent run by the Vatican hmmm? Saddams the bad guy, USA!! USA!! USA!!

This video may be ok for novice conspiracists but for anyone with half a brain - get the fuck outta here....
 Quoting: Tman 384284


He's really full of himself.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 518647
United Kingdom
10/06/2008 02:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Firstly, he starts his talk off with a series of obscure fotos of himself, his friends and family, that are supposed to look like Edgar Cayce and his former friends. Those fotos look more like the Adams family than Edgar Cayces old mates.

Then he goes on about the pineal gland being so special as if none of us were aware of this fact or that it was the third eye (in fact he also left out tonnes of info about the tiny crystals on the pineal gland and how those crystals were used with ancient crystal technology)

Then the final straw was "and thats why the Americans invaded Iraq, because Saddam was going to blow the world up with the stargate"

Oh, right, and the Americans arent run by the Vatican hmmm? Saddams the bad guy, USA!! USA!! USA!!

This video may be ok for novice conspiracists but for anyone with half a brain - get the fuck outta here....


He's really full of himself.
 Quoting: The Monk 515245




He is also Gay.

He really pisses me off with that (I know more than you) Grin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 518647
United Kingdom
10/06/2008 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
And his 70s monkees/Shaggy off scooby doo hairstyle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 212026
United States
10/07/2008 01:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
The real story is with this DEAGLE guy.....What he was saying really scared the shit out of me.

Im just south of Los Angeles....If a NUke went off there, I would die a slow and painful death....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 336435


Deagle is full of fear-mongering bullshit. Where's your nuke? How is that fear working out for you?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 385124
United States
10/07/2008 01:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
there all full of shit. no different then alex jones, all just trying to profit off fear.
hardcorr
User ID: 521370
United Kingdom
10/09/2008 07:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Those who are searching for the "truth" do so as their own leisure activity. As really we create our own truths and form our own subjective mental worlds. David Wilcock is not someone I choose to listen to or follow, as I'm smart enough to see through his poor logic. Actually I'm quite glad I'm not him. And maybe he could see some truth in the words of these posts.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 523324
Australia
10/11/2008 09:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Firstly, he starts his talk off with a series of obscure fotos of himself, his friends and family, that are supposed to look like Edgar Cayce and his former friends. Those fotos look more like the Adams family than Edgar Cayces old mates.

Then he goes on about the pineal gland being so special as if none of us were aware of this fact or that it was the third eye (in fact he also left out tonnes of info about the tiny crystals on the pineal gland and how those crystals were used with ancient crystal technology)

Then the final straw was "and thats why the Americans invaded Iraq, because Saddam was going to blow the world up with the stargate"

Oh, right, and the Americans arent run by the Vatican hmmm? Saddams the bad guy, USA!! USA!! USA!!

This video may be ok for novice conspiracists but for anyone with half a brain - get the fuck outta here....
 Quoting: Tman 384284


Tman is the one who sucks balls! you are a tool and you probably jack off to the wall... go take that chip off your shoulder!
Notordinary
User ID: 523324
Australia
10/11/2008 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Firstly, he starts his talk off with a series of obscure fotos of himself, his friends and family, that are supposed to look like Edgar Cayce and his former friends. Those fotos look more like the Adams family than Edgar Cayces old mates.

Then he goes on about the pineal gland being so special as if none of us were aware of this fact or that it was the third eye (in fact he also left out tonnes of info about the tiny crystals on the pineal gland and how those crystals were used with ancient crystal technology)

Then the final straw was "and thats why the Americans invaded Iraq, because Saddam was going to blow the world up with the stargate"

Oh, right, and the Americans arent run by the Vatican hmmm? Saddams the bad guy, USA!! USA!! USA!!

This video may be ok for novice conspiracists but for anyone with half a brain - get the fuck outta here....
 Quoting: Tman 384284


Tman is the one who sucks balls! you are a tool and you probably jack off to the wall... go take that chip off your shoulder!
Matt..
User ID: 523360
United States
10/11/2008 10:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Possibly real inside information is hard to come by...

Q: What are we to do but test our cognitive and truth gleaning skills and yet --

-- refuse to be pre-convinced about 'any' of the details even as premise while considering the discussion?



To state 'a take on information' as potential fact and build a glut of data upon the constuct as it 'is fact' is apparently what taxes the human attention and results in a suspension of disbelief that is then open for the checkmate introduction of things you then have to take on faith-- referenced to that construct.

Some such information may have great (or little value) and yet while i may go through it for any possible gems, i firmly take on the open mindset yet refuse to consider any of it as truly potential fact at that moment.


I see that many here have the presence of mind and heart to fully consider a discussion and yet also fully refuse to jump to any conclusion, or be swayed one way or the other until key points are properly referenced and categorized for potential usefulness and validity.


When witnessing the new age construct it is clear that the introduction of potential past incarnation data can be such a wild card that they can end up with followers that will follow, and make them feel on top of the world but even if it were true or false, can create a personality cult that even the leader starts to have so pressing in as reflected chi-light from the admirers that the leader believes and allows the welled up idolatry to cloud their own sense of self and identity.

Such leaders are always under allot of criticsm from the rest of humanity and can be open to a defensive shoring up their own doubts by retreating into a default belief and loving aura of their followers, accepting the crowd's belief in them when they are down, and then truth may suffer-- for it has become subject to the popular vote of that one group and has lost some of the objectivity needed to stay always centered back on the truth.

This is where a person who presents as a potential source of helpful information becomes an internal trusted fixture in the landscape of a follower's identity and becomes above seeking from the normal unbiased mode, above reproach and even the desiring to continue to personally dig for the raw truth for themselves.

I tend to look at everything in front of me for clues, but outright refuse to be swayed at the moment on anything.


Clues can be everywhere.


Bring 'em on.



Next!



REALLY LIKE FREE SPEECH BOARDS THOUGH...


MATT..

------------------------------------------------------------


GOOGLE SEARCH: FUTURE KNOWLEDGE UPDATE
MATT..
User ID: 523360
United States
10/11/2008 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
(quoting Tman)"(in fact he also left out tonnes of info about the tiny crystals on the pineal gland and how those crystals were used with ancient crystal technology)"

LINK?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 501976
United States
10/11/2008 11:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
you have to have a REAL LOT of dopamine activity in your brain in order to show pics of you and cacye and be into it without feeling silly
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 522100
United States
10/11/2008 01:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
He was right about stupid old Dr. Deagle though, wasn't he?

LOL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 374615
United States
10/11/2008 01:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
to much drugs can be a bad thing!
Josh
User ID: 528928
United States
10/17/2008 02:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
Everyone here, seems to me, confused. Our reality limits.
Josh
User ID: 528928
United States
10/17/2008 02:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: David Wilcock sucks balls
We are infinite. We are god.

News