Hillary Clinton-LIAR,FRAUD,THIEF,MURDERESS,TRAITOR,AND TAX CHEAT

If it were only possible! It's a vision for another time, but not our immediate time. Only hard, hard times will awaken people out of their stupor, the result of so much brainwashing for way too long.
.

Clinton is a carpetbagger who by-passed Pennsylvania on her way to New York. I don't believe people in Pennsylvania are SO stupid that they would actually vote for Shitlery. Some (20 %)were saying that if their candidate (Clinton) didn't win then they would vote for McCain. That shows you that they are not really Democrats,they are zionazi Repukes. Also,I personally know Repukes who changed their party affiliation just so they could vote for Shitlery which tells me that Clinton is a zionazi stooge all the way.

Personally,I don't think Clinton can win without a little help from her friends at Diebold. Look at the states where she allegedly has already won - those states are pure NEOCON.

snip>Few pundits wondered, for example, why 160,000 Pennsylvania Republicans switched registrations, most of them in order to vote for Clinton,

[link to tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com] /

How Republicans Gamed the Pennsy Primary

For six weeks, as Democrats' hope of unity rode on Barack Obama's hope that Pennsylvanians would prove his national lead to be more than a wish, most tribunes of the news media ignored breathtakingly cynical Republican news-media ploys to keep Dems bitterly divided. You had to admire the artistry of it all, even its virtual invisibility.

Few pundits wondered, for example, why 160,000 Pennsylvania Republicans switched registrations, most of them in order to vote for Clinton, if demographics are a guide. That strategy -- promoted by right-wing Clinton scourge and sudden "supporter" Richard Mellon-Scaife and his Pittsburgh Post-Tribune -- is to keep the Dems divided and just maybe to give them the nominee whom Scaife has more reason than most to believe Republicans can demolish this fall.

Few commentators questioned why Clinton didn't reject Mellon-Scaife's endorsement, as she'd challenged Obama to reject Louis Farrakhan's. Few asked why she instead actually courted the Machiavellian funder of a "vast, right-wing conspiracy" that had implicated her in Vincent Foster's murder and more.

Clinton's desperation was one thing, but her abdication of all dignity was another. Yet journalists who'd scrutinized Obama's handling of Farrakhan indulged her collapse into Mellon-Scaife's arms. No prissy New York Times op eds parsed whether she, like Obama, ought to have "denounced" or "renounced" or "rejected" the come-on.

The vigilant blogger John Campanelli noted Big Dog's even-more amazing appearances on Rush Limbaugh's show to urge Ditto-heads to vote for Hillary, even though he knew they'd do so only for Mellon-Scaife's set-up reasons. Now, there's desperation for you, and, in Bill's case, we needn't even mention lost dignity. I wouldn't say that the Clintons are Stalin and that Mellon-Scaife is Hitler, but show me how this mesalliance is any less cynical than the Soviet-Nazi pact of 1939, and I'll show you a bridge to the future I have to sell.

Not all Republican-leaning media agree that Clinton's the one they're most likely to beat. Republicans do have "new" dirt on the Clintons, but Americans are gagging on these tactics, effective though such ugliness remains. Obama will be easier to take down, reason the post-Rove Republicans, because, often, they can stand back and, with a wink and a nudge, let racism do its work in the privacy of the voting booth.

That's certainly the strategy of Rupert Murdoch's New York Post, which actually endorsed Obama for the Democratic nomination and showed that when it endorses someone, it delivers! The paper has turned every tabloid trick to slant its coverage toward Obama, no doubt endearing itself to blacks I've watched perusing the paper on the subway. Today's primary-day headlne: "Hill's 'Osama' Scare Tactics." The Post even ballyhooed the fact that the voter who loudly protested Obama's observations about "bitter" small-town Pennsylvanians is a life-long resident of New Jersey!

The paper's intended message to politicos of all persuasions: Always kiss the ring of Rupert, and forget his imported editors and their mini-con minions have turned the once-liberal Post into a daily reminder that Australia was founded as a penal colony. They are now busy turning the Wall Street Journal into the Voldemort of big dailies.

When Obama is nominated, the Post's editors will announce soberly that upon agonised reflection they've decided that McCain is the man America most desperately needs. After a suitable pause, they'll begin tearing into Obama on non-racial grounds (his latte liberal backers, his weakness on defense, etc.) while promoting McCain relentlessly and relying on racism to do the rest as they keep their hands clean with New York's multiracial populace.

Come to think of it, that's what New York Times columnist David Brooks has already done, as I predicted he would long ago: "Brooks has pretended to admire Obama so much... that you expect him to swim over to the Democrats. Don't count on it...." He was merely accumulating credibility with liberal readers for giving Obama a serious chance before reeling in as many as he can for McCain. Brooks turned that corner pre-emptively last week, ahead of the Post , either to "help" Clinton or to look smart himself by being the first to show how to champion John McCain, hero of Selma and the Edmund Pettus Bridge, against Obama, that deracinated Hyde Park liberal.

I'll say more about these conservative journalistic ploys soon, but for now it's worth emphasizing that few commentators have noted how corrosive the cynicism and duplicity of Mellon-Scaife, Murdoch, and Brooks have become of the very civic-republicanism, virtue, and freedom they claim to defend.

The philosopher George Santayana noted that Americans are "inexperienced in poisons," owing to their forthright civic-republican candor and courage in controversies, no matter how bitter and partisan. No more. Unless, that is, as I dearly hope, Pennsylvanians carry Obama strongly enough tonight to discredit the poisoned Clintons and their new Republican pushers.

This is the bum Hiltlery is fornicating with. They have an agreement to Double-Team Obama. The zionist neo-cons are desperate to cling to their slippery grasp on power.

War Hero? Meet the Real John McCain: North Vietnam 's Go-To Collaborator

April 19, 2008

by Alexander Cockburn

Counterpunch

John McCain’s been getting kid-glove treatment from the press for years, ever since he wriggled free of the Keating scandal and his profitable association – another collaboration, you might say — with the nation’s top bank swindler in the 1980s. But nothing equals the astounding tact with which his claque on the press bus avoids the topic of McCain’s collaborating with his Vietnamese captors after he’d been shot down.

How McCain behaved when he was a prisoner is key. McCain is probably the most unstable man ever to have got this close to the White House. He’s one election away from it. Republican senator Thad Cochrane has openly said he trembles at the thought of an unstable McCain in the Oval Office with his finger on the nuclear trigger.

What if a private memory of years of collaboration in his prison camp gnaws at McCain, and bursts out in his paroxysms of uncontrollable fury, his rantings about “gooks” and his terrifying commitment to a hundred years of war in Iraq . What if “the hero” knows he’s a phony?

Doug Valentine has written the definitive history of the Phoenix Program in Vietnam . He knows about the POW experience. His dad, an Army man, was captured by the Japanese and sent to a POW camp in the Philippines for forced labor. Many of his mates died. Doug wrote a marvelous book about it, The Hotel Tacloban.

Now Valentine has picked up the unexploded bomb lying on McCain’s campaign trail this year. As he points out, he’s not the first. Rumors and charges have long swirled around McCain’s conduct as a prisoner. Fellow prisoners have given the lie to McCain’s claims. But Valentine has assembled the dossier. It’s devastating. We’re running it in our current CounterPunch newsletter and we strongly urge you to subscribe.

Some excerpts from Valentine’s indictment.

“War is one thing, collaborating with the enemy is another; it is a legitimate campaign issue that strikes at the heart of McCain’s character. . .or lack thereof. In occupied countries like Iraq , or France in World War II, collaboration to that extent spells an automatic death sentence.. . .The question is: What kind of collaborator was John McCain, the admitted war criminal who will hate the Vietnamese for the rest of his life?

“Put it another way: how psychologically twisted is McCain? And what actually happened to him in his POW camp that twisted him? Was it abuse, as he claims, or was it the fact that he collaborated and has to cover up? Covering-up can take a lot of energy. The truth is lurking there in his subconscious, waiting to explode. ”

“McCain had a unique POW experience. Initially, he was taken to the infamous Hanoi Hilton prison camp, where he was interrogated. By McCain’s own account, after three or four days he cracked. He promised his Vietnamese captors, “I’ll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital ...

“His Vietnamese captors soon realized their POW, John Sidney McCain III, came from a well-bred line in the American military elite. . .The Vietnamese realized, this poor stooge has propaganda value. The admiral’s boy was used to special treatment, and his captors knew that. They were working him.”

“. . .two weeks into his stay at the Vietnamese hospital, the Hanoi press began quoting him. It was not ‘name rank and serial number, or kill me’. as specified by the military code of conduct. McCain divulged specific military information: he gave the name of the aircraft carrier on which he was based, the number of U.S. pilots that had been lost, the number of aircraft in his flight formation, as well as information about the location of rescue ships.”

“…McCain was held for five and half years. The first two weeks’ behavior might have been pragmatism, but McCain soon became North Vietnam’s go-to collaborator…..McCain cooperated with the North Vietnamese for a period of three years. His situation isn’t as innocuous as that of the French barber who cuts the hair of the German occupier. McCain was repaying his captors for their kindness and mercy.

“This is the lesson of McCain’s experience as a POW: a true politician, a hollow man, his only allegiance is to power. The Vietnamese, like McCain’s campaign contributors today, protected and promoted him, and, in return, he danced to their tune. . .”

[link to www.tbrnews.org]

Hillary Flashes The Hand
Sign (No, It's Not For UT)

[link to www.rense.com]

PIC

Clintoon is definetely doing more than flashing! She's got the Illuminati Satanic Hand Sign raised high. A thank you to the riggers of the Pa 'vote'.

How come in 20+ debates, nobody asked her about her role in Waco? Word was that she gave the go ahead for the kill.

If it was ever asked, it didn't "meet the press".
.

The MSMs spin and the fact that republicans are switching parties in order to vote for Clinton is an indication that the American Nazi Party is faltering badly.May they go down in all consuming flames.

What do you really think?

Flags fall around Hilary Clinton in Waterloo, Iowa, Nov. 11, 2007

WTF does this tell you?

[link to ugv.abcnews.go.com]

Add WAR MONGER to Clintoon's attributes.


Rabid Clintonesque Moments

Hillary, the war chick

April 26, 2008

by Pepe Escobar

Asia Times

PHILADELPHIA - When that phone rings at 3am at the White House, what does a true red-blooded Madam President do? She calls her generals and orders them to "obliterate" Iran . In other words: she orders the killing of 70 million people.

It's 10pm right outside Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton's victory rally at the Hyatt in downtown Philadelphia , and Mei-ling Wang is very, very angry. Fervent Hillary and Senator Barack Obama supporters in the streets try to out-shout and out-perform each other after Clinton beat Obama in the Philadelphia presidential primary, but that's not what's bothering Wang.

She embodies the quintessence of the Asian-American dream. A master's from Harvard, a PhD at the University of Maryland , an associate professor at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia . But she chose not to simply follow the "get rich is glorious" way as extolled by the late Chinese "Helmsman" Deng Xiaoping. As a co-director of the Social Exclusion Knowledge Network, she's been all over the developing world working with the poor, the homeless, the downtrodden, the excluded. And she has a few rash words to say to the Clintons . I've stumbled on Clinton supporters and asked them why she has lied about so many important issues. They told me everybody lies. I am a teacher. I told them 'look me in the eye. Would you say to your children that it is OK to lie'?"

Wang defends Obama as a "true American hero", stressing "in the beginning, he had nothing. The kind of people we Americans admire is the little guy, not somebody who has used her husband's [Bill's] resources, or someone who has a rich wife like [Republican Senator John] McCain."

Hillary won in Pennsylvania propped up essentially by old (second only to Florida ) Catholic (40% of the vote) women (almost 60% of the vote). Blue-collar white men - "bitter" or not - also helped. Pennsylvania - even more rural than Ohio - is a state where the majority of voters (55%) have not even finished high school.

What the throng outside Hillary's victory rally made clear is what's being confirmed by most polls. At least one in four Hillary voters are that stubborn; they will never vote for Obama if he clinches the nomination. Not only happy to use all the tricks in the Karl Rove slash and burn political playbook, thus committing a potential disaster inside the Democratic Party, Hillary had to extend her slash and burn approach to the Middle East.

The (nuclear) postman never rings twice

On ABC's Good Morning America, Hillary was asked what she would do as president if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons. The premise of the question in itself is preposterous. Iran does not possess a single nuclear weapon; it is not trying to assemble a nuclear weapon (even US intelligence admits it); and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has already stressed, echoing the leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini, that a nuclear weapon - which implies the genocide of civilians - is "against Islamic rules". Khamenei has stressed "our nuclear bomb and our explosive powers are our faith, our youth and our people who have been present on the most difficult scenes with utmost power and faith and will continue to do so".

Hillary, anyway, was undeterred. She said: "In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel , we would be able to totally obliterate them." She admits this is "a terrible thing to say", but doesn't question the much-hyped Iranian threat for the hype it truly is, adding that "those people who run Iran" need to understand her tough talk. Thus she positions herself as the sender of a wise message that "perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic".

Not a world from Hillary about Israeli neo-colonization and collective punishment in the West Bank and Gaza . Not a word about Israel 's several hundred nuclear warheads - the only country in the Middle East to actually possess nuclear weapons, and to have announced not so subtly it would have no problems using them.

Mei-ling Wang has every reason to be angry with what she characterizes as Hillary's "lies". This is further evidence that as the acrimony inside the Democratic Party spreads like a poisonous virus, Hillary by now has become virtually indistinguishable from the presumptive Republican nominee, McCain. McCain, not happy to just contemplate a hundred-year war in Iraq , has already sung his now famous "Bomb, bomb, Iran " Beach Boys rip-off. Hillary lip-synchs she wants to finish the war in Iraq , but then goes for the "obliteration" of Iran .

Both candidates are obviously pandering towards the Zio-cons and the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobby in the US . But most of all, Hillary is hedging her bets in terms of the buildup towards a possible attack on Iran, now that Vice President Dick Cheney is free to pursue his ultimate goal with pliable, opportunistic, counterinsurgency ace General David Petraeus promoted to head US Central Command.

Hillary's positioning spells Imperial Washington in all its glory - and hubris. Not only McCain; a president Hillary will mean more wars in the Middle East . So much for Hillary's rhetoric about "peace in the Middle East ". But the real tragedy is that none of the vociferous street supporters outside the victory party rally in downtown Philadelphia , or her voters at large, are aware of the true colors of Hillary, the war chick.

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. He may be reached at [email protected].

[link to www.tbrnews.org]

By now most of you have figured out that Hillary Clinton is a Neo-con in the employ of the Neo-cons. Clinton's job is to totally destroy the Democratic Party from the inside and ensure that the Republican GOP aka the Nazi 4th Reich maintains power. Hillary Clinton needs to insure that she and the Bushies don't end up in prison for what they have done. There is no difference between Hillary Clinton and George W Bush. They are both arrogant liars and co-conspirators in the treasonous destruction of America. If you loved George W.Bush and the GOP,you're really going to love Hillary Clinton.

By now most of you have figured out that Hillary Clinton is a Neo-con in the employ of the Neo-cons. Clinton's job is to totally destroy the Democratic Party from the inside and ensure that the Republican GOP aka the Nazi 4th Reich maintains power. Hillary Clinton needs to insure that she and the Bushies don't end up in prison for what they have done. There is no difference between Hillary Clinton and George W Bush. They are both arrogant liars and co-conspirators in the treasonous destruction of America. If you loved George W.Bush and the GOP,you're really going to love Hillary Clinton.

A vote for Clinton or McCain is a vote for the FASCIST NEW WORLD ORDER.It's amazing how stupid Americans are that they don't see this.

Hillary Clinton - SELFISH,SHALLOW,SHAMELESS,AND SOUL-LESS. A person who has and will LIE,CHEAT,STEAL,AND MURDER in order to 'win'. A 'tough' piece of meat that one can not chew let alone swallow so you spit the gooey wad out,thus rejecting it.

It's no great wonder that American women are perceived as possessing the same attributes as those of Hillary Clinton listed above. They look at Hillary Clinton and see themselves. I have seen so many of them at Clinton's rallies,their vacant,adoring faces lifted upward in response to Clinton's desperate cackling,roaring approval as Clinton applies Rovian tactics against a fellow in her own party thus dividing,weakening, and taking everyone OFF MESSAGE and AWAY from the issues that really matter like Bush's Middle East Wars,the ongoing TREASON out of BOTH parties,our looted economy,the subversion of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. I've not heard one of the three candidates,including Hillary Clinton,address the Bush regime's lies,crimes,war crimes,and treason. Hillary Clinton is not interested in what's good for Americans or the country,Hillary Clinton's ONLY interest is what's good for Hillary Clinton and her Neo-Con friends.

Clinton is so deep on debt that people she owes will have to put leins against the Clinton's assets in order to be paid.Another desperate reason for Clinton to have herself installed so the taxpayers can pick up her tabs besides the fact that Shitlery needs to crawl into the WH to keep herself,Slick Willy,the Bushies,and their pals in and out of Congress from being hung.

People are being blinded by this FRAUD called Hiltary clinton.

She is a wolf in a sheep's disguise. Beware of Hilary Clinton and Mcain.

Ah yes, spoken like the true peaceloving, unbiased 'changling' of the Obama camp. Whee's the change in politics for America in your statements sir?

Clinton hasn't changed a bit.She's still the same self-serving neo-con elitist that she has always been with much that she and her hubby need to keep hidden.

Oh yeah,RUH-ROH!

[link to www.tbrnews.org]

I've noticed that not only is Hillary Clinton an arrogant,self serving ankle biter,she's also another delusional neo-con with a sense of entitlement.Hillary Clinton will lie,cheat,steal,and murder in true neo-nazi style to get what she thinks she deserves.Recently,the shrew has reduced herself to the Queen of Meaningless Political Cliches,regurgitating her cud over and over ad nauseum and never saying anything we don't already know about the economy,Bush's endless illegal wars (THAT SHE VOTED FOR AND VOTED TO FUND),and desperately trying to manufacture dirt,al la Karl Rove, on Obama.

Does this country really need more of the same from the Bushies,McCains, and Clintons - ALL WAR MONGERS who are willing to mass murder people on a scale never before seen in history - INCLUDING AMERICANS if it furthers their desire to raise the 4th Nazi Reich?

AMERICA needs a thorough clean out from the WH down,every agency on every level from federal and state to local.

Hillary thumps Obama in West Virginia!

Wow this thread is full of nonense.