Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,256 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 348,431
Pageviews Today: 461,559Threads Today: 148Posts Today: 2,030
04:01 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject The World is only 7000 years old
Poster Handle Clavain
Post Content
There is no argument for that 'but the creator did it' aproach.

I just have what I see in front of me, and I see a very old place, with geological landscapes which look like they took a long time to become where they are.

but they didn't. There is evidence already presented of a global cataclysmic flood that caused the damage
(No, this does not prove that the flood did it)

I see the stars which are at different ages, some red dwarfs, some supernova, some like our Sun.

All dated by the age of tghe earth
No, dated by other methods too. Distance, speed of light, size, movement.

I see science finding results which show ages of about 4billion years.

proof? haven't seen it. The textbook says so. National Geographic says so. the Jesuits says so.
But the results are the same anyway whoever says it!

I see fossils in the ground.

Could on;ly happen in a flood
Fossils? I dont understand. So there were dinosaurs walking around before the flood? why didnt Noah save them?

I see evolutionary traits in animals in plants which seem to compliment 'survival of the fittest' theories.

there are none, just fantasy religion that springs from paganism. Were there evoloution how did bees and plants arrive at seperate time periods?
Fantasy religion? look at your own religion first before classing others as fantasy. Plus, there are lots of examples, look at the Galapagos islands for starters.

Natural selection preserves a strong genome, it in no way causes evolution.
Evolution happens over a very long time, trying to monitor it in our time-scales is fruitless.

I see a book, written by people and compiled selectively by other people a few years later.

You don't even know what you are talking about. The scriptures existed before the RCC. The early first century patriarchs letters prove that as well as the dead sea scrolls.
I understand the basic fact that the Gospels were written by men. Then they were selected by men to be part of the Bible, bits were left out, some were classed as heresy and what remains is classed as the word of God. Also, this 'word of God' has been allowed to be changed over time and revised, compacted etc. Ever heard of Chinese whispers?

I beleive what seems to be the most prominent.....

Ths majority are always wrong. There is no voting on science, we need evidence to determine science.
i dont understand this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 412415
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP