The World is only 7000 years old

anyone who believes the earth is only 7000 years old is a moron.

The Heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of His hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge. There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard. Their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the end of the world. Psalms 19:1-4

For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. Romans 1:20

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

Look into Harold Camping and see what he has to say. I think he is like the Einstein of the Bible. His time frame adding it up with other things that I have researched is pretty darn accurate in my opinion.

I am lazy, do you have a link. Actually, I am in the middle of writing up a book on the entire Genesis thing. I have been at it for several years. There is so much there as to be an incredibly rich fount at so many differnt levels, even quantum mechanic, quantum dynamics, even into genetics. It is so awesome when you really dig down into it, words can barely describe. And none of the other so called "creation stories" even come within 6,000 light years of it.

=================
... oh, lol, I don't know about that... and as in like, just how long is a 'heaven and earth generation'?

As in, "These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created." You mean like those generations?

Starlight has not arrived here after millions of years. Whether big bang or creation the stars have stretched out from a central point accelerated to where they are and continue to expand. Starlight cannot be used to date anything.

12. Not enough Stone Age skeletons.
Evolutionary anthropologists now say that Homo sapiens existed for at least 185,000 years before agriculture began,28 during which time the world population of humans was roughly constant, between one and ten million. All that time they were burying their dead, often with artifacts. By that scenario, they would have buried at least eight billion bodies.

I've a question, maybe not related to this thread but it's near enough.

If the sun is so far away and light takes so long to reach us then how come during a total eclipse of the sun, the lights go out instantly (and heat)?

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

I've a question, maybe not related to this thread but it's near enough.

If the sun is so far away and light takes so long to reach us then how come during a total eclipse of the sun, the lights go out instantly (and heat)?

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

I started to respond to this post, but felt any attempt at refuting it would be lost on the op. This is after all, someone who believes the earth is 7,000 years old. I imagine grasping the simple concept of structural integrity and the degradational forces that would cause its destruction over time would be completely foreign to the op.

Bottom line, the pyramids were constructed out of limestone, a sedimentary rock composed mainly of calcite, but also can contain dolomite and aragonite. Weathering forces, over time will cause the structual integrity of the pyramid to deteriate. There is no way, no matter how good of an architect one may be, to make a structure that will last for a billion years.

Your logic regarding the construction of the pyramids is severly flawed, much similar to your logic regarding the age of the planet.

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.


I know this may be difficult to grasp, but the pyramids are *NOT* a natural formation.

They did not arise from the ground on their own. Those rocks were cut from the ground, and placed there by people.

As such their load & weight contribute to their weathering, and the fact that they are nolonger sheilded by young stone.

Nice try, but that's a rather piss poor example.

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

I started to respond to this post, but felt any attempt at refuting it would be lost on the op. This is after all, someone who believes the earth is 7,000 years old. I imagine grasping the simple concept of structural integrity and the degradational forces that would cause its destruction over time would be completely foreign to the op.

Bottom line, the pyramids were constructed out of limestone, a sedimentary rock composed mainly of calcite, but also can contain dolomite and aragonite. Weathering forces, over time will cause the structual integrity of the pyramid to deteriate. There is no way, no matter how good of an architect one may be, to make a structure that will last for a billion years.

Your logic regarding the construction of the pyramids is severly flawed, much similar to your logic regarding the age of the planet.


Its preposterous to believe the Earth/World is 4.5 billion years in existence, if we apply the logic of the naysayers on here. Carbon dating is, I repeat, a flawed method of calculating age. You scientific posters are too narrow minded to believe that.

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

I started to respond to this post, but felt any attempt at refuting it would be lost on the op. This is after all, someone who believes the earth is 7,000 years old. I imagine grasping the simple concept of structural integrity and the degradational forces that would cause its destruction over time would be completely foreign to the op.

Bottom line, the pyramids were constructed out of limestone, a sedimentary rock composed mainly of calcite, but also can contain dolomite and aragonite. Weathering forces, over time will cause the structual integrity of the pyramid to deteriate. There is no way, no matter how good of an architect one may be, to make a structure that will last for a billion years.

Your logic regarding the construction of the pyramids is severly flawed, much similar to your logic regarding the age of the planet.


Its preposterous to believe the Earth/World is 4.5 billion years in existence, if we apply the logic of the naysayers on here. Carbon dating is, I repeat, a flawed method of calculating age. You scientific posters are too narrow minded to believe that.


Carbon dating works perfectly for stuff that lived and died till around 80000 years old.

Besides that we ample of evidence that the earth is older then 8 or 10 thousand years, we have for example those stalagmites in caves, which if you open that contain year rings (a new deposit of minerals every certain timespan), there is radiometric dating and the list could go on and on.

The notion that you would call every dating mechanism "carbon dating" shows only your ignorance.

I don't believe anything monumental in this world happens by chance.

Just like I think OS of 9/11 is BS for all coincidences it doesn't explain, that's how I feel about anti-Creationist ideas.

I don't think human life is a meaningless coincidence


It's funny how athiests don't think they are exercising blind faith in the science they have used to denounce religion.


If one doesn't think science can be fabricated look no further than NIST and the rest of the pseudo-science surrounding events like 9/11.


Carbon dating an entire universe is a preposterous idea.

That is unquantifiable data.



Christianity has been under attack since its existence and the more evil and deception I see, the more I believe its validity.


I guarantee Zionists were behind these Bible bashing scientific theories

Really? Not a natural formation? Thanks for the update. Rocks in their natural state are subject to the same forces/weathering as those man made structures. Nice try, but a piss poor response.

humans have been here for 1000000 of years, and animals too, u all forget 1 big thing, its us kind of human there have been here for over 6000 years, we are a new model, before us, there was another model, but our model is around 6000 years old. never forget that.


DANE

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.

Sure, the earth is billions of years old, and soon, 12 foot tall aliens will be landing on earth, to tell you they are extraterrestrials.
Whatever it takes to prove there is no God.
If one is blind, then they cannot see. Words do not create light for the blind, only the Spirit can do that.
If one is adamantly against the truth, no amount of light will illuminate them.
In an absolute, there is no way one can prove the age of the earth, one way or another. I can't prove it is 6983 years old, but I can't prove without an absolute doubt, that the earth is 20 billion years old either. It is what somebody takes faith in.
It is simply a choice of the mind.
When you die, you will go where you choose to follow.



So what you're saying is: Nothing can be absolutely proven.



According to some of the oldest writings known to men, there were people who thought just as you pretend to.

The earth split open, water gushed out and all of them were killed horribly.

There's a lesson there for you personally.


If this is meant to scare me, I can assure you it didn't work. I believe the flood happened, but not on such a grand scale, plus the Ark is nonsense (unless they kept DNA somehow with lost ancient knowledge). I believe it happened and I believe it killed a lot of people. But innocent people died too, believers died too.

When was the last time you heard of unexplainable things happening to 'bad' people? Probably this flood was the last time.

In my experience, it seems the 'bad' people dont get any worse treatment throughout their life than the devote belivers who do everything 'right'

I want to do what is best for the Species of Humans that are my family. I want to be a moral person who cares for others, but I don't need a reward like eternal life to be good. I think it is the end when my brain dies. But I am not sad, I am happy becasue I saw this life and was conscious of myself. I was and I am.


I doubt you'll feel the same way when you're about to die.
The one thing they don't tell you and the one thing always forgotten is that regardless of whether or not you'll be back... death is the most awful thing one can ever experience.

You say my comments do not scare you. That's fine. Similar comments did not scare people in Noah's time, but you can rest assured that when they heard the Earth's crust ripping, when it all wouldn't stop, and when they saw the sky end -- in a matter of moments -- they experienced the kind of fear not often repeated.

It's a kind of fear so potent -- it is risidual. It survives without the memory of death because death itself is not retained in the ethereal engram.

If I were you I would pray that my aloof and irreverent denials, my determined and deliberate opposition, my wicked suppression of truth -- does not result in a very sudden and very present reminder of a past trauma, because there aren't many effective ways to describe what I mean.


Please do not tell me how I will feel before I die. I think I would be inhuman if I did not feel human emotions. Yes I feel fear of dying, but no fear of Hell, or excitement of Heaven. I accept that it is the end when I die, for all things.

If you can call me all those things, Wicked, aloof and opposed then what are you? Yes I am standing by my beliefs, I am looking at the facts laid out before me and I am choosing the most acceptable to me. I am trying to explain how my thinking works to you all. And I think I am right.


I'm telling you how you will feel when you die because it is the way others who have spoken like you felt before they were ended.

You have a callous and ugly policy which amounts to nothimg more than rejection of truth.

This why your death will be as horrible as can be arranged.


You must be a sad person inside to wish such horror on a person.


No. I'm just a person who believes in justice.


And what, exactly, did I do wrong that deserves death in the most horrible way as can be arranged? Do all non-believers deserve this fate?


You are reasonably intelligent and yet you choose to ignore all that is obvious in favor of abject lies and untruths. Furthermore, you actively deploy these untruths and you do it in such a way so as to appear reasonable. This is most despicable.

You deny people the opportunity to return to the father.

There can only be adverse consquences for you.



'return to the father' so he is not here with you? the contradictions within your religion leave me unable to believe.

You want me to be 'ended' and you think it will be in a rather bad way.

What happened to your 'Love thy neighbour' Commandment?

Dont you see that religions seperate the species of Homo Sapiens? It is the main cause of wars and death, yet you call it a beautiful thing.


I'm not one who hangs on every word of the dogma you attribute to what you've called Christianity.

My understanding is a lot less complicated.

There exists a virus that must be quarantined.

In order for people to avoid being mistaken as part of the offending phenomenon they must observe the will of the father.

They can't do that if they don't believe he exists and they won't belive he exists if you convince them he doesn't, so all you're really doing is preventing the children from returning to their father.

This is why you must be ended.

OPtard, can I have a sack of that shit ya' smokin'?

Sick shit ya' postin' here.

So if the Pyramids were built today,hypothetically, with rocks that will last a billion years,then the structure would last a billion years in some form? Pyramids we know today are 4000 years old and crumbling away slowly. In 4 or 5000 years they will be gone. Rocks weather and corrode much quicker than a billion or a million years. Thats what I'm driving at in all this.



Maybe this will explain in Layman's terms to you why you cannot use Pyramids as the subject of your theory.

If a 'rock' is buried under ground, there is no system to weather it (no wind, rain or sun). Therefore it will remain in it's state of 'rockness' for an indefinite period of time. (normally millions of years, until it finds it's way to the surface)

Once the rocks were quarried for the Pyramimds, they became susceptible to weathering, which has occured over time. You are correct in thinking that the rocks will weather away before millions of years has passed, but wrong in thinking this is true for all substances on earth.

Again, if a rock - limestone, granite or other is under a mountain for example where it was formed by huge compressive forces due to plate tectonics, it will not erode unless there is some erosive force acting upon it.

Take a beach, it has billions of grains of sand. This sand used to be rock which is now eroded by the wind and rain and the sea grinding it together. This sand, over time, will form sediment at the bottom of the ocean or be blown over land to settle under soil. Over many years, and I'm talking millions of years here, this sand will be compressed again into rock or even be melted into glass by the heat and pressures of the Earth.

This is a cycle, it happens constantly and will happen until the Earth burns itself out.

You do not seem to understand that rocks under the ground do not 'turn to dust' as easily as you think.