Scott Peterson...Fair Trial? | |
hoot 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Scott was innocent: they wouldnīt have made a big deal out of it if he was guilty. This was done to show their power to all. There were at least two other pregnate women and their babys sacrificed and thrown in the bay before Lacy. This was covered up. Same way with O. J. and Martha they were innocent also. These are all created crimes to fill the airways and show their power over us slaves! |
not another peterson thread 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
VikingWoman nli 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Iīm not sure because I wasnīt presented with the evidence...but one thing is really weird... Doesnīt seem like California is like the Capital of killing quite pregnant women? Like since at least Manson? I think Petersonīs side does make a case to investigate satan worshipers types... Wish he didnīt act so darn guilty though, and talking about "losing his wife" etc....and appearing to flee the country probably cost him his life more than anything. |
Urinal Cake.. 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
guilty 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
not another peterson thread 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Call me crazy, but if I was ever brought up on murder charges (falsely or not) Iīd like the people who were going to decide my fate to take some time to do it." And when the jury comes back after deliberating your trial for 15 minutes what are you going to do? Jump up on the bench and demand that they go back and talk about it some more? Donīt get around the U.S. "justice" halls too much now, do you? |
IS THE POPE CATHOLIC? 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not a fair trial. A nobody fertilizer salesman has a disappeared, dead, pregnant wife. But the story is in the national news every day, cover of the National Enquirer most weeks, Russians are following the story... Heīs guilty, but he was tried in the media. The case was poor, and by California legal standards, the prosecution did not make the elements. It never should have been a death penalty case, either. The drama will play on for the appeal. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He got a better trial than his wife and kid did. Iīm not saying he shouldnīt have been punished for it. Iīm just wondering if the process that he went thru was proper. At least one juror, Justin Falconer, on his case was kicked off because he believed in the reasonable doubt defense...and did from day one. So he gets shitcanned. Then the doctor/lawyer wants to talk in depth about the case. Shitcanned. Some other woman may have done outside research. Shitcanned. Result? A jury that convicts after eight hours of deliberation. Next time, it might be a TRULY innocent person. Do we want to get in the habit of putting "hanging judges" on the jury everytime someone gets accused? |
19.47 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sure there is. If enough news people see these types of comments on the Net, then maybe next time a person who has no physical evidence linking them to a crime wonīt be sent to prison. In essence, Scott was convicted on his character after being accused, his emotional display in court, and his habit of lying. Is he guilty? Probably. But you ought to take more than 8 hours to reach a verdict on it. This isnīt like a cop walked in while he was unwrapping a silk scarf from around her neck and testified to that. Thatīs a shorter type of verdict...maybe two hours. Getting rid of people who wanted to 1) vote differently than the rest of the jury, or 2) make the jury actually talk out the details seems counter to Justice in my opinion. Weīve sent a lot of innocent men to prison in the last few years. DNA evidence has freed a few of them. Ever wonder how many more are in prison who donīt have the benefit of DNA admitted evidence to prove their innocence? |
Big Brother 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FAIR TRIAL MY ASS!!!! oj gets off SCOTT free with PHYSICAL DNA EVIDENCE that he murdered his wife. Poor Whitey gets convicted and sent to the gallows on CIRCUMSTANCE ALONE. HOW THE HELL DO YOU GET A FAIR TRIAL WHEN THE DEATH PENALTY IS DECIDED SEPARATE FROM THE CONVICTION? 1st degree murder is 1st degree murder. AM I MISSING SOMETHING? Fucking whore justice system. Fucking illiterate bleeding heart juries. Fuck em. |
Undead 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "The case was poor, and by California legal standards, the prosecution did not make the elements. It never should have been a death penalty case, either." I agree. The prosecution had piles of proof that Scott was a lying weasel faced scum bag, but nothing at all to prove he murdered anybody. |
Harrdrawk 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Try to lie your way out of that.. Harrd |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Weīve sent a lot of innocent men to prison in the last few years. DNA evidence has freed a few of them. Ever wonder how many more are in prison who donīt have the benefit of DNA admitted evidence to prove their innocence? The groups that are trying to correct some of these bad cases are so busy trying to free the innocent - especially those on death row. It is probably never going to happen - but the federal government should fund a rework of all old DP cases where the accused is already dead and DNA soaked evidence is still available for additional testing. That would be the end of the DP in this "land of the free." |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Stan 12/08/2005 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 86761660 Canada 01/23/2024 08:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nothing, absolutely nothing about the Scott Peterson witchhunt was fair. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17465443 [link to pinterquest.com (secure)] Thank God for the Innocence Project!!!!! If you have to ask, he didn't get a fair trial unless you are guilty until proven innocent. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 86766550 United States 01/24/2024 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nothing, absolutely nothing about the Scott Peterson witchhunt was fair. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17465443 [link to pinterquest.com (secure)] Thank God for the Innocence Project!!!!! If you have to ask, he didn't get a fair trial unless you are guilty until proven innocent. Bro fuck off cunt |