Manned Moon Landings were Hoaxed- official NASA Apollo 15 photo clearly shows small capsule model with stage rigging in the background

AS11-44-6574HR - Official NASA Apollo 11 photo reveals the support rigging for small Lunar Lander model
[link to i230.photobucket.com]

The overhang support rigging is seen above the small Lunar Lander model

Here the same photo at different brightnesses
[link to i230.photobucket.com]
[link to i230.photobucket.com]
---------------------------

AS11-44-6598HR - Official NASA Apollo 11 photo reveals the background support rigging for small Lunar Lander model
[link to i230.photobucket.com]

The background support rigging has a solid shape

Heres the same photo a little brighter
[link to i230.photobucket.com]
---------------------------

AS14-66-9228HR - Official NASA Apollo 14 photo reveals the ceiling support rigging above the model Moon
[link to i230.photobucket.com]

bumpty

they only staged these photos after they got to the moon & the aliens ran them off & told them not to return.

They couldn't cancel the remaining missions, so they
staged them

Wow……the stories people can concoct from simple lens flares!
This never ceases to amaze me.

I have to ask though, the plant picture and reference…your joking about that one right? I mean I don’t see anything that looks like a plant, nor do I see how such a thing could have anything to do with either a hoax or a real lunar mission. I would love to hear if you really think it is a plant and if so what your explanation for its presence is.

Official NASA Apollo 14 photo's reveal the small model capsule supported from a rigging above, while in the background a man is seen counterweighting the small model.

AS14-66-9348HR
[link to i230.photobucket.com]

AS14-66-9349HR
[link to i230.photobucket.com]

AS14-66-9347HR
[link to i230.photobucket.com]
-------------------


AS10-34-5091 Official NASA Apollo 10 photo reveals small model Lunar Lander supported by a person's hands above.
[link to i230.photobucket.com]

do you really want to proove your point with images from photobucket?

They are all official NASA Apollo photos, all I've done is brighten them to show what is really there.

Yep just like alot of their official pics have strange structures in them when you run them through a filter to lighten it up a bit.

Brightness contrast was not available then...but by goodness we sure as hell have it now.

How do we know you haven't added stuff to the pictures?

It was filmed by Stanley Kubric

It was filmed by Stanley Kubric

Just copy the (HR)high resolution images yourself from NASA's own site,
[link to www.apolloarchive.com]

You will need an image enhancer/lightener, I've been using 'Gimp-2.4' which is freeware to download

I've included all the photo numbers, get in quick and copy them from the NASA site, you never know what they might do with them.

Heh, idiots...

OK, I tried it with AS14-66-9347HR. The vague shapes you refer to are actually visible without lightening the picture. I lightened it, and that makes it more visible.

I think what you're seeing is a reflection off the inside of the window. The photographer is shooting through a window.

If it was actually stage rigging, etc., why isn't it in focus, like the "model" is?

Let me state that I'm not a knee-jerk debunker. I'm all for people asking interesting questions about everything.

If that photo was taken from the luner lander what you're seeing is the framing inside the luner lander window.

The stage rigging and backgrounds are not in focus because the focus is set on the models. Also all the light was focused on the models, what shows up in the background is from reflected light off solid objects.

That's the inside of the luner lander you're seeing.

You're dense as a rock.

OK but what would be the purpose of hoaxing it?

You are misinterpetting the photos. That's all. This isn't evidence of a hoax.

I think the landing hoax has had plenty of time to prove its case and has failed repeatedly. There's no evidence of a hoax and overwhelming evidence that it really happened.

I would imagine they also hoaxed the planting of the U.S. flag on lunar soil. Let me be the first to plant the flag that describes this post the best:

I hope this is not your evidence:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

My family was newly arrived when Apollo 11 landed on the moon. I really believed it happened because I saw the film and the devoloped pictures! Some proof, huh? Then I saw the movie "Capricorn II" and had second thoughts. And then...

I found a really good website that puts forth scientific argument that there was no way the astronauts went to the moon. Here is the link for your inquiring minds:

[link to www.ufos-aliens.co.uk]

BTW, OP, I have a blown up pic of the LEM taken, supposedly, on the moon. It only sort of resembles the pics on your links to photobucket. As I looked at it one more time, it seems laughable that tinfoil tank ever made it into orbit let alone to the moon and back.
.

It does sem ridiculous.

Yeah - right one - brightness and contrast are 21st century inventions only. They haven't been around for very long - if only I had of had brightness and contrast settings on my telly back in the 70's - might have been able to make out some detail.

I think the truth of the matter may lie "in the middle"- I have read insider interviews saying we have been there, but we discovered things that were not told to the general public. Some of the stuff we saw was staged, other stuff was really us going there. Again, we need brave astronauts to come forward and tell the truth, a couple have confirmed UFO's and alien visitations. In time, soon, hopefully, more will be revealed....thanks for the info OP- all space stuff needs to be tested and not fully trusted, though some may be factual. It seems sad to me that we cant just be told the truth straight out.

We went there. 40 years ago. We just cant go back. No one can.

But we really went there.

Trust us.