[TURTLE]
User ID: 420822
 United States
04/25/2008 01:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This article appeared as part of a feature in the December 8, 1995 issue of Executive Intelligence Review, and was circuclated extensively by the Schiller Insitute Food for Peace Movement. It is reprinted here as part of the package: “Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage?”
Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide
by Joseph Brewda
Dec. 8, 1995
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.
The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.”
NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome, since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength.
For example, Nigeria: “Already the most populous country on the continent, with an estimated 55 million people in 1970, Nigeria's population by the end of this century is projected to number 135 million. This suggests a growing political and strategic role for Nigeria, at least in Africa.” Or Brazil: “Brazil clearly dominated the continent demographically.” The study warned of a “growing power status for Brazil in Latin America and on the world scene over the next 25 years.”
Food as a weapon
There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted.
A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targetted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.”
“Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? ... Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?”
Kissinger also predicted a return of famines that could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. “Rapid population growth and lagging food production in developing countries, together with the sharp deterioration in the global food situation in 1972 and 1973, have raised serious concerns about the ability of the world to feed itself adequately over the next quarter of century and beyond,” he reported.
The cause of that coming food deficit was not natural, however, but was a result of western financial policy: “Capital investments for irrigation and infrastucture and the organization requirements for continuous improvements in agricultural yields may be beyond the financial and administrative capacity of many LDCs. For some of the areas under heaviest population pressure, there is little or no prospect for foreign exchange earnings to cover constantly increasingly imports of food.”
“It is questionable,” Kissinger gloated, “whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis.” Consequently, “large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades—a kind the world thought had been permanently banished,” was foreseeable—famine, which has indeed come to pass.
To read the entire NSSM 200 document, click here ---> [link to wlym.com]
To read the full report from EIR Magazine, follow the link below:
Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage?
[link to www.larouchepub.com]
[ link to www.schillerinstitute.org] |
LouisWinthorpeIII
User ID: 384893
United States
04/25/2008 05:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is no doubt about it, this guy is evil as they come. He is right up there with Stalin. "I don't know which was scarier...the speech...or the Congress cheering it. He evoked Lincoln. Whenever a President is going to get us into serious trouble...they always use Lincoln."
-2010 |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 422148
 Australia
04/25/2008 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is no doubt about it, this guy is evil as they come. He is right up there with Stalin.
Quoting: LouisWinthorpeIIIStalin was an angel compared to Kissinger. |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 341677
United States
04/25/2008 06:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
420822]
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security.
Quoting: You obviously don't understand the role of governments. You ALSO don't understand probability and possibility. Governments, just like individuals, PLAN for things that they DON'T expect to ever happen. I plan for what I'll do when I win the Lottery, even though the chances of that happening are INCREDIBLY small. If it DOES happen, I want to have SOME idea of what I'll do, and NOT do. Governments are no different. There is NOTHING sinister in planning for the almost unthinkable. And excess population ISN'T, in ANY way, unthinkable. The most likely cause of the decline or even extinction of the human race, is over-population. And NO ONE is actually doing anything about it, except for think tanks that get hung out to dry when their ideas make it into the publics consciousness. - |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58109
United States
04/25/2008 06:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won't control their population growth?
No chance there chief. Just ultimatum. |
GraftedPromise U$ofA
User ID: 422787
United States
04/25/2008 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It would be difficult for us to get anything from our garden if troops were going through the neighborhood and shooting/killing anyone who moved.
It would be difficult for us to get anything from our garden if fire, drought, flood, and/or insects were involved.
It would be difficult for us to get anything from our garden if the government passed laws/regualtions that forbid us to have a garden.
It would be difficult for us to get anything from our garden if we didn't have the land or the know how/experience to hava a garden.
It would be difficult for us to get anything from our garden if we believed the nay-sayers. |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 922384
 New Zealand
03/22/2010 10:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [ link to www.youtube.com] Vid explains it, to a tee Peace, and good will. |
Flidais
User ID: 922151
United States
03/22/2010 10:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation | Re: Henry Kissinger's 1974 Plan for FOOD CONTROL Genocide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I used to think Genocide was a bad thing, now, it is what I want to do to Democrats, all of them, and their children too. Their flawed DNA has no place on this earth. Never Quit! Never Surrender! |
