|
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3
|
picesnator 
User ID: 318318
5/4/2008 4:58 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 383362
 catchy tune |
|
kataklyzm
unconditional idealist
User ID: 407693
5/4/2008 5:25 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
holy crap, never read that one.
"Scientists at a Japanese university believe another planet - up to two-thirds the size of the Earth - is orbiting in the far reaches of our solar system.
Researchers at Kobe University in western Japan say theoretical calculations using computer simulations led them to conclude it was only a matter of time before the mysterious 'Planet X' was found.
"The possibility is high that a yet unknown, planet-class celestial body, measuring 30 percent to 70 percent of the Earth's mass, exists in the outer edges of the solar system," Kobe University said in a statement."
 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
5/4/2008 5:45 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
:zetaright:
and so it continues Quoting: picesnator
I'll ask you again, picesnator...if you're claiming zetas "right again"...when were they ever right to begine with? Can you name one single astronomical prediction or statement from all of zetatalk that you can defend? Just one? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 141756
5/4/2008 5:47 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
So what color does the Sun look to you? |
|
picesnator
User ID: 318318
5/4/2008 6:07 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
and so it continues
I'll ask you again, picesnator...if you're claiming zetas "right again"...when were they ever right to begine with? Can you name one single astronomical prediction or statement from all of zetatalk that you can defend? Just one?
good enought?? |
|
The Lone Ranger
"Chat" campaign Adviser!!
User ID: 427124
5/4/2008 6:14 PM
 | |
The Lone Ranger
"Chat" campaign Adviser!!
User ID: 427124
5/4/2008 6:29 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Your description is so vague that it can't be commented upon.
Try again.
Here is what i posted about a week ago
i even pointed to a picture. But knowing you mennow
you would say this is just normal
=================
t was a couple of weeks ago, March 22. I was looking outside and saw the moon in a postion that was not normal. It was around 11pm and the moon was in a northeast position, about one hour later i looked out the window again and the moon was in the southeast at that moment but it was likeit made a jump cause it first posistion and the second postions where not that close to eachother. Now one could say this is normal and there is nothing going on but this kind of things make you go mmm and for me it like a sing that something odd is going on that can not be explained by normal science. As this seemed like a earth wobble to me
<img> [ link to i26.tinypic.com]
Such sudden wobbles have been described by others too. One man described a movement of the Moon while he and his daughter were lying on the ground in Arizona watching the stars. He was stunned. Yet another was waiting for his wife to pick him up in New York City, standing in the shadows and gazing at the sidewalk. The shadow formed on the walk MOVED several inches suddenly.
What do you suppose is causing all these horrific storms roaring into Europe, and tornados across the US, lately?
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
picesnator
User ID: 318318
5/4/2008 6:39 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
:gooday:
and so it begins
......  I think ya cute!!
love u too |
|
kataklyzm
unconditional idealist
User ID: 407693
5/4/2008 7:53 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
:surv2k12:
|
|
VVizz
User ID: 427893
5/4/2008 7:55 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Should we expect to lose internet connection soon?
SOZT
The internet is already faltering, as many who have troubled delivering email consistently might have noted. No bounce, no delivery, just a lost email. Since the Internet is a series of handshakes, each reach requiring a response else retried repeatedly until successful, what is going on here? These are faults within servers, who drop service before transactions in memory can be stored to hard drives. Satellites are not as reliable, as many with flickering or erratic cable service will report. But when forwarding digital data, ANY drop in the data means the address of the sender or receiver might be damaged, and thus the email or html page cannot be delivered. Pages on computers freeze, and cannot load. Insofar as land lines are carrying data and the servers involved have little downtime, the Internet should not experience problems. But when servers are overloaded and those monitoring them are increasingly distracted, data is damaged and lost. Satellites which receive an upload and signal the sender a successful send can subsequently falter, damaging the data to a degree that prevents the data from continuing on its journey.
EOZT Quoting: Nancy Lieder
If You present this information to a computer geek, for sure, the zeta system will hear his (her) loudly laugh.
Mailservers do run filters and can remove mail silently. If the spam filter on the mailserver (yes they run them too) is not working in a good manner, it can remove mail without further notice. In past, there was always a bounce of an email which can not be delivered. However, a lot of mailservers are not setup this way anymore, to avoid a bounced mail, would be double-bounced because the sender of the mail was fake, to avoid to forward spam (the mail) to the sender (which is the actually recipient of the mail, but not the real sender) or to avoid to receive more spam in general.
The internet is based on a military concept.
It is designed to operate in war times.
If a route or full net or subnets are malfunctioning, the packets or data
takes another path on the net.
If transmission is corrupt, a new transmission of the packets are send to the net. This happens on the low level
of the protocol TCP/IP by redundancy check and indeed, handshaking. But TCP/IP, the protocol of the datatransmission of the net, is designed to recover broken datastreams.
If a HTML page does freeze, it has more to do with flash or embedded information inside the page. Some hops can between the reciever and the sender can hold or block the information due to bandwidth problems, but again, it will be redirected by the routers on the hardware level.
So sorry, but this is a very weak statement and no proof at all of malfunctioning of the Net.
I agree, it is a basic communication system compared to those in 'higher level civilization', but it still stands and runs
in an acceptable manner for the level of science on Earth.
All the Best,
VVizz of Ur |
|
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 388107
5/5/2008 8:28 AM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
holy crap, never read that one.
"Scientists at a Japanese university believe another planet - up to two-thirds the size of the Earth - is orbiting in the far reaches of our solar system.
Researchers at Kobe University in western Japan say theoretical calculations using computer simulations led them to conclude it was only a matter of time before the mysterious 'Planet X' was found.
'The possibility is high that a yet unknown, planet-class celestial body, measuring 30 percent to 70 percent of the Earth's mass, exists in the outer edges of the solar system,' Kobe University said in a statement." Quoting: kataklyzm
But did you notice that not ONCE did they say this body has been hovering near the sun for the past five years as Nancy claims? Nor did they ever say that it comes bounding into the solar system to wreck havoc on Earth. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 427583
5/5/2008 9:45 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
holy crap, never read that one.
"Scientists at a Japanese university believe another planet - up to two-thirds the size of the Earth - is orbiting in the far reaches of our solar system.
Researchers at Kobe University in western Japan say theoretical calculations using computer simulations led them to conclude it was only a matter of time before the mysterious 'Planet X' was found.
'The possibility is high that a yet unknown, planet-class celestial body, measuring 30 percent to 70 percent of the Earth's mass, exists in the outer edges of the solar system,' Kobe University said in a statement."
But did you notice that not ONCE did they say this body has been hovering near the sun for the past five years as Nancy claims? Nor did they ever say that it comes bounding into the solar system to wreck havoc on Earth. Quoting: Circuit Breaker
As usual they try to attach Nancy's planet x to the Planet X of Percival Lowell, Robert Sutton Harrington, and others. If you do a search on scientific papers concerning Planet X, you will find quite a bit about the subject.
NOTE: Planet X and Nancy's planet x are TWO DIFFERENT things.
ORK |
|
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 388107
5/5/2008 11:30 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
As usual they try to attach Nancy's planet x to the Planet X of Percival Lowell, Robert Sutton Harrington, and others. If you do a search on scientific papers concerning Planet X, you will find quite a bit about the subject.
NOTE: Planet X and Nancy's planet x are TWO DIFFERENT things.
ORK Quoting: Anonymous Coward 427583
Exactly. In December 1983, an article was published discussing the possibility that a 10th planet was discovered using IRAS. It has never been proven to actually exist and no claim was ever made that it came swooping into the solar system. However, Free Store clings to this article as if it is ultimate proof of "Planet X" and some cover up. One can read the original 1983 article here:
[link to www.planet-x.150m.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 427583
5/5/2008 2:49 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
As usual they try to attach Nancy's planet x to the Planet X of Percival Lowell, Robert Sutton Harrington, and others. If you do a search on scientific papers concerning Planet X, you will find quite a bit about the subject.
NOTE: Planet X and Nancy's planet x are TWO DIFFERENT things.
ORK
Exactly. In December 1983, an article was published discussing the possibility that a 10th planet was discovered using IRAS. It has never been proven to actually exist and no claim was ever made that it came swooping into the solar system. However, Free Store clings to this article as if it is ultimate proof of "Planet X" and some cover up. One can read the original 1983 article here:
[ link to www.planet-x.150m.com]
...and what they actually found is discussed here:
[link to adsbit.harvard.edu]
Note that one of the authors is the same scientist quoted in the newspaper article. |
|
CanadianVandal
Planet X is closing in....
User ID: 425944
5/5/2008 2:52 PM
 | |
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 133854
5/5/2008 4:05 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
If you believe this, then instead of using the childish potty language, why don't you bring us some real verifiable information? The FACT is that there isn't a single shred of evidence that points to an invisible rogue planet in the inner solar system. None. |
|
kataklyzm
unconditional idealist
User ID: 407693
5/5/2008 5:12 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
So 10,000 deaths from cyclone caused by wobble.
:surv2k12:
|
|
Setheory
User ID: 428345
5/5/2008 5:25 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
So 10,000 deaths from cyclone caused by wobble. Quoting: kataklyzm
NO......caused by cyclone. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
5/5/2008 6:17 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
There is no "wobble". Otherwise, long exposure astrophotography would be impossible. But we certainly wouldn't expect any of Nancy's flunkies to know anything about that, would we? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
5/5/2008 6:25 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
So 10,000 deaths from cyclone caused by wobble. Quoting: kataklyzm
Are you also claiming that px was around in 1970 when Cyclone Bhola killed nearly 500,000?
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Or Typhoon Nina that killed 170,000 in China in 1975?
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Or Typhoon Swatow that killed 60,000 in China in 1922?
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Was px the cause of these much larger and deadlier cyclones?
You really ought to do a little research before making such a fool of yourself. Following Nancy is a sure sign of brain damage. |
|
picesnator
User ID: 318318
5/5/2008 6:29 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
soooo...where is PX
 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 359403
5/5/2008 7:17 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
So 10,000 deaths from cyclone caused by wobble. Quoting: kataklyzm
No wobble except for the well documented Chandler's Wobble which had nothing to do with the cyclone.
So Mr. kataklyzm, do you have any proof that the recent cyclone was caused by an earth wobble that, in turn, was caused by Nancy's planet X?
I bet not. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428459
5/5/2008 8:08 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Pole Shift Date of May 15, 2003
Shortly after May 15, 2003 was given as the time frame for the passage thoughout the body of ZetaTalk text. This was abreviated in discussions to May 15, 2003 but the actual words of the Zetas was always shortly after May 15, 2003, without clarification as to the exact date of rotation stoppage or shift. Below, the actual words of the Zetas in ZetaTalk.
The comet will be visible to the eye for approximately 7.3 weeks, certainly no less than 43 days, prior to the great gravitational and magnetic disruption we have described. All will be aware of it, though most will discount its presence.
ZetaTalk: Time Frame, 1995
The date of May 15th has often been referred to as an early date, to some degree. This is early to some degree, the number of days or weeks not specified. Anyone who has severed their life elsewhere and is in a safe place by May 15th will not find this distressing, or have any regrets.
ZetaTalk: Hour of the Shift, Nov 2001
Thus, you have Planet X in the news, under every subject but the inbound planet that will pass on May 15, 2003 or shortly thereafter.
ZetaTalk: Solar Flares, Jun 2002
We have stated that Planet X will be visible in the daytime sky, 7 weeks before passage. Given that we have stated that passage is shortly after May 15, 2003, as at this time those wanting to survive should be at their safe locations, this is putting the visibility into the last week of March at the earliest.
ZetaTalk: April 2003, Jan 2003 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428459
5/5/2008 8:10 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
On the Lou Gentile live radio show May 16, 2003, the Zetas gave a specific date of May 27, 2003, and reasons for being specific at this time. Details such as the day a late sunset could be expected, rotation stoppage expected, and the exact number of days, in decimals, until the hour of the shift:
As explained on Gentile last evening, but repeated here as many will not be able to hear this streaming audio, we have given the dates out because the US and Indonesian governments can no longer succeed with their plans. We had held the date close, to put these governments in the same position the common man they planned to murder are in, so that rotation stoppage would happen suddenly and prevent a smooth blockading of the city dwellers. As Nancy has been able to be interviewed in the US, the message of these plans replayed around the world, cooperation by the military or locale police in such blockades are unlikely to happen. Given such orders, they would object, refuse, allow escape, as they know the true agenda. Thus, the number of people injured by withholding the date outnumbered the number that would be murdered, the balance scale tipped.
ZetaTalk: Dates, Why Now?
Note: relayed during the May 16 Lou Genitle show, and addressed during the May 17 IRC as well. |
|
kataklyzm
unconditional idealist
User ID: 407693
5/5/2008 9:20 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
|
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 359403
5/5/2008 9:41 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Nice chart, but where is the raw data you used to create it? You could have just pulled numbers out of your ass to do that chart. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 350460
5/6/2008 12:07 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Does Nancy ever revisit questions after the fact...after she has signed off? Because I can never ask her a question in real time because she always does her thing while I'm half a world away in Australia. Is there a way to get my Qs answered despite this? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428864
5/6/2008 1:28 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Does Nancy ever revisit questions after the fact...after she has signed off? Because I can never ask her a question in real time because she always does her thing while I'm half a world away in Australia. Is there a way to get my Qs answered despite this? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 350460
Just make up your own answer. That is as valid as asking Nancy. She's never gotten anything right. |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 393820
5/7/2008 8:56 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Uh huh, you're right brianiac AC, she has never gotten anything right ... especially volcanoes popping off with more frequency ... Cyclones, hurricanes, tornadoes ravaging more than ever, rouge waves sweeping people back into the sea.
Hmmmmm, with every newscast these days, more and more surprises. And the debunkers keep telling us this just isn't so. Hmmmmm, who to believe???
Me thinks they will all re-avatar soon ... they've completely shot their credibility. Fitting, ain't it? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
5/7/2008 9:00 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat May 3 | Quote |
Uh huh, you're right brianiac AC, she has never gotten anything right ... especially volcanoes popping off with more frequency ... Cyclones, hurricanes, tornadoes ravaging more than ever, rouge waves sweeping people back into the sea.
Hmmmmm, with every newscast these days, more and more surprises. And the debunkers keep telling us this just isn't so. Hmmmmm, who to believe???
Me thinks they will all re-avatar soon ... they've completely shot their credibility. Fitting, ain't it? Quoting: User # 78/68
How hilarious. You make these claims but yet cannot provide a single comparitive study to show that any of it is true. You've been beat to a pulp before when making such claims when I and others proved you completely wrong. So, for once, instead of making laughable claims with absolutely no basis at all, surprise us by actually supplying some comparitive data from decades past to show that anything is increasing.
Start with whatever you'd like...volcanoes, hurricanes...pick one and let's see your data.
My bet is that you will run away from this challenge like you have all the others. Such a wimp. |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
|
