Eisenhower White House Claimed Phobos was Artificial Structure

AC 16339, just what "statement" has "the whitehouse" "put out there"?

Idiot.

Could have been hollowed out.Perhaps a drive system put inside.
Didn't Mdme. Blavatsky say something about the Martian moons?
Perhaps it is the Third Unseen Body that keeps being displayed in crop circles.And maybe the plant X Nancy refers to. A magnetic giant due to its powerplant.
if it moves from orbit,should provide a convincing display.Create somewhat of an eclipse I heard.

You should bite your tongue!


"maybe the plant X Nancy refers to."



Do you mean the biblical planet she says aliens tell her about?

Thanks AC,i was looking for some corroberation on this topic.

It is not artificial,it was a hollowed out planetoid.The planet looks like it is already done as well.All the activity is underground.
Any probes been sent directly to the Moons?

All the prophecies point to something big and frightening appearing in the sky,unmoving.
Nostradamus mentioned Mars ascendant as well.

Our own Moon is hollowed out and used as a staging area for the Ufos,the far side unobserved.
According to the Hill Star Map,which was of the solar system,NOT Zetaville.
All the lines radiate from Earth's smaller twin.

Suncruiser Alert! Suncruiser Alert!
Firing Beam Weapons! Calling Idol, Calling Idol, Suncruiser Alert!
[link to sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov]

Can anyone find Blavatsky's mention of the Martian moon in prophecy?

Found something in a search!
Mars is one of the "7 Sacred Planets".

"Phobos is not a true moon.Demios is a true moon..."

Coincidence?

What, exactly, makes you think that THAT opinion hasn't changed with all the space trips and new technology we've developed in the last 45 years??

Nothing we have done on the other planets tells us what is going on beneath. And the fact that these prophecies are hidden,not flashed all over the place like the failed disaster scenarios tells me something.
Time will tell.

That it is hollow was a theory brought about by peculiarities of its orbit.

Like the Hollow Earth theory,this has been exaggerated to mean the planet is completely hollow with a thin crust.
The planet is hollow IN SOME AREAS. Large "bubbles" left over from the solidifying stage from when the Earth was still boiling.
Natural caverns all over the place.Tunnels,channels,some quite cavernous.Occupuied by the Visitors as they always were.Abductees report being taken underground.That should settle that.
That is all that a "hollow" Earth means.You do not have to attack it so vehemently.

As to Phobos,I think the Visitors utilize the ferrous or conducting qualities of the planetoid. Like the earth,it generates its own electrical field.Perhaps it is an ideal choice because of it composition.
Is it a giant sized spaceship instead? No,I don't think they would construct anything that large,but if it is capable of moving (and there are peculiarities in its rotation) then it could be the as yet unseen third body.

Fact is,Blavatsky picked this vague planetoid out of all the rest. She also knew about Devas which puts her in a category above all the rest.
Not speculating here.Experience.

In fact these "crators" are not usually made by massive meter hits,they are natural calderas ,formed when these magma "bubbles" have reached the surface and rapid cooling ensued.
The Moon's (Luna's) near side all craters,yet the far side smooth.The inside the inner part of a brocken off piece of the earth. Same age,same composition, and tethered right where it broke off.That is why it keeps the same face to the earth.

These "experts" recall their grade school movies and sci fi with planets getting peppered by giant meteorites.
NO meteor will made crators the size we see on the Moon's surface. The Source say they are calders,although I am not sure if even that is the correct word for these exposed pockets.

Examine a piece of pummice stone.It is volcanic rock,but it is full of bubbles.Imagine that on a larger scale. There are buildups of gasses below the surface as well and as the crust solidify,you get gas pockets.

The Earth itself. See the enhanced satelite picture of the Earth without the oceans or vegetation. It is pockmarked all over the place.Some ocean sized ones.
Where are these meteor bombardments??

The crust becomes quite thick and solidified with these gas pockets.

See how the opposition retreats when challenged effectively? They really do not know one way or another.I could be making this all up for all they know but I am using common sense.

So what you stay clear of is an intelligent discussion in the paranormal area?
They gave up debating with me years ago and just type up tons of disinfoe garbage.

in the zend avesta
written a long time ago
zarathustra asks mazda who was contacted
before him
and he is told
YAMI
before the earth grew to three times its size

More information about Phobos.

The First Mars Express Science Conference had four presentations specifically about the research done concerning Phobos. If you examine these presentations, which are in PDF format, you will see it stated that Phobos over the last observed 6 years has an “increased secular rate … MER Rovers see 11-12 km orbital advance … HRSC/SRC [ESA Mars Express] see 11-12 km orbital advance”, Thomas C. Duxbury et. al., JPL California Institute of Technology, 11_Duxbury.pdf.

“Phobos ahead of its predicted orbital position by approx. 1 radius, Bell Duxbury et al., Nature”… “Phobos estimated to be off its normal (JPL ephemeris) orbit by 6s (approx. 12 km) along-track; across-track position errors <1 km”, J. Oberst et al., and the HRSC Co-Investigation Team, 12_Phobos_Oberst.pdf.

In the PDF presentation by John Murray et al., the images of Phobos specifically the leading edge of Phobos does not show the leading edge crater chains to be larger than the trailing edge crater chains so their theory that Phobos flew through Mars debris or flew through ejecta debris is not valid or was not validated. But they did achieve to acquire some better imaging of the leading edge of Phobos.

What you might find even more interesting is the last presentation PDF by Severine Perrier et al., SPICAM Team on the Mars Express. They worked on the UV absorption or reflectance of Phobos and Deimos, the albedo of those two moons. What they found was a repetitive reading in the 220 um, “significant absorption feature around 220 um, similar to interstellar extinction feature … could be caused by the presence on Phobos of organic material … not compatible with the UV silicate signature (around 260 um) … similar to the extinction feature observed in the Interstellar Medium of 217.5 um” To quote them even more “Nature of ISM absorbing material? Possible organic material”.

The First Mars Express Science Conference Presentations, [link to sci.esa.int]

Therefore, Isoef Shmuelovich Shklovskii’s mathematics and theory of Phobos being an artificial satellite has been further substantiated by the Mars Express (JPL) MRSC/SRC investigative teams conclusions that Phobos is out of predicted position but amazingly Phobos must have some organic material.

Y’all have a nice day now.

stgeorge:
"Our own Moon is hollowed out and used as a staging area for the Ufos,the far side unobserved.
According to the Hill Star Map,which was of the solar system,NOT Zetaville.
All the lines radiate from Earth's smaller twin."

You mean this? [link to www.kochkyborg.de]
(I'm not seeing the Phobos link you mention, but it does discuss the Hill starmap as being our solar system at the time of their abduction.)

This was new to me, thanks!

Whoops, meant >lunar< link, not phobos.

The Koch / Kyborg interpertation of the Hill starmap shows routes Earth & Jupiter, not the moon & anywhere else.

The also don't discuss the position of Phobos in that article.

Your name start with a K?

True Story,


was just the very tip of the iceberg though!

YIMA
not YAMI

ha


Scriptures of Zoroastrianism, Vendidad 1

The fair Yima, the great shepherd, O holy Zarathustra! he was the first mortal, before thee, ... And the fair Yima replied unto me, O Zarathustra, saying: ...
hinduwebsite.com/sacredscripts/ zoroscripts/venfar_01.htm

bump

Since you very conveniently did not include the source of the "story", I have to assume that it came from a woo-woo website/blog, and if so, it has absolutely no credibility. Sorry.