Royal U.S. Presidential Bloodlines -- Why Voting in America Doesn't Matter

[cont.]

What is this bullshit that won't allow this information to be posted?

I guess since GLP is censored, you'll have to read it for yourself:

Download a free copy of "The Atlantean Conspiracy":

(.pdf format) [link to www.linktoit.com]

or read it online now at Scribd:

[link to www.scribd.com]

Is that all you got, shill?

Then explain how Andrew Jackson, a backwoods hick, was voted president in favor of John Quincy Adams who was a direct descendent of King Edward III of England...

Yeah, you can't explain it, because your story is bullcrap.

The greatest document in world history, the Constitution, was written by "bluebloods."

They can't be all that bad then.

there is evidence to show that all the presidents are directly connected to European royal bloodlines.

Kennedys - [link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]

the Windsor/Bush bloodline[must see] -
[link to www.bibliotecapleyades.net]

I think the Esoteric Agenda mentions this bloodline material.

"The Bush-Clinton dynasty will have been in power thirty-six consecutive years, by the time the re-election of Hillary Clinton occurs. After Hillary, will it be Jeb or George P. Bush who becomes President? Most likely, it will be Jeb's son who succeeds his uncle in office. Are Americans really THIS ASLEEP, to fall for this time and again?"
[link to kentroversypapers.blogspot.com]



Al's Family Hardly Peasants

Gore's family members weren't exactly peasants. The vice president's family tree includes Charlemagne and three Holy Roman emperors. And a good fight wouldn't frighten the vice president's most famous ancestor, England's Edward I - best known today as the king who defeated, then executed Braveheart. Edward was also said to be very popular with the ladies. His descendent, Al Gore certainly won the hearts of many American ladies with "that kiss" he publicly planted on wife Tipper. Although Gore is running a bit behind Bush in the European royal count, his blood-line runs close to some American home-grown nobility, including Thomas Jefferson, Daniel Boone, and "Buffalo Bill" Cody.

Trump Card

Buckingham Palace politely declined to comment on the recorded royal connections of either candidate. "This sort of thing happens every time there's an American Presidential Election," scoffed one palace official. But if the Burke's Peerage prediction has its doubters, the company doesn't hesitate to defend its crowning legacy. "You can't just write off 200 years of accurate predictions," says Brooks-Baker pointing out Mike Dukakis learned about the "royal factor" the hard way. The 1988 Democratic nominee and son of Greek immigrants had no connections to any European thrones, and he lost in a landslide.

Most American Presidents Are Descendents of the Same Royal Bloodline
Thread: Most American Presidents Are Descendents of the Same Royal Bloodline (Page 3)


(most-if not-all royal Euro bloodline descendants)

i HIGHLY doubt the constitution was written by blood-bloods.

Sound like blue-bloods???


ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?
Quote

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.

Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.

They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners: men of means, well educated. But they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader saw his ships swept from the seas by the British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly. He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him, and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and Middleton. At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr. noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months. John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning to find his wife dead and his children vanished. A few weeks later he died from exhaustion and a broken heart. Norris and Livingston suffered similar fates.

Such were the stories and sacrifices of the American Revolution. These were not wild-eyed, rabble-rousing ruffians. They were soft-spoken men of means and education. They had security, but they valued liberty more. Standing tall and straight, and unwavering, they pledged: "For the support of the declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of the divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor."

Thread: ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

Easy -- Jackson was a Grand Master Mason who the Rothschilds thought they could trust. When he didn't go along with the Rothschild plan to renew their central bank's charter, they tried to assassinate him:

1829-1837 Andrew Jackson, 7th. President of the United States (D). Confirmed Mason (The New Age Magazine, January 1953, pg. 44). Initiated: The record for Brother Jackson has not been located. He seems to have been a Member of St. Tammany Lodge No. 1, Nashville, Tennessee, as early as 1800. It was the first Lodge in Tennessee, organized in 1789, under a Dispensation from the Grand Lodge of North Carolina. The name was later changed to Harmony Lodge No. 1 on November 1, 1800. Brother Jackson is officially listed as a Member in the Lodge Return to the Grand Lodge of North Carolina and Tennessee for 1805. On December 27, 1813, the Grand Lodge of Tennessee was granted its own Constitution. Brother Jackson was the sixth Grand Master of Masons of Tennessee, serving from October 7, 1822 until October 4, 1824. Strengthened Presidential Veto Power.

1835: On January 30, an assassin tries to shoot President Jackson, but miraculously both of the assassin's pistols misfired. President Jackson would later claim that he knew the Rothschilds were responsible for that attempted assassination. He is not the only one, the assassin, Richard Lawrence, who was found not guilty by reason of insanity, later bragged that powerful people in Europe had hired him and promised to protect him if he were caught.

The Rothschilds acquire the rights in the Almadén quicksilver mines in Spain. This was at the time the biggest concession in the world and as quicksilver was a vital component in the refining of gold or silver this gave the Rothschilds a virtual world monopoly.

1836: Following his years of fighting against the Rothschilds and their central bank in America, President Andrew Jackson finally succeeds in throwing the Rothschild's central bank out of America, when the bank's charter is not renewed. It would not be until 1913 that the Rothschilds would be able to set up their third central bank in America, the Federal Reserve, and to ensure no mistakes are made, this time they will put one of their own bloodline, Jacob Schiff, in charge of the project.

Again this post.

Some of this is factually correct, but much of it is wrong.

And no, I didn't go to snopes.com, I looked into it myself when I saw it first around July 4th years ago.

And I mentioned the Constitution.

James Madison wrote much of that document. He was elected President and according to the op, all the Presidents are bluebloods.

Let's see if GLP will even allow this information to be posted:

Did you know all 43 U.S. presidents have carried European royal bloodlines into office? 34 have been genetic descendants from just one person, Charlemagne, the brutal eighth century King of the Franks. 19 of them directly descended from King Edward III of England. In fact, the presidential candidate with the most royal genes has won every single American election.

“This information comes from Burke's Peerage, which is the Bible of aristocratic genealogy, based in London. Every presidential election in America, since and including George Washington in 1789 to Bill Clinton, has been won by the candidate with the most British and French royal genes. Of the 42 presidents to Clinton, 33 have been related to two people: Alfred the Great, King of England, and Charlemagne, the most famous monarch of France. So it goes on: 19 of them are related to England's Edward III, who has 2000 blood connections to Prince Charles. The same goes with the banking families in America. George Bush and Barbara Bush are from the same bloodline - the Pierce bloodline, which changed its name from Percy, when it crossed the Atlantic. Percy is one of the aristocratic families of Britain, to this day. They were involved in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament at the time of Guy Fawkes” -Researcher/Author David Icke, “Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center”

If America declared its Independence from the European monarchies in 1776, how is it possible that every single president has descended from European monarchs? If presidents are democratically elected as we are told, what are the odds that we would always choose members of British and French royal bloodlines to lead us?

“The Americas have always been owned and governed by the same royal families of Britain and Europe that conventional history states as being among those defeated during the wars of so-called ‘Independence.’” -Michael Tsarion, “Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology”

“If it really is the Land of the Free and if, as is claimed, anyone really can become the president, you would fairly expect that the 43 presidents from George Washington to
George W. Bush would express that genetic diversity. You're having a laugh. The presidents of the United States are as much a royal dynasty as anything in Europe, from whence their bloodlines came.” -David Icke, “Tales from the Time Loop”

Researchers like David Icke, Michael Tsarion, and Fritz Springmeier, along with foundations like the New England Historical Genealogy Society, Burkes Peerage, the Roman Piso Homepage, and other reliable genealogical sources have documented these royal presidential bloodlines. Actually, by branching out far enough on the presidential family tree, the dedicated researcher will find that all 43 presidents share kinship, belonging to the same general ancestry, often called the 13th Illuminati bloodline, the Merovingian line, and/or the Windsor-Bush bloodline.

“If you go deeply enough into the genealogical research you will find that ALL the presidents are from this line …A spokesman for Burkes Peerage, the bible of royal and aristocratic genealogy based in London, has said that every presidential election since and including George Washington in 1789 has been won by the candidate with the most royal genes. Now we can see how and why. United States presidents are not chosen by ballot, they are chosen by blood!” -David Icke, “The Windsor-Bush Bloodline”

Granted the relationships are sometimes distant 10th or 15th cousins, but in a country with hundreds of millions to choose from, this simply cannot be chance or coincidence. Gary Boyd Roberts, a genealogist at the New England Historic Genealogical Society thoroughly traced these connections in his book “Ancestors of American Presidents.” George W. Bush himself is directly related to 16 former U.S. presidents including George Washington, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, James Garfield, Grover Cleveland, Teddy Roosevelt, William H. Taft, Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Richard Nixon, and Gerald Ford.

Bush is closely related to the king of Albania and has kinship with every member of the British royal family and the House of Windsor. He is related to 20 British Dukes, the 13th cousin of Britain’s Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth. He is 13th cousin once removed from Prince Charles and has direct descent from King Henry III, Charles II, and Edward I of England. Through the House of Windsor and King Henry III, the Bush’s and Bill Clinton are genetically related as well.

“According to Burke's Peerage, even according to the official genealogy, Bill Clinton is genetically related to the House of Windsor, the present royal family in Britain; to every Scottish monarch; to King Henry III of England; and to Robert I of France.” -David Icke, “Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center”

In 2004 George W. Bush ran as a “Republican” against “Democrat” John Forbes Kerry – his 16th cousin. These cousins, related to the same British and French monarchs, are also secret society brothers in the infamous Skull and Bones fraternity. John Kerry descends from King Henry II of England and Richard the Lionheart, leader of the third Christian crusade in 1189. He also has links to royalty in Albania, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia, Persia, and France, but still not enough royal genes to top George Bush. Earlier in 2000 we see the same story - George W. Bush ran neck and neck with Al Gore; another supposed democrat and cousin of the Bush family.

“Al Gore is a descendant of Edward I, Roman Emperors Louis I, II, and Charles II and is direct descendant of Charlemagne which makes him a distant cousin of Richard Nixon and George W. Bush. So the top “democratic” candidates against Bush in 2000 and 2004 were actually his cousins!” -Michael Tsarion, “Where History Ends DVD”

“Never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances. There has always been a significant “royal factor,” in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, among others, all boasting blue blood links. Al Gore…a descendant of Edward I, he is also a cousin of former U.S. President Richard Nixon, who resigned from the White House in 1974 for his part in the Watergate scandal. However, Al Gore does have direct links to the Holy Roman Empire. He is descendant of Roman Emperors Louis II, Charles II, and Louis I and is therefore also a direct descendant of Charlemagne, the eighth-century Emperor. The problem is that Gore’s Charlemagne links also make him a cousin of George W. Bush.” -Harold Brooks-Baker, Burke’s Peerage Publishing Director from p. 7, NEXUS magazine, Vol. 8, No 1, January-February edition

By placing bloodline members on both sides of America’s faux political dichotomy, the old monarchs have guaranteed their right to throne under the guise of democratic elections. Back in 1996 we see the same tactic as “Democrat” Bill Clinton defeated “Republican” Bob Dole, his cousin.

“Even Bill Clinton and Bob Dole, who ‘opposed’ each other at the 1996 election, are distant cousins. They can trace their ancestry to England’s King Henry III, who reigned from 1227 to 1273, and US Presidents William Henry and Benjamin Harrison …Clinton has far more royal blood than Dole and is directly descended from the same bloodline as the House of Windsor, every Scottish monarch, and King Robert I of France. This is why he was the Brotherhood’s choice.” -David Icke, “The Biggest Secret” (191-192)

The Windsor-Bush bloodline reaches from the American presidents, back to British/European royalty, and it doesn’t stop there. It continues back through Roman emperors, all the way to Babylonian Kings and Egyptian Pharaohs near the beginning of recorded history.

From Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVI, the French line continues back through Louis XV-I, Charles XI-I, Henry IV-I, Philip V-I, Robert II and many other French monarchs. It passes the de Medici family, specifically Queen Catherine de Medici of France, who supported Columbus’ expedition to the “New World” along with bloodline Queen Isabella of Castile, King Ferdinand of Spain, and the House of Lorraine. It was also Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand who started the 350 year Spanish Inquisition, which ordered the murder of millions who refused to convert to Christianity. And from the House of Lorraine, Duke Godfroi de Bouillon became the first Crusader King of Jerusalem.

“Father George and wife Barbara [Bush] are both descendants of Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into the King’s palace at Temple Mount … Godfroi de Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for the Illuminati bloodline …So when George W. Bush, a descendant of the de Bouillon through his mother and father, talked of a “Crusade” against “Islamic” terrorism…this was no slip of the tongue…as was reported” - David Icke “Alice In Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster”

According to a New York Times article, the average American's chances of having a royal bloodline is about 5 percent.

But anyone can be president, right?

In your dreams...

What does that have to do with anything? You said that all the US presidents were "blue bloods" and that in every presidential race the candidate "with the most royal genes" has won. Yet John Quincy Adams was the son of American aristocrats, and directly descended from English kings. Andrew Jackson's family were backwoods hicks and his ancestry was unknown even to himself.

I would also like to know, based on your theory, how it is that Bill Clinton has more royal genes than HW Bush [who is descended from Charlegmegne]. Explain Bill Clinton's royal lineage, please.

~

Edward I

I wish Dubya had at least one thing in common
with Edward I, his ancestor King.


~

Thanks for the softballs:

Is Bill Clinton A Descendant Of Cecil Rhodes or Winthrop Rockefeller?

3-11-00
 
President Bill Clinton's official biography states that he is a Blythe.
 
We have all heard the tear-jerking story of how he was born Billy Blythe, how his father died three months before he was born when he drowned after his car careened into an irrigation ditch, how he was adopted by a man named Clinton, whose name he took. It is a familiar scene from the black-and-white movie that is Clinton's past.
 
Despite this storyline, however, questions have lingered about the true facts of the President's ancestry since he first stepped onto the national stage in 1992. This debate has been fueled in part by the President's political enemies, masters of the low blow. But it has also been re-ignited, time and again, by the Clinton team itself. They have always acted as if they were hiding something about Clinton's heritage.
 
Remember how, following his election, Clinton went in search of his Blythe cousins?
 
Generally, when one has just been elected President of the United States, it is deemed unnecessary to go in search of one's long-lost cousins. Traditionally, they are expected to come to you.
 
Then we have the first inaugural of William Jefferson Clinton in 1992. The President and First Lady scheduled, and then abruptly cancelled, a sojourn to Monticello that was to immediately follow his Inaugural Address. Was this done to disguise the fact that the 42nd President was a direct descendant of the 3rd President, the sage of Monticello, Thomas Jefferson?
 
At least one long-time friend of the President has made public statements that would tend to support the premise that Bill Clinton is, in fact, related to Thomas Jefferson. William McDonough, today the dean of architecture at the University of Virginia (the university that Jefferson founded), told a Sustainability Project symposium in California in 1994 that William Jefferson Clinton is "the seventh lineal descendant of Thomas Jefferson." He called upon Clinton to act in the spirit of his ancestor by drafting "A Declaration of Interdependence," one that would include the biosphere, just as Jefferson authored a Declaration of Independence on behalf of humans. Clinton later appointed McDonough to his Commission on Sustainable Development.
 
This explanation of the President's "hidden heritage" was confirmed by a Clinton cousin in 1994, who stated that she and the President were related to novelist John Grisham, and that both are descendants of Thomas Jefferson.
 
Other theories about the President's lineage have been advanced over the years by muckraking journalists who have implied that something sinister lies lurking in Clinton's genetic code. Two of the most spirited the Clinton years have seen are Sherman Skolnick and Ace Hayes.
 
Skolnick, the Chicago-area court activist and author of recent anti-Bush jeremiads, has alleged that President Clinton is not a Jefferson, as McDonough and others have purported, but, in fact, a Rockefeller, specifically, the illegitimate son of Governor Winthrop Rockefeller of Arkansas, Clinton's political godfather.
 
In this vein, Hayes, the late, great editor of the Portland Free Press, speculated that Clinton is the illegitimate son of FDR's son, Elliott, which would make him, like his putative grandparents, Eleanor and Franklin, a "Charlemagne descendant."
 
After he was re-elected in 1996, Burke's Peerage, the British aristocratic heritage society [in full BURKE'S GENEALOGICAL AND HERALDIC HISTORY OF THE PEERAGE, BARONETAGE, AND KNIGHTAGE], whose pronouncements are deemed authoritative, stated that Bill Clinton, a descendant of Hugh Capet and Robert I of France, has more "royal blood" than any president in American history. Curiously, Burke's Peerage also stated that the candidate with the most "royal blood" has won every presidential election since our Republic was founded.
 
Subsequent events would bear out the certainty that Clinton has royal blood and the raffish propensity to disseminate this royal blood, willy-nilly, in the libidenous manner of a debauched monarch. I am speaking of the blood evidence in the Lewinsky case.
 
In the sordid season of 1998, when the stain on Monica's blue dress was analyzed, the President's "blood" -- to put it politely -- was found to have genetic markers possessed by only one in every five *trillion* Caucasians. Holy blood, holy grail, Batman! Could this uncommon combination of chromosomes have been created by the "kissin' cousins" of Hope? It seems doubtful. Talk to a mathematician. Rather, perhaps Bill pleasured Monica with a cigar not merely to prove that he is a polite smoker, but also to preserve the divine substance of his royal essence.
 
As he prepares to leave office and resume life as a mere mortal again, and walk and talk among us, royals and commoners alike, and become president of Dreamworks, and chase women, humidore in hand, Clinton's true paternity remains a lot like George Frost Kennan found Russia to be, "a mystery wrapped inside a riddle wrapped inside an enigma." What to make of this undistinguished President's distinguished lineage? Who is he?

[more] [link to www.rense.com]

Excellent thread OP, I love this kinda shit. It's all a Truman Show movie. What a charade.

So Obama or McCain? Who has the most royal blood?

I didn't say all US presidents were Bluebloods. Burke's Peerage of London -- publisher of the Bible of aristocratic genealogy -- says it. Not only that, they say every presidential candidate with the most royal bloodlines has won every election since George Washington. That's quite the "coincidence."

Just like "William Jefferson Rockefeller Clinton" and his 1 in 5 *trillion* genetic markers, the fact that Andrew Jackson's ancestry was unknown even to himself probably indicates that his family wasn't the backwoods hicks -- at least genealogically -- that they were portrayed. Backwoods hicks don't end up being the Grand Master Mason of Tennessee and the 7th president of the US.

That ALONE shows your post is so much bovine excrement.




.

Sounds EXACTLY like more bovine excrement.

[link to www.snopes.com]



-

That is COMPLETE AND TOTAL bushit!

NO ONE can prove that lineage, let alone prove it for 34 U.S. Presidents!

And you're a complete moron for believing it!



-

That is COMPLETE AND TOTAL bullshit!

NO ONE can prove that lineage, let alone prove it for 34 U.S. Presidents!

And you're a complete moron for believing it!



-

A Truman Show indeed (which was co-produced by a Rothschild.)

Who knows which candidate has the most royal blood, 'cause they're ALL related:

McCain and Obama share royal lineage
By Auslan Cramb, Scottish Correspondent
The Telegraph
Last Updated: 2:18AM GMT 14/01/2008

John McCain, the Republican presidential contender, and Barack Obama, his Democrat rival, are both descended from the same Scottish king, it has been claimed.

According to research by an American genealogist, they share a common bloodline that can be traced to William I of Scotland, or William the Lion.

It was disclosed last year that Mr Obama was a descendant of the monarch who ruled Scotland from 1165 to 1214, and his background and upbringing spans the globe. He was born in Hawaii to an American mother and a Kenyan father, later living in Indonesia.

A separate study into Mr McCain's ancestry has now found that the 71-year-old Arizona senator has the same royal lineage.

Senator McCain was the surprising Republican victor in the New Hampshire primary last week. The former navy pilot and Vietnam veteran described his Scottish credentials in his autobiography, Faith of My Fathers.

He wrote that "the McCains, bred to fight as Highland Scots of the Clan McDonald, arrived in America shortly after it gained independence".

Gary Boyd Roberts, a senior research scholar at the New England Historic Genealogical Society, claims that both Mr McCain and Mr Obama can trace their ancestry to Isabel, an illegitimate daughter of William the Lion.

Mr McCain's family was traced back to his four-times great-grandparents, Hugh and Agnes McCain, who emigrated to Caswell County, North Carolina, in 1778.

Mr Obama's ancestor, Edward FitzRandolph, emigrated to America more than 100 years earlier.


OBAMA RELATED TO PRESIDENT BUSH AS WELL AS V.P. DICK CHENEY

NEW YORK (AFP) — US presidential hopeful Barack Obama turns out to be a distant relative not only of President George W. Bush but also of wartime British prime minister Winston Churchill, according to US researchers.

The New England Historic Genealogical Society traced the family trees of the three major presidential candidates, also revealing Democratic rival Hillary Clinton's ties to pop icon Madonna and Beat generation writer Jack Kerouac.

And while Obama and Hollywood heartthrob Bard Pitt are ninth cousins who share a relative who died in 1769, Clinton is a ninth cousin twice removed of Pitt's partner Angelina Jolie, sharing a common ancestor who died in 1718.

Clinton is meanwhile also related to a number of celebrities with French Canadian ancestry, including singers Celine Dion and Alanis Morissette.

"It is common to find people of French Canadian descent to be related to large numbers of other French Canadians," said genealogist Christopher Child, who conducted the research.

On the Republican side, John McCain's family tree came up with perhaps less surprising results, revealing mainly that he was a sixth cousin of First Lady Laura Bush.

Other ties established by the genealogical society linked Obama to former presidents Gerald Ford, Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman, and to Civil War General Robert Lee.

alright, my bad. I was unaware of the origins of this article.

I'll learn some things from this snopes article then hm

AND so does ALL the rest of your story!



-

This is cut/paste.

however, i do consider bibliotecapleyades legit, like it or not.

that would be if Hillary got selected.
[link to bp0.blogger.com]

My, aren't we all upset and bent out of shape? You know not what you speak.

I guess you've never heard of Burke's Peerage of London, who publishes the authoritative Bible of aristocratic genealogy.