| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 | I've been through the desert on a thread with no name
| killdamon
User ID: 444686
6/12/2008 7:21 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
NASA Going to the Sun
Our Sun has been the focus of astronomers for many centuries, and humanity for much longer. So for the first time, NASA will be sending a mission, labeled as Solar Probe+ (Solar Probe plus) to study our star.
"We are going to visit a living, breathing star for the first time," says program scientist Lika Guhathakurta of NASA Headquarters. "This is an unexplored region of the solar system and the possibilities for discovery are off the charts."
The mission could launch as soon as 2015, and within the 7 years it will take to complete the mission, Solar Probe+ will have hopefully solved two of the greatest astrophysical mysteries; the high temperature of the Sun’s corona and the weird acceleration of solar winds.
At its closest approach, Solar Probe+ will be 7 million kilometers from the sun, witnessing the Sun at 23 times wider than what we see it from Earth. The vessel will have to withstand temperatures greater than 1400 degrees Celsius, and suffer radiation bursts that no other Earth vessel has ever encountered.
Johns Hopkins' Applied Physics Lab (APL) will be designing and building the spacecraft, following on from their MESSENGER success. The MESSENGER, which this year made its first flyby of Mercury, is made up of similar heat protection, considering how close it travels to the Sun. The “plus” part of the missions name comes from the improved design of APL’s earlier 2005 design called Solar Probe.
The two main mysteries that Solar Probe+ is hoping to answer are puzzles that have baffled scientists for a long time. In the case of the Sun’s corona, if you were to take the Sun’s surface temperature, it would read somewhere around the 6,000 degrees Celsius mark. However, if you move further out, the heat rises, instead of intuitively dropping.
The second mystery, that of the solar winds, focuses on the fact that, even though all objects in a system suffer from solar winds, there are no organized winds close to the surface of the Sun. So just what gives the solar winds their massive velocity?
Solar Probe+ will likely launch May 2015, and spend the next 7 years hopefully answering these mysteries, and making new discoveries. It will encounter the end of Solar Cycle 24, as well as hopefully finish near the predicted maximum of Solar Cycle 25. "Solar Probe+ is an extraordinary mission of exploration, discovery and deep understanding," says Guhathakurta. "We can't wait to get started."
[link to www.dailygalaxy.com]
Just passing thru.
OG id 126286
NasTraDooMis - Aka, killdamon |
| killdamon
User ID: 444686
6/12/2008 7:23 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
The Sunspot Enigma: The Sun is “Dead”—What Does it Mean for Earth?
Dark spots, some as large as 50,000 miles in diameter, typically move across the surface of the sun, contracting and expanding as they go. These strange and powerful phenomena are known as sunspots, but now they are all gone. Not even solar physicists know why it’s happening and what this odd solar silence might be indicating for our future.
Although periods of inactivity are normal for the sun, this current period has gone on much longer than usual and scientists are starting to worry—at least a little bit. Recently 100 scientists from Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa and North America gathered to discuss the issue at an international solar conference at Montana State University. Today's sun is as inactive as it was two years ago, and solar physicists don’t have a clue as to why.
"It continues to be dead," said Saku Tsuneta with the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, program manager for the Hinode solar mission, noting that it is at least a little bit worrisome for scientists.
Dana Longcope, a solar physicist at MSU, said the sun usually operates on an 11-year cycle with maximum activity occurring in the middle of the cycle. The last cycle reached its peak in 2001 and is believed to be just ending now, Longcope said. The next cycle is just beginning and is expected to reach its peak sometime around 2012. But so far nothing is happening.
"It's a dead face," Tsuneta said of the sun's appearance.
Tsuneta said solar physicists aren't weather forecasters and they can't predict the future. They do have the ability to observe, however, and they have observed a longer-than-normal period of solar inactivity. In the past, they observed that the sun once went 50 years without producing sunspots. That period coincided with a little ice age on Earth that lasted from 1650 to 1700. Coincidence? Some scientists say it was, but many worry that it wasn’t.
Geophysicist Phil Chapman, the first Australian to become an astronaut with NASA, said pictures from the US Solar and Heliospheric Observatory also show that there are currently no spots on the sun. He also noted that the world cooled quickly between January last year and January this year, by about 0.7C.
"This is the fastest temperature change in the instrumental record, and it puts us back to where we were in 1930," Dr Chapman noted in The Australian today.
If the world does face another mini Ice Age, it could come without warning. Evidence for abrupt climate change is readily found in ice cores taken from Greenland and Antarctica. One of the best known examples of such an event is the Younger Dryas cooling, which occurred about 12,000 years ago, named after the arctic wildflower found in northern European sediments. This event began and ended rather abruptly, and for its entire 1000 year duration the North Atlantic region was about 5°C colder. Could something like this happen again? There’s no way to tell, and because the changes can happen all within one decade—we might not even see it coming.
The Younger Dryas occurred at a time when orbital forcing should have continued to drive climate to the present warm state. The unexplained phenomenon has been the topic of much intense scientific debate, as well as other millennial scale events.
Now this 11-year low in Sunspot activity has raised fears among a small but growing number of scientists that rather than getting warmer, the Earth could possibly be about to return to another cooling period. The idea is especially intriguing considering that most of the world is in preparation for global warming.
Canadian scientist Kenneth Tapping of the National Research Council has also noted that solar activity has entered into an unusually inactive phase, but what that means—if anything—is still anyone’s guess. Another solar scientist, Oleg Sorokhtin, a fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, however, is certain that it’s an indication of a coming cooling period.
Sorokhtin believes that a lack of sunspots does indicate a coming cooling period based on certain past trends and early records. In fact, he calls manmade climate change "a drop in the bucket" compared to the fierce and abrupt cold that can potentially be brought on by inactive solar phases.
Sorokhtin’s advice: "Stock up on fur coats"…just in case.
[link to www.dailygalaxy.com]
Just passing thru.
OG id 126286
NasTraDooMis - Aka, killdamon |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450521
6/12/2008 8:11 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
You probably have no passion in your life. Quoting: DrPostman
What an arrogant mean-spirited person you are. |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450521
6/12/2008 8:14 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
One of the payoffs to reading and posting to threads like
this is that they expand my learning. I take time to do
research on the net over the subject and that continues
to increase my knowledge and understanding. Kind of the
opposite of the folks who post "don't read them!", "they're
shills", or "they're afraid of our truth that we won't
prove!". All they do is react instead of respond on these
types of threads. Reminds me of church folks reacting out
of fear when confronted with something that might contradict
their belief system. Quoting: DrPostman
what a hypocrate. |
| Dee
User ID: 536
6/12/2008 8:44 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Sorokhtin’s advice: "Stock up on fur coats"…just in case.
A little "chilling" might be just what some of us need. |
| Jew Loving Canadian
User ID: 367933
6/12/2008 8:47 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Both bunkers and debunkers have their extremists. Immediately discounting a theory because it doesn't seem likely is just as ignorant as as assuming a theory is correct before gathering evidence to support it. As is the case with this thread.
I'm not sure that "the sun looks to be in a different place" qualifies for a pinned thread. I'm not debunking anything because there's nothing to debunk...the OP gave no effort to research (other than looking out the window) no information and pushed the panic button.
"the sun IS too far north". Really? How do we determine "too far"? What is "normal" position for the sun? To find that answer you would have to reserch habits of the sun for the past few million years so you could have a benchmark so to speak. If it IS too far north, let's see the data to support.
Also, you are getting burns on your face because of UV index increase. This has nothing to do with the sun's position being "too far north".
My two biggest complaints about "bunkers" are that they rarely provide the foundation for scientific discussion and almost NEVER entertain solutions.
It's almost like a cult of people racing to be the first one to guess how the world will end so they can say "SEE???? TOLD YOU SO!"
I used to be a bunker of sorts, but at least I compiled data to support my claims and welcomed all discussion. ANYONE WHO HAS EVER DISCOVERED ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT HAS RELIED ON THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY TO "DEBUNK" THIER THEORY IN ORDER TO PROVE IT RIGHT! The fact that most of you dislike "debunking" (read: providing info to counter the highly improbable) shows you have no interest in obtaining the truth.
Grow up, get an education, become useful, stop trying to scare the shit of of people with pointless threads that have no basis of any kind.
Fuck. |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450521
6/12/2008 8:59 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Both bunkers and debunkers have their extremists. Immediately discounting a theory because it doesn't seem likely is just as ignorant as as assuming a theory is correct before gathering evidence to support it. As is the case with this thread.
I'm not sure that "the sun looks to be in a different place" qualifies for a pinned thread. I'm not debunking anything because there's nothing to debunk...the OP gave no effort to research (other than looking out the window) no information and pushed the panic button.
"the sun IS too far north". Really? How do we determine "too far"? What is "normal" position for the sun? To find that answer you would have to reserch habits of the sun for the past few million years so you could have a benchmark so to speak. If it IS too far north, let's see the data to support.
Also, you are getting burns on your face because of UV index increase. This has nothing to do with the sun's position being "too far north".
My two biggest complaints about "bunkers" are that they rarely provide the foundation for scientific discussion and almost NEVER entertain solutions.
It's almost like a cult of people racing to be the first one to guess how the world will end so they can say "SEE???? TOLD YOU SO!"
I used to be a bunker of sorts, but at least I compiled data to support my claims and welcomed all discussion. ANYONE WHO HAS EVER DISCOVERED ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT HAS RELIED ON THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY TO "DEBUNK" THIER THEORY IN ORDER TO PROVE IT RIGHT! The fact that most of you dislike "debunking" (read: providing info to counter the highly improbable) shows you have no interest in obtaining the truth.
Grow up, get an education, become useful, stop trying to scare the shit of of people with pointless threads that have no basis of any kind.
Fuck. Quoting: Jew Loving Canadian 367933
This is a forum for such stuff, arrogant ass. No one is hurt by it. Get a life, control freak. Why dont you tel us all about 9/11 truth then.  |
| Dee
User ID: 536
6/12/2008 9:35 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Good Morning DarkStarCrashs....I wonder what today will bring we sure are in some mighty strange days..
 |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 10:24 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Both bunkers and debunkers have their extremists. Immediately discounting a theory because it doesn't seem likely is just as ignorant as as assuming a theory is correct before gathering evidence to support it. As is the case with this thread.
I'm not sure that "the sun looks to be in a different place" qualifies for a pinned thread. I'm not debunking anything because there's nothing to debunk...the OP gave no effort to research (other than looking out the window) no information and pushed the panic button.
"the sun IS too far north". Really? How do we determine "too far"? What is "normal" position for the sun? To find that answer you would have to reserch habits of the sun for the past few million years so you could have a benchmark so to speak. If it IS too far north, let's see the data to support.
Also, you are getting burns on your face because of UV index increase. This has nothing to do with the sun's position being "too far north".
My two biggest complaints about "bunkers" are that they rarely provide the foundation for scientific discussion and almost NEVER entertain solutions.
It's almost like a cult of people racing to be the first one to guess how the world will end so they can say "SEE???? TOLD YOU SO!"
I used to be a bunker of sorts, but at least I compiled data to support my claims and welcomed all discussion. ANYONE WHO HAS EVER DISCOVERED ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT HAS RELIED ON THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY TO "DEBUNK" THIER THEORY IN ORDER TO PROVE IT RIGHT! The fact that most of you dislike "debunking" (read: providing info to counter the highly improbable) shows you have no interest in obtaining the truth.
Grow up, get an education, become useful, stop trying to scare the shit of of people with pointless threads that have no basis of any kind.
Fuck.
This is a forum for such stuff, arrogant ass. No one is hurt by it. Get a life, control freak. Why dont you tel us all about 9/11 truth then.
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 11:12 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
We see that the OP has never come back to offer ANY substantive evidence to support her claim.
End of bullshit story. |
| jarha 
User ID: 109238
6/12/2008 11:19 AM
 | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
One of the payoffs to reading and posting to threads like
this is that they expand my learning. I take time to do
research on the net over the subject and that continues
to increase my knowledge and understanding. Kind of the
opposite of the folks who post "don't read them!", "they're
shills", or "they're afraid of our truth that we won't
prove!". All they do is react instead of respond on these
types of threads. Reminds me of church folks reacting out
of fear when confronted with something that might contradict
their belief system. Quoting: DrPostman
I AGREE
___________________________________
KNOW THY ENEMY:
THIS IS NOT YOUR MOTHER'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY
___________________________________
COUNTDOWN TO 12/21/2012
STARTED ON 04/26/2009
We need REVOLUTION
a. a turning round or rotating, as on an axis.
b. a moving in a circular or curving course, as about a central point.
c. a single cycle in such a course.
___________________________
[link to www.sarahpac.com]
There is no thing endowed with life - from man, who is enslaving the elements, to the nimblest creature - in all this world that does not sway in its turn. Whenever action is born from force, though it be infinitesimal, the cosmic balance is upset and the universal motion results. |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450521
6/12/2008 11:29 AM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again. Quoting: Menow 449281
You are an arrogant piece of crap. Are you everyone's hall monitor? You are a joke. Let's hear you speak about 9/11 truth so we can see howe much of a dispicable peice of crap you are. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 12:00 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again.
You are an arrogant piece of crap. Are you everyone's hall monitor? You are a joke. Let's hear you speak about 9/11 truth so we can see howe much of a dispicable peice of crap you are. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450521
Interesting. You can't respond logically to points on the subject at hand, so you resort to distracting insults, changing the subject and putting words into people's mouths. How droll. Don't you have any idea how foolish you look? Apparently not. |
| Setheory
User ID: 383050
6/12/2008 12:04 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
You are an arrogant piece of crap. Are you everyone's hall monitor? You are a joke. Let's hear you speak about 9/11 truth so we can see howe much of a dispicable peice of crap you are. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450521
Translation: < You are a piece of crap…….bla-bla-bla…….bla-bla-bla…….You are a piece of crap.>
This is pretty much your typical post. How about a little less emoting and a little more thinking? Lawyer indeed…… |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 450650
6/12/2008 12:57 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
You are an arrogant piece of crap. Are you everyone's hall monitor? You are a joke. Let's hear you speak about 9/11 truth so we can see howe much of a dispicable peice of crap you are.
Translation: < You are a piece of crap…….bla-bla-bla…….bla-bla-bla…….You are a piece of crap.>
This is pretty much your typical post. How about a little less emoting and a little more thinking? Lawyer indeed…… Quoting: Setheory 383050
Start a fan club, dirtball. Get over your job envy. You are embarrassing yourself. You cover-up crimiminals invented name calling in this place. I'm just playing your game. How do you like it? The American people are under attack from within. You appear to be the enemy. I'm not alway nice to the enemy. If you think you can outwit me in a real debate then step right up and I will mop the floor with you. |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450650
6/12/2008 1:06 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Interesting. You can't respond logically to points on the subject at hand, so you resort to distracting insults, changing the subject and putting words into people's mouths. How droll. Don't you have any idea how foolish you look? Apparently not. Quoting: Menow 449281
This agrument is not about the original post. I clearly told you my position several times regarding that topic. As of today, you still have not proven anything to me. This argument is about you dicks who beat up every person who tries to expose truth of matters or merely questions the establishment re: science, space, comets, 9/11, chemtrails, OKCB, DU, bla, bla, bla You want to burn people at the stake as witches any time they question you. You are no one's gatekeeper, so go take a leap, jerk. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 1:32 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Interesting. You can't respond logically to points on the subject at hand, so you resort to distracting insults, changing the subject and putting words into people's mouths. How droll. Don't you have any idea how foolish you look? Apparently not.
This agrument is not about the original post. I clearly told you my position several times regarding that topic. As of today, you still have not proven anything to me. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450650
Funny how you have failed to respond to the points of proof I offered, even after being repeated several times. You apparently think that if you don't acknowledge somthing, it ceases to exist?
This argument is about you dicks who beat up every person who tries to expose truth of matters Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450650
The "truth of matters" that YOU say you don't really believe?
or merely questions the establishment re: science, space, comets, 9/11, chemtrails, OKCB, DU, bla, bla, bla Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450650
Bla, bla, bla is right. You are attempting to change the subject.
You want to burn people at the stake as witches any time they question you. You are no one's gatekeeper, so go take a leap, jerk. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450650
You want to claim BOTH that you don't really believe the OP's claim AND that it is a major TRVTH we are trying to hide?
AND, that I should prove the OP wrong when she offered that outrageous claim with NO supporting evidence?
Logic not your strong suit? |
| Freeman
User ID: 450670
6/12/2008 1:37 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again. Quoting: Menow 449281
And what evidence do you have to so surely prove this theory wrong?
Id like to hear it.
For Nibiru -
1. Climate change on earth
2. More frequent natural disasters
3. Climate change on planets other than earth.
4. Sneaky - Type in Nibiru into the NASA search engine and an eplanation into 'Planet X' comes up. Not direct evidence, but maybe a sneaky clue?
5. The amazing attention the Planet x theory is getting, not only on GLP where we have so many do gooders who despise fear mongering, but everywhere the subject is mentioned on the internet.
give me your 'Against' arguemnts. Thanks, im sure you will have plenty seen as your so hung up and caring about the whole subject. |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450650
6/12/2008 1:40 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Interesting. You can't respond logically to points on the subject at hand, so you resort to distracting insults, changing the subject and putting words into people's mouths. How droll. Don't you have any idea how foolish you look? Apparently not.
This agrument is not about the original post. I clearly told you my position several times regarding that topic. As of today, you still have not proven anything to me.
Funny how you have failed to respond to the points of proof I offered, even after being repeated several times. You apparently think that if you don't acknowledge somthing, it ceases to exist?
This argument is about you dicks who beat up every person who tries to expose truth of matters
The "truth of matters" that YOU say you don't really believe?
or merely questions the establishment re: science, space, comets, 9/11, chemtrails, OKCB, DU, bla, bla, bla
Bla, bla, bla is right. You are attempting to change the subject.
You want to burn people at the stake as witches any time they question you. You are no one's gatekeeper, so go take a leap, jerk.
You want to claim BOTH that you don't really believe the OP's claim AND that it is a major TRVTH we are trying to hide?
AND, that I should prove the OP wrong when she offered that outrageous claim with NO supporting evidence?
Logic not your strong suit? Quoting: Menow 449281
OK, you breached the boring barrier. You are not a very good debater and you are an ass. If you remove the fluoride that is dumbing you down, you might learn how to read and reason. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 187162
6/12/2008 1:47 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
No, I didn't say that. In fact, I am always of thinking that a debate, any debate is better when one side defends one point of view and the other the opposite view.
But you take things to a completely new level.
You spend at least 15 hours a day, 5 days a week talking about the same subject over and over again.
Like that movie the Groundhog day.
Your arguments are the same, you say the same things all the time.
Really ma, you are going to go insane in the brain if you are going to keep this up.
You expect me to make up new stuff to keep you entertained? There are certain basic fact which tell the tale. There is really nothing else to say when the same lame bullshit claims are made over and over and over again. The Sun is exactly where it belongs- ask any astronomer. "NO, THEY LIE". You think they are ALL in on the conspiracy?? "WELLL.... stammer... wander away..." "BUT I REMEMBER!" Well, here is the standard data for this date. "THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED!" All of it? How? "I DON'T KNOW, BUT WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON AND KENNEDY WAS ASSASINATED BY ALIENS AND 911 AND 911 AND 911 AND 911 AND 911............"
What else do you expect me to say?
I didn't say that you should make up new stuff. And I was not complaining that I am getting bored of you.
I am simply saying that you are going to go insane if you'll keep this up.
You already show signs of dementia and "God" complex.
Stop it and just have fun.
That is unless you really are on a pay role. In that case just ignore my post and carry on. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 449879
Word |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450650
6/12/2008 1:49 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again.
And what evidence do you have to so surely prove this theory wrong?
Id like to hear it.
For Nibiru -
1. Climate change on earth
2. More frequent natural disasters
3. Climate change on planets other than earth.
4. Sneaky - Type in Nibiru into the NASA search engine and an eplanation into 'Planet X' comes up. Not direct evidence, but maybe a sneaky clue?
5. The amazing attention the Planet x theory is getting, not only on GLP where we have so many do gooders who despise fear mongering, but everywhere the subject is mentioned on the internet.
give me your 'Against' arguemnts. Thanks, im sure you will have plenty seen as your so hung up and caring about the whole subject. Quoting: Freeman 450670
You are right, there is evidence for PX. PX also explains why the world governments are setting up a police state and getting ready to euthanize the masses. You should add to your list, the 100's of large comets/bodies crashing into the Sun at the 8 and 4 O'clock positions. You can see these at the SOHO LASCO C3 feeds. I have seen dozens myself and have the clips to prove it. That is the most provocative evidence for me. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 1:50 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again.
And what evidence do you have to so surely prove this theory wrong? Quoting: Freeman 450670
First of all... what theory? Please be specific.
Id like to hear it.
{/quote]
You haven't said what you are claiming.
For Nibiru -
1. Climate change on earth
2. More frequent natural disasters
3. Climate change on planets other than earth.
4. Sneaky - Type in Nibiru into the NASA search engine and an eplanation into 'Planet X' comes up. Not direct evidence, but maybe a sneaky clue?
5. The amazing attention the Planet x theory is getting, not only on GLP where we have so many do gooders who despise fear mongering, but everywhere the subject is mentioned on the internet. Quoting: Freeman 450670
"For Nibiru"? Meaning that you think all of the above was caused by an alleged mysterious planet which has never been seen? Surely you jest.
give me your 'Against' arguemnts. Thanks, im sure you will have plenty seen as your so hung up and caring about the whole subject. Quoting: Freeman 450670
Sure. My argument against: Where is it?
Please don't start listing a mountain of "might be's" and saying that all clear evidence has been hidden from us. That would be a child's argument. If that's all you have, don't bother. |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450650
6/12/2008 1:53 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again.
And what evidence do you have to so surely prove this theory wrong?
First of all... what theory? Please be specific.
Id like to hear it.
{/quote]
You haven't said what you are claiming.
For Nibiru -
1. Climate change on earth
2. More frequent natural disasters
3. Climate change on planets other than earth.
4. Sneaky - Type in Nibiru into the NASA search engine and an eplanation into 'Planet X' comes up. Not direct evidence, but maybe a sneaky clue?
5. The amazing attention the Planet x theory is getting, not only on GLP where we have so many do gooders who despise fear mongering, but everywhere the subject is mentioned on the internet.
"For Nibiru"? Meaning that you think all of the above was caused by an alleged mysterious planet which has never been seen? Surely you jest.
give me your 'Against' arguemnts. Thanks, im sure you will have plenty seen as your so hung up and caring about the whole subject.
Sure. My argument against: Where is it?
Please don't start listing a mountain of "might be's" and saying that all clear evidence has been hidden from us. That would be a child's argument. If that's all you have, don't bother. Quoting: Menow 449281
Run away brave sir robin. What a putz. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 187162
6/12/2008 1:55 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Hey Menow, didn't you say you will no longer be on GLP?
What, is the paycheck that good? |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 1:56 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Interesting. You can't respond logically to points on the subject at hand, so you resort to distracting insults, changing the subject and putting words into people's mouths. How droll. Don't you have any idea how foolish you look? Apparently not.
This agrument is not about the original post. I clearly told you my position several times regarding that topic. As of today, you still have not proven anything to me.
Funny how you have failed to respond to the points of proof I offered, even after being repeated several times. You apparently think that if you don't acknowledge somthing, it ceases to exist?
This argument is about you dicks who beat up every person who tries to expose truth of matters
The "truth of matters" that YOU say you don't really believe?
or merely questions the establishment re: science, space, comets, 9/11, chemtrails, OKCB, DU, bla, bla, bla
Bla, bla, bla is right. You are attempting to change the subject.
You want to burn people at the stake as witches any time they question you. You are no one's gatekeeper, so go take a leap, jerk.
You want to claim BOTH that you don't really believe the OP's claim AND that it is a major TRVTH we are trying to hide?
AND, that I should prove the OP wrong when she offered that outrageous claim with NO supporting evidence?
Logic not your strong suit?
OK, you breached the boring barrier. You are not a very good debater and you are an ass. If you remove the fluoride that is dumbing you down, you might learn how to read and reason. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450650
In other words, I didn't take your baiting to change the subject and argue points that YOU falsely claim I have made on other subjects, and you are stymied by that.
AND, you are going to continue to hide behind insults and ignore the points I offered on the actual subject of this thread. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 1:58 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Hey Menow, didn't you say you will no longer be on GLP?
What, is the paycheck that good? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 187162
Uhh.. No, I didn't. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 2:00 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again.
And what evidence do you have to so surely prove this theory wrong?
First of all... what theory? Please be specific.
Id like to hear it.
{/quote]
You haven't said what you are claiming.
For Nibiru -
1. Climate change on earth
2. More frequent natural disasters
3. Climate change on planets other than earth.
4. Sneaky - Type in Nibiru into the NASA search engine and an eplanation into 'Planet X' comes up. Not direct evidence, but maybe a sneaky clue?
5. The amazing attention the Planet x theory is getting, not only on GLP where we have so many do gooders who despise fear mongering, but everywhere the subject is mentioned on the internet.
"For Nibiru"? Meaning that you think all of the above was caused by an alleged mysterious planet which has never been seen? Surely you jest.
give me your 'Against' arguemnts. Thanks, im sure you will have plenty seen as your so hung up and caring about the whole subject.
Sure. My argument against: Where is it?
Please don't start listing a mountain of "might be's" and saying that all clear evidence has been hidden from us. That would be a child's argument. If that's all you have, don't bother.
Run away brave sir robin. What a putz. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 450650
Yes, you bunkers would love for us to try to prove a negative- that a non-defined object doesn't exist. It doesn't work that way. Get real. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 187162
6/12/2008 2:05 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
You didn't? I guess you have a scientific explanation for these words too...
Please, enlighten me what you ment.
How about if I just do as I please? How would that be?
I have actually had some time too kill the last few days and have been doing things that give me a lot of intermittant time during other tasks. That is about to end. Y'all will just have to suffer through without me. Quoting: Menow 449281 |
| DarkStarCrashes
User ID: 450650
6/12/2008 2:22 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
There was a post just the other day on Nancy's thread from some people in New Zealand who were quitting their jobs and moving to be safer from PX and the poleshift. No one is hurt by these fear-mongering lies? Guess again.
And what evidence do you have to so surely prove this theory wrong?
First of all... what theory? Please be specific.
Id like to hear it.
{/quote]
You haven't said what you are claiming.
For Nibiru -
1. Climate change on earth
2. More frequent natural disasters
3. Climate change on planets other than earth.
4. Sneaky - Type in Nibiru into the NASA search engine and an eplanation into 'Planet X' comes up. Not direct evidence, but maybe a sneaky clue?
5. The amazing attention the Planet x theory is getting, not only on GLP where we have so many do gooders who despise fear mongering, but everywhere the subject is mentioned on the internet.
"For Nibiru"? Meaning that you think all of the above was caused by an alleged mysterious planet which has never been seen? Surely you jest.
give me your 'Against' arguemnts. Thanks, im sure you will have plenty seen as your so hung up and caring about the whole subject.
Sure. My argument against: Where is it?
Please don't start listing a mountain of "might be's" and saying that all clear evidence has been hidden from us. That would be a child's argument. If that's all you have, don't bother.
Run away brave sir robin. What a putz.
Yes, you bunkers would love for us to try to prove a negative- that a non-defined object doesn't exist. It doesn't work that way. Get real. Quoting: Menow 449281
Hilarious. This idiot can't debate the existance of a planetary body? I guess you are not an astronomer then. They do it all the time. What a retarded ass. |
| Menow
User ID: 449281
6/12/2008 2:30 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
You didn't? I guess you have a scientific explanation for these words too...
Please, enlighten me what you ment.
How about if I just do as I please? How would that be?
I have actually had some time too kill the last few days and have been doing things that give me a lot of intermittant time during other tasks. That is about to end. Y'all will just have to suffer through without me. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 187162
I see you didn't include your other post so we can't see what you claimed I said. Cute.
Seems pretty plain. I have had some extra time and that is about to end. English a second language? Where do I say I am leaving GLP? |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 | |
|
