| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 | I've been through the desert on a thread with no name
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 329387 6/10/2008 9:54 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I moved to Alaska 9 years ago. At that time, here in Anchorage, we would have about 2 hours of total darkness and an hour of twilight on each side of those 2 hours around summer solstice - the way it's been for as long as anyone can remember. I have clients whose yards and plants I take care of during the summer months. Up to 4 years ago everything seemed "normal". During the past 4 years I've had to deal with lots of dying plants due to being fried by the sun. In addition to that, the daylight during the summer months has been increasing at night. This summer, like last summer, there is no "night time"...no 2 hours of dark anymore. It stays light here for 24 hours now with just a 'hint' of twilight around 2am. Many people here have commented on the increase of daylight hours...including the native residents who have been observing the skies here for 10,000 years.
Total horseshit. There has NEVER been ANY real twilight in Anchorage at summer solstice in all of recorded history. There is, and ALWAYS has been NO time of total darkness during those nights.
[ link to www.wunderground.com]
"Length Of Visible Light: 24h 00m
Length of Day 19h 12m
Tomorrow will be 1m 58s longer." Quoting: Menow 449281
I offered this forum an honest observation and you, sir, or whatever you are, just called me a liar. You also called hundreds of native elders liars. You also called my 81 year old aunt a liar (who remarked to me last year, "These past few summers have been odd - it never gets dark anymore in June when it always has for the past 50 years I've been here.") And you've called every person who lives here and has noticed these anomalies a liar. Your quoting a website's info about the current "Length of visible light: 24 hours", actually validates my point - yes, the light is visible 24 hours a day now, where it has NOT been in the past. Research past astronomical archives on the subject. Having read your posts in this thread, all I can say is that your blatant arrogance is only exceeded by your willful ignorance. I'm sorry but, my experience, as well as all those who live here, trumps your sophomoric need to pander to some sort of authority figure. |
| Menow User ID: 449281 6/10/2008 9:54 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
While I understand those nice scientists were giving what they thought were intelligent answers, i.e. "the bending light effect".
And you feel their answers were not intelligent?
Yes, from their standpoint, they were. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
I was asking about your standpoint, obviously. You have no explanation why you imply that the answers were NOT intelligent?
They fail to take into consideration that these people use the sun to navigate, tell time, and plan their year. They truly live with the sun each and every day.
They attempted to explain what they thought was physically taking place. No amount of further anecdotal reports are going to change the approach they took. The alternative explanation that the Sun is ACTUALLY in the wrong place is quite unlikely.
Anectotal evidence, while often discarded by hard scientists, at least leaves the door open for other explainations - life isn't black and white as hard science would like you to believe. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
"Discarded"? No, they were apparently the trigger for the very investigation we are discussing. How does that equate to having been "discarded"?
Unlike those who spend most of their lives indoors not paying too much attention to what it is doing. Those of us mathmatically challenged but spend loads of time in the garden, planting for shade and sun, are finding things aren't all that they seem.
That is totally vague, cryptic and meaningless.
Nonsense. Obviously your not a gardener so it would be vague and meaningless. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
"...things aren't all that they seem." is gardening terminology? That's all you said in that statement you feel is so meaningful. Could you elaborate for us non-gardeners?
Even taking into consideration changes in plant size, surrounding plant growth, etc, it has been relatively easy to see that something is odd, something one can't quite put their finger on.
More of the same. What is your point?
If I knew the answer I would have said it. But when one plants a shade loving plant in the shade, it ought to be in the shade year after year. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
No, it ought to be in the shade unless the Sun changes position in the sky. It does that on both daily and seasonal basis. In addition, the shading object can change or move.
Especially when one tracks where the shade is at, before one plants the plant. When one spends years observing sun and shade in ones garden one gets to know ones garden's quirks and when things start to change, one has to wonder why a shade plant is not longer in its nice shady spot or a sun plant ends up in the shade. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
Well, trees in the area can change shape, loose branches, etc, and Humans are prone to error in memory. Those things are common. Earth shifting on it's axis? EXTTTTEEEEEEMEEEELLLYYYYY uncommon.
I have been gardening for over 16 years in the same place. I know my garden and I know the needs of my plants. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
But you are not an astronomer. Whom do you think is more likely to know if the Sun is in the wrong place in the sky?
Whether the earth has changed its position slightly or the "bending light effect", something is different.
Well, you seem to be denouncing the "nice scientists" opinion about bending light, so that leaves the choice, from your post, of: "earth has changed its position slightly". Well, since Earth is changing position on a constant basis, can you be more specific?
Denouncing is your term. I was merely pointing out the placating voice of the "experts". Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
No, you were characterizing it as such, in a patronizing way, and continue to do so.
"....said the likely cause of this "rising sun" mystery is a temperature difference between the very cold air over the snow and the air above, which has been warmer than usual". Notice the word "likely". It is a guess, it is not a fact. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
Tut tut. Let's call it an "educated guess", shall we?
They know no more about the situation than the ones observing. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
Horseshit. Why do you people think that education in a certain science renders one no more capable than someone without training? Wishful thinking? You think the cargo cult people of the South Pacific were as capable of accurate understanding of the nature of wartime technology as the U.S. Navy?
Which is why they intend on examining the issue further. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
No, that is NOT "why" they are investigating further. It is because they are honest researchers and they are questioning their OWN preliminary conclusions. That is what good scientists do.
I do not know the answers. I am observing a change. I neither understand what is causing the change or have the scientific background to even propose one. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
Then why are you proposing that the Sun is not where it belongs?
And since the only thing that matters is earths relation to the sun then that there seems to be a change in their relationship. Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
See what I mean? You are making a "scientific" conclusion as to what the answer must be, based on very sparse understanding of the ramifications of your proposal. You seem to refuse to even accept the remote possibility that you could be mistaken about the altered position of the Sun. That is BAD science! |
| jlazarus User ID: 348904 6/10/2008 9:56 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I love this time of year...when we can look forward to threads claiming the sun is too far north with absolutely no evidence to back up the claim. And no explanation as to why the summer solstice lined up with locations like Stonehenge just as it does every year.
In six months, we can look forward to the "sun too far south" threads.
So what? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 402039
So what? So WHAT????
Damn we get a bit tired of the same stupid crap every single summer and winter, that's "so what".
Really tired. Seriously. It's stupid. And if someone like me comes on and tries to explain 'why' the sun seems north or south - we are immediately told we are nothing but "shills" and "debunkers"...which now really is beginning to piss me off. It's stupid. I am not a shill or a debunker - I am (and have many times in the past) simply offering reasonable, documented, easy to prove facts to explain to people with less knowledge in the subject - and for my time I am told I am a shill and should shut up.
It's a freaking DISCUSSION FORUM ya idiots! I thought this was a place to LEARN and DISCUSS - yet some people don't want to learn anything or discuss anything and if someone tries to explain reality to them they freak the heck out and act like total dumb asses, that's "what"!
So, to all you 'sun is too south' or 'sun is too north' freaks - open your freaking mind to reality once in a while and quite living in your fear mode.
There are lots of other things we can discuss that truly may be conspiratorial nature. Where the sun 'sets' is not one of them. I will accept any rules that you feel necessary to your freedom. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. ~ Robert Heinlein |
| Amaruca User ID: 420547 6/10/2008 9:57 PM
 | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote | or maybe your head is to far north into your ass.
oh yeah, the moon is where it should be, the same as the rest of the stars and planets.
the ice is currently melting at the north pole at the moment because spring has come and summer is just around the corner. "God" said, let us make man in our image.. IMPLYING genetic hybridization
"I awoke only to find, that the rest of the world was still asleep" |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 448232 6/10/2008 10:06 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote | Don't worry, be happy, it's just that our handlers (the ones who wrote the programming for the hologram we call 'reality') are playing with the parameters in order to gradually accustom us to the idea that we are all inside the equivalent of the Truman Show . . .
ps I live in Fairbanks AK, used to live on the Kenai Peninsula just south of Anchorage and the Anchorage resident is right that there used to be at least a very deep dusk in the middle of even midsummer nights. Haven't been down that way for many years so I don't know about now. Here summer is definitely and always has been light all night (don't see stars from mid-May to early August), but the skies do seem more luminous, like something in the high atmosphere is scattering the light rays and we are getting more over-the-horizon 'backscatter'. . . this is especially noticeable in the wintertime. . .
Hard to tell if the sun is rising and setting where it 'should' as it changes almost daily anyway ! |
| Menow User ID: 449281 6/10/2008 10:12 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I moved to Alaska 9 years ago. At that time, here in Anchorage, we would have about 2 hours of total darkness and an hour of twilight on each side of those 2 hours around summer solstice - the way it's been for as long as anyone can remember. I have clients whose yards and plants I take care of during the summer months. Up to 4 years ago everything seemed "normal". During the past 4 years I've had to deal with lots of dying plants due to being fried by the sun. In addition to that, the daylight during the summer months has been increasing at night. This summer, like last summer, there is no "night time"...no 2 hours of dark anymore. It stays light here for 24 hours now with just a 'hint' of twilight around 2am. Many people here have commented on the increase of daylight hours...including the native residents who have been observing the skies here for 10,000 years.
Total horseshit. There has NEVER been ANY real twilight in Anchorage at summer solstice in all of recorded history. There is, and ALWAYS has been NO time of total darkness during those nights.
[ link to www.wunderground.com]
"Length Of Visible Light: 24h 00m
Length of Day 19h 12m
Tomorrow will be 1m 58s longer."
I offered this forum an honest observation and you, sir, or whatever you are, just called me a liar. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
No, I'm calling you seriously mistaken. I said it as I did because what you claim is ludicrous if you are claiming that the Sun is not where it used to be during solstice. There CANNOT be total darkness in Anchorage during the summer solstice due to the fact that the Sun is simply not far enough below the horizon. This has not changed in recorded history.
You also called hundreds of native elders liars. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
Where is the quote of "hundreds of native elders" agreeing with you? I think you exaggerate.
You also called my 81 year old aunt a liar (who remarked to me last year, "These past few summers have been odd - it never gets dark anymore in June when it always has for the past 50 years I've been here.") Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
Ever think about the possibility that city lights have vastly increased in your aunts lifetime?
And you've called every person who lives here and has noticed these anomalies a liar. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
See above.
Your quoting a website's info about the current "Length of visible light: 24 hours", actually validates my point - yes, the light is visible 24 hours a day now, where it has NOT been in the past. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
So you think that chart is different than a chart which would have been printed in, say, 2000? Why don't you go to the library and look?
Research past astronomical archives on the subject. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
No, YOU do that research. YOU are the one with the ludicrous theory that all current data has been altered at some vague point in the past in some sort of massive coverup of the truth. SHEESH!
Having read your posts in this thread, all I can say is that your blatant arrogance is only exceeded by your willful ignorance. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
Please quote my alleged "willful ignorance", or outline it. You are a buffoon who thinks he has discovered some vast conspiracy. Get a clue.
I'm sorry but, my experience, as well as all those who live here, trumps your sophomoric need to pander to some sort of authority figure. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 329387
Huh? What are you going on about now? What "authority figure"? |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 10:18 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested. We all know 911 was done by our government and there is a cover-up going on there is there not? Same with chemtrails. Cover-ups are the norm. There are a lot of dead scientists lately. You are not paying attn.
You don't have to pay much attention to the fact that you
are throwing strawman arguments out fast and furious in the
hope that you won't have to address things like that Solstice
image I provided.
Sux2BU. Quoting: DrPostman
strawman? you do not know what is. U use it incorrectly here. if you are saying the sun sets in the exact same place on the solstice at stonehedge then show me some analysis proving it. Put up or shut up. Lets see the photos. |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 10:23 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 318980
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid. |
| Gaia Child User ID: 1216 6/10/2008 10:23 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
While I understand those nice scientists were giving what they thought were intelligent answers, i.e. "the bending light effect".
And you feel their answers were not intelligent?
Yes, from their standpoint, they were.
I was asking about your standpoint, obviously. You have no explanation why you imply that the answers were NOT intelligent?
They fail to take into consideration that these people use the sun to navigate, tell time, and plan their year. They truly live with the sun each and every day.
They attempted to explain what they thought was physically taking place. No amount of further anecdotal reports are going to change the approach they took. The alternative explanation that the Sun is ACTUALLY in the wrong place is quite unlikely.
Anectotal evidence, while often discarded by hard scientists, at least leaves the door open for other explainations - life isn't black and white as hard science would like you to believe.
"Discarded"? No, they were apparently the trigger for the very investigation we are discussing. How does that equate to having been "discarded"?
Unlike those who spend most of their lives indoors not paying too much attention to what it is doing. Those of us mathmatically challenged but spend loads of time in the garden, planting for shade and sun, are finding things aren't all that they seem.
That is totally vague, cryptic and meaningless.
Nonsense. Obviously your not a gardener so it would be vague and meaningless.
"...things aren't all that they seem." is gardening terminology? That's all you said in that statement you feel is so meaningful. Could you elaborate for us non-gardeners?
Even taking into consideration changes in plant size, surrounding plant growth, etc, it has been relatively easy to see that something is odd, something one can't quite put their finger on.
More of the same. What is your point?
If I knew the answer I would have said it. But when one plants a shade loving plant in the shade, it ought to be in the shade year after year.
No, it ought to be in the shade unless the Sun changes position in the sky. It does that on both daily and seasonal basis. In addition, the shading object can change or move.
Especially when one tracks where the shade is at, before one plants the plant. When one spends years observing sun and shade in ones garden one gets to know ones garden's quirks and when things start to change, one has to wonder why a shade plant is not longer in its nice shady spot or a sun plant ends up in the shade.
Well, trees in the area can change shape, loose branches, etc, and Humans are prone to error in memory. Those things are common. Earth shifting on it's axis? EXTTTTEEEEEEMEEEELLLYYYYY uncommon.
I have been gardening for over 16 years in the same place. I know my garden and I know the needs of my plants.
But you are not an astronomer. Whom do you think is more likely to know if the Sun is in the wrong place in the sky?
Whether the earth has changed its position slightly or the "bending light effect", something is different.
Well, you seem to be denouncing the "nice scientists" opinion about bending light, so that leaves the choice, from your post, of: "earth has changed its position slightly". Well, since Earth is changing position on a constant basis, can you be more specific?
Denouncing is your term. I was merely pointing out the placating voice of the "experts".
No, you were characterizing it as such, in a patronizing way, and continue to do so.
"....said the likely cause of this "rising sun" mystery is a temperature difference between the very cold air over the snow and the air above, which has been warmer than usual". Notice the word "likely". It is a guess, it is not a fact.
Tut tut. Let's call it an "educated guess", shall we?
They know no more about the situation than the ones observing.
Horseshit. Why do you people think that education in a certain science renders one no more capable than someone without training? Wishful thinking? You think the cargo cult people of the South Pacific were as capable of accurate understanding of the nature of wartime technology as the U.S. Navy?
Which is why they intend on examining the issue further.
No, that is NOT "why" they are investigating further. It is because they are honest researchers and they are questioning their OWN preliminary conclusions. That is what good scientists do.
I do not know the answers. I am observing a change. I neither understand what is causing the change or have the scientific background to even propose one.
Then why are you proposing that the Sun is not where it belongs?
And since the only thing that matters is earths relation to the sun then that there seems to be a change in their relationship.
See what I mean? You are making a "scientific" conclusion as to what the answer must be, based on very sparse understanding of the ramifications of your proposal. You seem to refuse to even accept the remote possibility that you could be mistaken about the altered position of the Sun. That is BAD science! Quoting: Menow 449281
I understand what you are doing. I actually quite appreciate it. However, I have neither the time nor energy for a philosophical discussion of the roots of an opinion. They are a dime a dozen, mine as well as yours. Some other time, perhaps? |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 10:25 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
If the Sun is not where it is supposed to be then why is it
right where it's supposed to be during the Solstice? Quoting: DrPostman
well, dr. rudeman, since u are the expert. prove it to me. i'll watch and listen. where is the proof other than a computer program or your lay opinion. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 449679 6/10/2008 10:25 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Those who fight so hard against Op's postulation must be protecting something.
Otherwise, why wouldn't they just let OP alone?
If OP is crazy, then why don't you just let her howl at the wind.
Debunkers always reinforce my opinion that there's truth about.
But you won't simply ask an astronomer and find out the truth. No body is "fighting so hard". We are simply offering the observation that the OP is making an absurd claim with ZERO supporting evidence.
Personally, I don't give a shit either way.
Neither should you when somebody makes a post. What do you think this is - a science forum? It's freakin GLP. If somebody wants to claim something - so be it.
Believe, don't believe, move along, whatever.
BTW, who is the "WE" that you speak about?
All I know is that where I live, in the southern US, we've set a new record each day of June for temperature. Go back and check any record books to find out how common that is - NOT. 10 days straight of new heat records. Nearly 100 each day of June. That is the FACT. That is verifiable. So, something is up with the Sun and personally, I'm open to all explanations.
Hey genius, that's not the sun, it's the high pressure system stalled off the east coast. Weather happens. Blame those who can prove ther's no climate change. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 373696
I think most scientists believe that there is a climate change going on. They just disagree as to what is causing it. Is it mankind or natural earth and sun cycles.
The earth has an increased wobble which could affect earthquakes and volcanoes. Some scientist believe that it was a spike of increased wobble right before the Sumatra quake that caused it. They expected the increased wobble that occurred after the quake. The after wobble was not nearly as extreme as the wobble right before the quake. Earth also has many other cycles that modern man has never been through such as precession.
But the big one affecting our weather/climate currently may be the sun's 1500 year cycle having to do with it's illumination. It's approaching its peak currently so the poster that you are insulting may be correct about "something is up with the sun" and her observation about record heat temperatures for her area. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 402039 6/10/2008 10:27 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote | Your getting tired of it??? then ignore it!
I have been here at GLP for five years and most of you "debunkers" have been rude and arrogant to those who felt safe here reporting what seemed to be anomolies.
You are projecting your fears on others and you are not willing to admit that YOUR version of reality may not suit everyone else.
Get over it.
I love this time of year...when we can look forward to threads claiming the sun is too far north with absolutely no evidence to back up the claim. And no explanation as to why the summer solstice lined up with locations like Stonehenge just as it does every year.
In six months, we can look forward to the "sun too far south" threads.
So what?
So what? So WHAT????
Damn we get a bit tired of the same stupid crap every single summer and winter, that's "so what".
Really tired. Seriously. It's stupid. And if someone like me comes on and tries to explain 'why' the sun seems north or south - we are immediately told we are nothing but "shills" and "debunkers"...which now really is beginning to piss me off. It's stupid. I am not a shill or a debunker - I am (and have many times in the past) simply offering reasonable, documented, easy to prove facts to explain to people with less knowledge in the subject - and for my time I am told I am a shill and should shut up.
It's a freaking DISCUSSION FORUM ya idiots! I thought this was a place to LEARN and DISCUSS - yet some people don't want to learn anything or discuss anything and if someone tries to explain reality to them they freak the heck out and act like total dumb asses, that's "what"!
So, to all you 'sun is too south' or 'sun is too north' freaks - open your freaking mind to reality once in a while and quite living in your fear mode.
There are lots of other things we can discuss that truly may be conspiratorial nature. Where the sun 'sets' is not one of them. Quoting: jlazarus |
| Menow User ID: 449281 6/10/2008 10:33 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I understand what you are doing. I actually quite appreciate it. However, I have neither the time nor energy for a philosophical discussion of the roots of an opinion. They are a dime a dozen, mine as well as yours. Some other time, perhaps? Quoting: Gaia Child 1216
It's not about "opinion", as much as you people would like for it to be. Unless you are proposing that we are living in varying realities, the Sun CANNOT be in a different place in the sky than it used to be on this same date. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 449679 6/10/2008 10:33 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Those who fight so hard against Op's postulation must be protecting something.
Otherwise, why wouldn't they just let OP alone?
If OP is crazy, then why don't you just let her howl at the wind.
Debunkers always reinforce my opinion that there's truth about.
But you won't simply ask an astronomer and find out the truth. No body is "fighting so hard". We are simply offering the observation that the OP is making an absurd claim with ZERO supporting evidence.
Personally, I don't give a shit either way.
Neither should you when somebody makes a post. What do you think this is - a science forum? It's freakin GLP. If somebody wants to claim something - so be it.
Believe, don't believe, move along, whatever.
BTW, who is the "WE" that you speak about?
All I know is that where I live, in the southern US, we've set a new record each day of June for temperature. Go back and check any record books to find out how common that is - NOT. 10 days straight of new heat records. Nearly 100 each day of June. That is the FACT. That is verifiable. So, something is up with the Sun and personally, I'm open to all explanations.
Hey genius, that's not the sun, it's the high pressure system stalled off the east coast. Weather happens. Blame those who can prove ther's no climate change. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 373696
I think most scientists believe that there is a climate change going on. They just disagree as to what is causing it. Is it mankind or natural earth and sun cycles.
The earth has an increased wobble which could affect earthquakes and volcanoes. Some scientist believe that it was a spike of increased wobble right before the Sumatra quake that caused it. They expected the increased wobble that occurred after the quake. The after wobble was not nearly as extreme as the wobble right before the quake. Earth also has many other cycles that modern man has never been through such as precession.
But the big one affecting our weather/climate currently may be the sun's 1500 year cycle having to do with it's illumination. It's approaching its peak currently so the poster that you are insulting may be correct about "something is up with the sun" and her observation about record heat temperatures for her area. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 318980 6/10/2008 10:40 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it?
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
Well you seem to be afraid of polite conversation and actually reading the content of posts. I have already said that if you give me latitude and a longitude I will tell you exactly where the Sun will set on any date according to science - you can then go to that location and test to see if my predictions are true.
If this would not be proof enough for you what would? What kind of proof are you looking for? |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 10:56 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it?
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid.
Well you seem to be afraid of polite conversation and actually reading the content of posts. I have already said that if you give me latitude and a longitude I will tell you exactly where the Sun will set on any date according to science - you can then go to that location and test to see if my predictions are true.
If this would not be proof enough for you what would? What kind of proof are you looking for? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 318980
i told you already your computer program does not impress me. "according to science" means nothing. You claim to be the expert, so show me any other proof you got. How about some photos proving it? A program is not evidence. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 166625 6/10/2008 11:01 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it?
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid.
Well you seem to be afraid of polite conversation and actually reading the content of posts. I have already said that if you give me latitude and a longitude I will tell you exactly where the Sun will set on any date according to science - you can then go to that location and test to see if my predictions are true.
If this would not be proof enough for you what would? What kind of proof are you looking for? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 318980
On todays Date and compare the Data to 20 yrs ago
If you can find a chart that goes back
City ° ' ° ' Time
Albany, N.Y. 42 40 73 45 12:00 noon |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 11:03 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I understand what you are doing. I actually quite appreciate it. However, I have neither the time nor energy for a philosophical discussion of the roots of an opinion. They are a dime a dozen, mine as well as yours. Some other time, perhaps?
It's not about "opinion", as much as you people would like for it to be. Unless you are proposing that we are living in varying realities, the Sun CANNOT be in a different place in the sky than it used to be on this same date. Quoting: Menow 449281
the sun orbits the milky way, genious. It is never in the same place. neither is the earth. orbits are not perfect and they change. and celestial bodies wobble. you dont know what you are talking about. |
| Menow User ID: 449281 6/10/2008 11:11 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it?
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid.
Well you seem to be afraid of polite conversation and actually reading the content of posts. I have already said that if you give me latitude and a longitude I will tell you exactly where the Sun will set on any date according to science - you can then go to that location and test to see if my predictions are true.
If this would not be proof enough for you what would? What kind of proof are you looking for?
On todays Date and compare the Data to 20 yrs ago
If you can find a chart that goes back
City ° ' ° ' Time
Albany, N.Y. 42 40 73 45 12:00 noon Quoting: Anonymous Coward 166625
1)How do you imagine that at some point all charts became obsolete, with nobody noticing it, and then they were all replaced with different ones with nobody objecting and no record of it ever having happened?
2)The Earth is supposed to be abnormally "wobbling", right? That means that the motion is unpredictable. How in the world do you think that ANY database could predict those erratic motions? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 318980 6/10/2008 11:11 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it?
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid.
Well you seem to be afraid of polite conversation and actually reading the content of posts. I have already said that if you give me latitude and a longitude I will tell you exactly where the Sun will set on any date according to science - you can then go to that location and test to see if my predictions are true.
If this would not be proof enough for you what would? What kind of proof are you looking for?
i told you already your computer program does not impress me. "according to science" means nothing. You claim to be the expert, so show me any other proof you got. How about some photos proving it? A program is not evidence. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
Well actually 'according to Science' does mean something - it means according to the currently accepted model of the solar system here's a starting place if you are interested in the maths: [link to en.wikipedia.org]
You seem to be quite willing to accept that I can accurately predict the location of the setting sun on any date at any point on earth but completely dismissive of the method I use to do it - do you think maybe its voodoo I use? Explain how come I can be 100 percent accurate, or if you think I can't, and am claiming to be able to do something I cannot , prove it by taking the test..
Out of curiosity what would be in this photo that you want? Tell me the difference between a photo that proves your theory and one that proves mine? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 166625 6/10/2008 11:16 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote | Over whelming response to everyone who sees the Sun too far North
As the days pass the people respond more
Just three yrs ago was never so many witnesses noticing anything wrong in the skies |
| Menow User ID: 449281 6/10/2008 11:17 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I understand what you are doing. I actually quite appreciate it. However, I have neither the time nor energy for a philosophical discussion of the roots of an opinion. They are a dime a dozen, mine as well as yours. Some other time, perhaps?
It's not about "opinion", as much as you people would like for it to be. Unless you are proposing that we are living in varying realities, the Sun CANNOT be in a different place in the sky than it used to be on this same date.
the sun orbits the milky way, genious. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
No. It doesn't. The Solar system is *IN* the Milky Way Galaxy, which rotates.
It is never in the same place. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
And?
neither is the earth. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
And?
orbits are not perfect and they change.
What do you mean by "not perfect"? Of course they change. What is your point?
and celestial bodies wobble. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
And?
you dont know what you are talking about. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
Gee, that was informational... NOT. What are you talking about? |
| DrPostman   Forum Moderator User ID: 51197 6/10/2008 11:18 PM
 | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
oh yeah, the moon is where it should be, the same as the rest of the stars and planets. Quoting: Amaruca
Why would you disrespect millions of religious practitioners
living all over the world who depend on tracking the locations
of the Moon and the Sun in their observances? Are you calling
them all liars?
strawman? you do not know what is. U use it incorrectly here. if you are saying the sun sets in the exact same place on the solstice at stonehedge then show me some analysis proving it. Put up or shut up. Lets see the photos. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
There is no analysis, just a bunch of people who show up
and see how the sun rises above the Heel Stone.
[link to gouk.about.com]
well, dr. rudeman, since u are the expert. prove it to me. i'll watch and listen. where is the proof other than a computer program or your lay opinion. Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 449594
[link to www.flickr.com]
It happens every year at the same location at the same time
of year.
I have been here at GLP for five years and most of you "debunkers" have been rude and arrogant to those who felt safe here reporting what seemed to be anomolies. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 402039
I don't reply in rude or arrogant ways, and why can't I be
"safe" in pointing out an error?
What are you afraid of? "It's kinda like creating a carpool lane on the internet, except instead of
high-occupancy vehicles, only rich assholes will be able to drive on it"
-- Jon Stewart on what the telecoms would prefer instead of Net Neutrality.
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 11:19 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I don't know if this is all true or not, Surely, it can be easily tested.
Yes it can, so why are you so unwilling to test it?
show me the test, dick. im not afraid of anything. i've been asking for the proof stupid.
Well you seem to be afraid of polite conversation and actually reading the content of posts. I have already said that if you give me latitude and a longitude I will tell you exactly where the Sun will set on any date according to science - you can then go to that location and test to see if my predictions are true.
If this would not be proof enough for you what would? What kind of proof are you looking for?
On todays Date and compare the Data to 20 yrs ago
If you can find a chart that goes back
City ° ' ° ' Time
Albany, N.Y. 42 40 73 45 12:00 noon
1)How do you imagine that at some point all charts became obsolete, with nobody noticing it, and then they were all replaced with different ones with nobody objecting and no record of it ever having happened?
2)The Earth is supposed to be abnormally "wobbling", right? That means that the motion is unpredictable. How in the world do you think that ANY database could predict those erratic motions? Quoting: Menow 449281
it not erratic. u make that part up. software udates by itself all the time. Let see non computer proof. |
| Menow User ID: 449281 6/10/2008 11:22 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Over whelming response to everyone who sees the Sun too far North
As the days pass the people respond more
Just three yrs ago was never so many witnesses noticing anything wrong in the skies Quoting: Anonymous Coward 166625
Funny, but not one of them knows where the Sun SHOULD be and can compare the two. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 166625 6/10/2008 11:27 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Over whelming response to everyone who sees the Sun too far North
As the days pass the people respond more
Just three yrs ago was never so many witnesses noticing anything wrong in the skies
Funny, but not one of them knows where the Sun SHOULD be and can compare the two. Quoting: Menow 449281
I left a challenge, the Sunrise times for Albany NY and todays Sunrise for Albany
If they match Sunrises then it's settled |
| killdamon User ID: 444686 6/10/2008 11:27 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote | Sun Goes Longer Than Normal Without Producing Sunspots :
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Just passing thru.
OG id 126286
NasTraDooMis - Aka, killdamon |
| DrPostman   Forum Moderator User ID: 51197 6/10/2008 11:34 PM
 | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
Just three yrs ago was never so many witnesses noticing anything wrong in the skies Quoting: Anonymous Coward 166625
:steamingpi:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
It's been one of the staple subjects of GLP since I started
posting here 4 or more years ago. "It's kinda like creating a carpool lane on the internet, except instead of
high-occupancy vehicles, only rich assholes will be able to drive on it"
-- Jon Stewart on what the telecoms would prefer instead of Net Neutrality.
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| DarkStarCrashes User ID: 449594 6/10/2008 11:40 PM | | Anonymous Coward User ID: 318980 6/10/2008 11:40 PM | | Re: I've been through the desert on a thread with no name | Quote |
I left a challenge, the Sunrise times for Albany NY and today’s Sunrise for Albany
If they match Sunrises then it's settled Quoting: Anonymous Coward 166625
Sunrise June 11th Albany NY 1988 5:16:42
Sunrise June 11th Albany NY 2008 05 16:46
A grand difference of 4 seconds or 0.016 degrees to its apparent rising position - if you are telling me this is the difference the OP has noticed they have better eyes then I! |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 | |
|