Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,459 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,271,222
Pageviews Today: 1,871,544Threads Today: 537Posts Today: 10,889
06:44 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !

 
Gimme The Willies O'Bibbl
User ID: 454043
United States
06/18/2008 11:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !
[link to money.cnn.com]

Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all

The Democratic nominee, in an exclusive interview with Fortune, says he wants free trade "to work for all people."


By Nina Easton, Washington editor
June 18, 2008: 10:22 AM EDT

WASHINGTON (Fortune) -- The general campaign is on, independent voters up for grabs, and Barack Obama is toning down his populist rhetoric - at least when it comes to free trade.

In an interview with Fortune to be featured in the magazine's upcoming issue, the presumptive Democratic nominee suggests he doesn't want to unilaterally blow up NAFTA after all.

"Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified," he conceded, after I reminded him that he had called NAFTA "devastating" and "a big mistake," despite nonpartisan studies concluding that the trade zone has had a mild, positive effect on the U.S. economy.

Does that mean his rhetoric was overheated and amplified? "Politicians are always guilty of that, and I don't exempt myself," he answered.

What Obama says now is that he believes in "opening up a dialogue" with trading partners Canada and Mexico "and figuring to how we can make this work for all people."

That tone stands in marked contrast to his primary campaign's anti-NAFTA fusillades. The pact creating a North American free-trade zone was President Bill Clinton's signature accomplishment; but NAFTA is also the bugaboo of union leaders, grassroots activists and Midwesterners who blame free trade for the factory closings they see in their hometowns.

The Democratic candidates fought hard to win over those factions of their party, with Obama generally following Hillary Clinton's lead in setting a protectionist tone.

In February, as the campaign moved into the Rust Belt, both candidates vowed to invoke a six-month opt-out clause ("as a hammer," in Obama's words) to pressure Canada and Mexico to make concessions.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper called that threat a mistake, and other leaders abroad expressed worries about their trade deals. Leading House Democrats, including Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel, distanced themselves from the candidates.

Now, however, Obama says he doesn't believe in unilaterally reopening NAFTA. On the afternoon that I sat down with him to discuss the economy, Obama said he had just spoken with Harper, who had called to congratulate him on winning the nomination.

"I'm not a big believer in doing things unilaterally," Obama said. "I'm a big believer in opening up a dialogue and figuring out how we can make this work for all people."

Obama has repeatedly described himself as a free-trade proponent who wants to be a "better bargainer" on behalf of U.S. interests and wants agreements to include labor and environmental standards.

In May 2007, congressional Democrats and the Bush administration agreed to a plan to include environmental and international labor standards in upcoming trade agreements. Still, later that year Obama supported one agreement (Peru) and opposed three others (Panama, Colombia, South Korea). Labor leaders - many of whom backed Obama in the primary - were the chief opponents of those pacts.

Obama jumped into the anti-trade waters with Clinton even though his top economics adviser, the University of Chicago's Austan Goolsbee, has written that America's wage gap is primarily the result of a globalized information economy - not free trade.

On Feb. 8, Goolsbee met with the Canadian consul general in Chicago and offered assurances that Obama's rhetoric was "more reflective of political maneuvering than policy," according to a Canadian memo summarizing the meeting that was obtained by Fortune. "In fact," the Canadian memo said, Goolsbee "mentioned that going forward the Obama camp was going to be careful to send the appropriate message without coming off as too protectionist."

In the Fortune interview, Obama noted that despite his support for opening markets, "there are costs to free trade" that must be recognized. He noted that under NAFTA, a more efficient U.S. agricultural industry displaced Mexican farmers, adding to the problem of illegal immigration.

We "can't pretend that those costs aren't real," Obama added. Otherwise, he added, it feeds "the protectionist sentiment and the anti-immigration sentiment that is out there in both parties."

Obama also reiterated his determination to be a tougher trade bargainer. "The Chinese love free trade," he said, "but they are tough as nails when it comes to a bargain, right? They will resist any calls to stop manipulating their currency. It's no secret they have consistently encroached on our intellectual property and our copyright laws. ...We should make sure in our trade negotiations that our interests and our values are adequately reflected."

Republican nominee John McCain, for his part, is emphasizing his consistent position as a free-trader. In a press conference in Boston this week, he attacked Obama as protectionist: "Senator Obama said that he would unilaterally - unilaterally! - renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement, where 33 percent of our trade exists. And you know what message that sends? That no agreement is sacred if someone declares that as president of the United States they would unilaterally renegotiate it. I stand for free trade, and with all the difficulties and economic troubles we're in today, there's a real bright spot and that's our exports. Protectionism does not work." To top of page
Digg
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 409684
United States
06/18/2008 11:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !
it's already happening
i doubt if anyone can stop it now
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428351
United States
06/18/2008 11:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !
Obama has always said that he wants to renegotiate Nafta for better oversight and security he never said eliminate NAFTA...what's your point here?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 409684
United States
06/18/2008 11:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !
the point is that
many of the posters assigned to glp
have a political agenda
and being pro-Obama is not it
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5174
United States
06/18/2008 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !
YOU DO KNOW THAT HE WAS ANOINTED AT THE BILDERBERG CONFERENCE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, RIGHT? YOU THINK HE DIDN'T GET HIS MARCHING ORDERS?

[link to www.wnd.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 454070
United States
06/18/2008 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Obama: NAFTA not so bad after all ! WTF !
Ron Paul 2008

or maybe Lou Dobbs 2008

News