911 truthers always win againts debunkers...why? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 419160 Spain 06/25/2008 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
maya432 (OP) User ID: 458191 Germany 06/25/2008 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 458281 Brazil 06/25/2008 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reality is BS User ID: 452395 United States 06/25/2008 09:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
maya432 (OP) User ID: 458191 Germany 06/25/2008 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
... User ID: 457966 United States 06/25/2008 09:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is real nice to see truth win the arguments of 9/11 fakery. I think most people that were awake at all could feel the bullshit oozing from the TV that day. The problem is they have changed the plan, due to the unforeseen progress of truth-outers. The truth getting out in the mainstream will play right into the new plan and trigger false terror attacks and martial law............ and so it will begin. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 458129 United States 06/25/2008 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 457966 United States 06/25/2008 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 286595 United States 06/25/2008 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thing about the truth is that a truth is timeless and will always fit perfectly with every other truth in the universe. Lies must be constantly changed to try to keep up with truth as it emerges. In the end, the lie never fits and always ends up bloated, blue and cold on the floor. The official story (fairytale) is a lie, I don't know who how or why (you would need an actual investigation to know that), But what is supposed to have happened is clearly outside the realm of possibility. |
maya432 (OP) User ID: 458191 Germany 06/26/2008 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
maya432 (OP) User ID: 458191 Germany 06/26/2008 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
maya432 (OP) User ID: 458191 Germany 06/26/2008 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 457966 United States 06/26/2008 03:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I`m a little embarrassed to admit it but, Quoting: maya432when 911 happened , I bought it hook, line and sinker. it wasn`t until 2004 that I took the Non-F.D.A approved RED PILL. then I woke up fast... its a really good pill.......lol well everyone had to grab on to something that day and the following years. Even if you felt that it was a setup the day of the attacks, who wouldn't get behind the fact that we need to blow someone else's shit up because of the death and destruction of that day. So don't feel bad, but it did open a hole in the vail that day! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 225509 United States 07/01/2008 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army (ret), is the former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. In testimony before a 2005 Congressional briefing, he said, “It falls to me this morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11 Commission report … “The 9/11 Commission which studied US intelligence and law enforcement community performance in great detail, (maybe not so much great detail, but they did), neglected to cover the community’s performance during the weeks following the attacks to determine who was responsible for them, not a word about that in the Report. “The Report does discuss the immediate US responses but the immediate investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has closely studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough came two weeks into the investigation when the money transfers from the United Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered. “Furthermore, if you have studied that investigation, you know there is no disputing that while investigators may have struggled with the identity of the paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was Al Qaeda’s finance chief. For this reason alone you have to ask why the 9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chief’s role as the 9/11 paymaster.” |
Guns n' God User ID: 275868 United States 07/01/2008 11:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
pacnwguy User ID: 461589 United States 07/01/2008 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 417071 United States 07/01/2008 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then why is traffic to all the 9/11 conspircay websites down the past year? Quoting: Guns n' GodAnd why haven't had you had any effect on the election, on public opinion, etc.? You're just a small group of paranoid kooks and you always will be. Yep! And when they come up with one shread of "truth" that hasn't been twisted, mis-quoted or spun to fit their preconceived notions, let me know. Otherwise, the self proclaimed "truthers" can STFU! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 461560 United States 07/02/2008 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then why is traffic to all the 9/11 conspircay websites down the past year? Quoting: Guns n' GodAnd why haven't had you had any effect on the election, on public opinion, etc.? You're just a small group of paranoid kooks and you always will be. Yes yours is the safe position to take. |
dogotemn User ID: 461734 United States 07/02/2008 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 428351 United States 07/02/2008 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ATTC User ID: 397787 United States 07/07/2008 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because you cannot prove a lie. That's why they still haven't released the NIST report As much as they try to spoliate the evidence at Ground Zero, as much as they have a controlled opposition movement, and have debunkers to make articles and shills who post on websites, it will never be enough. This is the 21st century an age where covering up false flag operations is not nearly as easy as it used to be. It took 40 years for people to find out about things like Gulf of Tonkin. With 9/11 we've had people who knew within 1-2. |
ATTC User ID: 397787 United States 07/07/2008 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then why is traffic to all the 9/11 conspircay websites down the past year? Quoting: Guns n' GodAnd why haven't had you had any effect on the election, on public opinion, etc.? You're just a small group of paranoid kooks and you always will be. Link? If anything more and more people have woken up to the truth. The 9/11 Coincidences Series on YouTube continues to get more hits. The movement has gone to the point where the media can't even ignore it. BBC feels the need to make a video "debunking" the beliefs about WTC 7 which will coincide with the NIST finally releasing a report. Why all the trouble? More and more people are rejecting the official story of 9/11 every day. Just like more and more people have woken up and looked past the BS War on Terror and have put the economy as the #1 issue to worry about |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9251 United States 07/07/2008 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 464475 United States 07/07/2008 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Earnest User ID: 464411 Canada 07/07/2008 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | need i say more......he he he we are soooo kicking your ass. Depends on how you measure victory. If you consider you nuts blowing each other with how "right" you are = victory, then I guess you are winning. If you take objective opinion however, you are simply deluding yourself, hoping that if you make enough of these inane threads, it will change the facts. Good luck with that. Reality is interesting enough. |
SIS User ID: 447145 United Kingdom 07/07/2008 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army (ret), is the former Executive Quoting: Anonymous Coward 225509Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. In testimony before a 2005 Congressional briefing, he said, “It falls to me this morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11 Commission report … “The 9/11 Commission which studied US intelligence and law enforcement community performance in great detail, (maybe not so much great detail, but they did), neglected to cover the community’s performance during the weeks following the attacks to determine who was responsible for them, not a word about that in the Report. “The Report does discuss the immediate US responses but the immediate investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has closely studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough came two weeks into the investigation when the money transfers from the United Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered. “Furthermore, if you have studied that investigation, you know there is no disputing that while investigators may have struggled with the identity of the paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was Al Qaeda’s finance chief. For this reason alone you have to ask why the 9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chief’s role as the 9/11 paymaster.” Omar Sheikh was a former MI6 agent who murdered Osama bin Laden on the orders of his ISI handler Brigadier - (redacted). The latter was the one whom Mrs Bhutto threatened, if she became prime minister of Pakistan, to have arrested for plotting to kill her because he was in charge of her security when she arrived in Karachi, where many people were killed in the bomb attack on her car entourage. He is now languishing in a Pakistani prison, protected by his ISI colleagues (yes, he was a double-agent, working for Al-Qaeda but secretly working with MI6/CIA/ISI) and awaiting his appeal of his death sentence for his part in the murder of Daniel Pearl (actually a trumped-up charge just to keep him in prison, where he cannot talk to the world about what he knows about 9/11, being the man who wired $100,000 on behalf of Lt General Mahmoud, head of Pakistan's ISI, to Mohammed Atta shortly before 9/11). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 447145 United Kingdom 07/07/2008 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pakistan paid the living expenses of Mohammed Atta [link to timesofindia.indiatimes.com] This was then covered up by Congress. |
HardTruth User ID: 423076 United States 07/07/2008 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Surely you jest? ___________ If it expects, or demands worship, it is not divine!! Let the truth be told... though the heavens fall! The opposite of bravery is not cowardice but conformity. Nothing is more dangerous, than trying to give truth to people, who are stuck in their ways... I am not bound by the laws of original sin.. I am one of the other people.. [link to www.paganlibrary.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 447145 United Kingdom 07/07/2008 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Although protesting his innocence in the murder of Pearl, Sheikh was sentenced to death in July. An appeal is now pending. There is little doubt from his personal history that Sheikh has been actively involved in militant Islamic groups of the kind so long supported by the CIA in the region. Because of where it might lead, however, it would certainly be extremely 'difficult' for the Bush administration if the link between Sheikh and CIA-appointed General Mahmoud was to be exposed in detail. The link between Sheikh and 911 is, after all, already seemingly established. The 911 connection with Mahmoud was in fact raised by an accredited Indian journalist on 16 May at a White House press briefing run by US National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice. The briefing was about what the Bush administration knew pre-911. The journalist asked with whom the head of the ISI had been meeting in Washington around the time of the attacks. Rice denied knowledge and swiftly moved on. Ominously both White House and CNN transcripts of the press briefing omit this reference to Mahmoud in the journalist's question. They simply leave out the relevant words in the case of the White House version, or insert 'inaudible' in the case of CNN. However, the wording is audible on the official video recording of the briefing: [link to www.globalresearch.ca] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 447146 United States 07/07/2008 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | need i say more......he he he we are soooo kicking your ass. Depends on how you measure victory. If you consider you nuts blowing each other with how "right" you are = victory, then I guess you are winning. If you take objective opinion however, you are simply deluding yourself, hoping that if you make enough of these inane threads, it will change the facts. Good luck with that. Only nuts have questions, huh? [link to patriotsquestion911.com] |