IF YOU WATCH PORN YOU OPEN YOUR AURA TO THE NEGATIVE

Gus you have it right. But most can't see that what purity is. Shame

People like you make it evil. And again ...besides ...it would not exist if there was more love in the world. Bottom line. Increase the love and porno would go away. It would be no more. Less love more porno.

Flawed perspective.

You have God on the side of Light, and Evil on the side of Dark.

God is deeper than that.

God is that which makes all dichotomies possible.

God is not he/she, God is what makes he/she possible.
God is not light/dark, God is what makes light/dark possible.
God is not something/nothing, God is what makes something/nothing exist all at once.

Under such a perspective, you can have healthy porn watching, and you can have unhealthy porn watching. All is possible.

If i don't get any from the wife today before she goes to work then most likely I will whack it to free porn!

Wohoo!

then you are extremely powerful to watch porn and be unaffected by it. congrats.

IF YOU LIVE YOU OPEN YOUR AURA TO NEGATIVE COCKS, MIGHT AS WELL KILL YOURSELF NOW TO SAVE YOURSELF!

Porn is NOT REAL SEX.

Real sex is the union of the souls, not just the bodies. It does not have to be a marriage or long term relationship, just has to be 2 people with mutual acceptance and compassion.

Porn movies are boring. The "actors" has no personality, hardly even caress or hold each other, dont share food or laughs. They look like "ok, 3 more minutes and I can go to the cashier and grab my check". Their facial expression is empty or mean. Happy lovers shine and make the world better!

Real sex is not dirty, and the person who refrains from sex is not pure.

I agree with Winningjob refraining from sex is harmful. Sexual energy is the core of our being, the basic life energy that ultimately creates life itself; opressing it results in growing frustration, which results agression, neurosis, addictions (to drugs, alcohol, to power to money). You don't use it - lose it.

Refraining from sex is disempowering on the long run. That is why most organized religions have rigorous restrictions towards sex. It is easier to control you if you are frustrated and feel miserable.

How did you know its Atltantean?

I think porn is isolating. Think of all the people trolling porn on the internet, home alone. Tis a waste of energy for sure. But it does feel great when you find whatever your particular thing is, which may be completely absent from your life.

So? I don't know know. I think porn reflects how inhibited we are still, not about freedom at all. If we were unhibited and capable of real love/compassion for others we would all be in loving unions bonking our brains out, and all the joy would change the world? Maybe. I don't think we'll ever know.

You hit it on the nose, Kingdom of Heaven! Happy Fourth of July to all!

WORD! There are porn and then there are "porn".

I think a lot don't like porn because they like a certain kind of porn that is kind of creepy.

And since most males watch porn with the eye to the COCK they get freaked out by "what this all mean"...

If we accepted that we are bisexual, then this need to be "humiliated" (through projection on the females of porn) then porn would not be so much of a big deal, and it would be more like Corbin Fisher's porn: completely harmless, enjoyable, life-affirming, vanilla porn - orgies or non-orgies.

They like the idea of homosexuality A LOT - it just HAS to be of the safe kind: females'.

Though there is this perversion that TPTB likes to spread wherever they can. So some porn will, no matter how much we accept our bisexuality, be forever demeaning... It's the "rough trade" that 'the elite' likes so much to satisfy themselves with.

Monkey see. Monkey do.

They are immersed in the whole "money buys everything", so their views are very narrow and limited by their own fucked up realities.

They forget that there are tons of gays/straights who have sex - FOR FREE - that are basically vanilla. And don't give a shit about paying, or getting paid by, anyone.

The problem is.. for these lame fucks, since they have no real ability to be charming, charismatic, through true life-affirming mind-set, they all translate those non-qualities to: "Ha! I'm going to prove to myself for the billionth time that all beings are for sale! I'm going to wave some dollars in front of their face until I can reassure my theory!"

And of course they do, since they are the ones who create this desperation in the first place. (And who does not want to make seemingly easy money?)

They are the epitome of the "stiff-gringo". Completely lost in their ridiculous self-images.

How can these idiots care about freedom? They dine in hushed tone, and drink vintage wines, while counting their money, like it is the be all and end all of all that is good in physical reality.

HOW CUM....

in every scene where the guy is getting a blowjob, they focus for a few long seconds on just the guy's face as he grimaces and moans?! I mean, who the fuck wants to see that??

Is that better??????????????????

Tell me why it is acceptable for people to watch killings and wars,
but man and woman in sexual union is bad????????????????

man is polygamic by Nature

there are so many diferent types of Sex...

u morons just dont have experience at All

u have fear...
and u triyng to put fear on People

to have Orgasms

cause u prefer wars

fuck u than

People need LOVe

SEX with LOVE even if Porno is good

pleasure is good


dont be bull cheated

See and have pleasure in Orgiastic Sex

is the best

[link to www.gexo.com]

If people knew the power of pure love it would make sex and orgasms look like a mild sneeze at best. Pure love is like a supernova of feeling. Unfortunately pure love does not exist in our world. But it is coming back. In a very very very big way it is coming back : )

kabooom !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! * hello.

u right

but sex is LOve 2 moron

and its here

love has infinite expresions

and Squirting is gooddd...

Woman forgot

lol

Yea i agree sex is great. never said it wasnt.

And calling someone a moron is not nice. Very unloving.

Money ruins sex though. Money is the death of sex.

u right with that 2

so whats wrong is money... not sex

sory ive called u that

love and light

If this is true then Amsterdam would be worse off than Darfur.

While pornography can be dehumanising and exploitative, it can also be educative, liberating, empowering, fulfilling and immensely socially beneficial. It all depends on how it is made, who makes it, what it depicts and why it is being used.

The puritanical rightwing feminist claim that porn is always anti-women is simplistic, untrue, insensitive, uncaring and, dare l say it, sometimes misogynistic and homophobic. Using sexually explicit imagery can be egalitarian, health promoting, emotionally fulfilling and life saving.

Critics say that porn is exploitative and degrading. Aren’t most jobs? Are people working in the porn industry more exploited than those working in mind-numbing, routine, dead end, low paid employment? Most skin flick actors get paid a damn sight better than the minions at McDonald's.

Sexually explicit imagery that involves participants who have been coerced, pressured, manipulated, trafficked or blackmailed into taking part is obviously wrong, as is imagery that involves children or actors who have been forced into non-consensual acts of violence or humiliation. These forms of porn include unwilling actors who have not given their free and informed consent, and who suffer harm. This porn should be banned and criminalised.

Outlawing other visual depictions of sex - even very explicit depictions - is highly problematic and ethically dubious. After all, since consensual adult sex acts are entirely natural, healthy and lawful, why should images of these acts be criminal offences? Criminalising such pornography is neither necessary nor justified.

There are some grey areas that I feel uncomfortable about, such porn videos produced by consenting participants, which nevertheless show images of extreme sexual violence and degradation. But the censorship of these images involves inherent problems: how do you define degradation and who decides? While some porn is degrading, not all of it is. Do we believe that the state, and often-elderly conservative judges, are the appropriate and reasonable arbiters of such matters?

The main problem is that there is no agreed consensus on what constitutes a degrading, exploiting or humiliating image. Opinions differ widely. Even if a definition could be generally agreed, it would be very difficult - if not impossible - to set out in law and interpret uniformly in practice.

Legislation in this area is likely to throw up more problems than solutions. In Canada, one of the first prosecutions under that country’s tighter anti-porn laws was a consensual lesbian SM publication. Here, in the UK, our anti-porn laws were used successfully in the 1980s to prevent explicit safer sex advice to combat HIV.

Even in the case of depictions of sexual violence and degradation, much of it involves consensual SM fantasy and role-play, where two or more adults commit sexual acts with mutual agreement and where no one experiences any lasting physical harm.

Criminalising such behaviour violates the right to privacy, individual liberty and personal autonomy. To deny mutually consenting adults the right to personal private space, and the right to make decisions about their own bodies, has more than a whiff of authoritarianism. For these reasons, abusive images produced by consenting participants who act out extreme SM fantasies should not be banned; although there may be a case for discouraging and campaigning against them on the grounds that a minority of disordered people might be unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality and may come to view such abuse as normal and valid – to the detriment of their partners.

Any opposition to consensual sexual violence and humiliation is based on many ifs and maybes and it seems unfair to penalise the majority of mature, responsible SM lovers on the grounds of what an aberrant minority of viewers of this extreme imagery might do subsequently.

Critics say that abusive pornography encourages emulation in real life. Apart from a handful of disputed individual cases, this claim is not supported by empirical evidence. There is no research to show that that degrading porn generally or significantly causes copycat behaviour. While it may reflect the desires of a tiny number of disordered people, it does not create these desires.

Some defenders of oppressive sex imagery suggest that it might sometimes act as a ’safety valve’ for the small minority of people who do harbour violent and abusive sexual fantasies. If this is true, and I suspect that it may be true in some cases, then extreme porn could provide a non-harmful outlet and have a positive social value, in that it helps reduce real-life sexual violence and abuse.

Even if a connection were established between porn and a few cases of actual sexual abuse, this would not justify a ban. We cannot legislate for the whole of society on the basis of what a tiny, dysfunctional minority might do. Otherwise, we would ban cars on the grounds that some people drive recklessly, cause accidents and kill people.

The real problematic issue with pornography is the way many women (and some men) are forced into the sex industry via trafficking, imprisonment, blackmail or pimping. We need a more concerted effort to free and support these genuine victims, and to help them to secure alternative training, employment and income.

Some critics argue that banning porn is the best way to protect the often abused and involuntary participants. This seemingly plausible argument does not stand up. Although sex imagery is illegal in many parts of the world, it still exists as a worldwide phenomenon. Participants are still coerced and degraded. The producers ignore the law. The law can’t and won’t stamp out porn or the abuse it often involves.

Regardless of whether porno images are same-sex or opposite sex, there is a strong case for making consensual adult porn more legal and open, in order to break the links between the sex industry and organised crime, and to reduce the exploitation and abuse of the participants.

Criminalising porn only drives it underground - making it harder to monitor and more difficult to rescue its victims. If porn is made criminal, it will discourage participants who have witnessed serious abuses, such as the use of under-age models or the trafficking of models, from coming forward and contacting the police.

Legalisation, the other hand, is likely to create more spaces and opportunities for the production of independent, do-it-yourself and alternative sex imagery that avoids the traditional exploitative and misogynistic scenarios.

Liberalisation would help facilitate a non-degrading feminist porn, made by women, for women, from a women’s perspective with the aim of pleasuring women.

So what about the individual and social benefits of sexually explicit imagery? Porn magazines are dismissed by some critics as ’wank mags.’ But what’s wrong with wanking? It’s perfectly natural and healthy, for both men and women.

Indeed, masturbation, with or without porn, has a number of positive virtues. It is totally safe sex, with no risk of contracting or transmitting HIV or other sexually-transmitted infections (STIs). If, instead of going out on the town and shagging left, right and centre, a person stays at home and jerks off over a porn video, isn’t that safer?

In other words, good quality sexual imagery can make masturbation an attractive alternative to casual sex, which can reduce a person’s number sexual partners and help cut the spread of STI’s.

Regular sex is vital for men’s health. Medical research in Australia has shown that men who cum five or more times a week from the age of puberty have a much lower incidence of prostate cancer. Therefore, if you haven’t got a regular partner, masturbation is good for you. If porno magazines and films assist frequent masturbation, then porn is helping save lives.

Sex mags and vids can be great sex education for young people. Unlike the coy, euphemistic nonsense that passes for sex education in schools, quality porn shows young people about sex – the techniques and skills involved, and how to satisfy yourself and your partner. This gives users of porn much better knowledge and expertise in the art of sex. The result? Often better quality sex lives and partners who are more sexually and emotionally fulfilled.

Pornography has been used very successfully to popularise safer sex. The use of sexually explicit leaflets and videos in HIV prevention campaigns has encouraged many people (gay, bisexual and straight) to switch to less risky behaviour. By promoting safer sex as exciting and fun, socially-aware porn has helped glamorise and eroticise responsible sexual behaviour – debunking the idea that non-risky sex is somehow boring, dull and second best. My own book, Safer Sexy (1994), was a good example. It won plaudits for making no-risk sexual behaviour appealing and exciting.

Porn also has another big social benefit. As an aid to masturbation, it may be the only means of regular erotic satisfaction for some single people, for partners in sexually dysfunctional marriages and for widows / widowers.

And what about people who are not young, beautiful, able-bodied and self-confident - or who live in isolated communities? Are these people supposed to do without sexual happiness? Not everyone measures up to the fitness and good looks that popular culture promotes as sexually desirable. It is cruel and inhuman to deny single disabled, overweight and elderly people the erotic fulfilment that pornography can give them.

We all grow old and lose our pulling power. But sexual desire may remain strong. It needs (and deserves) an outlet. That’s when sexy pictures and films can come to our rescue, helping us to maintain pleasure and satisfaction.

Pornography can thus be a cornerstone of sexual democracy. It gives everyone access to carnal pleasure and happiness, regardless of our age, looks, abilities or background.

it's sad and grosss

i feeel for all things who suffer because of desire and quantity

jesus masturbated watching lesbians...he told me so

reality is porn is the works of satan...watch at your own risk. I prefer not to give the powers of darkness any chance to enter me-

i'm so sad that there are people in hell because of sex

hell is on video

A

l

e

x



S

h

a

m

a

s

h



is the first and last name for


S

p

y


W

a

r

e


at GLP.

and voyeuristic

imagination is better anyway, since sex is basically an energetic exchange, not a physical act

i have a theory that the zillions of mosquitoes are the lost souls of sperms that were ejaculated unlovingly . . .