Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 290 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 24,477
Pageviews Today: 58,441Threads Today: 94Posts Today: 1,975
03:50 AM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us
 New! GLP YOUTUBE CHANNEL | GLP Radio! | Contact
ForumDiscussion TopicsAdvanced SearchNewsGallery
ForumTopicsAdv. SearchNewsGallery

News

Back to Forum
Back to Forum		Post a New Thread
Post New Thread		Reply to this Thread
Reply		View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180

 RSS 
Throw the bums out
User ID: 467903
7/16/2008 8:54 AM
Report abusive post
Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180
Quote

House Vote #492 (Jul 15, 2008)
On Motion to Refer: H RES 1345 The Kucinich Resolution

House Vote #492 --- Jul 15, 2008
Result: Passed

Bill status is not yet available on GovTrack.

Primary Source
This information comes from House Vote #492 on the House website . Geographic Voting Pattern
(see below for info)Cartogram

Standard Projection

Cartograms give an equal area in an image to an equal number of votes by distorting the image. Senate vote cartograms are shown with each state stretched or shrunk so that the states each take up an equal area because each state has two votes. For House votes, it is each congressional district which is stretched or shrunk.
Totals & Party Breakdown
Total Democrat Republican Independent
Ayes: 238 (55%)
229 9 0
Nays: 180 (41%) 0 180 0
No Vote: 16 (4%) 6 10 0
Required: Simple Majority of 418 votes (210)

[link to www.govtrack.us]

I can't find the text of the document but this is in reference to the articles of impeachment for Dubya.

Ron Paul voted YEA!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 466463
7/16/2008 9:04 AM
Re: Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180Quote

OK, so where does it go from here? tomato
Is it being file 13'd? again?
Yeah for Kucinich. hf
Got the list of other still humans voting Yes?
The list of bench sitters?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 467903 (OP)
7/16/2008 9:20 AM
Re: Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180Quote

Congressional panel to review Kucinich's call to impeach Bush

But the House committee won't actually consider removing the president from office.
From the Associated Press
July 16, 2008


WASHINGTON -- Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich's single article of impeachment will get a committee hearing -- but not on removing President Bush from office.

The House on Tuesday voted 238 to 180 to send his impeachment article -- for Bush's reasoning in taking the country to war in Iraq -- to the Judiciary Committee, which buried Kucinich's previous 35-article effort in June.

This time, the panel will open hearings, possibly as soon as next week. But House Democratic leaders said the proceedings would not be about Bush's impeachment, a first step in the Constitution's process of a removing a president from office.

Instead, the panel will conduct an election-year review -- possibly televised -- of anything Democrats consider to be Bush's abuse of power. Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat, is likely to testify. So will several scholars and administration critics, Democrats said.

The hearing is a modest gesture by House Democratic leaders to members like Kucinich who insist that Bush's reasons for going to war meet the standard for impeachment.

Kucinich had said that if his impeachment article was tabled he would simply propose another one. In June, he spent four hours on the House floor reading his longer resolution into the record, only to see it buried in committee.

[link to www.latimes.com]
Queen Subscriber
User ID: 422489
7/16/2008 9:50 AM
Re: Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180Quote

Congress better do it's job, if the banks fail and they have allowed the debt to become the responsibility of the government then congress is as responsible as the bankers that stole monies.

Sad day for those individuals that sold off the american public for 60 trinkets of silver.
If a lie becomes a truth after so many years it is a McCainism
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 457431
7/16/2008 9:52 AM
Re: Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180Quote

Congressional panel to review Kucinich's call to impeach Bush

But the House committee won't actually consider removing the president from office.
From the Associated Press
July 16, 2008


WASHINGTON -- Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich's single article of impeachment will get a committee hearing -- but not on removing President Bush from office.

The House on Tuesday voted 238 to 180 to send his impeachment article -- for Bush's reasoning in taking the country to war in Iraq -- to the Judiciary Committee, which buried Kucinich's previous 35-article effort in June.

This time, the panel will open hearings, possibly as soon as next week. But House Democratic leaders said the proceedings would not be about Bush's impeachment, a first step in the Constitution's process of a removing a president from office.

Instead, the panel will conduct an election-year review -- possibly televised -- of anything Democrats consider to be Bush's abuse of power. Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat, is likely to testify. So will several scholars and administration critics, Democrats said.

The hearing is a modest gesture by House Democratic leaders to members like Kucinich who insist that Bush's reasons for going to war meet the standard for impeachment.

Kucinich had said that if his impeachment article was tabled he would simply propose another one. In June, he spent four hours on the House floor reading his longer resolution into the record, only to see it buried in committee.

[link to www.latimes.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 467903


Those who appease need to be named so that-

1. They may be tarred and feathered
2. They may be voted out of office

I'm not for or against impeachment, but to deny the majority of citizens their will is an abuse of power. These public servants need to remember who they work for.
ShadowDancer
User ID: 287857
7/16/2008 4:02 PM
Re: Kucinich HR 1345 Referred 238 to 180Quote

"Those who appease need to be named so that-

1. They may be tarred and feathered
2. They may be voted out of office

I'm not for or against impeachment, but to deny the majority of citizens their will is an abuse of power. These public servants need to remember who they work for."

***********************************************

or far worst is what I see for many of them as they are betraying their fiduciary responsibility for profit at all costs-as though the corporate govt agency is all there is...not looking good for those who would obstruct the truth.I think impeachment should be on the table for cheney then bush...do not want to waste cash but this head in the sand stuff is unbearable as the uSA hemmorrhages


bump
Back to Forum
Back to Forum		Post a New Thread
Post New Thread		Reply to this Thread
Reply		View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!
Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.392s (6 queries)