Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,218 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,501,164
Pageviews Today: 2,496,418Threads Today: 1,000Posts Today: 17,819
11:18 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

_ _ _ Iran has two-week deadline for nuclear answer _ _ _

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 464146
Mexico
07/21/2008 05:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
_ _ _ Iran has two-week deadline for nuclear answer _ _ _
Iran has two-week deadline for nuclear answer
1 day ago

TEHRAN (AFP) — Iran was on Sunday facing a two-week deadline to give a final answer to world powers seeking a breakthrough in the nuclear crisis, after talks with the EU foreign policy chief ended in stalemate.

Iran's top nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili and EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana hailed their latest talks in Geneva on Saturday as "constructive" but Solana lamented that Tehran had still not given a final response.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad described the talks as a "step forward" in the nuclear standoff, which has raised fears of regional conflict and sent oil prices spiralling.

Solana, who presented Iran with a major package aimed at ending the standoff on behalf of world powers last month, said he was waiting for a decision from Tehran on an initial deal to start pre-negotiations.

This would see world powers promising not to impose further UN Security Council resolutions against Tehran, in exchange for Iran not installing any more uranium-enriching centrifuges, he said.

"We have not got an answer to the most important issue... we are looking forward to an answer to these questions in a couple of weeks," said Solana.

Russia's deputy foreign minister, Sergei Kisliak, who attended the talks was quoted by the Ria-Novosti news agency as saying he too expected a response from Iran in two weeks.

"During his visit to Tehran, Mr Solana presented a text on the framework of negotiations. We have examined this proposal," said Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki in apparent reference to the so-called "freeze-for-freeze" offer.

In a major development, the talks were also attended by the third most senior diplomat from the United States, the first time Washington has had direct contact over the nuclear standoff with Tehran.

However, the United States warned Iran would face "confrontation" -- an implicit warning of further sanctions -- if it failed to suspend uranium enrichment, which the West fears could be used to make a nuclear weapon.

"We hope the Iranian people understand that their leaders need to make a choice between cooperation, which would bring benefits to all, and confrontation, which can only lead to further isolation," said State Department spokesman Sean McCormack.

He said the US envoy at the talks, Undersecretary of State William Burns, delivered a "clear, simple message" that Iran must suspend enrichment to have negotiations with the United States.

IRNA quoted Jalili as saying after talks with Kisliak on Sunday that dialogue would be continued and "points of disagreement can be discussed."

Iran has already been hit by three sets of UN sanctions over its refusal to suspend uranium enrichment, while the United States and European Union have imposed unilateral measures against its banks.

The main package presented by Solana in Tehran offers Iran full negotiations on technological, economic and political incentives if it suspends uranium enrichment.

Iranian officials have repeatedly said they have no intention of freezing enrichment -- the key demand of world powers for ending the crisis.

In a sign that Tehran believes the diplomatic efforts may be lengthy, Jalili compared the diplomatic process to weaving traditional Persian carpets where progress in some cases "moves forward in millimetres".

Ahmadinejad said that "all negotiations are a step forward and the negotiations yesterday were negotiations that were a step forward," the official IRNA news agency reported.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, insisting its programme is designed to provide energy for its growing population when the OPEC member's reserves of fossil fuels run out.

[link to afp.google.com]





GLP