Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,794 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 702,564
Pageviews Today: 894,669Threads Today: 191Posts Today: 3,248
06:28 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World

 
Divinity
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 474434
United Kingdom
07/28/2008 09:26 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World
So...the veils are thinning and the fog is clearing. Sorry for the mixed metaphors but at last, with the impending defeat of the Neocons and their global domination of the world's MEDIA, articles are filtering through to the West signifying there are other countries/powers who will influence our future in a positive manner.

This is great news for freedom of speech and balance of power.

They will still have you believe that Russia, China, Iran and other countries are dangerous to your well-being/security but that's exactly how they've achieved so much devastation to our world so far.

Love Divinity
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[link to www.atimes.com]

Middle East
Jul 29, 2008

Snub for Iran eases nuclear crisis
By M K Bhadrakumar


A window of opportunity for Iran to become a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) seemed to have opened when on July 18 the Russian news agency quoted a source in the Foreign Ministry in Moscow hinting at such a prospect. It happened two days after Washington let it be known that a shift in its Iran policy was under way.

The unnamed Russian diplomat said the SCO foreign ministers at a meeting in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, a week later would decide on whether to lift a moratorium on bringing in new states. "The moratorium has lasted for two years. We have now decided to consider the possibility of the SCO's enlargement," he said. It appeared that weathering US opposition, Moscow was pushing Iran's pending request for SCO membership. Founded in 2001, the SCO currently comprises China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Iran has observer status.

However, in the event, following the meeting in Dushanbe on Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov revealed that the foreign ministers did not discuss the enlargement of the SCO, while finalizing the agenda of the organization's summit meeting on August 28, and that Iran wouldn't be able to get the status of an associate member.

Not only that, Friday's meeting also decided to set up a "mechanism for dialogue partnership to establish links with all countries and international organizations that are interested in the SCO". In other words, the US may finally be on the verge of establishing links with the SCO.

Since such issues are invariably decided within the SCO on the basis of a consensus between Russia and China, it stands to reason that either Russia didn't press Iran's membership case or China disfavored the idea. On balance, it seems to be a combination of both. Conceivably, Moscow didn't press after informally ascertaining Beijing's lukewarm attitude. Tajikistan, which hosts the SCO summit in August, has openly favored Iran's membership. If the two Big Brothers had given the green signal, Tajikistan would have asked Iran to come in from the cold. No doubt, Tehran, which openly canvassed for SCO membership, has suffered a diplomatic setback.

On the face of it, neither Russia nor China would have any conflict of interests to keep Iran out of SCO membership. Both countries enjoy excellent relations with Iran. As The Russian news agency acknowledged, "Both China and Russia have major commercial interests in Iran. China wants Iranian oil and gas, and to sell weapons and other goods to that country, while Moscow hopes to sell more weapons and nuclear energy technology to Tehran. The Kremlin also needs Iran's endorsement for a multinational arrangement to exploit the Caspian Sea's energy resources." They have been, arguably, the principal beneficiaries of the Iran nuclear problem. Their "principled position" on the Iran problem enabled them to optimally tap business opportunities in Iran so long as the West continued to boycott Iran and Tehran needed friends.

What emerges is that Moscow and Beijing take great care that their doublespeak on the Iran problem never quite gets to the point of antagonizing Washington. As for Tehran, being an experienced player itself, it let the charade continue and even to try to extract any advantages out of it as far as possible, until options opened up with regard to Iran's relations with the West.

But the endgame may be nearing. It seems neither Beijing nor Moscow quite expected that to happen so soon. Chinese commentators and scholars have been confident that short of a war, the US-Iran standoff would remain on a high pitch during the rest of US President George W Bush's term in office. Moscow commentators were relatively outspoken and speculated on disarray at the leadership level in Tehran, which all but precluded any progress on the nuclear problem. They wrote that President Mahmud Ahmadinejad was "on his way out". On the whole, Russian commentaries have become needlessly critical of Tehran. Chinese commentators have lapsed into silence.

Why is Moscow (and Beijing) edging closer to the West's stance? The short answer is, they seem to be apprehensive that Tehran has found a new interlocutor for communicating with Washington - Turkey. Thus, soon after talks ended in Geneva on July 19 on Iran's nuclear program , Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili, headed for Ankara, where Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki joined him. The two Iranian diplomats briefed Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan, who flew to Washington immediately thereafter. Tehran has indeed made a very interesting choice here.

Ankara is currently also mediating between Syria and Israel - most certainly, with Washington's acquiescence, if not encouragement. Besides, Turkey has some unique credentials to aspire to as a go-between in the US-Iran standoff. Apart from being a leading country in the Islamic world, it is one of the US's staunchest regional allies, while its relations with Iran have been on a steady upswing in recent years. It is quite capable of acting as a bridge between the Christian and Muslim worlds. Its strategic location makes it a kind of bridge between Europe and the Middle East.

Despite its hostility toward Tehran, the US has largely looked away from Turkey-Iran cooperation in stabilizing northern Iraq. Washington will not throw a spanner into the Iranian attempt to mediate the easing of tensions in Turkey-Armenia relations or in bringing Armenia and Azerbaijan to a path of dialogue and negotiations. Such Iranian efforts would even serve the interests of US regional policies in the Caucasus. Most important, Iran can be the key to the realization of the Nabucco gas pipeline project, which would go a long way in reducing Europe's energy dependence on Russia. Turkey, in turn, would be the transportation corridor for any Iranian gas to be pumped to Europe.

All in all, therefore, a fascinating pattern of interlocking diplomatic moves is forming on the regional chessboard in which Turkey, Syria and Israel are already openly engaged as protagonists with Iran now appearing on the scene. (Mottaki visited Damascus en route to Ankara.) The very fact that Turkey has extended an invitation to Ahmadinejad to pay a visit to Ankara and the alacrity with which the visit is being scheduled for late August surely indicates that the diplomatic tempo is expected to pick up in the coming period. For the beleaguered Islamist government in Ankara, any diplomatic breakthrough on this front would be a feather in its cap, enhancing its prestige and prospects of survival while at the same time underscoring Turkey's immense importance as a regional power for both the US and the European Union.

Overarching everything is the reality that the clock is ticking for the finalization of a US-Iraq security pact. (Turkish President Abdullah Gul is scheduling a visit to Baghdad.) In the absence of a security pact, a further extension beyond December of the United Nations mandate on the international forces in Iraq becomes necessary, which in effect means that the US troops have to stay in Iraq. Washington is desperately keen to wrap up the security pact, though it is clear that the end-July deadline cannot be met. Tehran opposes the pact and has influence on the Iraqi ulema, government and Iraqi groups to block the pact.

Tehran has the capacity to ratchet up tensions in Iraq, but it is also in a position to play a significant role in bringing down tensions. Indeed, the Iraqi government headed by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki cannot afford to cross swords with Tehran. Clearly, no matter what Moscow commentators seem to think, if Washington were to press ahead in September with a tough UN sanctions resolution against Iran, it must be prepared for the fallout on the Iraq situation.

In a fundamental sense, the Iranian stance remains highly pragmatic, notwithstanding its matching rhetoric against the US or Israel. The Iranian reaction to the deal between Hezbollah and Israel on a prisoner exchange was restrained. Iranian Majlis (parliament) speaker Ali Larijani complimented Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah for the latter's "wise diplomatic efforts that guaranteed calm in the region", even while sending a "strong message to Zionists that they are facing a strategic deadlock in the region". Tehran is manifestly helping to calm the situation in Lebanon. It didn't disapprove of the deal between Hamas and Israel either. Again, it has allowed the US to finesse the Shi'ite Mahdi Army of Muqtada al-Sadr in Iraq. And it has signaled its welcome to the establishment of a US diplomatic presence in Tehran and has reiterated its own interest in establishing direct flights between the countries.

Significantly, at such a critical turning point when issues of peace and war are hanging by a thread, it was more than a coincidence that former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani was chosen to deliver the customary Friday prayer sermon at the Tehran University campus. The main thrust of his speech, addressed unmistakably to the Western audience, was that the Israeli lobby in the US is once again working hard to torpedo nuclear talks by harping on a "deadline" and an "ultimatum" to Iran.

After taking a well-trodden route peppered with the familiar rhetoric of the Islamic revolution of 1979, Rafsanjani came to the point. The senior cleric who has seen many ups and downs in US-Iran relations over the past three decades, urged, "With patience and perseverance, let us give this negotiation a chance. Every time the situation is about to improve, these Western hardliners and radicals begin their diversionary ploys, which only shows some powers cannot bear to see peace in the region."

Rafsanjani summed up, "Iran is ready to negotiate. The aim of the talks is also clear ... Staging military maneuvers and holding talks from a distance cannot resolve issues. Do not try to invent pretexts. Be patient and let wise people sit down and talk to resolve the problems."

Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey.

(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)
"Aether is a Quantum 2 Spin Rotating Magnetic Field that encapsulates Primary Angular Momentum and via Tensegrity forms Matter with resulting Quantum 1/2 spin.

PHI is the direct result and first Ratio produced by this arrangement as it Cycles." Junglelord, www.thunderbolts.info

"It's never too late to have a happy childhood" - Ahim-sa

"Thought being a given is the first assertion of self-awareness; the remaining truth is simply "I am, therefore there is". Self and other, subject and object." Eyeam

"Remember me as I AM." My Brother
Divinity (OP)

User ID: 474434
United Kingdom
07/28/2008 09:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World
2008 Annual Arab Public Opinion Poll:
Survey of the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland (with Zogby International).


Iraq: Only 6% of Arabs polled believe that the American surge has worked. A plurality (35% ) do not believe reports that violence has in fact declined. Over 61% believe that if the US were to withdraw from Iraq, Iraqis will find a way to bridge their differences, and only 15% believe the civil war would expand. 81% of Arabs polled (outside Iraq) believe that the Iraqis are worse off than they were before the Iraq war.

Iran: In contrast with the fears of many Arab governments, the Arab public does not appear to see Iran as a major threat. Most believe that Iran has the right to its nuclear program and do not support international pressure to force it to curtail its program. A plurality of Arabs (44%) believes that if Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons, the outcome would be more positive for the region than negative.

The Arab Israeli conflict: There is an increase in the expressed importance of the Palestinian issue, with 86% of the public identifying it as being at least among the top three issues to them. A majority of Arabs continues to support the two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, but an increasing majority is pessimistic about its prospects. If the prospects of a two state solution collapse, 50% believe it would lead to a state of intense conflict for years to come, while only 9% believe it would lead to a one-state solution, and only 7% believe that the Palestinians would eventually surrender.

Palestinian Divisions: In the conflict between Hamas and Fatah, only 8% sympathize with Fatah most, while 18% sympathize with Hamas, and 38% sympathize with both to some extent. In so far as they see Palestinians as somewhat responsible for the state of affairs in Gaza, 15% blame Hamas’s government most, 23% blame the government appointed by President Mahmoud Abbas, and 39% blame both equally.

The Lebanese Crisis: Only 9% express sympathy with the majority governing coalition in the current internal crisis in Lebanon, while 30% sympathize with the opposition led by Hizbollah, 24% sympathize with neither side, and 19% sympathize with both to some extent.

[link to 66.102.9.104]
"Aether is a Quantum 2 Spin Rotating Magnetic Field that encapsulates Primary Angular Momentum and via Tensegrity forms Matter with resulting Quantum 1/2 spin.

PHI is the direct result and first Ratio produced by this arrangement as it Cycles." Junglelord, www.thunderbolts.info

"It's never too late to have a happy childhood" - Ahim-sa

"Thought being a given is the first assertion of self-awareness; the remaining truth is simply "I am, therefore there is". Self and other, subject and object." Eyeam

"Remember me as I AM." My Brother
Divinity (OP)

User ID: 474434
United Kingdom
07/28/2008 09:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World
I have never heard of this organisation before yet it has been formed since 1955!

Divinity


Tehran hosts NAM meeting today:

Tehran will be hosting the 15th meeting of Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) foreign ministers later today amid efforts to end Iran’s long-running standoff with the West over its nuclear program.

The 118 member states, 15 observer members, and eight international and regional organizations will be attending the four-day meeting.

The Non-Aligned Movement is a major supporter of Iran’s efforts to access peaceful nuclear technology.


Form the beginning of the nuclear row between Iran and the West, NAM has issued several statements in support of Tehran’s nuclear activities at international venues, most notably at IAEA Board of Governors’ meetings.

The Non-Aligned Movement is an organization of states which are not aligned with or against any major power bloc.

The organization’s objective, as stated in the Havana Declaration of 1979, is to ensure “the national independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity, and security” of its member states in their “struggle against imperialism, colonialism, neo-colonialism, racism, Zionism, and all forms of foreign aggression, occupation, domination, interference or hegemony.”

Since its establishment in 1955, NAM has repeatedly condemned the proliferation of nuclear weapons and has directed its efforts toward full nuclear disarmament.

However, NAM members believe that all nations have the right to access civilian nuclear technology according to international law and that no country should be pressured to relinquish its inalienable right to peaceful atomic energy.

During international negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear activities, the Non-Aligned Movement has drawn attention to Iran’s voluntary cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and its efforts to gain the trust of the international community by clearing up ambiguities surrounding its nuclear activities.

The NAM representatives at the IAEA Board of Governors have repeatedly asserted that pressuring Iran to rein in its uranium enrichment work is “illogical”.

They have frequently called for Iran’s nuclear dossier to be returned to the UN nuclear watchdog and warned that any strike on Iran’s nuclear installations would be a blatant violation of international law, the IAEA Statute, and the United Nations Charter.

NAM represents nearly two-thirds of United Nations’ members and comprises 55 percent of the world population, mostly in developing countries.

It includes India, Ghana, Pakistan, Algeria, Libya, Sri Lanka, Egypt, Indonesia, Cuba, Colombia, Venezuela, post-1994 South Africa, Iran, and Malaysia.

Brazil has never been a formal member of the movement, but shares many of the aims of NAM and frequently sends observers to the Non-Aligned Movement’s summits.

On July 19, Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili held talks in Geneva with EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana over ending Iran’s long-running nuclear standoff with the West.

U.S. Undersecretary of State William Burns also participated in the negotiations. It was the highest level of diplomatic contact between Iran and the United States in 30 years.

Representatives from the four other permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany also attended.

Russia, China, the United States, Britain, France, and Germany last month offered Iran an updated package of incentives that would be provided in return for a halt to Tehran’s uranium enrichment program.

The package, which is a follow-up of an original proposal in 2006, offers nuclear cooperation and wider trade in aircraft, energy, high technology, and agriculture.

The Islamic Republic has also presented its own package of proposals on ways to address international challenges, including the threat of nuclear proliferation, and Iranian officials have said they have found common ground between the two separate packages.

Iran has repeatedly ruled out suspending uranium enrichment as a precondition for talks with the major powers and has said it will hold talks “only on common points”.

After the July 19 meeting, some countries within the sextet said Iran had two weeks to reply to the offer to rein in its nuclear work in return for a halt to new steps toward more UN sanctions.

Last Monday, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Tehran had two weeks to respond seriously to a proposal made by the six powers or face “punitive measures”.

The United Nations has so far imposed three rounds of sanctions on the Islamic Republic including travel and financial curbs on Iranian individuals and companies and an asset freeze on Iran’s largest bank, Bank Melli.

The Non-Aligned Movement has also expressed support for global efforts to make the Middle East a nuclear weapons-free zone.

After Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert admitted that the Zionist regime has stockpiled nuclear warheads, the 118-nation Non-Aligned Movement issued a statement warning that Israel’s nuclear arsenal poses a major threat to Middle East security.

NAM has called for the Zionist regime to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to allow the IAEA to inspect its nuclear installations

[link to www.tehrantimes.com]
"Aether is a Quantum 2 Spin Rotating Magnetic Field that encapsulates Primary Angular Momentum and via Tensegrity forms Matter with resulting Quantum 1/2 spin.

PHI is the direct result and first Ratio produced by this arrangement as it Cycles." Junglelord, www.thunderbolts.info

"It's never too late to have a happy childhood" - Ahim-sa

"Thought being a given is the first assertion of self-awareness; the remaining truth is simply "I am, therefore there is". Self and other, subject and object." Eyeam

"Remember me as I AM." My Brother
FF
User ID: 456207
Austria
07/29/2008 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World
applause
WIL-EDISON

User ID: 978903
United States
05/23/2010 07:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World
Hey./.. Im building a Cronovisor MnBI array I have built a gravity generator . Its really cool Peggs the Ceiling. I love the Quantum spin 2 and 1/2 Explanation you did.. very good. Im into Oscillators and rotors. :p 1, 2 , 6 hydro
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 682262
United States
10/12/2010 12:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Westerners Waking Up to the Other Side of the World
1rof1

News