Shanksville plane crash was FAKE | |
Nighthawk User ID: 417071 United States 07/31/2008 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No it wouldn't. Flight 585, which is what the vid is about, crashed while landing. They were at an altitude of less than 1000ft and traveling at 230MPH. Flight 93 started it's final decent from 10,000ft. and impacted at well over 500MPH and almost straight down. Apples and oranges here. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 303149 United States 07/31/2008 09:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 433091 United States 07/31/2008 09:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 382841 United States 07/31/2008 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 433091Not according to eye witness accounts. Witnesses saw the plane or something that looked similar to a plane fly over at low altitude before it crashed. One witness described the plane as looking more like a cruise missile than an airliner. Very odd. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 382841 United States 07/31/2008 09:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 433091Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . |
jiggy User ID: 411163 United States 07/31/2008 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Brwnstown User ID: 465293 United States 07/31/2008 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No it wouldn't. Quoting: NighthawkFlight 585, which is what the vid is about, crashed while landing. They were at an altitude of less than 1000ft and traveling at 230MPH. Flight 93 started it's final decent from 10,000ft. and impacted at well over 500MPH and almost straight down. Apples and oranges here. I would not bet on flight 93 being at 10 thousand ft. it flew through northeast ohio twice going west to about toledo and turned and came back east and it was not very high at all. and shortly after it made its trip east back through here 2 fighter jets came from somewhere and they were fucking flying. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 465182 United States 07/31/2008 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only was the CRASH a fake... ...so was "Todd Beamer" and the "Let's Roll" story. But hey, it sounded so REAL. Just like a real Hollywood movie. Gosh, what a great inspiring, uplifting and yet heartwarmingly sad story. It really is such a shame it's all a big lie... because it really did have all the trappings of a blockbuster movie. Whoever thought it all up deserves an Oscar for Best Screenplay. |
Cinch User ID: 476646 Germany 07/31/2008 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No it wouldn't. Quoting: NighthawkFlight 585, which is what the vid is about, crashed while landing. They were at an altitude of less than 1000ft and traveling at 230MPH. Flight 93 started it's final decent from 10,000ft. and impacted at well over 500MPH and almost straight down. Apples and oranges here. First off, 93 reportedly crashed at a 40 degree angle. The video showed would a crash like 585 would look like ("apples"). Pretend no video of the alleged 93 crash was seen. Describe to people what a plane crash would look like from one crashing 580mph at 40 degrees into uncompacted dirt. |
SHR Forum Administrator 07/31/2008 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1) At whatever angle, a real plane crashed. There is a chance that the aircraft was shot down and some evidence supports this. There are inconsistencies in the crash dynamics as reported by the Gov't. 2) There were never any planes and the whole thing is made up. All the so called evidence is also made up. Really it is about time both camps just tossed the minor differences among themselves and focus on their own "bigger pictures" ____________________________________________________ E-mail anytime [email protected] Inquiring about a ban?, include the IP address found here. [link to www.showmemyip.com] Ooooh, see the fire is sweepin' Our very streets today... Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bulls lost the way... War, children, it's just a shot away...it's just a shot away.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 476663 Puerto Rico 07/31/2008 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 382841Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 474769 United States 07/31/2008 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 476663Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. This is the problem with you 911 hoax idiots. The debris was only 1.5 miles away (not 8) and it was paper and small pieces of sheet metal that can fly long distances through the air. The idea that the debris was found 6 or 8 miles away is because the road miles are that far...the direct line is only 1.5 miles. See the map at: [link to www.popularmechanics.com] Please get some actual facts befor making such ridiculous claims. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 471491 United States 07/31/2008 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 206814 United States 07/31/2008 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only was the CRASH a fake... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 465182...so was "Todd Beamer" and the "Let's Roll" story. But hey, it sounded so REAL. Just like a real Hollywood movie. Gosh, what a great inspiring, uplifting and yet heartwarmingly sad story. It really is such a shame it's all a big lie... because it really did have all the trappings of a blockbuster movie. Whoever thought it all up deserves an Oscar for Best Screenplay. I'm with you on this one. What a clever cover-up. Much better than the passport that survived the WTC inferno along with the Koran and flight instruction manuals left in the rental car. Oh, and that jet fuel brought the twins towers AND WTC7. Anyone here ever see an actual commercial airliner accident? If you have, you would also be laughing your head off after being told that a 757 hit the Pentagon and everyone simply 'disappeared', DNA and all. OMFG, these guys have GOT to come up with a better story; but yep, Shanksville was the best one ... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 476663 Puerto Rico 07/31/2008 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 474769Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. This is the problem with you 911 hoax idiots. The debris was only 1.5 miles away (not 8) and it was paper and small pieces of sheet metal that can fly long distances through the air. The idea that the debris was found 6 or 8 miles away is because the road miles are that far...the direct line is only 1.5 miles. See the map at: [link to www.popularmechanics.com] Please get some actual facts befor making such ridiculous claims. You are obvious a product of the American school system, you've been dumbed down so much that you are incapable of thinking for yourself. You fall for such blatant lies and propaganda that I hope you haven't procreated, the world already has too many idiots. Popular Mechanics is known, just as Faux News to be nothing more than a mouthpiece for TPTB in their attempt to cover up their lies. The engines that PM showed from the WTC wreckage was more proof that the supposed jets that crashed into the towers were not from a 767. [link to www.thewebfairy.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 287211 United States 07/31/2008 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only was the CRASH a fake... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 206814...so was "Todd Beamer" and the "Let's Roll" story. But hey, it sounded so REAL. Just like a real Hollywood movie. Gosh, what a great inspiring, uplifting and yet heartwarmingly sad story. It really is such a shame it's all a big lie... because it really did have all the trappings of a blockbuster movie. Whoever thought it all up deserves an Oscar for Best Screenplay. I'm with you on this one. What a clever cover-up. Much better than the passport that survived the WTC inferno along with the Koran and flight instruction manuals left in the rental car. Oh, and that jet fuel brought the twins towers AND WTC7. Anyone here ever see an actual commercial airliner accident? If you have, you would also be laughing your head off after being told that a 757 hit the Pentagon and everyone simply 'disappeared', DNA and all. OMFG, these guys have GOT to come up with a better story; but yep, Shanksville was the best one ... I think the most stupid part of this plot was when the wings laid out an impression on the building. It reminds me now of a road runner cartoon. It just amazes me when I look back that I could even fall for any of it. When you go to a movie, you know it's fake. Now you have to realize that the media is doing the same thing. Creating Reality thru visualizations. Either they also got caught up in this script or they were a part of it from the start. I think the script and screenplay had to have their signature in it somewhere. I give up on the media, I do not want to participate in Roger Rabbit part 2, The Final Oil Debacle. Written by non other than Congress, Exxon Mobil, and the media. The screenplay and script provided by leaders of the executive branch, they really should have a golden globe for this stuff. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 474769 United States 07/31/2008 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are obvious a product of the American school system, you've been dumbed down so much that you are incapable of thinking for yourself. You fall for such blatant lies and propaganda that I hope you haven't procreated, the world already has too many idiots. Popular Mechanics is known, just as Faux News to be nothing more than a mouthpiece for TPTB in their attempt to cover up their lies. The engines that PM showed from the WTC wreckage was more proof that the supposed jets that crashed into the towers were not from a 767. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 476663[link to www.thewebfairy.com] So, do YOU see 6 or 8 miles between the crash site and the debris site...yes, or no? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 474769 United States 07/31/2008 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The debris from farther away was very small... [link to www.debunk911myths.org] "The debris found in New Baltimore consisted of very light materials, including paper, thin nylon, and other things that would, if in the air with the wind, would easily blow. At the time of the crash, the wind was blowing at 9 knots in the direction towards Indian Lake and New Baltimore.[9] The debris in New Baltimore included charred pages of in-flight magazines, papers from a pilot's manual, a map showing the Guadalajara, Mexico, airport, and copies of stock portfolio monthly earnings reports. It also included some black webbing, from insulation lining the belly of the jetliner, which was a flexible material where it hadn't burned, and crisp where it had.[14] " |
bbb User ID: 455012 United States 07/31/2008 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DarkStarCrashes User ID: 476623 United States 07/31/2008 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No it wouldn't. Quoting: NighthawkFlight 585, which is what the vid is about, crashed while landing. They were at an altitude of less than 1000ft and traveling at 230MPH. Flight 93 started it's final decent from 10,000ft. and impacted at well over 500MPH and almost straight down. Apples and oranges here. |
DarkStarCrashes User ID: 476623 United States 07/31/2008 04:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DarkStarCrashes User ID: 476623 United States 07/31/2008 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 476663BS, there is no wreckage anywhere. show us the pics |
DarkStarCrashes User ID: 476623 United States 07/31/2008 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 474769Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. This is the problem with you 911 hoax idiots. The debris was only 1.5 miles away (not 8) and it was paper and small pieces of sheet metal that can fly long distances through the air. The idea that the debris was found 6 or 8 miles away is because the road miles are that far...the direct line is only 1.5 miles. See the map at: [link to www.popularmechanics.com] Please get some actual facts befor making such ridiculous claims. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 476602 United States 07/31/2008 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 476663Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. Didn't you watch the old WWII movies where the sub launched personal items out the torpedo tubes to make the ship above think the sub had been hit? I think Captain Kirk had to resort to such tactics on one or two occasions. Translation: If they were smart enough to try to fake a crash landing, they would have thought about spreading shit around to make it look authentic. |
LOU DOBBS User ID: 340476 United States 07/31/2008 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
G. House User ID: 476777 United States 07/31/2008 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Flight 93 impacted at near the speed of sound and close to verticle, like a missle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 476663Also, wreckage from the plane was found scattered over many miles. If it crashed straight down, the wreckage would be confined in a relatively small area. . This is the most glaring item to me. The wreckage was spread out over several miles, (things were found up to 8 miles away) the only way that could of happened was if it was blown out of the air by air-to-air missile. And the lack of physical evidence at the 'hole' was a nothing but a joke. NO, that is not the only way it could have happened! If the aircraft was out of control and coming down WAY OVER SPEED, it very well could have started breaking up as it was coming down. That could have caused some parts to be seperate from the main crash site. Further more WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU? YOU have access to EVERY photo of the pieces of debri drug out of the impact site? So that YOU can hazard an absolute statement on lack of physical evidence? Please tell us how you got access to this because as far as I know the general public doesn't have it. Fuel? How much fuel did it actually have at that point? It had been flying around for quite some time by then. Couple this with the possibility that it broke up in mid air and most of the fuel would have evaporated before hitting the ground. Personally I find it quite laughable that so many totally ignorant people regarding what to expect in crash debri from any given situation go and make concrete judgement statements obout what happens in any particular crash. "Everybody lies." |
DarkStarCrashes User ID: 476623 United States 07/31/2008 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
G. House User ID: 476777 United States 07/31/2008 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | TOTAL BS Quoting: DarkStarCrashes 476623ASSHOUSE, you are full of BS. You are a misinfo criminal The best you can do is a personal attack? Tell me why I'm wrong if you can, which I doubt. But since you started this, let's talk about YOU. People like YOU are friggen traitors that should be rounded up and shipped off to some place they can be happy, like Turkmenistan, or Swaziland or some other enjoyable location. "Everybody lies." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 476623 United States 07/31/2008 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The best you can do is a personal attack? Quoting: G. HouseTell me why I'm wrong if you can, which I doubt. But since you started this, let's talk about YOU. People like YOU are friggen traitors that should be rounded up and shipped off to some place they can be happy, like Turkmenistan, or Swaziland or some other enjoyable location. You are the king of personal attacks. give me a break. Tell us where's the plane, liar? [link to www.theodoresworld.net] Tell us what is in the warhead of a missile? Tell what color DU burns? No 757 crahed there. case closed. You are a knowing liar |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 476775 United States 07/31/2008 05:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |