Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 606 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 135,500
Pageviews Today: 365,208Threads Today: 621Posts Today: 9,411
06:20 PM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us
 New! GLP YOUTUBE CHANNEL | GLP Radio! | Contact
ForumDiscussion TopicsAdvanced SearchNewsGallery
ForumTopicsAdv. SearchNewsGallery

News

Back to Forum
Back to Forum		Post a New Thread
Post New Thread		Reply to this Thread
Reply		View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

John Edwards affair most important news story today

 RSS 
Smokescreen
User ID: 420023
8/8/2008 10:03 PM
Report abusive post
John Edwards affair most important news story today
Quote

Who gives a f*ck? CNN and Fox, that's who. Check them out.
Omega Subscriber
Total Unequivocal Bad Fuckin' News
User ID: 355596
8/8/2008 10:04 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

Who gives a f*ck? CNN and Fox, that's who. Check them out.
 Quoting: Smokescreen 420023


I am watching both right now. Unbelievable.

Proves MSM completely controlled....
Yahoo IM omega375hh
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 481340
8/8/2008 10:09 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

I don't care about John Edwards' affair about as much as I didn't care about Bill Clinton's BJ. I can't believe that there is important news being so blithely ignored.

I take issue with the Oympics, too. 40 billion would feed and get medicine for a lot of people.
Hillcrest Subscriber
Not For You*
User ID: 392015
8/8/2008 10:14 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

in L.A. today it's worse than usual (yes that's possible): the big stories are Kobe Bryant "might" play for Italy, the Hollywood DMV employees staged a sick-out and closed down the office due to State budget crap, John Edwards affair and the Olympics.

'tards.
whyidontknow Subscriber
User ID: 471651
8/8/2008 10:14 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

'John Edwards affair most important news story today'

do you think if they have a child that child will be able to read from the otherside to??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 476735
8/8/2008 10:42 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

noticed that too..

seems nicely timed, doesn't it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 479808
8/8/2008 10:59 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

Who cares? He's not running for any public office, his career is totally over period end of story.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 481188
8/8/2008 11:00 PM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

Both parties are working together. I think every politician is soo sold out, they suck dick on command.

On 911 the united States was usurped/couped.
kits
User ID: 357079
8/9/2008 1:28 AM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

It's not just a distraction, it's a strategy. Obsessing over the Georgia situation at this stage would be suspicious. America is supposed to have no involvement in the matter, meaning America would have limited interest. That being so, the American MSM would naturally only comment on the Georgian war in passing. Because it "doesn't matter." America "isn't involved." They're slow playing right now. It's a ball which will roll and thicken as time goes on, a psychological build up. They say Russia invaded Georgia unprovoked and fuck those Reds/Soviets/Russians. They're providing enough information for you to develop an opinion (Russia/Ossetia bad, US/Georgia good), but not too much causing suspicion (later) or desire to better inform yourself on the matter (we're giving you a good overview, no other sources needed). It rolls and rolls as more video, information and opportunities arrive to use to make their case (Russia/Ossetia bad, US/Georgia good), and they put out a few hints along the way so as not to shock (shake awake) anyone too terribly much (130 American soldiers in Georgia, Russia bombing Tbilisi, Georgia asking for help). Eventually there's breaking news, you learn that the "Soviets" have "ruthlessly attacked" American soldiers either minding their own business (Base, embassy) or who were doing something heroic (saving little children with teddybears in hand, defending Red Cross). And you can imagine where it goes from there.
AIM:kits56fa2
hobnailboots
User ID: 321955
8/9/2008 1:34 AM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

It's not just a distraction, it's a strategy. Obsessing over the Georgia situation at this stage would be suspicious. America is supposed to have no involvement in the matter, meaning America would have limited interest. That being so, the American MSM would naturally only comment on the Georgian war in passing. Because it "doesn't matter." America "isn't involved." They're slow playing right now. It's a ball which will roll and thicken as time goes on, a psychological build up. They say Russia invaded Georgia unprovoked and fuck those Reds/Soviets/Russians. They're providing enough information for you to develop an opinion (Russia/Ossetia bad, US/Georgia good), but not too much causing suspicion (later) or desire to better inform yourself on the matter (we're giving you a good overview, no other sources needed). It rolls and rolls as more video, information and opportunities arrive to use to make their case (Russia/Ossetia bad, US/Georgia good), and they put out a few hints along the way so as not to shock (shake awake) anyone too terribly much (130 American soldiers in Georgia, Russia bombing Tbilisi, Georgia asking for help). Eventually there's breaking news, you learn that the "Soviets" have "ruthlessly attacked" American soldiers either minding their own business (Base, embassy) or who were doing something heroic (saving little children with teddybears in hand, defending Red Cross). And you can imagine where it goes from there.
 Quoting: kits


Oh yeah. You summed it up all too fucking well.
Head for the hills. This wheel's on fire.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 481498
8/9/2008 3:46 AM
Re: John Edwards affair most important news story todayQuote

It's to point out-. Jon 2006 & Jon 2008 isn't same person. Jon06 is real one. Jon08 is clone.
Back to Forum
Back to Forum		Post a New Thread
Post New Thread		Reply to this Thread
Reply		View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!
Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.121s (6 queries)