Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 645 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 130,207
Pageviews Today: 351,088Threads Today: 594Posts Today: 9,063
05:40 PM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us
 New! GLP YOUTUBE CHANNEL | GLP Radio! | Contact
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASS

 RSS 
Observer
User ID: 391855
8/13/2008 4:32 AM
Report abusive post
Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASS
Quote

Just really sick and tired of the double hypocrisy of cheating "Holier than thou" politicians and church leaders. These betrayed wives in the public eye should set an example of enpowerment and do the "doormatted American (Christian)" women a service and for ONCE publically say ENOUGH i ENOUGH!! I hate how there is a neverending stream of these cheating little infidels that get cought and then hide behind their "good women's" forgiving skirts just to keep themselves on their unearned path of public admiration. Jesus/the bible says that divorcce is a sin except in the case of infidelity. Come on women! Stop letting them do this! No man I know would act so forgiving, if they were publically humiliated like this. Even strong independent women seem to believe men are just so incapable of faithfulness. It just perpetuates the behavior in our culture. Hillary is still a wimp and a phoney because she stayed around because she thought Bill was necessary to her future career. The opposite turned out to be true. Elizabeth Edwards, we LOVE you and I am personally sickened over your situation. Teach him a lesson publically - do this country a favor and ultimately you will be doing him a favor.
wizard
User ID: 482534
8/13/2008 4:34 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

kick him to the curb and take have his money
Chicky
User ID: 483965
8/13/2008 4:34 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

I am SURE that old Johnnyboy ain't gettin' any these days.

Positive, in fact.
Hair Frizz Specialist
LOU DOBBS
User ID: 340476
8/13/2008 4:50 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

DUMB FUCK SHE ALMOST DEAD ONE SURVIVING KID.AT LEAST HE STAYED WITH HER UNLIKE MANY CONS THAT LEFT THEIR SICK WIFES.SHIT 4 BRAINS
Observer
User ID: 391855 (OP)
8/13/2008 4:53 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

and just wait ... that baby is his, and it will come out, and not too much longer to waitfor that. The affair was OVER in 2006 or 07, right? And Elizabeth forgave him for his stupid "misjudgement" then. But there he was sneaking around from 9 pm to 230 am in Feb of 2008 in a CA hotel meeting with lover and the baby. (not positive of dates, but it was long after he had admitted to one bad misjudgement and been forgiven by his wife) So much for the power of forgiveness from his wife in 2006/07. And so much for his "remorse"
Observer
User ID: 391855 (OP)
8/13/2008 4:56 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

You are a disgrace to the name of LOU DOBBS
LOU DOBBS
User ID: 340476
8/13/2008 4:59 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

WHO REALLY GIVES A FUCK RETURD,HE'S GOT ENOUGH TO SUPPORT ALOT OF KIDS.SHE'S LUCKY HE DIDNT DUMP HER LIKE(NEWT RUDY BOB JOHN ROY ECT.)DID WITH THEIR WIFES. NOW GO FUCK YOURSELF!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428255
8/13/2008 5:03 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

Divorce is not wrong, marriage is wrong chuckle
Observer
User ID: 391855 (OP)
8/13/2008 5:08 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

It's not about money - it's about principle, a subject you don't seem to understand. You are very obviously the shallow fucktard here, and are completely off the subject - so be a good little misogynist and go to bed or get on a thread here that is more on your level. There's a good discussion about finding big foot....
Observer
User ID: 391855 (OP)
8/13/2008 5:10 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

BTW -I was referring to our distinguished "LOU DOBBS" not anyone else here!!
Observer
User ID: 391855 (OP)
8/13/2008 5:20 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

DUMB FUCK SHE ALMOST DEAD ONE SURVIVING KID.AT LEAST HE STAYED WITH HER UNLIKE MANY CONS THAT LEFT THEIR SICK WIFES.SHIT 4 BRAINS
 Quoting: LOU DOBBS 340476


She is not almost dead, and they have three surviving children - I am not a shit for brains nor a dumbfuck, thank you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 400833
8/13/2008 5:23 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

LET HE THAT IS AMONG YOU WITHOUT SIN THROW THE FIRST STONE!

This man and women have had SERIOUS problems in their marriage, including her facing a terminal illness, major surgery, etc. He got lonely, probably felt like he'd already lost his wife of many years because the intimacy died long ago, and he got caught in an age old trap. He's a wealthy man with quite a political career. Having his "love child" might be the smartest thing a woman involved with him could possibly do. It guarantees her an income for the next 20 years, and his public and private protection of her and the child - if not acknowledgement and paternity. But regardless of whether she threw away the pill, poked holes in her diaphram or just LIED to him about being on Birth Control, the bitch wrote her own meal ticket with her womb.

Wifey number one does not need his cash. She has her own family money. She needs a partner to go through this cancer thing with her and perhaps to hold her hand when she leaves this world - and it may well be soon. This "dump him" and "take his money" sounds like some evil spite-filled old crone.

I've had three divorces and not one of my ex wifes did without anything. I even put my step-sons (her biological children from her first marriage) thru college. Not because I was obligated to do so, but because I truly loved them and always will. That same wife - 30 years later had a bout with cancer. I paid for her trips to NYC and the bills at Sloan Kettering. So far, she's in remission. Why? Not because of a legal obligation. Just because I liked her and once loved her. This is called "being decent" and it is something that men must be taught - but we are capable of doing these random acts of kiness
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 484037
8/13/2008 9:05 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

and just wait ... that baby is his, and it will come out, and not too much longer to waitfor that. The affair was OVER in 2006 or 07, right? And Elizabeth forgave him for his stupid "misjudgement" then. But there he was sneaking around from 9 pm to 230 am in Feb of 2008 in a CA hotel meeting with lover and the baby. (not positive of dates, but it was long after he had admitted to one bad misjudgement and been forgiven by his wife) So much for the power of forgiveness from his wife in 2006/07. And so much for his "remorse"
 Quoting: Observer 391855


I'm with you.

He only told his wife afterward about his 'visit' to the girlfriend and baby because he was CAUGHT on camera by the National Enquirer!!

LOL..

He shows no remorse whatsoever.

BTW...people who made campaign contributions to Edwards, guess where your money went? To pay off his mistress.

The only reason why the mistress now doesn't want dna testing is because another guy is claiming to be the father..lol.

So far, she's continuing to get Edwards' payments. If the dna test reveals the other guy is the actual father, those payments STOP...

Your campaign donations at work, folks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 463567
8/13/2008 9:18 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

EDWARDS IS THE FATHER. REILLE'S SISTER AND FRIEND TOLD ABC NEWS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 484016
8/13/2008 9:24 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

He is an ambulance chaser what do you expect.
Never trust a man that gets $300 haircuts.
The Analog Guy Subscriber
User ID: 355383
8/13/2008 9:32 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

Just really sick and tired of the double hypocrisy of cheating "Holier than thou" politicians and church leaders.
 Quoting: Observer 391855


EXACTLY my sentiments. Those hypocritical sanctimonious
assholes.

:edwards:
[link to www.cafepress.com]
"If a man could understand all the horror of the lives of ordinary people who are turning round in a circle of insignificant interests and insignificant aims, if he could understand what they are losing, he would understand that there can be only one thing that is serious for him—to escape from the general law, to be free. What can be serious for a man in prison who is condemned to death? Only one thing: How to save himself, how to escape: nothing else is serious-Gurdjieff
FYI
User ID: 484049
8/13/2008 9:36 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

Divorce is not wrong, marriage is wrong chuckle
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 428255


Ditto!!!

Marriage is a man-made institution.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 484052
8/13/2008 9:40 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

Elizabeth should not seek divorce, but should file suit against the bitch for alienation of her husband's affections.

Sue the bitch!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79958
8/13/2008 10:05 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

They only reason Hillary-ious didn't do it.....is.....well, she's a lesbian. But, she does need Bill's connections...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 464592
8/13/2008 10:22 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

fuck his money - at this point , if nothing else, she needs his health insurance.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 460702
8/13/2008 10:42 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

She should do what she wants to do, she's the one who should pick for her own life.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 484037
8/13/2008 10:52 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

EDWARDS IS THE FATHER. REILLE'S SISTER AND FRIEND TOLD ABC NEWS.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 463567


The only proof is a dna test. Of course the mistress's sister and friend want the world to think it's Edwards baby...that way the bucks keep rolling in for their sister/friend.

Reille now claims she doesn't want one.

Why not?? It would be the ultimate proof. She must have some doubts to call it off.

Her sister and friends hearsay don't matter compared to dna proof.

And as long as the payments keep coming in....she probably figures who needs the dna...which might prove he isn't the father and all that money would stop.
Observer
User ID: 391855 (OP)
8/13/2008 2:04 PM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

To 833 - You sound like a truly decent peron. Wish there were more like you. Thankss for writing what you did.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 446469
8/13/2008 2:08 PM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

She is very ill. She may not want the stress that a divorce would cause.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 484102
8/13/2008 2:13 PM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

LET HE THAT IS AMONG YOU WITHOUT SIN THROW THE FIRST STONE!

This man and women have had SERIOUS problems in their marriage, including her facing a terminal illness, major surgery, etc. He got lonely, probably felt like he'd already lost his wife of many years because the intimacy died long ago, and he got caught in an age old trap. He's a wealthy man with quite a political career. Having his "love child" might be the smartest thing a woman involved with him could possibly do. It guarantees her an income for the next 20 years, and his public and private protection of her and the child - if not acknowledgement and paternity. But regardless of whether she threw away the pill, poked holes in her diaphram or just LIED to him about being on Birth Control, the bitch wrote her own meal ticket with her womb.

Wifey number one does not need his cash. She has her own family money. She needs a partner to go through this cancer thing with her and perhaps to hold her hand when she leaves this world - and it may well be soon. This "dump him" and "take his money" sounds like some evil spite-filled old crone.

I've had three divorces and not one of my ex wifes did without anything. I even put my step-sons (her biological children from her first marriage) thru college. Not because I was obligated to do so, but because I truly loved them and always will. That same wife - 30 years later had a bout with cancer. I paid for her trips to NYC and the bills at Sloan Kettering. So far, she's in remission. Why? Not because of a legal obligation. Just because I liked her and once loved her. This is called "being decent" and it is something that men must be taught - but we are capable of doing these random acts of kiness
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 400833


What a wonderful human being you are. Good for you! hf
lorraine
User ID: 484658
8/14/2008 10:33 AM
Re: Divorce is wrong = but not in Elizabeth Edwards case. She should do what Hillary wouldn't and take a stand. DUMP HIS ASSQuote

Here is the first STONE! I will cast it.
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!
Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.554s (6 queries)