ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16

Off the internet..If I'm wrong great.. I learn

link?

The Moon rose a couple degrees off from due East on Feb.21/08


Anything unusual?

You have given no links explaining the gibbous Moon's movements in regards to a Lunar eclipse

I record what I saw thats what I did

Anyways as usual :> Zetas Right Again

You have given no links explaining the gibbous Moon's movements in regards to a Lunar eclipse

I record what I saw thats what I did

Anyways as usual :> Zetas Right Again

The Moon rose a couple degrees off from due East on Feb.21/08


Anything unusual?

Well I'm sorry but it did and I've always maintained that observation

The Moon at that time was the ascending node

So it moved from the NE as a Gibbous Moon to the due East position as a Full Moon in February

The Moon rose a couple degrees off from due East on Feb.21/08


Anything unusual?

Well I'm sorry but it did and I've always maintained that observation

The Moon at that time was the ascending node

So it moved from the NE as a Gibbous Moon to the due East position as a Full Moon in February

I did...For Feb 20/08

time pacific.08:10

Alt.-11.0

Azm.94.2 .....is what I had

You are too general..If the moon rose from the West..is that where it's suppost to be?

The Moon was seen by many others who posted that it was seen farther than remembered

The Gibbous Moon was very far North and I live in the North

Anyways I am glad that my observations are bang on the money

The white Sun is back out ..Latter debunkers

Good grief..........not this crap again.

I didn't think it was possible for someone to be so dense.

maybe we are the zetas....in a different plane of existance...works for me...


Time to bring out that NASTY hybrid pic, Nator!!

WARNING!! WARNING!!.....you will never be the same again




....I have just the willing companion for this lovely hybrid "chick".

..........

PS: Now just try to imagine the offspring from that potential union!!

Why did I even TRY to have a rational conversation with freebird?

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply insults others and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun CANNOT be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) ID 88145 invited "User # 78/68" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) ID 88145 has now invited ANYONE who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, he threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User # 78/68" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User # 78/68" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User # 78/68" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take 88145 up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) "User" claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, he spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators equipment and use of the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is NOT setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit) supplied a link showing the sun is NOT moving north at this time.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) 88145 sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, Loser spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a failed attempt to explain them and then spewed insults and ran away.

I'll see what kind of challenge I can come up with later today, Loser....I'm sure you'll run away from it as well.

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply insults others and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun CANNOT be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) ID 88145 invited "User # 78/68" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) ID 88145 has now invited ANYONE who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, he threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User # 78/68" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User # 78/68" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User # 78/68" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take 88145 up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) "User" claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, he spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators equipment and use of the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is NOT setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit) supplied a link showing the sun is NOT moving north at this time.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) 88145 sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, Loser spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a failed attempt to explain them and then spewed insults and ran away.

I'll see what kind of challenge I can come up with later today, Loser....I'm sure you'll run away from it as well.

The Debunkers claim the Sun looks yellow..that's the mentality people, I am dealing with..

Last February, I measured each night the gibbous Moon's position as it approached it's Lunar eclipse during the week

Three nights prior to the Eclipse, the gibbous Moon was found rising 84 degrees NE.

Now tell me where the Moon is suppose to be prior to the Eclipse?..as you say you know where it should be..link or something do tell

On the night of the Eclipse, the Moon rises due East

Well that is a big step backwards of 24 degrees from the NE position


Now Yellow Sunshine do point to where the position in degrees the Gibbous Moon is suppose to be before a lunar Eclipse

I did...For Feb 20/08

time pacific.08:10

Alt.-11.0

Azm.94.2 .....is what I had

maybe we are the zetas....in a different plane of existance...works for me...


Time to bring out that NASTY hybrid pic, Nator!!

WARNING!! WARNING!!.....you will never be the same again




....I have just the willing companion for this lovely hybrid "chick".

..........

PS: Now just try to imagine the offspring from that potential union!!

:961asuperm:...............superman ought to know

I did...For Feb 20/08

time pacific.08:10

Alt.-11.0

Azm.94.2 .....is what I had


Meaningless observation without the observer's location

What is your latitude and longitude?