|
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16
|
The Lone Ranger 
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/18/2008 9:17 PM
 | |
picesnator
User ID: 318318
8/18/2008 9:20 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You know, all you Nancy believers could silence the debunkers once and for all if you could just come up with ONE single astronomical prediction or claim that you could defend as having come true. I've seen the debunker challenge here for years, but none of you even attempt to meet it. Can't you even find ONE from all of Nancy's writings that you can defend? If not, that says a whole lot about how you have been fooled into following someone who you cannot even find one piece of evidence to support.
Are you really THAT stupid?
BINGO! You have it. They really ARE that stupid. If they could show even one single astronomical prediction or claim that Nancy and Nancy alone made that actually came true, then we'd have nothing to debunk.
COME ON BUNKERS...CAN'T YOU FIND EVEN ONE EXAMPLE YOU CAN DEFEND?
hey...are u ready for nancy to be part of the obobma adminstration???.....
In what capacity?
...or in her case, what incapacity? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 486056
i dunno..but it raises interesting possibilities..like the office of channeling, or perhaps, the bureau of PX.....comes to mind... |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/18/2008 9:26 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You wasted all that on me?....answer....NO!!
You are text book obsessed, you must have been in LOVE at one time with the Zeta's in her head and they make believe hurt you somehow......answer....NO!!
So you have taken it upon yourself to save everyone from the make believe Zeta's.....answer....NO!!
more power to you and fight the good fight and all that stuff.....ah.......maybe!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 486980
Did I pass the test?
PS: Keep up with the play Sparkie. According to the two MOST intelligent(no wonder the zetacult fell apart into oblivion) Nancy followers here.....  is one of the highly PAID debunker agents on GLP.
Go Figure!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/18/2008 9:36 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You know, all you Nancy believers could silence the debunkers once and for all if you could just come up with ONE single astronomical prediction or claim that you could defend as having come true. I've seen the debunker challenge here for years, but none of you even attempt to meet it. Can't you even find ONE from all of Nancy's writings that you can defend? If not, that says a whole lot about how you have been fooled into following someone who you cannot even find one piece of evidence to support.
Are you really THAT stupid? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 356996
Not ONE bunker has taken up the challenge. GAME OVER!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 486635
8/18/2008 9:40 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nope, they never will step up to the challenge. Just as Nancy will never wiggle her way out of the admission that she really didn't know how to read coordinates. Another one that is laughable is that she claimed a couple of weeks ago that the Zetas are higher density beings. In all the dimensional beings lore I have ever come across, superior beings are lower density and higher frequency. So there you have the reason why the Zetas are always wrong - they are actually a race inferior to humans. |
|
picesnator
User ID: 318318
8/18/2008 9:42 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nope, they never will step up to the challenge. Just as Nancy will never wiggle her way out of the admission that she really didn't know how to read coordinates. Another one that is laughable is that she claimed a couple of weeks ago that the Zetas are higher density beings. In all the dimensional beings lore I have ever come across, superior beings are lower density and higher frequency. So there you have the reason why the Zetas are always wrong - they are actually a race inferior to humans. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 486635
maybe we are the zetas....in a different plane of existance...works for me... |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/18/2008 9:50 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
......Another one that is laughable is that she claimed a couple of weeks ago that the Zetas are higher density beings. In all the dimensional beings lore I have ever come across, superior beings are lower density and higher frequency. So there you have the reason why the Zetas are always wrong - they are actually a race inferior to humans. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 486635
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/18/2008 9:52 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
maybe we are the zetas....in a different plane of existance...works for me... Quoting: picesnator
Time to bring out that NASTY hybrid pic, Nator!!
WARNING!! WARNING!!.....you will never be the same again
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 471033
8/18/2008 10:17 PM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nope, they never will step up to the challenge. Just as Nancy will never wiggle her way out of the admission that she really didn't know how to read coordinates. Another one that is laughable is that she claimed a couple of weeks ago that the Zetas are higher density beings. In all the dimensional beings lore I have ever come across, superior beings are lower density and higher frequency. So there you have the reason why the Zetas are always wrong - they are actually a race inferior to humans. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 486635
lore? ... fitting
must be nice to feel so superior ... how's it workin for ya? |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/18/2008 10:21 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nope, they never will step up to the challenge. Just as Nancy will never wiggle her way out of the admission that she really didn't know how to read coordinates. Another one that is laughable is that she claimed a couple of weeks ago that the Zetas are higher density beings. In all the dimensional beings lore I have ever come across, superior beings are lower density and higher frequency. So there you have the reason why the Zetas are always wrong - they are actually a race inferior to humans.
lore? ... fitting
must be nice to feel so superior ... how's it workin for ya? Quoting: User # 78/68
100% on the money, Anonymous Coward 486635.
The wittle "bow and arrow" dude is just jealous of your superior intelligence.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 486056
8/18/2008 11:12 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nope, they never will step up to the challenge. Just as Nancy will never wiggle her way out of the admission that she really didn't know how to read coordinates. Another one that is laughable is that she claimed a couple of weeks ago that the Zetas are higher density beings. In all the dimensional beings lore I have ever come across, superior beings are lower density and higher frequency. So there you have the reason why the Zetas are always wrong - they are actually a race inferior to humans.
lore? ... fitting
must be nice to feel so superior ... how's it workin for ya? Quoting: User # 78/68
They must be inferior considering how much they get wrong. Even us lowly earthlings have no problems debunking their rants.
No comment about Nancy and the Zetas being wrong about Europa? So wrong they even got the time frame wrong? |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 483025
8/19/2008 11:33 AM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nothing else makes sense. Who would spend so damn much of their precious spare time on something they completely disagree with? Stupid is as stupid does ... just ask Circuit Breaker. Quoting: Loser # 78/68
LOL!! You're funny Loser...why would someone spend so much time insulting others like you do if "debunkers" were wrong unless they were paid to be here. You can't provide a shred of evidence to support Nancy's claims and you run away from every challenge put before you. Stupid is as stupid does...just look in the mirror, Loser.
Keep on scrolling as the idiots talk to each other, spreading their oh-so lovely energies. Quoting: Loser # 78/68
Keep on scrolling? That's a laugh. If you followed your own advise you wouldn't even respond to us. Ooops! Loser smacked down to the floor again. Perhaps we "debunkers" should scroll past you and deprive you of the attention you obviously crave. |
|
picesnator
User ID: 318318
8/19/2008 8:20 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
maybe we are the zetas....in a different plane of existance...works for me...
Time to bring out that NASTY hybrid pic, Nator!!
WARNING!! WARNING!!.....you will never be the same again
 |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 471033
8/19/2008 9:22 PM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Nothing else makes sense. Who would spend so damn much of their precious spare time on something they completely disagree with? Stupid is as stupid does ... just ask Circuit Breaker.
LOL!! You're funny Loser...why would someone spend so much time insulting others like you do if "debunkers" were wrong unless they were paid to be here. You can't provide a shred of evidence to support Nancy's claims and you run away from every challenge put before you. Stupid is as stupid does...just look in the mirror, Loser.
Keep on scrolling as the idiots talk to each other, spreading their oh-so lovely energies.
Keep on scrolling? That's a laugh. If you followed your own advise you wouldn't even respond to us. Ooops! Loser smacked down to the floor again. Perhaps we "debunkers" should scroll past you and deprive you of the attention you obviously crave. Quoting: Circuit Breaker
Maybe you should just scroll past, Circuit Not-So Bright, but, we all know you cannot do this. Just like you cannot leave people alone that want to read Nancy and her threads. Your stalking Nancy and her words shows you're very lame at breaking circuits.
Maybe, just maybe .... it is a life you need?
It's obvious to most, and very revealing CB, that you have an agenda here. I mean ... how much time do you and your phoney astronomer friends spend in threads at GLP that really interest them. OR is interest really a negative word to you?
Shills will be shills! |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
8/19/2008 9:41 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You know, all you Nancy believers could silence the debunkers once and for all if you could just come up with ONE single astronomical prediction or claim that you could defend as having come true. I've seen the debunker challenge here for years, but none of you even attempt to meet it. Can't you even find ONE from all of Nancy's writings that you can defend? If not, that says a whole lot about how you have been fooled into following someone who you cannot even find one piece of evidence to support.
Are you really THAT stupid?
Not ONE bunker has taken up the challenge. GAME OVER!! Quoting: The Lone Ranger
You really didn't think them capable of ever actually meeting the challenge did you? Their own inability puts the final nails in the coffin of zt. When px fails to show by 2012, which it will, what will they be able to say then? |
|
picesnator
User ID: 318318
8/19/2008 9:43 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You know, all you Nancy believers could silence the debunkers once and for all if you could just come up with ONE single astronomical prediction or claim that you could defend as having come true. I've seen the debunker challenge here for years, but none of you even attempt to meet it. Can't you even find ONE from all of Nancy's writings that you can defend? If not, that says a whole lot about how you have been fooled into following someone who you cannot even find one piece of evidence to support.
Are you really THAT stupid?
Not ONE bunker has taken up the challenge. GAME OVER!!
You really didn't think them capable of ever actually meeting the challenge did you? Their own inability puts the final nails in the coffin of zt. When px fails to show by 2012, which it will, what will they be able to say then? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 88145
it is invisible...cloaked....sometype of space thingie to keep us from observing it.... |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 486056
8/19/2008 10:11 PM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Shills will be shills! Quoting: User # 78/68
...and mindless sheep will be sheep. Oh, excuse me...you're not a sheep - you're one of Nancy's unquestioning lap dogs.
So far, in all the posts you've made, you haven't provided one shred of evidence to support your dear leader, Nancy Lieder. I guess it's one of the prerequisites of being a zeta lapdogs. All you do is growl every once and a while at the debunkers, insult a few people, provide no substance then run away like a whipped dog from the newspaper when you are challenged.
Yip, yip, yip! |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/20/2008 1:28 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You know, all you Nancy believers could silence the debunkers once and for all if you could just come up with ONE single astronomical prediction or claim that you could defend as having come true. I've seen the debunker challenge here for years, but none of you even attempt to meet it. Can't you even find ONE from all of Nancy's writings that you can defend? If not, that says a whole lot about how you have been fooled into following someone who you cannot even find one piece of evidence to support.
Are you really THAT stupid?
Not ONE bunker has taken up the challenge. GAME OVER!!
You really didn't think them capable of ever actually meeting the challenge did you? Their own inability puts the final nails in the coffin of zt. When px fails to show by 2012, which it will, what will they be able to say then? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 88145
Yes the bunkers are incapable of producing REAL facts and REAL events to back up the deluded  ings of their failed LIEDer. It is quite apparent that the remaining bunkers are living in the distant past of Ms LIEDer's hoax of 2003.
They are clearly WASTING their efforts in flogging Nancy's "dead horse" cult.
Sad as it really is ALL those that support Ms LIEDer are basically WASTING their individual life's.....and I have my doubts now whether Nancy's charade will even actually make it to 2012. I mean over the last few years her ings have become repetitive and very confusing. Her ADMISSION of not understanding even the most basic of astronomy concepts was a FATAL mistake on her part....and we will never fail to remind her and her misguided followers of that very fact.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/20/2008 1:35 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
maybe we are the zetas....in a different plane of existance...works for me...
Time to bring out that NASTY hybrid pic, Nator!!
WARNING!! WARNING!!.....you will never be the same again
....I have just the willing companion for this lovely hybrid "chick".
.......... 
PS: Now just try to imagine the offspring from that potential union!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
The Lone Ranger
Guardian of actual "Truth"!!
User ID: 475827
8/20/2008 1:39 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
You know, all you Nancy believers could silence the debunkers once and for all if you could just come up with ONE single astronomical prediction or claim that you could defend as having come true. I've seen the debunker challenge here for years, but none of you even attempt to meet it. Can't you even find ONE from all of Nancy's writings that you can defend? If not, that says a whole lot about how you have been fooled into following someone who you cannot even find one piece of evidence to support.
Are you really THAT stupid?
Not ONE bunker has taken up the challenge. GAME OVER!!
You really didn't think them capable of ever actually meeting the challenge did you? Their own inability puts the final nails in the coffin of zt. When px fails to show by 2012, which it will, what will they be able to say then?
it is invisible...cloaked....sometype of space thingie to keep us from observing it.... Quoting: picesnator
UPDATE...... 
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 483025
8/20/2008 4:49 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Maybe you should just scroll past, Circuit Not-So Bright, but, we all know you cannot do this. Just like you cannot leave people alone that want to read Nancy and her threads. Your stalking Nancy and her words shows you're very lame at breaking circuits. Quoting: Loser # 78/68
I knew you couldn't just scroll past, LOSER. We all knew you can't. Your life is rather empty unless you come here to insult others. You can't let people have a debate and show how Nancy is wrong. Your stalking of Nancy's threads and those that show how she is wrong shows you're a very lame individual who has no life...two university degrees...my ass.
Maybe, just maybe .... it is a life you need? Quoting: Loser # 78/68
No, that would be you. If you had a life, you wouldn't have been here so late.
It's obvious to most, and very revealing CB, that you have an agenda here. I mean ... how much time do you and your phoney astronomer friends spend in threads at GLP that really interest them. OR is interest really a negative word to you? Quoting: Loser # 78/68
It's obvious to all, and very revealing LOSER, that you have an agenda. I mean...how much time do you and your phony supporters spend at GLP desperately hoping "Planet X" will come? Why is it so wrong to you for others to have an opposing point of view? What are you so afraid of, LOSER? Are you afraid Nancy will cut you off? And how would you know if any astronomer here is a phony? You were invited by one to view the night sky and you ran away. Very telling indeed, LOSER. Feel free to come back when you've dusted yourself off.
Shills will be shills! Quoting: Loser # 78/68
Yes....yes, you will |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 483025
8/20/2008 4:52 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)
1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply insults others and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun CANNOT be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) ID 88145 invited "User # 78/68" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) ID 88145 has now invited ANYONE who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, he threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User # 78/68" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User # 78/68" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User # 78/68" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take 88145 up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) "User" claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, he spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators equipment and use of the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is NOT setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit) supplied a link showing the sun is NOT moving north at this time.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) 88145 sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, Loser spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a failed attempt to explain them and then spewed insults and ran away.
I'll see what kind of challenge I can come up with later today, Loser....I'm sure you'll run away from it as well. |
|
Free Store.
User ID: 158594
8/20/2008 5:35 AM
 | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
I for one seen the Moon out but I have no link..just me eyes and compass..bogus 21
I've received a ton of insults..whats the big deal on that I have never complained ..ever!
Debunkers are alright giving out but not receiving
Anyone on this thread can see you're all desperate debunkers..why, I don't know exactly :>..As one can see bunkers are satisfied and watching the show
Looks to be a nice day I'm running away now from the gloom
....................
"Regard your neighbor's gain as your own gain; and regard your neighbor's loss as your own loss."
Tai Shang Kan Ying P'ien |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
8/20/2008 8:03 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Shills will be shills!
...and mindless sheep will be sheep. Oh, excuse me...you're not a sheep - you're one of Nancy's unquestioning lap dogs.
So far, in all the posts you've made, you haven't provided one shred of evidence to support your dear leader, Nancy Lieder. I guess it's one of the prerequisites of being a zeta lapdogs. All you do is growl every once and a while at the debunkers, insult a few people, provide no substance then run away like a whipped dog from the newspaper when you are challenged.
Yip, yip, yip! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 486056
Run, Luser, run!! Run away! |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 483025
8/20/2008 9:23 AM
| | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
I for one seen the Moon out but I have no link..just me eyes and compass..bogus 21 Quoting: Free Store.
21 is not bogus because the challenge was for User, not you. But, since you brought it up...the moon is not out of place. You claim the moon is out of place and yet you can't tell anyone where it should have been in the first place. Your measuring technique leaves a lot of room for error. We've asked you if the moon is out of place, why is it that GOTO telescopes can still accurately track it...for which you have no logical answer. We've asked you if the moon is out of place why not one single amateur astronomer is talking about it...of which you have no answer. We've asked you if the moon is out of place why amateur radio operators can still bounce their signals off of it when their antenna arrays track the moon automatically based on known parameters...to which you have no answer. It was suggested that you view the moon with a local astronomy club and yet you refuse by claiming you know the moon is in the wrong place so you don't need to view with some club. That doesn't fly. If you were to view it with an astronomy club and the moon really is out of place, then you'd have documentation to back up your claim...and yet you still refuse. Why? Because you're afraid of being wrong and possibly having to admit it...just like last year when you were afraid to admit you were wrong and went back on your "Canadian Word" when "Planet X" failed to show up.
Anyone on this thread can see you're all desperate debunkers..why, I don't know exactly :>..As one can see bunkers are satisfied and watching the show Quoting: Free Store
Desperate? How do you figure? We've proved you and Nancy wrong time and time again. None of you have ever been able to come up with one shred of evidence to back up your claims. "Planet X" failed to show up in 2003 as it was predicted by your messiah Nancy. It also failed to show up in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. It continues to be a no show. You gave up your family over this. Obviously, the desperation is on your side.
Looks to be a nice day I'm running away now from the gloom Quoting: Free Store
You're running away alright. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 356996
8/20/2008 9:25 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
The moon is not out of place since the partial lunar eclipse happened last weekend exactly as predicted years ago. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 477259
8/20/2008 11:13 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
I for one seen the Moon out but I have no link..just me eyes and compass..bogus 21
I've received a ton of insults..whats the big deal on that I have never complained ..ever!
Debunkers are alright giving out but not receiving
Anyone on this thread can see you're all desperate debunkers..why, I don't know exactly :>..As one can see bunkers are satisfied and watching the show
Looks to be a nice day I'm running away now from the gloom Quoting: Free Store.
Freestore:
You have made multiple claims that the moon is out of place, but you have yet to provide any real observational data. How about the following to bolster your claims:
1. Observer's location (lat/long)
2. Observation time
3. Observed azimuth and altitude of moon
4. Expected azimuth and altitude of moon
Unless you provide empirical data that others can check, your claims nothing but hot air. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 488134
8/20/2008 11:19 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Have events of last week, 50 ships from US UK and FR on way to Iran for blockade, and Russia invading Georgia changed the possibility of war?
SOZT
What occurred in Georgia was not a war, it was a police action, with the fault lying with Georgia. Georgia invaded a UN protectorate, and killed over 1,000 citizens, in an attempt to bully the protectorate back under their control. This is not being denied. All the posturing that has occurred since is only that, posturing. No one wants war with Russia.
EOZT Quoting: Nancy Lieder |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 488134
8/20/2008 11:21 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Much has been said regarding the disclosure of px and the pole shift. My question is more of the broader question of is full disclosure actually beneficial? The zetas have said that disclosure is problematic for many reasons and those who will prepare will do so without the assistance of government so does full official disclosure represent a net positive or a net negative?
SOZT
The preferred approach would be for all governments and their scientific arms to disclose, completely, what is about to happen; allow their citizens to leave their day jobs and arrange for safety for their families, or volunteer to continue their day jobs if necessary for the general welfare of mankind; for the rich to donate all their wealth for the betterment of survival sites; for countries to open their borders to allow the citizens of other countries to setup in relative safety; for all to share equally and openly, with fair rules if there is not enough food to go around. Will this happen? No. Full disclosure, as we have stated, is likely to create panic in those in power, who fear losing their perch. The wealthy have been funding the contrail program and hope to be able to poison any migrating hoards approaching their enclaves. Where there are those among the common man who would help others as we have stated above, there are also those who would take advantage of others, be lazy and selfish and hoard rather than share. Thus, full disclosure has both benefits and drawbacks.
EOZT Quoting: Nancy Lieder |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 356996
8/20/2008 11:23 AM | | Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 16 | Quote |
Why are you quoting Nancy when she has a 100% failure record? |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 |
|
.
