..Which is why Hillary and Tenzing immediately climbed Everest again. Oh, they didn't? I meant, that Roald Amundsen got together a second expedition to go back to the pole. Or someone else did. Oops. Wrong again. Nobody went back for forty years...and in 1954, they arrived by airplane. Oh, but of course Lance Armstrong retraced his winning run of the Tour de France, just to make sure he actually won it. Dang. Wrong again. I'll keep working at it. I'm sure I'll find one.
Quoting: nomuse (NLI) 490131
clever lol
DildoverterMakerfuck petrol User ID: 491319 8/27/2008 11:22 AM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
From YouTube description: This video illustrates, analyses and compares the intriguing differences in shape and size, between astronaut sun-in-visor reflection images recorded both pre and post-Apollo... with Apollo "sun-in-visor" reflection photographs, allegedly taken on the lunar surface.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 435070 8/27/2008 12:37 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
Exposes the hoax of the Soviet supremacy in
MISSILES
AIR POWER
SPACE
MEDICINE
SCIENCE
The Lunik Hoax
The Non-existent Russian ICBM
Soviet Missiles and Rockets
[link to findarticles.com] Moscow paraded dummy missiles
Independent, The (London), Nov 18, 1998
MANY OF the huge strategic missiles displayed in Red Square parades during the Soviet era were only dummies, but they scared the West into an expensive response, a Russian magazine reported yesterday.
The Associated Press ("REPORT: RUSSIA USED DUMMY MISSILES," Moscow, 11/17/98) reported that the Russian magazine Vlast (Power) said on Tuesday that many of the strategic missiles displayed in Red Square parades during the Soviet era were only dummies. One such fake - GR-1, an acronym for Global Missile - showed during a May 9, 1965, parade prompted the US to build an anti-missile defense system costing billions of dollars. In fact, the Soviet Union had abandoned the GR-1 project long before the parade. It added that another two mobile ballistic missiles shown on the same day were also fakes, their test launches having been a complete failure. The article stated, "Foreign military attaches were scared to death, triggering panic in NATO headquarters. A huge international uproar followed, and only those who prepared this demonstration knew they were dummies." The magazine said that when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev said that the Soviet Union was making missiles "like sausage," the Soviets only had four intercontinental ballistic missiles. It added, "The myth about the Soviet missile superiority was convenient for both the Soviet leadership and the American military industrial complex, which was getting huge contracts." The article said that the Soviet Union did not reach parity with the US in land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles until 1970, and overall nuclear balance was attained only shortly before the 1991 Soviet collapse.
#6
May 8, 1999
Report by Aleksey Baranov:
[link to www.cdi.org] "Parade of Fakes"
In the history of our Soviet reality two dates -- 9 May and 7 November -- were united by a common denominator: It was then that, every six months, we were shown the famed "shield of the Motherland." Over the granite paving passed dashing guardsmen, the latest tank models, and our pride and joy -- ballistic missile systems capable of destroying a target at any point on the globe.
Naturally, such events were unfailingly attended by foreign military attaches, the lawful representatives of foreign military intelligence services. They meticulously scrutinized the hardware on show, rightly believing that the USSR was showing the best available models on such holidays. Alas for them, they did not even suspect what a simple trick they had fallen for. Bearing in mind that at the time this method of obtaining military information was practically the only legal one (let us recall that the USSR did not take part in arms fairs), our "competent organs" decided on a grandiose deception. Namely, our counterintelligence officers "invented"... an intercontinental ballistic missile which never really existed!
This task was set following a thorough study of all characteristics which on close inspection could create the outward appearance of a missile. At that time there was universal fascination with so-called "multiple warheads," each of which could carry both a nuclear warhead and simply a target that was supposed to confuse the potential enemy's antimissile defense forces. When they got the data on the Soviet warheads' approximate volume and mass, foreign intelligence services were horrified -- the missile model shown on Red Square could carry several dozen potential Hiroshimas. They had nothing like it.
Our sources, who were employed in the USSR military-industrial complex at the time, claim that the effect of the dummy missile's demonstration was not confined to fooling the potential enemy and simply causing panic in its ranks. Foreign intelligence services started actively trying to obtain increasingly detailed information about the Russian "wonder weapon" and fell victim to meticulously prepared disinformation. Our intelligence service's operation resulted in an extremely important success -- the enemy started trying to duplicate the USSR's "achievement" and went down a scientific route subsequently declared fruitless.
It must be said that, according to the information obtained by us, the dummy missiles are still gathering dust in a Defense Ministry hangar. It is undoubtedly the right decision to preserve them. What if tomorrow somebody needs to dupe somebody again? But no -- this success of Soviet military intelligence's is worthy of museum immortalization.
[link to g-ecx.images-amazon.com]
"From Major Jordan's Diaries"
Major George Jordan started a diary in 1942 when he became suspicious of US-sanctioned air shipments to the USSR. But he never expected to uncover a secret American WWII deal to give the Russians the raw materials and know-how to make atomic bombs!
online:
[link to www.sweetliberty.org]
Later confirmed by James Roosevelt in his book
"A Family Matter"
No Nukes
1 hr 38 min - Jun 23, 2007 -
Historian Ralph Epperson provides evidence that the United States is the only nation in the world with nuclear weapons. Please watch part 2 as well. For more information
[link to video.google.com]
Anonymous Coward User ID: 435070 8/27/2008 12:43 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
From YouTube description: This video illustrates, analyses and compares the intriguing differences in shape and size, between astronaut sun-in-visor reflection images recorded both pre and post-Apollo... with Apollo "sun-in-visor" reflection photographs, allegedly taken on the lunar surface.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 435070
weak evidence.
For one the quality of images is completely different, probably even different photo equipment
who says that round thing with spokes is really the sun's reflection?
And I dó see spokes in the image supposedly taken on the moon.
The only possible strong point is the hexagonal shape, the rest is weak.
KindaGamey Parsley Sage User ID: 482960 8/27/2008 1:05 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
No Nukes
1 hr 38 min - Jun 23, 2007 -
Historian Ralph Epperson provides evidence that the United States is the only nation in the world with nuclear weapons. Please watch part 2 as well. For more information
[link to video.google.com]
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 492055
link does not work “Prepare your proof before you argue”
- Jewish Proverb
No Nukes
1 hr 38 min - Jun 23, 2007 -
Historian Ralph Epperson provides evidence that the United States is the only nation in the world with nuclear weapons. Please watch part 2 as well. For more information
[link to video.google.com]
is not logical to do something once and never again, once you do something successfully you instantly want to repeat the success.
Exactly Spock.. Wonderful interjection.
Quoting: Rastifar
There were several moon landings, not one. And at tremendous expense to the tax payers. Wonderful interjection? Perhaps if you don't like having all the facts. Otherwise,
Anonymous Coward User ID: 434023 8/27/2008 2:34 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
WTF changes peoples lifes if they know the trip to the moon was a freaking show or not ?
Quoting: DildoverterMakerfuckpetrol 491319
It changes in this: The people can ask in what were used all those millions and millions and millions from 1960 to now. And then get rid of a bunch of parasyts that only suck your blood.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 212026 8/27/2008 3:52 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
Although entertaining they are not scientists,they are TV people and they will produce a show consistent with TV programing.
I will point to their attempt to disprove Pyramid energy;
1)their preliminary research information was flawed
2)when an apparent possible proof appeared they pulled the experiment citing preparation problems.
3)resumption of the test was then cut due to time limits.
4) they then proceeded to claim that they had proven the assertions of pyramid power were untrue,However all they did prove is that their bias is stronger than truth.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 472003 8/27/2008 4:29 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
Yea, Dr. James Van Allen:
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense."
His own words.
Did the rover fit in the
storage bin? Why no crater under LEM? The angles the
shadows ..It's such a tangled mess....
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 491927
Only because you want it to be. But all those claims have
been addressed here: [link to www.clavius.org]
Buzz Aldrin punching people left and right.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 491927
I only know of one person he punched, a rude bastard who
jumped him and yelled at him to swear on the Bible. I
would have done the same thing if a lunatic had acted
that way with me. Sibrel got what he deserved. "Sooner or later all the peoples of the world will have to discover a way to
live together in peace, and thereby transform this pending cosmic elegy into
a creative psalm of brotherhood. If this is to be achieved, man must evolve
for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation.
The foundation of such a method is love."
--Reverend Martin Luther King
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at
DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Yea, Dr. James Van Allen:
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense."
I didn't want to believe the moon landings were bullshit, but upon reading all the evidence and seeing the pictures and footage, it's a lie. It was fake.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 433558
Learn to read.
..Oh, and get your eyes checked while you are at it.
If you are not a troll, please seek help ASAP. Reality is interesting enough.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 458657 8/27/2008 7:25 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
Every object in every museum at the Smithsonian is full of such stories. The SIguide is just one new and exciting tool for sharing them with visitors. When James Smithson made his bequest to found the Institution, a place he envisioned as an "establishment for the increase and diffusion of knowledge," he could not have foreseen how rapidly technology in museums would develop—from multimedia exhibitions to cutting-edge Web sites to the astonishing little SIguides, each of which has thousands of times more memory than the computer aboard Apollo 11—but is only about 1/250th of its size. Then again, forward-thinking scientist that he was, maybe he imagined it all.
My watch probably has more memory than the 1969 Apollo 11 computers. Considering the computing power available at the time, I think it's impossible to have landed a man on the moon, based on this fact alone.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 281126 8/27/2008 7:46 PM
Re: Myth Busters is doing a show on the Moon Landing.
My watch probably has more memory than the 1969 Apollo 11 computers. Considering the computing power available at the time, I think it's impossible to have landed a man on the moon, based on this fact alone.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 458657
You know why computers nowadays have more power? because they need it. Why do they need it? because programmers program around bugs instead of fixing them. Computers do not need all the power they have now.if done properly, Windows vista would weigh only about maybe 100 MB, it is multiple of gigabytes, totally unneeded.
Disclaimer: This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every
effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually
review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in
no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of
the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or
administration of GodlikeProductions.
This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.
Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.
