| | "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 425372
8/25/2008 11:31 AM
Report abusive post | "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden
| Quote |
Has anyone seen this article and know where I can go to read it?
I heard an article by this title was written by him. |
| |
| paindrain
User ID: 492631
8/28/2008 11:10 AM | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
How I Learned to Love the New World Order
Biden, Joseph R Jr.
Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 23, 1992. pg.
A13
Abstract (Summary)
Joseph R. Biden Jr defends his view that the Pentagon's new strategy which appoints the US as a sort of world monitor could render the US a hollow superpower. Biden explains why he reacted the way he did to the plan.
____________
Counterpoint: How I Learned to Love the New World Order
Biden, Joseph R Jr. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 23, 1992. pg.
A13
Imagine my surprise when a Wall Street Journal editorial appointed me dean of the Pat Buchanan school of neo-isolationism. My credentials? Believing that the Pentagon's new strategy -- America as "Globocop" -- could render the United States a hollow superpower. All agree we need the military capacity to defend our vital interests -- by ourselves when need be. The question is grand strategy. With the Journal's endorsement, the Pentagon has called for a Pax Americana: The U.S. should cast so large a military shadow that no rival dare emerge.
American hegemony might be a pleasant idea, but is it economically, politically or even militarily wise? Bristling with weapons, we would continue our economic decline, while rising industrial and financial giants in Europe and Asia viewed our military pretensions with indifference or contempt.
Defense Secretary Dick Cheney outdid even the Journal, dipping deep into the well of Cold War argumentation to accuse Pax Americana critics of thinking "America's world presence is somehow immoral and dangerous.
" Why doesn't the Journal stop the namecalling, get its schools sorted out, and court an honest debate over America's proper role in the new world order?
Pat Buchanan's "America First" preaches martyrdom: We've been suckered into fighting "other" people's battles and defending "other" people's interests. With our dismal economy, this siren song holds some appeal.
But most Americans, myself included, reject 1930s-style isolationism. They expect to see the strong hand of American leadership in world affairs, and they know that economic retreat would yield nothing other than a lower standard of living. They understand further that many security threats -- the spread of high-tech weapons, environmental degradation, overpopulation, narcotics trafficking, migration -- require global solutions.
What about America as globocop? First, our 21st-century strategy has to be a shade more clever than Mao's axiom that power comes from the barrel of a gun. Power also emanates from a solid bank balance, the ability to dominate and penetrate markets, and the economic leverage to wield diplomatic clout.
Second, the plan is passive where it needs to be aggressive. The Journal endorses a global security system in which we destroy rogue-state threats as they arise. Fine, but let's prevent such problems early rather than curing them late. Having contained Soviet communism until it dissolved, we need a new strategy of "containment" -- based, like NATO, on collective action, but directed against weapons proliferation.
The reality is that we can slow proliferation to a snail's pace if we stop irresponsible technology transfers. Fortunately, nearly all suppliers are finally showing restraint. The maverick is China, which persists in hawking sensitive weapons and technology to the likes of Syria, Iran, Libya, Algeria and Pakistan -- even while pledging otherwise.
The Senate has tried to force China's leaders to choose between Third World arms sales (1991 profits of $500 million) and open trade with the U.S. (a $12.5 billion annual Chinese surplus). Even though we have convincing intelligence that China's leaders fear the use of this leverage, the president inexplicably refuses to challenge Beijing.
Weapons containment can't be foolproof; and against a nuclear-armed North Korea, I would support pre-emptive military action if necessary. But let's do our best -- using supplier restraint and sanctions against outlaw sellers and buyers-to avoid having to round up the posse.
Why not an anti-proliferation "czar" in the cabinet to give this objective the prominence it urgently needs?
Third, Pax Americana is a direct slap at two of our closest allies -- Japan and Germany -- and a repudiation of one of our panel1. Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? great postwar triumphs. For years, American leaders argued that building democracy in Europe and Asia would guarantee stability because democracies don't start wars. Now the Pentagon says we must keep our military large enough to persuade Japan and Germany "not to aspire to a greater role even to protect their legitimate interests.
"
How has our success suddenly become a threat? It hasn't, but the Pentagon plan could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By insulting Tokyo and Berlin, and arrogating to ourselves military stewardship of the world, we may spark the revival no one wants.
Secretary Cheney says he wants the allies to share the burden on defense matters. But Pax Americana puts us on the wrong end of a paradox: Hegemony means that even our allies can force ever greater U.S.
defense spending the more they try to share the burden!
Fourth, collective security doesn't rule out unilateral action. The Journal says I'm among those who want "Americans . . . to trust their security to a global committee." But no one advocates that we repeal the "inherent" right of self-defense enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Secretary Cheney says his plan wouldn't undermine support for the U.N. Who would know better than the U.N.'s usually understated secretary general? If implemented, says Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the Pentagon's strategy would spell "the end of the U.N." Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? It envisages a permanent commitment of forces, for use by the Security Council. That means a presumption of collective action -- but with a U.S. veto.
Rather than defending military extravagance, the Bush administration should be reallocating Pentagon funds to meet more urgent security needs: sustaining democracy in the former Soviet empire; supporting U.N. peacekeepers in Yugoslavia, Cambodia and El Salvador; and rebuilding a weakened and debt-burdened America.
If Pentagon strategists and their kneejerk supporters could broaden their horizons, they would see how our superpower status is best assured. We must get lean militarily, revitalize American economic strength, and exercise a diplomatic leadership that puts new muscle into institutions of collective security.
---
Sen. Biden is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's European Affairs Subcommittee. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 592726
1/14/2009 10:44 PM | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
The New World Order isn't what everyone's making it out to be, imo. What Biden said didn't sound unreasonable to me.
Except I don't see why the US should have veto power over other nations. That just keeps the US in control so why even bother with a UN in the first place?
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 473060
1/14/2009 10:49 PM | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
The New World Order isn't what everyone's making it out to be, imo. What Biden said didn't sound unreasonable to me.
Except I don't see why the US should have veto power over other nations. That just keeps the US in control so why even bother with a UN in the first place?
The US reserves the right to make it's own decisions for it's own welfare. Do you think the others take the US into consideration?...except for a handout? |
| no, a NWO is not a good idea.
User ID: 647492
4/1/2009 1:51 AM | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
Doesnt matter what biden said, apparently nobody seems to grasp the concept about what the NWO is all about. Their view is to make "order out of chaos". Notice anything chaotic lately? neverending perhaps?
NWO = a one world money system, one world religion and one world government.
what comes along with that is 100% tyranny, your enslavement and zero tolerance for true freedom as we have known (in the past) in the USA. i parenthaceed in the past because we no longer are able to enjoy those freedoms. they are mostly gone. and we are mostly used to it now and dont even flinch when our rights are violated. or we do and are told to get over it, or are simply lied to and told that are rights are not being violated when they positively are being violated. maybe you dont care anymore, that is one of their objectives. they are advancing.
If you are not aware, the US Bills of RIGHTS, are OUR LAWS in this country. when you remove them, you also REMOVE YOUR RIGHTS AS A HUMAN BEING and give someone who you cannot trust authority over you. Legally this is not yet accomplished. but illegally they have been doing this since 1950's or earlier. Now its well received and no one even KNOWS their own personal and basic rights. let alone no one wants to FIGHT for them any more. SHAME TO YOU who are apathetic towards this!
NWO destroys our Bill of Rights.
In stealth mode, over the last few decades, little by little, they have been taken from us until there are none left. all in the name of our own good, SAFETY and well being.
its been a scam.
anyone who doesn’t think that the NWO is a problem or will effect them has certainly engulfed themselves with our fluoridated drinking water, inhaled the chemicals that fall from the chem trails and/or are taking an SSRI.
DID you know this nugget of info? - IG FARBEN and the BAYER company are the same entity. IG Farben is the company that was sentenced for war crimes after Hitler’s stompage that built the gas for the gas chambers, the steel, the ammo, just about everything that was 'PRO-Hitler' and was responsible for the slogan, "work brings freedom" over the entrance of Auschwitz that many saw for the last time before they were killed in the name of EUGENICS.
BAYER was CAUGHT after selling AIDS and HEP tainted vaccines to other countries and killing THOUSANDS of innocent ppl, MAINLY CHILDREN. They knew. We find out almost 20 years after the fact. Funny too. AIDS had just been discovered about that same time but no one knew what it was. Sound fishy? yes, it does. connect the dots.
Research for your own health's sake and future (if you still care)
1 research by Dr. Stan Montieth
2 research by Dr. Ann Blake Tracy
3 research by Dr. Michael Coffman
4 research by Dr. Rima Laibow Codex Alimentarious (effective as of Dec 31st 2009) this year. 100% Food Control in the world, including the usa. estimated 3 BILLION PPL die as a direct result of implementation according the UNITED NATIONS.
and her husband US Major General Stubblebine who also joins her in other evils being exposed.
Codex Alimentarious basically says that nutrients are TOXIC poisons and will be as ILLEGAL as heroin is, thus making human beings suffer from malnutrition and dying. Oh, it also states that ALL food animals, ALL, none left out must be injected with Monsanto's growth hormone that raises IGF-1 levels which does CAUSE CANCER in humans and all test subjects. yes, its EVIL.
5 - NAIS - National Animal Identity System - this will make it impossible for ALL small farms/farmers AND ALL everyday US citizens to OWN even ONE chicken for free eggs or even as a pet. It actually covers ALL/ANY FOOD ANIMALS and everything is on the list including Deer. I don’t know anyone who has a pet Deer, or a Deer farm, but apparently they wanted to cover all bases. Whether you think that’s a stupid idea is irrelevant because its control over our food that is the cost to all.
Basically says they all must be tagged, reported, ID'd and report any deaths, births, when how why and pay the gub $$$ to do all this invasion of our privacy and rights. Yes, ITS EVIL.
6 - Senate Bill HR 875 - basically says that you will not be allowed to even own your own garden, (let alone eat from it or distribute from it), for your own safety of course. Nope. We might be to stupid to be able to grow a tomato plant and eat tomatoes that are disease free.
FOOD CONTROL again.
7 - The GIVE ACT - See for yourself.
[link to frwebgate.access.gpo.gov]
Shockingly, the GIVE legislation also contains language that could completely demolish the 1st amendment.
The 12th amendment to the act states, “Amendment to prohibit organizations from attempting to influence legislation; organize or engage in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes; and assist, promote, or deter union organizing.”
Obamas bill to abolish our freedom of speech and religion, abolishing our bill of Rights and forcing every young American to SERVE in his spy military brigade, imitating HITLER.
8 - Vaccines are contaminated on purpose with extreme toxins and were told that many of them are mandatory when they are not. period. they are not yet mandatory. we all think they are, why is that DO YOU THINK? Someone lying to us? We don’t even KNOW if vaccines really help with anything do we? No, no evidence OR EVEN STUDIES to look into. YES, its EVIL.
Connect the dots and stop being naive.
How crazy can something be to force MANY DOCTORS with PhD’s to either be fired for whistle blowing about the truth or to decide close their own practices and devote their entire lives to trying to STOP these hideous happenings from advancing?
Because....... they are TRUE. that’s the only logical conclusion. Especially when you disregard what you’ve been taught your whole life from television and see for yourself, with your own eyes the actual and scary evidence.
Put it all together and we (especially Americans) are ingesting (from our own WATER supplies and toothpaste and food) many toxic chemicals that are only there to cause us to be SICK and weaken our immune system to destroy us. We have the same in much MILK. we have it in SODA and artificial sweeteners. ASPARTAME (Monsanto created of course). WE have the SAME in MOST FOOD that are mainly GMO, GE, GM now (that’s combining a MAMMAL GENE or other animal GENE with FOOD PLANT genes to create a patented food that causes cancer in all test subjects. Including humans of course. God said in the old testament DO NOT DO THAT.
no, a NWO is not a good idea.
NWO is about Control of YOU, by Controlling what you eat, how you eat it, what you drink, what you buy, what you drive, where you go, what or who you worship, monitoring your every move, implementing tracking devices into your skin with an RFID chip that is half the size of a grain of SAND. Seeing what you buy, how you buy it, limiting how much you can buy obama said he wants to do this in his FIRST speech as president. So its on the way.
NWO is about Population reduction on purpose - if youre not sure what I mean, thats DE-population of YOU and me.
Check out the Georgia Guidestones. that is their anonymous calling card or warning that they are at least attempting to kill as many as it takes to get the world back down to only 500,000,000. That’s more than 96% of the worlds population currently.
from a biblical standpoint I dont think that they’ll get that many of us, but I know from the bible that they will get A LOT of us. Do you want to be one of them? have you been brainwashed into believing that population reduction is a good thing? that’s evil. You dont think God would create this earth and allow enough room for people and nature? ridiculous mindset. Lets not be so proud to forget that it is GOD our creator who holds our breath in his hands. He is the one who makes sure that our hearts are beating. He created us to know Him and to understand truth and wisdom. Lets not be lazy in that! SEEK truth, for your own sake! What else is there to stand on as stability?
If you are concerned good, do something about it to reverse it before its too late. If you’re not concerned, why not? have a death wish?
Get Saved.
For all have fallen short of God's standards (the 10 commandments) and NONE are righteous, not even ONE except The Lord Jesus Christ. But ALL who call on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ shall be saved. His will is that NONE perish. Not even one.
Don’t be deceived any longer, don’t live in fear wondering where you’re going when you die, we WILL ALL DIE. THAT is a fact. be prepared for afterlife. Don’t live in denial of a Judgment that is eminent. God said these things would happen in the Book of Revelation. Look it up. READ IT for free! It has been foretold to us all. NOW we see it happening. So GET SAVED and live forever.
Once you die in your sin, its too late. Don’t let that be your eternal mistake.
All those who decide and choose to NOT be saved are condemned already.
Make sure that your name is WRITTEN IN THE LAMB'S BOOK OF LIFE. |
| The Jurist
User ID: 642652
4/1/2009 2:01 AM | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
These people in high offices are there because they are put there.
Most of them have skeletons in their closet so they can be controlled.
Others are dumb as posts and can be led.
`
(Be) Divide(ed) and (be) Conquer(ed)...
Don’t listen to what they say, watch what they do.
~There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner. —me
~What luck for Rulers that Men do not Think. —Adolf Hitler
:damned: Doom is optional. There is good news abounds. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 462545
4/1/2009 3:07 AM | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
The New World Order isn't what everyone's making it out to be, imo. What Biden said didn't sound unreasonable to me.
Except I don't see why the US should have veto power over other nations. That just keeps the US in control so why even bother with a UN in the first place?
That's how it's presented to people down the chain like Biden
so they comply. He doesn't know what happens at the upper echelon. He just likes his money and status. |
| -Dr. Who -
User ID: 629561
4/1/2009 3:12 AM
 | | Re: "How I learned to love the New World Order" - By Joe Biden | Quote |
These people in high offices are there because they are put there.
Most of them have skeletons in their closet so they can be controlled.
Others are dumb as posts and can be led.
Exactly- Biden either had to love it or leave it by force ..
Purveyor of Interdimensional Existentialism... When all else fails * Levitate * |
| |
|
