| | | Page 1, 2, 3 | Vaccine Coverup exposed
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 483678
9/3/2008 10:30 PM
Report abusive post | Vaccine Coverup exposed
| Quote |
[link to www.vacinfo.org]
In this shocking letter, Congressman Weldon refers to Dr.
Verstraeten’s study, which looked at the data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink and found a statistically significant correlation between Thimerosal exposure via vaccines and several neurodevelopmental disorders including tics, speech and language delays, and possibly ADD.
Congressman Weldon questions the CDC director as to why,
following this meeting, Dr. Verstraeten published his results almost four years later in the journal Pediatrics to show just the opposite, that is, that except for tics, there was no statistically significant correlation to any neurodevelopmental problems related to Thimerosal exposure in infants. In this letter, Congressman Weldon refers to a report of the minutes of this meeting held in 2000, which exposes some incredible statements by the “experts” making up this study group. The group’s purpose was to evaluate and discuss Dr. Verstraeten’s interim results and data and make recommendations that would eventually lead to possible alterations in existing vaccine policy.
This is a "bombshell"
email it to everyone! |
| Grizzled Old Goat
User ID: 496713
9/3/2008 10:41 PM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Rob't Kennedy Jr. exposed that meeting in 2005 - quite a few people listened, and the tide is beginning to turn..
Deadly Immunity
When a study revealed that mercury in childhood vaccines may have caused autism in thousands of kids, the government rushed to conceal the data -- and to prevent parents from suing drug companies for their role in the epidemic.
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Published on Thursday, June 16, 2005 by Salon.com
[link to www.commondreams.org]
In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials gathered for a meeting at the isolated Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Ga. Convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the meeting was held at this Methodist retreat center, nestled in wooded farmland next to the Chattahoochee River, to ensure complete secrecy. The agency had issued no public announcement of the session -- only private invitations to 52 attendees. There were high-level officials from the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization in Geneva, and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer, including GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur. All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded the participants, was strictly "embargoed." There would be no making photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.
The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children. According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had analyzed the agency's massive database containing the medical records of 100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines -- thimerosal -- appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children. "I was actually stunned by what I saw," Verstraeten told those assembled at Simpsonwood, citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism. Since 1991, when the CDC and the FDA had recommended that three additional vaccines laced with the preservative be given to extremely young infants -- in one case, within hours of birth -- the estimated number of cases of autism had increased fifteenfold, from one in every 2,500 children to one in 166 children.
Even for scientists and doctors accustomed to confronting issues of life and death, the findings were frightening. "You can play with this all you want," Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the group. The results "are statistically significant." Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado whose grandson had been born early on the morning of the meeting's first day, was even more alarmed. "My gut feeling?" he said. "Forgive this personal comment -- I do not want my grandson to get a thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is going on."
But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine supply of thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data. According to transcripts obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, many at the meeting were concerned about how the damaging revelations about thimerosal would affect the vaccine industry's bottom line. |
| OneAngryMom
User ID: 300939
9/3/2008 10:50 PM
 | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
 |
| mopar28m 
Acts 2:46
User ID: 478401
9/3/2008 10:56 PM
 | | Anonymous Coward
User ID: 496691
9/3/2008 11:04 PM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Those stinkin bastards! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 494892
9/4/2008 12:58 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Finally.
I refused them all for my son, and boy did I pay...time and time again. From family, friends, school, doctors. Same with mercury fillings...laughed at and ridiculed by the same children's dentist who now makes you sign a release (I hear) if he puts anything but composite in teeth. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 496691
9/4/2008 1:02 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Finally.
I refused them all for my son, and boy did I pay...time and time again. From family, friends, school, doctors. Same with mercury fillings...laughed at and ridiculed by the same children's dentist who now makes you sign a release (I hear) if he puts anything but composite in teeth. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 494892
Good for you for staying the course,same for me as well.
They can all KMA! |
| GREY LENSMAN
User ID: 493724
9/4/2008 1:16 AM
 | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
IF YOU SEARCH VACCINES OR MERCURY ON GLP, YOU WILL FIND LOADS OF INFO ON ALL OF THIS. I EVEN POSTED IN FULL THE SECRET CDC REPORT.
A VERY SIMPLE SUMMARY WAS
1. WE KNOW MERCURY IS DEADLY
2. BUT WE DONT "KNOW' THAT IT IS DEADLY IN INFANTS
3. WE DONT WANT TO KNOW
4. BETTER NOT LET THE PEOPLE KNOW.
HENCE TH U TURN ON THE VERSTRAETEN REPORT.
THIS U TURNED REPORT WAS USED TO DESTROY WAKEFIELD IN THE UK HIGH COURT.
THEY ARE NOTHING BUT CRIMINALS
GL
greylensman@rocketmail.com |
| childoflight
User ID: 496841
9/4/2008 1:30 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
A whole generation has been poisoned by mercury. As they age who is to take care of them? If the government has it's way it won't be them because there is no connection in their eyes. The statisticians were coerced to play with this data! In the meantime Thimerisol is slowly being removed from the vaccines. Once the vaccines are free of it then we will see what happens to the Autism rate. I would expect it to drop dramatically. The burden of taking care of these children longterm will fall squarely on the shoulders of the parents and as they age, the siblings, if the government have anything to do with it, unless MAYBE WE GET A STONG AND HONEST ADMINISTRATION IN NOVEMBER WHO WILL HOLD HEARINGS, HONEST ONES THIS TIME!!!!!!This whole thing has been a tragedy and worse than Thalidomide in regards the number of children concerned!As I said before a whole gereration has been poisoned and someone needs to help these families! |
| GREY LENSMAN
User ID: 493724
9/4/2008 2:03 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
IT IS MY PERSONAL VIEW THAT IT IS NOT ONLY MERCURY. VACCINES CONTAIN A WHOLE LOAD OF TOXINS, FORMALDEHYDE BEING ANOTHER ONE. SO THE REMOVAL OF MERCURY MAY NOT HAVE AN IMMEDIATE DRAMATIC EFFECT.
THE STUFF THEY GIVE OR INJECT IS ALSO DESIGNED TO REACT WITH THINGS THAT YOU EAT, FLOURIDE BEING ONE. ALUMINIUM IS A CLEAR PARTNER IN THIS CRIME. SEE HOW MANY THINGS CONTAIN THAT NOW.
ITS A COMPLEX CRIMINAL WORLD THAT WE LIVE IN
GL |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 482701
9/4/2008 2:08 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3037
9/4/2008 2:09 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Don't forget that childhood vaccinations contain aborted baby fetuses.
Its not very hard to find that info. they don't even bother trying to hide that ingriedient.
What I don't get is why all of the right to life churches don't bother mentioning it? |
| Solve et Coagula
User ID: 496856
9/4/2008 2:11 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Are Vaccines Causing More Disease Than They are Curing?
BY ALAN CANTWELL JR., M.D.
Vaccines help keep us safe from infectious diseases. Smallpox and polio epidemics have been wiped out by mass vaccine programs. People rush to get flu shots every autumn, and kids are bombarded with a barrage of 22 required vaccinations before the age of six. Even pets need their shots. The manufacture of vaccines is a giant industry and what you pay for – inoculations and doctor visits – is big business for pediatricians, family practitioners and veterinarians. So why are more and more people worried about vaccines, especially the ones for kids?
Vaccine-induced Illness
Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Centre, a consumer’s group based in Virginia, USA, claims vaccines are responsible for the increasing numbers of children and adults who suffer from immune system and neurologic disorders, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, asthma, chronic fatigue syndrome, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and seizure disorders. She calls for studies to monitor the long-term effects of mass vaccination and Fisher wants physicians to be absolutely sure these vaccines are safe and not harming people.
No one can deny the dangers of vaccines. The measles, mumps, rubella (German measles) and polio vaccines, all contain live but weakened viruses. Although health officials tell you that polio has been wiped out in the US since 1979, they often fail to mention that all recorded cases of polio since that time are actually caused by the polio vaccine.
Vaccine investigator Neil Z. Miller questions whether we still need the polio vaccine when it causes every new case of polio in the USA. Before mass vaccinations programs began fifty years ago, Miller insists we didn’t have cancer in epidemic numbers, that autoimmune ailments were barely known, and childhood autism did not exist.
Vaccine Contamination
There is also the problem of contamination that has always plagued vaccine makers. During World War II a yellow fever vaccine manufactured with human blood serum was unknowingly contaminated with hepatitis virus and given to the military. As a result, more than 50,000 cases of serum hepatitis broke out among American troops injected with the vaccine.
In the 1960s it was discovered that polio vaccines manufactured in monkey kidney tissue between 1955 and 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus (Simian Virus, number 40). Although this virus causes cancer in experimental animals, health authorities insist it does not cause problems in humans. But evidence of SV40 genetic material has been popping up in human cancers and normal tissue. Researchers are now connecting SV40-contaminated polio vaccines to an increasing number of rare cancers of the lung (mesothelioma) and bone marrow (multiple myeloma). In a 1999 report, SV40 DNA was detected in tissue samples from four children born after 1982. Three were kidney transplant patients, and a fourth had a kidney tumour. Could SV40 be passed on from parents to their children? No one knows for sure.
Covert Vaccine Experiments
Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents’ worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made “high titre” Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), the high-potency experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.
Unbelievably, the measles vaccine caused long-term suppression of the children’s immune system for six months up to three years. As a result, the immunodepressed children died from other diseases in greater numbers than children who had never received the vaccine. Tragically, African girl babies in the experiment were given twice the dose of boys, and therefore suffered a higher death rate. The WHO pulled the vaccine off the market in 1992.
Ironically, the E-Z measles vaccine tested by Kaiser on minority babies was supposed to increase immunity in younger infants. Instead, the vaccine produced the opposite effect. A Los Angeles Times editorial (June 20, 1996) assured readers that “none of the 1,500 was injured by the unlicensed vaccine” and called upon the CDC to ensure that experiments like the E-Z measles vaccine could never occur again.
One wonders how many secret vaccine experiments are conducted by health authorities that never come to the attention of the public. During the two-year measles experiment I was employed by Kaiser and I never knew anything about it until I read the report in The Times five years later, in 1996.
In the poor inner cities across the United States the number of asthma cases is exploding and health officials don’t know why. According to the CDC, 5000 asthma deaths occur annually; and it is estimated that 17.3 million people (4.8 million are children) suffer from the disease, up from 6.7 million in 1980. Asthma usually begins before age 6, and blacks are two to three times more likely to die from asthma than whites. In the Bronx and Harlem sections of New York City, the hospitalisation rate for asthma is 21 times higher than in the more affluent areas of the city.
Could the sharp rise in asthma in poor children be connected with immunosuppression caused by a barrage of vaccines, as well as a lack of quality medical care and insurance, poor diet, and environmental factors? The possible connection of immunosuppressive vaccines to diseases like asthma has never been raised by health officials.
With vaccine experiments frequently performed in Africa and now on black Americans, no wonder one out of every four African-Americans believes AIDS was developed as a genocide program by the US government to exterminate the black population.
But vaccine experiments in the 1990s have not been limited to blacks. Millions of female Mexicans, Nicaraguans and Filipinos have been duped into taking tetanus vaccines, some of which contained a female hormone that could cause miscarriage and sterilisation. In 1995, a Catholic human rights organisation called Human Life International accused the WHO of promoting a Canadian-made tetanus vaccine laced with a pregnancy hormone called human choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG).
Suspicions were aroused when the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in the unusual dose of five multiple injections over a three month period, and recommended only to women of reproductive age. When an unusual number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages after the shots, a hormone additive was uncovered as the cause.
Apparently the WHO has been developing and testing anti-fertility vaccines for over two decades. Women receiving the laced tetanus shot not only developed antibodies to tetanus, but they also developed dangerous antibodies to the pregnancy hormone as well. Without this HCG hormone the growth of the fetus is impaired. Consequently, the laced vaccine served as a covert contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyse the vaccine, the Philippines Medical Association found that 20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines were contaminated with the hormone. Not surprisingly, the WHO has denied all accusations as “completely false and without basis,” and the major media have never reported on the controversy. For further details on this issue, consult the Human Life International website (www.hli.org).
Newly approved vaccines may also pose serious risks. In October 1999 a vaccine against “rotavirus” infection (which causes most cases of childhood diarrhea) was pulled off the market. One year after the RotaShield vaccine was inoculated into over a million infants, it was found to increase the risk of bowel obstruction. Almost 100 cases of bowel obstruction were reported to the government, and twenty infants developed bowel obstructions within one or two weeks after receiving the vaccine.
Vaccine Manufacture and Associated Dangers
Although the public has heard about side effects of vaccines, most people are clueless about the manufacture of vaccines. Few people know that viruses used in vaccine production need to be grown on animal parts like monkey kidneys, or in chicken embryos, or in human and fetal “cell lines.” Harvesting viruses in human cell-lines can be perilous because some human cell lines are derived from cancer cells.
In AIDS & The Doctors of Death I wrote about the development of the first human “HeLa” cell line – an “immortal” cell line used extensively in cancer and vaccine research for decades. Henrietta Lacks was a young black woman from Baltimore who died from a highly malignant cervical cancer in 1951. Small pieces of her tumour were donated to a laboratory specialising in tissue cell culture. In those days most attempts to grow human cells outside the body failed. But for some unknown reason Henrietta’s cancer cells grew vigorously and became known as the first successful human tissue cell line in history – the now famous HeLa cell line commemorating the legendary HEnrietta LAcks.
Henrietta’s cells were kept alive by feeding them a witches’ brew of beef embryo extract (the ground-up remains of a three-week-old, unborn cattle embryo); fresh chicken plasma obtained from the blood of a live chicken heart; and blood from human placentas (the placenta is the sac that nurtures the developing fetus and contains powerful hormones).
It is now suspected that a sexually-transmitted papilloma virus is the cause of cervical cancer. And it is anybody’s guess how many other chicken, cattle, and human viruses are incorporated into the HeLa cell line, but none of this possible viral contamination seems to bother scientists who have extensively used the cells in cancer research. What laboratory scientists did eventually discover was that HeLa cells proved so hardy that they frequently contaminated other tissue cell lines used in cancer and cancer virus research.
In the late 1960s when widespread HeLa cell contamination problems were uncovered, scientists were shocked and embarrassed to learn that millions of dollars worth of published cancer experiments were ruined. “Liver cells” and “monkey cells” that were used in cancer experiments turned out to be Henrietta’s cancer cells in disguise. Benign cells that supposedly “spontaneously transformed” into malignant cells were found to be cells contaminated with cancerous HeLa cells.
The serious problem of HeLa cell contamination in cancer and vaccine research is revealed in Michael Gold’s A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman’s Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal It Caused. Even Jonas Salk, who developed the legendary Salk polio vaccine, was fooled when HeLa cells contaminated his animal cell lines. He admitted this years later in 1978 before a stunned audience of cell biologists and vaccine makers. In experiments performed in the late 1950s on dying cancer patients, Salk tried injecting them with a cell line of monkey heart tissue – the same cell line he used to harvest polio virus for his famous vaccine. He hoped the monkey cell injections would stimulate the immune system to fight cancer. However, when abscesses developed at the site of injections, Salk began to suspect that he might be injecting HeLa cells rather than monkey cells, and he stopped the experiment.
Mark Nelson-Rees, a HeLa cell expert and one of the 1978 conference attendees, offered to test Salk’s line if it was still available. Salk graciously agreed and the monkey cells indeed proved to be HeLa cells which had invaded and taken over the monkey cell line. According to author Gold, Salk thought there were adequate ways to separate viruses from the tissue cell lines they were harvested in, so that it really didn’t matter what kind of cells were used. Even if vaccines weren’t filtered, and even if whole cancer cells were injected directly into a human, Salk believed they would be rejected by the body and cause no harm. In those days doctors didn’t much believe in cancer-causing viruses. Nowadays, no researcher would dare try injecting cancer cells into a human being. But in the 1950s Salk had done it accidentally. He had injected HeLa cells into a few dozen patients and it hadn’t bothered him a bit.
Is There a Vaccine Contamination
Connection to AIDS?
Most people assume vaccines are “sterile” and germ free. But sterilising a vaccine can destroy the necessary immunising protein that makes it work. Thus, contaminating viruses or viral “particles” can sometime survive the vaccine process.
Animal viruses are also contained in fetal calf serum, a blood product commonly used as a laboratory nutrient to feed various tissue cell cultures. Vaccine contamination by fetal calf serum and its possible relationship to HIV was the subject of a letter by J. Grote, published in the Journal of the Royal (London) Society of Medicine in October 1988. Bovine visna virus (which looks similar to HIV) is a known contaminant of fetal calf serum used in vaccine production and virus-like particles have been detected in vaccines certified for clinical use. Grote warns that “It seems absolutely vital that all vaccines are screened for HIV prior to use, and that bovine visna virus is further investigated as to its relationship to HIV and its possible role in progression towards AIDS.”
Could virus-contaminated vaccines lie at the root of AIDS? A few researchers, including myself, believe HIV was “introduced” into gays during the experimental hepatitis B vaccine trials when thousands of homosexuals were injected in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and New York, during the years 1978-1981.
The AIDS epidemic first erupted in gays living in those cities in 1981. In 1980, one year before, already 20% of the gays inoculated in Manhattan with the experimental vaccine were already HIV-positive. This was several years before definite AIDS cases were diagnosed in Africa. In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees, now wildly accepted as the animal from which HIV supposedly evolved.
Hepatitis B vaccine was developed to protect people from the sexual spread of the hepatitis B virus. Now the government recommends that all newborn babies be given the vaccine [this is also the case in Australia]. Such recommendations do not make sense to many parents. And people are still fearful of the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS. The original experimental vaccine was made from the pooled blood serum of hepatitis-infected homosexuals and, as mentioned, serum-based vaccines cannot be sterilised.
Another theory of AIDS is that HIV originated from polio vaccines contaminated with chimp and monkey viruses, and administered to Africans in the late 1950s. In The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS, published in 1999, Edward Hooper details how polio vaccine was made using monkey (and possibly chimp) kidneys and how the ancestor virus of HIV could have jumped species (via the vaccine) to produce the outbreak of AIDS in Africa. Hooper’s well-researched book greatly expands the polio vaccine theory of AIDS first reported by Tom Curtis in Rolling Stone magazine in 1992, and The River is a must-read for anyone interested in the possible man-made origin of AIDS.
Other researchers think it more likely that the various WHO-sponsored vaccine programs (particularly the smallpox program) in Africa in the 1970s are responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa in the 1980s. Hooper, who has worked as a United Nations official, has discounted the research pointing to AIDS as a man-made disease, as proposed by Dr. Leonard Horowitz in Emerging Viruses, and in my two books AIDS & The Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic and Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot.
Horowitz and I both suspect contaminated smallpox vaccines as the source of HIV in Africa. Certainly the smallpox (vaccinia-cowpox) virus is an excellent virus to use for the genetic engineering of new, multipurpose vaccines. By splicing into the DNA genes of the vaccinia virus, scientists can add on parts of disease-producing viruses like influenza, hepatitis, and other viruses. The safety of this technique has not been fully evaluated, prompting one vaccine maker at a Vaccinia Virus Workshop in 1984 to ask if this could lead to another form of AIDS.
Vaccine Connection to Gulf War Illness
and Huntsville Mystery Illness
The cause of Gulf War Illness (GWI) is unknown. For years this debilitating illness (which now affects one-half of the Gulf War vets) has been ignored by Pentagon officials who claim the disease does not exist and that vets are simply reacting to stress. GWI is also thought to be contagious. Vets insist their disease has been passed on to spouses, other family members, and even pets.
Some people suspect multiple vaccines, particularly the experimental anthrax vaccine, are implicated in the disease. Currently, soldiers who refuse to take the mandatory anthrax vaccine are being court-martialled and dismissed from the service.
Researchers Dr. Garth Nicolson and his wife Nancy have found a tiny bacterial microbe (a “mycoplasma”) in the blood of nearly half the ill vets with GWI. Amazingly, this infectious agent has a piece of HIV (the AIDS virus) attached to it. This microbe could never have occurred naturally. On the contrary, the composition of the microbe suggests a man-made and genetically-engineered biological warfare agent.
Garth Nicolson’s scientific credentials are impeccable. For 16 years he was a professor of medicine at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Centre in Houston, as well as professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of Texas Medical School, also in Houston. Nancy Nicolson, a molecular biophysicist, was on the faculty at Baylor College of Medicine.
Six months after returning home from the Gulf War, the Nicolson’s daughter contracted GWI. Her mother Nancy had contracted a similar illness in 1987 when she was working with Mycoplasma incognitus in infectious disease research. Finally suspecting that this research had biowarfare implications, Nancy Nicolson became a whistle-blower and angered officials. As a result, she believes she was deliberately infected with the mycoplasma. After partial paralysis and a long illness, she finally regained her health with the antibiotic Doxycycline.
The Nicolson’s discovery of a similar mycoplasma (but without the attachment of HIV) in a mysterious illness that erupted in the Huntsville, Texas area among prison guards and their families has all the drama of a ‘Movie of the Week’. Although the Huntsville disease broke out in the late 1980s (shortly before the Gulf War), it has many of the same signs and symptoms of GWI. Many locals are convinced the sometimes deadly disease originally spread from prisoners incarcerated in several large prisons around Huntsville.
In experiments conducted during the 1970s and 80s, the prisoners were inoculated with flu vaccines containing genetically engineered viruses and mycoplasma. It is suspected that vaccines were being covertly developed and deployed as biological warfare weapons. Nobel prize winner James Watson, world famous for his discovery of the molecular structure of DNA and a leading researcher of the still ongoing Human Genome Project, was involved in these prison experiments. The guards are convinced the Huntsville mystery illness is intimately connected to these experiments, jointly conducted by the Medical School and the military. Like GWI, health officials deny the disease exists.
The Nicolsons continue to developed antibiotic treatments, which have helped some vets. But they have paid a heavy price for their controversial research and unprecedented discoveries. Garth Nicolson was forced to resign from M.D. Anderson in 1996. His career and reputation destroyed, the Nicolsons have since moved to California and head The Institute for Molecular Medicine in Huntington Beach.
Dangerous Animal and Human Cell Lines
in Vaccine Manufacture
In an effort to quell concerns about the safety of vaccines, scientists are finally taking another look at the “non-infectious” particles of bird-cancer viruses (avian leukosis virus) in the mumps/measles/rubella vaccines routinely given to kids. Could this be the reason the US Federal Drug Administration held a meeting in September, 1999, to reconsider using human tumour cell lines (like HeLa) rather than monkey kidneys and chicken embryos which are no longer guaranteed 100% safe?
Writing in Science, Gretchen Vogel admits public trust in vaccines is a bit shaky. In Wales anti-vaccine parents are holding “measles parties” to infect their children with the disease rather than vaccinate them. She cites the danger of using immortal cell lines for live vaccine production because cancer genes or other hazardous factors might be transferred to people receiving vaccines. But manufacturers also realise vaccine critics are becoming more wary of vaccines made in animal and bird tissue. And vaccine makers want to use immortal cell lines to grow their viruses because obviously viruses can’t grow on their own.
The big question everyone seems to avoid is: Can vaccines cause cancer? There is certainly evidence connecting contaminated vaccines to AIDS. And HIV is a cancer-causing virus. Robert Gallo, the co-discoverer of HIV in 1984, has clearly stated AIDS is an epidemic of cancer.
Animal and avian viruses can contaminate vaccines and have all been studied as cancer-causing agents. And cancer and vaccine research would be much more difficult without the use of cell lines, some of which are derived from cancer.
Vaccines and Public Paranoia
Is the fear of vaccines justified? It is clear that vaccines can be dangerous. The contamination of vaccines is a reality, and vaccine experiments can be hazardous to one’s health. AIDS, unknown two decades ago, is now an increasing worldwide epidemic with millions of death predicted for the next decade. Could vaccines contaminated with cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses unleash new plagues in the New Millennium? If so, the new plagues may be far worse than the diseases we eradicated by vaccine programs in the twentieth century.
References
“Anti-diarrheal vaccine for babies recalled,” Los Angeles Times, October 16, 1999.
Butel JS, Arrington AS, Wong C, et al.: Molecular evidence of simian virus 40 infections in children. J Infect Dis 180:884-887, 1999.
Cantwell A: AIDS & the Doctors of Death. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, 1988.
Cantwell A: Queer Blood. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, 1993.
Gold M: A Conspiracy of Cells. State University of New York Press, Albany, 1986.
Hooper E: The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1999.
Horowitz L: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Tetrahedron, Inc, Rockport, MA, 1996.
Jaroff Leon: “Vaccine Jitters,” TIME, September 13, 1999.
Likoudis P: “Gulf war illness probe to advance with new study,” The Wanderer, January 21, 1999.
“Measles, government and trust “ (Editorial), Los Angeles Times, June 20, 1996.
Miller NZ: Immunization: Theory vs Reality. New Atlantean Press, Santa Fe, 1996.
Miller NZ: Immunizations: The People Speak! New Atlantean Press, Santa Fe, 1996.
Quinnan GV: Vaccinia Viruses as Vectors for Vaccine Antigens. Elsevier, New York, 1985.
Stolberg SG: “Poor fight baffling surge in asthma,” New York Times, October 18, 1999.
Alan Cantwell MD is a retired physician and cancer researcher who believes cancer is caused by bacteria and AIDS is man-made. There is probably no other physician on the planet whose publications are as controversial. Dr. Cantwell is a frequent contributor to New Dawn, and his various articles on AIDS and cancer can be found on the New Dawn website www.newdawnmagazine.com. Much of his research can be found on google.com, and thirty of his published papers can be accessed at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/ (type in Cantwell AR). He is the author of two books on the man-made epidemic of AIDS: AIDS and the Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood, and a book on the microbiology of cancer, The Cancer Microbe. His new book is called Four Women Against Cancer. Dr. Cantwell is now happily retired from the clinical practice of dermatology for 10 years, and lives in Hollywood, California. Web site: www.ariesrisingpress.com Email: alancantwell@sbcglobal.net.
© Copyright New Dawn Magazine, [link to www.newdawnmagazine.com.] Permission granted to freely distribute this article for non-commercial purposes if unedited and copied in full, including this notice.
[link to www.newdawnmagazine.com] |
| Solve et Coagula
User ID: 496856
9/4/2008 2:12 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Cancer Causing Vaccines, Polio, AIDS & Monkey Business
BY ALAN CANTWELL, M.D.
The Global Polio Eradication Program, supported by the United Nation’s World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF, Rotary International, and the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), plans to immunise all African children in the coming months. The purpose is to stem a wild polio epidemic, the epicentre of which is in oil-rich Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa.
The vaccine program hit a snag in the Fall of 2003 when Islamic clerics in the predominantly Muslim-populated areas of northern Nigeria claimed the WHO program was a plot by Westerners to depopulate the area. Laboratory tests revealed estrogen and other female sex hormones in the polio vaccine, proof the vaccines were contaminated with substances that could cause sterility. Furthermore, Nigerian officials became aware of internet reports suggesting the WHO vaccine might be contaminated with HIV (the AIDS virus) and other cancer-causing viruses. African blacks are as suspicious of government vaccine programs as American blacks. A 1990 survey of African-Americans in New York City showed 30% believed AIDS is an ethno-specific bioweapon designed in a laboratory to kill black people.
Dr. David Heymann, who heads the WHO eradication program, says the oral polio vaccine (which contains live but attenuated polio virus) is completely safe. He blames Nigerians for exporting polio to surrounding nations.
The WHO, the world’s leading international health and science agency, is mired in power politics. For example, the Bush administration now restricts communications between the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and WHO officials. A new HHS policy requires the WHO to submit all requests for expert scientific advice to political officials at HHS who will then choose which federal scientists will be permitted to respond. The new policy and two recent US administration decisions to withdraw federal scientists from major international health conferences are part of a disturbing pattern of political interference in global health issues.
Antifertility Vaccines and the WHO
In March 2004, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and Dean of Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, Nigeria, took samples of WHO’s controversial oral polio vaccine to India for analysis. Evidence of serious vaccine contamination was found. According to a March 11, 2004 report on www.lifesite.net, Kaita was asked why drug manufacturers would contaminate the oral polio vaccine. He gave three reasons: “These manufacturers or promoters of these harmful things have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly they have always taken us in the third world for granted, thinking we don’t have the capacity, knowledge and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such contaminants. And very unfortunately they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worst still some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests.” Dr. Kaita is demanding that “those who imported this fake drug in the name of Polio Vaccines… be prosecuted like any other criminal.”
This is not the first time the WHO has been called on the carpet to explain their surreptitious use of antifertility vaccines. Millions of female Mexicans, Nicaraguans and Filipinos were duped into taking tetanus vaccines, some of which were laced with a female hormone that could cause miscarriage and sterilisation. In 1995, a Catholic organisation called Human Life International accused the WHO of promoting this Canadian-made tetanus vaccine covertly laced with a pregnancy hormone called human choriogonadotropic hormone (HCG). Suspicions were aroused when the tetanus vaccine was prescribed in the peculiar dose of five multiple injections over a three month period, and recommended only to women of child-bearing age. When an unusual number of women experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages after the shots, a hormone additive was uncovered as the cause.
It is no secret that since the 1970’s the WHO has been testing and funding antifertility vaccine research that would make a woman’s immune system attack and destroy her own babies in the womb. In Geneva in 1989 the WHO sponsored a Symposium on Antifertility Vaccines and Contraceptive Vaccines.
Third-world women who received the laced tetanus shots not only developed antibodies to tetanus, but developed dangerous antibodies to the pregnancy HCG hormone as well. Without HCG, growth of the fetus is impaired. Consequently, the WHO’s vaccine served as a covert and unsuspected contraceptive device. Commissioned to analyse the vaccine, the Philippines Medical Association found that 20 percent of the WHO tetanus vaccines were contaminated with the hormone. The WHO has denied all accusations as “completely false and without basis,” and the US media never reported on the controversy. For further details, go to www.google.com and type-in key words “WHO + antifertility vaccine”, or “Philippines + antifertility vaccine.”
Following an eight month boycott, on June 24, 2004, the recalcitrant Nigerians agreed to resume polio vaccinations, under the conditions the polio vaccine had to be manufactured in Indonesia and nowhere else. In October 2004, the United Nations began its program of immunising 80 million children in 23 countries of sub-Saharan Africa.
The WHO and the Man-Made Theory of AIDS
Unlike most Americans, Africans are aware of the man-made theory of AIDS, and the possibility the WHO’s extensive vaccine programs in Africa in the 1970s are connected to the severe outbreak of AIDS in the early 1980s.
On May 11, 1987, the London Times, one of the world’s most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled, “Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus.” The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO was responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa. Almost 100 million Africans living in central Africa were inoculated by the WHO. The vaccine was held responsible for awakening a “dormant” AIDS virus infection on the continent.
An advisor to the WHO admitted, “Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory is the explanation for the explosion of AIDS.” Robert Gallo, M.D., the co-discoverer of HIV, told The Times, “The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV.” Despite the tremendous importance of this story, the US media was totally silent on the report, and Gallo never spoke of it again.
In September 1987, at a conference sponsored by the National Health Federation in Monrovia, California, William Campbell Douglass, M.D., bluntly blamed the WHO for murdering Africa with the AIDS virus. In a widely circulated reprint of his talk entitled “W.H.O. Murdered Africa”, he accused the organisation of encouraging virologists and molecular biologists to work with deadly animal viruses in an attempt to make an immunosuppressive hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans.
From the Bulletin of the World Health Organisation (Volume 47, p.259, 1972), he quoted a passage that stated: “An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus.” According to Douglass, “That’s AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is ‘Let’s cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency.’” The entire article can be read on google.com (“WHO Murdered Africa”).
In his 1989 book, AIDS: The End of Civilisation, Douglass claims the WHO laced the African vaccines. He blames “the virologists of the world, the sorcerers who brought us this ghastly plague, and have formed a united front in denying that the virus was laboratory-made from known, lethal animal viruses. The scientific party line is that a monkey in Africa with AIDS bit a native on the butt. The native then went to town and gave it to a prostitute who gave it to a local banker who gave it to his wife and three girl friends, and wham – 75 million people became infected with AIDS in Africa. An entirely preposterous story.”
Indeed, in my two books on man-made AIDS – AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the Epidemic (1988), and in Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot (1993), there is much evidence to show that throughout the 1970s (the decade that preceded the AIDS outbreak in the US and Africa) there was widespread laboratory transfer of animal viruses, particularly primate/simian/monkey/chimpanzee viruses, by virologists. Various animal viruses were pumped into different species of animals and into all sorts of cell cultures. This experimentation was undertaken to find, create, and develop new cancer-causing and immunosuppressive viruses. It is these species-jumping laboratory primate viruses that are the source of “human” immunodeficiency virus (HIV) – not the animals in the wild in Africa.
To researchers who believe whole-heartedly AIDS is a man-made disease, the evidence is crystal clear that the “primate ancestor virus of HIV” jumped species via contaminated vaccine programs, namely the extensive WHO-sponsored vaccine programs in sub-Saharan Africa during the 1970’s, and the experimental hepatitis B vaccine (1978-1981) that was injected exclusively into gay men just prior to the outbreak of AIDS in America. (More on this later.)
Cancer-causing Monkey Viruses and the Polio Vaccine
Americans have been told repeatedly that HIV/AIDS is the first time a monkey virus has jumped species to cause a new epidemic called AIDS. But the rarely-publicised truth is that a cancer-causing monkey virus jumped species a half century ago when contaminated polio vaccines were given to millions of people on the planet, including half the US population of that era.
In the early 1960’s it was discovered that some lots of polio vaccines manufactured on rhesus monkey kidney tissue during the period 1955 to 1963 were contaminated with a monkey virus called SV40 (Simian [monkey] virus #40). This primate virus was quickly proven to cause various cancers in experimental animals. However, to this day, US government officials still insist there is no absolute proof that SV40 causes human cancer.
Despite the lack of government interest in SV40 in human cancer for three decades, genetic and immunologic studies by independent researchers over the past decade indicate this virus is clearly associated with human cancer, such as rapidly-fatal cancers of the lung (mesothelioma), bone marrow cancer (multiple myeloma), brain tumours in children, and other forms of cancer.
A Washington Times report (September 21, 2003) indicates, “Some of the polio vaccine given to millions of American children from 1962 until 2000 could have been contaminated with a monkey virus that shows up in some cancers, according to documents and testimony to be delivered to a House committee Wednesday. The vaccine manufacturer said such claims ‘don’t have any validity,’ and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) agrees. Documents set to be delivered to the House Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness appear to show that the original ‘seeds’ used to produce the Sabin [oral] vaccine could have been tainted with SV40; that the company that manufactured the vaccine, Wyeth Lederle, may have used Rhesus monkeys – which are more likely to carry the disease – rather than the African Green monkeys it says it used, according to company documents; and that the company may not have performed all of the screening tests required.”
Stanley P. Kops is a lawyer who represents children and adults damaged by polio vaccines. He has documentation indicating the polio virus “seeds” from which the oral vaccine is made are still not proven to be free of SV40. In his article entitled “Oral polio vaccine and human cancer: a reassessment of SV40 as a contaminant based upon legal documents”, appearing in the journal Anticancer Research (November 2000), Kops states:
“In litigation involving the Lederle oral polio vaccine, the manufacturer’s internal documents failed to reveal such removal [of SV40] in all of the seeds. The absence of confirmatory testing of the seeds, as well as testimony of a Lederle manager, indicate that this claim of removal of SV40 and the testing for SV40 in all the seeds cannot be fully substantiated. These legal documents and testimony indicate that the scientific community should not be content with prior assumptions that SV40 could not have been in the oral polio vaccine. Only further investigation by outside scientific and independent researchers who can review the test results claimed in the January 1997 meeting and who can conduct their own independent evaluations by testing all the seeds and individual mono-valent pools will assure that SV40 has not been present in commercially sold oral poliovirus vaccine manufactured by Lederle.”
More information on Kops, SV40, and polio litigation can be found at www.sv40cancer.com.
More than 600 million doses of polio vaccine were sold by Lederle from 1963 to 1999. On January 1, 2000, the CDC recommended injections of an inactivated killed polio vaccine (IPV) that eliminates the risk of spreading the disease, unlike the oral live polio vaccine that had been used for decades. This prompted Lederle to get out of the polio vaccine business, and the last batch of Orimune was produced on December 31, 1999.
For anyone who still thinks vaccine makers and government health officials are always your friend, I would highly recommend a just-published book titled AIDS. The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the Millions of Americans Exposed, by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher. The book explores the history of the polio vaccine, the contamination problems with SV40, the ensuing vaccine-related cancer problems, and the government’s cover-up of the problem over the past three decades.
Few people realise how dangerous vaccines can be and how complicated the process of vaccine manufacture really is, particularly when vaccines are made on living animal or human cells. Contamination with bacteria and viruses and their elimination from the final product are constant problems during the process. There are also recent suspicions that the laboratory media used to feed and nourish the cell cultures upon which the virus is grown may also be a source of contamination. (For further details on the dangers of vaccines, see “Are Vaccines Causing More Diseases than they are Curing?” New Dawn No. 63, November-December 2000)
The Polio Vaccine/ Primate Virus
Connection to African AIDS
In a 1,070 page book published in 1999, entitled The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS, Edward Hooper claims a 1950’s polio vaccine made using monkey (and possibly chimp) kidneys, contained the ancestor virus of HIV which now infects millions of Africans. Hooper’s research greatly expands the polio vaccine man-made theory of AIDS first reported by Tom Curtis in Rolling Stone magazine in 1992. When Curtis asked the ubiquitous David Heymann whether the 1950’s polio vaccine might have contributed to the outbreak, the WHO official declared: “The origin of the AIDS virus is of no importance to science today. Any speculation on how it arose is of no importance.” Quite an amazing response from a man currently responsible for administering a possibly contaminated live oral polio vaccine to Africa’s children.
Hooper’s book got extensive press coverage, greatly upsetting the AIDS establishment which has always viewed any suggestion of AIDS as a man-made disease as hysteria, paranoia or “conspiracy theory.” Similarly, my two decades of man-made AIDS research linking AIDS to 1970’s vaccines, as well as two books on the subject, were dismissed by Hooper in a sentence in a footnote on page 897.
Not surprisingly, Hooper’s vaccine theory was totally discredited the following year by AIDS scientists and WHO officials at a conference held in London to debate the origin of AIDS, although Hooper still actively promotes his theory on the internet. The retesting of the old 1950’s polio vaccine showed no evidence of a chimp virus. The molecular biologists also came down hard on Hooper with their “genetic sequencing data” suggesting HIV first entered the human population in the 1930’s. (For details, see google “2000 London Origin of AIDS.”)
Why it took HIV a half-century to produce an epidemic was not made clear, nor was there any discussion as to how a black heterosexual African disease could have transformed itself exclusively into a white gay man’s disease in Manhattan. Or why the epidemic broke out first in America in 1979 and was only uncovered five years later in Africa.
Oral Polio Vaccine and Immunodeficiency
The public frequently receives bad news about AIDS in Africa. Millions are dying, millions are infected with HIV, and millions of children are left as orphans. And this is just the AIDS part of the various horrors connected with Africa.
Africans question why they are being given the oral form of the polio vaccine (OPV) when this form was removed from the market in America in January 2000. The inactivated and killed polio virus vaccine (IPV) cannot cause polio, but the live OPV is indeed capable of causing (although rarely) paralytic polio. Equally dangerous is that OPV recipients shed live polio virus, which is entirely capable of spreading polio to unvaccinated and unprotected others. However, the oral form of the vaccine is the only form recommended by health officials for outbreaks of polio epidemics.
Even if the IPV vaccine were effective, the cost would be prohibitive. A 5cc. vial (enough to adequately inoculate 3 children with three separate injections) is US$300. Is this form of the vaccine totally safe? The expensive IPV is thought to contain newly-discovered nanobacteria, which have been linked to various diseases. The vaccine web site www.whale.to claims nanobacteria have been found to be a contaminant in previously assumed-to-be-sterile medical products, specifically the IPV Polio Vaccine. Most human biologicals and vaccines are made in fetal bovine (cow) serum, a medium known to be contaminated with nanobacteria, as reported May 23, 2001, at the 101st General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.
Bad vaccine reactions are increased in the presence of HIV, immunodeficiency and malnutrition, which is purportedly common in sub-Saharan Africans. So why is this not being considered? Will the WHO’s live oral vaccine awaken more “dormant” HIV? Nowhere could I find this question being asked by WHO officials or other scientists. The WHO vaccine for Africa (except parts of Nigeria) is made by Aventis Pasteur, a multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in France. In 2003 Aventis donated 30 million doses to the program.
The Origin of AIDS and Monkey Business
A google search of the “origin of AIDS” lists an overwhelming 796,000 citations. However, there are essentially three major theories of AIDS origin. The AIDS establishment believes unanimously in the “official” monkey out-of-Africa theory. Second is Hooper’s polio vaccine origin, now largely discredited or ignored. And third is the never-discussed “conspiracy theory” that HIV was deliberately seeded into gay and black African populations as a covert depopulation experiment with genocidal overtones.
Until 1999, it was widely believed the African Green Monkey was the source of HIV. This theory was highly touted by Robert Gallo, the world’s most famous AIDS researcher, who had done extensive animal virus research forcing (“jumping”) primate viruses between species in the Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1980) in the years just before the AIDS outbreak. In 1975 Gallo reported on a “new” and “human” HL23 virus, which eventually proved to be three contaminating ape viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his laboratory [Queer Blood, p. 47]. For more information on pre-AIDS primate virus research, see google “primate research + Special Virus Cancer Program.”
In 1999 there was renewed interest in the origin of AIDS. A media blitz surrounded the finding of a team of researchers headed by Beatrice Hahn, M.D,, at the University of Alabama. Viral studies on three African chimps in the wild, and on the corpse of a frozen chimp named Marilyn, found accidentally in a freezer at Fort Detrick (the Army’s biowarfare unit), all indicated a common subspecies of chimp was the animal source “most closely” related to HIV. Hahn theorised the epidemic started when a hunter cut himself while butchering chimp meat and subsequently became infected. For details, see google “Beatrice Hahn + Marilyn”.
Hahn is no stranger to primate theories, having worked in Gallo’s lab when he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory in the mid-1980’s. Her publicised 1999 AIDS origin research, based on genetic and molecular evidence, was quickly accepted as gospel by the AIDS establishment.
In 2003 she presented further details of her primate research, which was again touted in the media. This time her findings were even more impenetrable (at least to me). The most popular origin of AIDS web site (www.avert.org/origins.htm) summarises Hahn’s most recent findings in this way:
“The findings of this 10-year long research into the origin and evolution of HIV by Paul Sharp of Nottingham University and Beatrice Hahn of the University of Alabama were published in 2003. They concluded that wild chimps became infected simultaneously with two simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs) which had ‘viral sex’ to form a third virus capable of infecting humans and causing AIDS. Professor Sharp and his colleagues discovered that the chimp virus was an amalgam of the SIV infecting red-capped mangabeys and the virus found in greater spot-nosed monkeys. They believe that the hybridization took place inside chimps that had become infected with both strains of SIV after hunting and killing the two smaller species of monkey.”
American AIDS and the Gay Hepatitis B Experiments (1978-1981)
Due to space requirements it is not possible to give all the evidence pointing to AIDS as a man-made disease. However, a Google search of “man-made AIDS” lists 135,000 citations (not bad for a “conspiracy theory”!) and most of my published research on the subject can be found on the internet (“alan cantwell + man-made AIDS”).
It is my view that the origin of AIDS cannot be determined without some reasonable (and not homophobic) explanation of how AIDS originated in America exclusively in young, predominantly white, previously healthy gay men in Manhattan, beginning in 1979. To my knowledge, there is no evidence to show American AIDS originated in Africa. Furthermore, the virus “strain” of HIV in the US is totally different from African strains. This finding has led AIDS researcher Max Essex of Harvard (and co-discoverer of HIV) to suggest there may be two separate HIV-1 epidemics – one in which subtype B (the American strain) predominates and that is spread by blood and homosexual sex, and a second involving the other HIV-1 subtypes and primarily vaginal sex (as seen in Africa). (www.aegis.com/news/ads/1995/AD951870.html).
The onset of the “gay plague” and “gay cancer” (in the form of Kaposi’s sarcoma) are clearly associated with the hepatitis B vaccine trials which used young gay men as guinea pigs during the years 1978-1981. A few months after the first group of men were injected in the experiment in Manhattan at the New York Blood Centre, the first cases of “gay-related immune deficiency” were reported to the CDC. The experimental hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees, the animal species now thought to harbor “the ancestor of HIV.”
Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp out-of-Africa theory is the fact the New York Blood Centre established a chimp virus laboratory in West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian Institute for Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop the human hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. The lab prides itself by releasing “rehabilitated” chimps back into the wild.
Also closely allied to the “pre-AIDS” development of the hepatitis B vaccine is the little publicised primate colony outside New York City called LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Surgery). Until disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists with primates and primate parts for transplantation and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with the NYU Medical Centre, where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma were discovered in 1979.
HIV tests of the stored gay men’s blood from the hepatitis experiment at the New York Blood Centre reveals that 6% of the men were HIV-positive in 1979! By 1981, the year the AIDS epidemic became “official”, 20% of the men were positive! By 1984, 40% were positive! This means this group had a spectacularly higher rate of HIV than any group in Africa during the same period – and at a time when AIDS cases were not even recognised or noted in Africa.
It is clear there is overwhelming molecular and genetic evidence to tie SV40–related cancer cases to the SV40 contamination of polio vaccines. Yet government health officials refuse to accept this research on the grounds of “not enough evidence” and “contamination problems” connected with SV40 testing (see Bookchin and Schumaker’s book). On the other hand, AIDS experts try to convince us that a molecular HIV test on a dried-up blood specimen taken from an unknown black man in the Congo in 1959 is strong “proof” human HIV cases existed in Africa back in 1959!! To me, the explanation for this absurdity and inconsistency in science is simple: The government does NOT want people to question the safety of vaccines, and it wants to blame Africans and African monkeys for a disease that is most likely caused by covert primate virus contaminated vaccine experiments, that undoubtedly still continue to this day. For more documentation of covert and unethical government-sponsored human experimentation, read In the Name of Science: A History of Secret Programs, Medical Research, and Human Experimentation (2003) by Andrew Goliszek.
AIDS scientists accept the fact that HIV was “introduced” into gays, but do not publicise the fact a second virus – the Kaposi’s sarcoma virus, also known as human herpes virus-8 – was also introduced into gays at the time of the gay vaccine experiments. Are two new viruses just another “accident of Mother Nature”?
Two decades after the KS virus was “introduced” into gay men, it is now a permanent virus in the blood supply, which is beginning (like SV40) to appear in association with certain cancers. Twenty percent of “healthy” Texas blood donors now carry antigens to the KS virus in their blood. As many as 40% of Caribbean men with prostate cancer also carry the virus.
More details on the KS virus and the role of bacteria in KS cancer and other cancers can be found in “Acid-fast Bacteria Discovered in Prostate Cancer” (www.rense.com/general53/acsaid.htm), and in my book The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden Killer in Cancer, AIDS, and other Immune Diseases.
It is clear to me that AIDS science is highly selective. Scientists who support the African origin of AIDS are heralded. Scientists and researchers who support the man-made, laboratory origin of AIDS are ignored as “conspiracy theorists” or crackpots.
In October 2004, ecologist and biologist Wangari Maathai won the Nobel Peace Prize, the first African woman to ever win the coveted Prize. In accepting the Prize she shocked the press by announcing that, in her view, AIDS was a man-made disease.
“Some say that AIDS came from the monkeys, and I doubt that because we have been living with monkeys (since) time immemorial. In fact, (the HIV virus) is created by a scientist for biological warfare”, she said. “Why has there been so much secrecy about AIDS? When you ask where did the virus come from, it raises a lot of flags. That makes me suspicious,” Maathai added. (For a fuller discussion, see New Dawn, “Nobel winner: HIV virus deliberately created,” No. 87, November-December 2004.)
The Revenge of the Monkeys
AIDS scientists blame AIDS on promiscuity, homosexuality, dirty needles, drugs, air travel, etc, but never once do they seriously consider themselves responsible in any way for the AIDS holocaust. Scientists quickly obscured the primate virus origin of AIDS by calling it the “human” immunodeficiency virus, a clever attempt to accentuate the “human” quality rather than calling it by its real name – a simian (primate) immunodeficiency virus. Better advise people to not transmit a human virus, than to remind them they are spreading an animal virus of dubious origin.
On the altar of science the primate populations of Africa are dwindling to extinction. And the ultimate blame for AIDS is placed on primates who cannot speak for themselves. Over the decades millions of animals have been sacrificed for their kidneys and other organs to make vaccines which are now creating new plagues of incurable AIDS and cancer and new emerging diseases – which in turn demand more animal sacrifice to make more vaccines and drugs.
Monkeys, chimps, apes, gorillas, and human beings are all classified as “primates.” “Human primates” and “non-human primates” share 99% of the same DNA. Yet, we treat them all as disposable beings, locking them up in increasingly large numbers as slaves of science in animal gulags called “primate centres” for the sole purpose of using them and their children as hapless research tools.
As a physician, I am not against animal experimentation. However, I am against foolish and excessive and dangerous animal experiments that expose millions, perhaps billions of people, to disease and death from contaminated vaccines and insane biological warfare creations. I do not believe we can exterminate countless animals for our selfish purposes without some sort of reckoning. What goes around, comes around.
Will the monkeys and the chimps get their revenge? It’s obvious it is already happening. AIDS is depopulating the planet. Mad cow disease is a concern. SARS is yet another deadly emerging disease. The list goes on and on.
There is no indication things will get better. Only worse. Isn’t it time we get over our fantasy that slaughtering these animals will somehow help us attain better health?
Deadly HIV and SV40 virus from primates have already co-mingled with our human genetic material, changing our collective gene pool forever.
How many more people will have to die as a result of our lab atrocities and our scientific ignorance? The more animals we kill for science, the more people will die from “emerging” laboratory viruses. Admittedly this is a hard concept to understand and accept when we have been conditioned to believe that abusing and killing animals for science is in our best interest.
Alan Cantwell MD is a retired physician and cancer researcher who believes cancer is caused by bacteria and AIDS is man-made. There is probably no other physician on the planet whose publications are as controversial. Dr. Cantwell is a frequent contributor to New Dawn, and his various articles on AIDS and cancer can be found on the New Dawn website www.newdawnmagazine.com. Much of his research can be found on google.com, and thirty of his published papers can be accessed at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/ (type in Cantwell AR). He is the author of two books on the man-made epidemic of AIDS: AIDS and the Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood, and a book on the microbiology of cancer, The Cancer Microbe. Dr. Cantwell is now happily retired from the clinical practice of dermatology for 10 years, and lives in Hollywood, California. Email: alancantwell@sbcglobal.net.
© Copyright New Dawn Magazine, [link to www.newdawnmagazine.com.] Permission granted to freely distribute this article for non-commercial purposes if unedited and copied in full, including this notice.
[link to www.newdawnmagazine.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 490625
9/4/2008 2:14 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
it is so sad that as soon as a baby comes out of the womb the first thing they do is give it a shot in the heel |
| GREY LENSMAN
User ID: 493724
9/4/2008 2:22 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
CAN ANYBODY HELP ME HERE.
VACCINES THAT ARE BANNED IN USA OR EUROPE, AS BEING UNSAFE OR OF QUESTIONABLE VALUE ARE REMOVED FROM THE MARKET. THATS A CLEAR AND UNEQUIVOCAL ACTION BASED UPON, ONE ASSUMES, SERIOUS SCIENCE.
YES
BUT THESE SAME VACCINES ARE THEN SUPPLIED TO AFRICA AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AS PART OF A WELL TRUMPETED "AID" PROGRAM.
SHAKES HEAD IN DISBELIEF.
GL |
| jas1977
User ID: 478370
9/4/2008 2:41 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
These new Vaccines that they come out or just money makers and a huge scam. For example the one for teens to take to not get the cervical cancer. That is one that is a scam in the making. We would be horrified to know the truth on everything. It's sickening how they get away with this. But it is reallity. We have been sleeping at the wheel for too long. These people who let this happen will have thier day.
We know by the method of looking at something and recognizing its correctness. It is a spiritual ablility. I believe we all have it.
Author Dr. Isabelle A. Moser |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 496888
9/4/2008 3:39 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
IT IS MY PERSONAL VIEW THAT IT IS NOT ONLY MERCURY. VACCINES CONTAIN A WHOLE LOAD OF TOXINS, FORMALDEHYDE BEING ANOTHER ONE. SO THE REMOVAL OF MERCURY MAY NOT HAVE AN IMMEDIATE DRAMATIC EFFECT.
THE STUFF THEY GIVE OR INJECT IS ALSO DESIGNED TO REACT WITH THINGS THAT YOU EAT, FLOURIDE BEING ONE. ALUMINIUM IS A CLEAR PARTNER IN THIS CRIME. SEE HOW MANY THINGS CONTAIN THAT NOW.
ITS A COMPLEX CRIMINAL WORLD THAT WE LIVE IN
GL Quoting: GREY LENSMAN 493724
Yes, you are correct and if that is the case the next few years will tell! I personally hope that you are incrrwct, that only Thimerisol did this but I too sadly have my doubts.....  |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3037
9/4/2008 4:16 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
May those bastards rot in hell!
Is there a vaccine to cure the diseases they caused?
Basterds!
I wonder how they prevent their own loved-ones from getting
the bad vaccines?
Target populations are one thing, but is this really just
stupidity and wanton carelessness?
I'd like to see some justice here. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 452238
9/4/2008 4:23 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Let us never forget the fine folks at Merck, who murdered 50,000 people with their little Vioxx debacle. No one went to jail, no penalties whatsoever. At some point, the human race should consider a preemptive strike... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3037
9/4/2008 4:45 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
ok-here it comes, this is really pissing me off.
>A Prayer<
The intended targets of the vaccines are RUBBER.
The perpatrators, the ones who would do anything harmful, on purpose, with vaccination to anyone without his/ or her consent, are GLUE.
Lord, please let the intended evil bounce off-of the targets, and stick on the glue. |
| GREY LENSMAN
User ID: 496925
9/4/2008 7:05 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
HERE IS A GOOD SUGGESTION, IN ORDER THAT YOU CAN DO SOME OF YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND DRAW UP SOME OF YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS.
SEARCH CORPORATE CRIMINALS. NOTE THE LEAGUE TABLES OVER SAY THE LAST FIVE OR TEN YEARS.
WHAT YOU WILL FIND, WILL AT THE VERY LEAST, MAKE YOU ASK YOURSELF
"CAN YOU POSSIBLY TRUST THESE PEOPLE"
GL |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 496948
9/4/2008 7:51 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
vaccines are a hoax.
there is no proof they work. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 403960
9/4/2008 8:14 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Don't forget that childhood vaccinations contain aborted baby fetuses.
Its not very hard to find that info. they don't even bother trying to hide that ingriedient.
What I don't get is why all of the right to life churches don't bother mentioning it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3037
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 496952
9/4/2008 8:22 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
they are finally coming around, no doubt the ones behind this torture and murderous thing are in a race for time before the trail leads to the ones that are actually bioweapons, like the morgellons in the tetnus shots, and who knows what they used to first induce aids. no wonder they want a war, martial law, so that when the rest of the filthy iceburg is exposed, no one will be in any position to do anything about it. |
| zen warrior
User ID: 485158
9/4/2008 8:23 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
|
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 496952
9/4/2008 8:35 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
forgot to mention all the other murderous things the pharmas have been doing, inducing cancer with drugs, and things like alzhiemers, ms, etc. this place is a slaughter house where one pays to be slaughtered. it is truly an abomination unlike any other. it's why it makes me so sick to see people mindlessly supporting the usa. |
| getaclue
User ID: 464271
9/4/2008 8:39 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
They are not supposed to have mercury included in children's/infants vaccinations!!
BTW, once again, there are safe alternatives to immunizing people!! It's called NOSODES and they do work! They are oral and taken once a year! You can get nosodes for example such as west nile virus (if that is prevalent in your area) and you can immunize yourself against WNV if you wish! Find a good integrated physician and he/she will tell you all about it!
Here is one good integrated physician in Rockville MD [link to 66.241.237.183]
I know nosodes work as I immunize my horses with them (except for rabies as the law requires it to be delivered with a needle which is ridiculous as the rabies nosode works as WELL or better!!!). I did titers, and yes my horses had a T cell count against what I gave to them. So, they DO work!! |
| ANOMALIA
User ID: 466162
9/4/2008 9:48 AM
 | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
they don't put mercury in vaccines any more (in most places). I think from 2000. |
| Tabitha
User ID: 497004
9/4/2008 9:49 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
Just throwing in my two cents....
My eleven year old has autism as well as a number of co-morbid disorders. He will never live a normal life. When I had my second chld in 2007 (I know, big gap) I refused ALL vaccines for her. I had nurses in the LDR ward basically accuse me of being a crack headed freak but I never relented. Her first ped. was very cool with my decision but when she moved and I had to take her to our GP, I got tons of grief. It was all very civil, but still. The conversation I had with that doctor though was interesting. I got him to admit that the vast majority of the diseases they vax for are NOT any more deadly than the flu or ther common cold. I got him to admit that the decline in disease could just as easily be attributed to a rise in hygiene and awareness as it could to vaccines. I ALMOST got him to admit that the side effects of vaccines were more of a concern than the risk of getting say measles. I even got him to admit that vaccines could have contributed to the rise in ADHD (but not autism for some reason, must have been stuck in his head :)). Anyway,I have tor un but will try to post more. Have a great day, Tabitha |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 494008
9/4/2008 9:55 AM | | Re: Vaccine Coverup exposed | Quote |
One word: GREED! |
| | Page 1, 2, 3 | |
|
