Users Online Now: 237 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 34,317
Pageviews Today: 77,482	Threads Today: 118	Posts Today: 2,476
05:44 AM

News

Back to Forum

Post New Thread

View Favorites

is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.

RSS

slippy
User ID: 492806
9/12/2008 5:01 PM
Report abusive post

is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Palin is obviously photogenic, while Hillary and other female Dems are less attractive. and i am being polite. is that what's driving them nuts.

Mr. Predictor Subscriber

Forum Moderator
User ID: 287257
9/12/2008 5:03 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.

Quote

yes

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is MOD when I lay my vengeance upon thee.

Brassia Rex
User ID: 373696
9/12/2008 5:04 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Since the invention of television we've only elected good looking people (Nixon's the exception.) That's why McCain will lose. "I got the blues so bad one time, it put my face in a permanent frown, you know, I'm feeling so much better I could cakewalk into town..." Taj Mahal

slippy
User ID: 492806 (OP)
9/12/2008 5:05 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
bush 41 is good looking? carter? man what are you smoking.

Mr. Predictor Subscriber

Forum Moderator
User ID: 287257
9/12/2008 5:05 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.

Quote

Since the invention of television we've only elected good looking people (Nixon's the exception.) That's why McCain will lose.

Quoting: Brassia Rex

huh ????

LBJ

slippy
User ID: 492806 (OP)
9/12/2008 5:08 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
they won't even have to paste her head on somebody else.

Nebulous
User ID: 433558
9/12/2008 5:08 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Too bad that shallowness is all that matters to Americans. Your Focus Determines Your Reality.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 502111
9/12/2008 5:13 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Too bad that shallowness is all that matters to Americans. Quoting: Nebulous what a lame wimpy statement. And why did you pick that avatar miss shallow?

Seneca Subscriber

User ID: 502084
9/12/2008 5:23 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Palin is obviously photogenic, while Hillary and other female Dems are less attractive. and i am being polite. is that what's driving them nuts. Quoting: slippy 492806 Conservative Republican women are rather attractive.

brassia rex
User ID: 373696
9/12/2008 5:31 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Since the invention of television we've only elected good looking people (Nixon's the exception.) That's why McCain will lose. huh ???? LBJ Quoting: Mr. Predictor Only elected as VP. Never would have won top spot.

slippy
User ID: 492806 (OP)
9/12/2008 5:31 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
you mean, more attractive than girls like Hillary? or Rachel Maddow, or Rosie, or ...? wouldn't take much.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 395901
9/12/2008 5:32 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
Palin is obviously photogenic, while Hillary and other female Dems are less attractive. and i am being polite. is that what's driving them nuts. Conservative Republican women are rather attractive. Quoting: Seneca How true.

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 502111
9/12/2008 5:36 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.	Quote
you mean, more attractive than girls like Hillary? or Rachel Maddow, or Rosie, or ...? wouldn't take much. Quoting: slippy they got some ugly chix on that side of the fence. Hateful and ugly - what a combination!

Nebulous
User ID: 433558
9/12/2008 5:38 PM

Re: is the problem with Palin and her looks, rather unlike Hillary, who needs a major Hollywood makeover.

Quote

Too bad that shallowness is all that matters to Americans.

what a lame wimpy statement. And why did you pick that avatar miss shallow?

Quoting: Anonymous Coward 502111

The girl looks thoughtful. And it's not a lame statement. I don't care if old farts have wrinkles. It's NORMAL. I don't have any trouble with real people.

BTW, did you know Kirstie Alley is like 60? ANd she's supposed to be a beauty queen forever? No, not to me. To me, she's a senior citizen and she can eat what she wants. She's starved enough.

I don't care if Hillary was wrinkly, she is about a million times smarter than Palin. Roughly.

Your Focus Determines Your Reality.

Back to Forum

Post New Thread

View Favorites

Vote For Godlike Productions!

Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.267s (6 queries)