JP Morgan Chase (Rockefeller/Rothschild) big winners after collapse--MEGABANK

Analysts say JP Morgan Chase (the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds) will emerge from the bank collapse as the big winner, becoming a megabank.

How sweet--you found/own the federal reserve, get the fed to cause a collapse by printing dollars and doling out the credit, then, as Alex often points out, move in and buy up the assets on the cheap.

First they got Bear Stearns, now they're going after Washington Mutual, and numerous banks across the nation will soon follow.

But Rothschild is merely doing what they've always done for hundreds of years.

Analysts say JP Morgan Chase (the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds) will emerge from the bank collapse as the big winner, becoming a megabank.

How sweet--you found/own the federal reserve, get the fed to cause a collapse by printing dollars and doling out the credit, then, as Alex often points out, move in and buy up the assets on the cheap.

First they got Bear Stearns, now they're going after Washington Mutual, and numerous banks across the nation will soon follow.

But Rothschild is merely doing what they've always done for hundreds of years.

And they take care of those who help them perpetrate these schemes:

Ex-Bear Stearns CEO joins Rothschild -NY Post: [link to www.reuters.com]

[link to news.google.com]

[link to news.google.com]

-------------------------------

Goldsmiths--Part IV

By R. D. Bradshaw

Previous articles on the Goldsmiths used the word “interventionalists” to describe them, along with manipulators and other appropriate descriptive terms. Since the word “interventionalists” is not a dictionary word, some explanation is now forthcoming.

The word interventionalists is a cross or mix between internationalists and interventionists. The goldsmiths seem to be a complete mix between being internationalists and interventionists. They are far removed from nationalism as they operate and plunder money from the suckers on a worldwide, international basis.

They use the technique of intervention in the financial markets to create oscillating ups and downs so that they can be buyers at the periodic bottoms and sellers at the periodic highs. Most of us are the reverse in psychology. We tend to buy at the top and sell at the bottom. Since the goldsmiths control the trend lines and know in advance where the tops and bottoms will fall, they are in the envious position of being able to buy and sell at the right moments to reap huge rewards.



Too, while most of us tend to want to be long term investors (as we have been so trained to think by the goldsmiths with their control over the media and our educational sources), they are traders—regularly buying and selling a given item on the oscillating ups and downs to make their profits. When they buy, they buy for the express purpose of selling when they reach their profit objective (which usually comes fairly soon). This is called—“taking profits.”



Traders and investors are different people. Frankly, I have always thought in the context of investing and never as trading back and forth. This is why it has been difficult for me to play on the same field with these experts at trading who have been at their game for vast ages. In terms of gold, I always wanted to be a long-term investor as I believed that the US dollar would collapse and gold and silver would survive in value.



More on the Rothschilds and their Team Players



From history, we know that the Rothschilds moved in on the US very early—evidently with the first and second US banks. We also know that though they had to wait on the sidelines for some years before they achieved total success, that time did ultimately come in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Bank. This thing was put together in the US by the fat cat Warburgs who were Rothschild relatives and agents.



The old J. P. Morgan banking interest was evidently free from European influence when it started in the 1800s. There is even evidence that in those early days the Morgan bank was a competitor of sorts with the Rothschilds. But just after the turn of the century, the competition ended when the Rothschilds gained control of the Morgan interest—evidently through stock acquisitions.



A similar turn of events happened with the Rockefellers. The Rothschilds financed and supported old John D. Rockefeller in the 19th century. But some time in the 20th century they became competitors of sorts. But this competition ended recently when Rothschild’s’ Morgan bank merged with Chase Manhattan, which was the Rockefeller flagship.



There was some speculation on whether the newly merged JP Morgan-Chase would be run by the Rockefellers or the Rothschilds. But quickly that speculation ended because the Morgan interests took over the key management positions of the new bank. Clearly, the conflict between the Rothschilds and Rockefellers seems to now be over. The JPMC bank appears to be now firmly in the grip of the Rothschilds.



But in addition to the Morgan bank, the Rothschilds have allegedly been the financial power behind many of the Wall Street investment banks—certainly like Morgan Stanley and others as well. Kuhn Loeb and Goldman Sachs are believed to be Rothschild players.



When we add in family names to the mix, the Wall Street linkage to the Rothschilds becomes even more intense. Important Wall Street names like the Schiffs and Warburgs have Rothschild ties that go all the way back to the early days in Frankfurt, Germany.



As a curious fact on this theme, some readers may remember the Little Orphan Annie cartoon script that used to run in the daily papers. There was a fat cat, super rich character in the series named Warbucks. It is said that the Warbucks was patterned after the Warburgs.



What This Means



This huge Rothschild control over Wall Street means that it is the House of Rothschild which calls many and/or most of the shots with the Federal Reserve Bank and the US government.



If one doubts Rothschild power and influence for a minute, all he has to do is note how powerful Goldman Sachs is in US affairs. It seems that there is a revolving door between GS and the US Treasury. People float back and forth with regularly. For proof of this reality, all one must do is note how recent Secretaries of the US Treasury came from GS—like Robert Rubin, Lawrence Summers and Henry Paulson.



A few years ago many of us will remember the Bill Clinton flap over the need to bail out the Mexican peso. As Clinton told it, many American investors stood to lose some money over the fall of the peso. So lovingly, Slick sent $20 billion to Mexico to help them out. Later secret information came from the Fed that the Fed also sent $20 billion—making a total of $40 billion (all made without appropriation of the US Congress as the US Constitution so stipulates).



As it turned out, the “needy” American investor was Goldman Sachs who had Mexican investments in the billions which could go down the tubes unless drastic action was taken. Naturally, Bill Clinton and the Fed came to the rescue. And that’s how the plutocrats operate.



With this advance information that $40 billion would soon arrive in Mexico, is it conceivable that stock and currency traders could and in fact did make stacks of profits on the deal? Yes, tipped off people/entities like GS, Morgan, etc cleaned up in this scam.



There is another fall out of this event. By getting the money the Mexican government gave up some/much/most of its control over its currency (which was probably a good thing because the Mexican government has been filled with grafters, crooks and bandits).



Wall Street took over management of the Mexican peso and it has steadily gone up ever since. Of course, in the deal, the US became a major buyer of Mexican products (oil, farm products, etc). Now, it’s possible to put two and two together and understand why the US began running a major trade deficit with Mexico; whereas the US used to have a trade surplus. Regardless, the whole process helps pave the way for a one currency between the two states (evidently like the coming Amero).



And did the Rothschilds and Goldman Sachs make any profits on this process. Has a cat got a tail?



More



A final word must be said about the Russian-Georgian flap and the coming Iran war. My view is that the Rothschilds have engineered, set-up and directed both of these wars. Why? The obvious answer is so that they can make vast new profits. Interestingly, the Russian ruble is now one of the strongest currencies (with much Russian gold in back of it) presently in the world--far stronger than the worthless US dollar. The ruble had been looking good against the dollar until recently.



So what happened with the Georgian invasion and agitation of Russia? Russia responded and the ruble fell dramatically (although it seems to be slowly recovering). Did fat cat plutocrats make a barrel of money on the collapse of the ruble? And if the Rothschilds wanted another new villain (or Hitler of the week) for the mesmerized and duped American public, they now have a new one with Putin and Russia.



The evidence is fully persuasive that the new plutocrat push against Russia is just one more step towards an ultimate WWIII with Russia (and China and much of the Muslim world, as a matter of fact). But as noted earlier, it is thru the process of war that the Rothschilds and their allies really make money and clean-up.



For More Reading/Information



For more reading on this issue, the reader may wish to check these sources:



The bestseller: “None Dare Call It Conspiracy,” by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham, first published in 1971, still available on eBay, Amazon and other book outlets.



“Tragedy and Hope,” by Carroll Quigley. At the 1992 Democrat Convention, Bill Clinton’s acceptance speech cited Quigley as Clinton’s mentor.



An Internet presentation on the Plutocrats, at Volume XXII of “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good People,” at www.AgeEnd.com on the net.



The author is not involved in the securities or financial market business and has no financial interest in presenting the information herein. The preceding information on this subject is presented for general information only and not for purposes of investment advise or recommendations. What the reader does on investments is his own personal decision and responsibility.

[link to news.goldseek.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]



Analyst Jon Markman, of Markman Capital Insight, says JP Morgan Chase (the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds) will emerge from the bank collapse as the big winner, becoming a megabank.

[link to kamron.com]

For centuries there has been big money to be made by
international bankers in the financing of governments and kings.
Such operators, however, are faced with certain thorny problems.
We know that smaller banking operations protect themselves by
taking collateral, but what kind of collateral can you get from a
government or a king?. What if the banker comes to collect and the
king says, "Off with his head!" The process through which one
collects a debt from a government or a monarch is not a subject
taught in the business schools of our universities, and most of
us - having never been in the business of lending money to kings -
have not given the problem much thought. But there is a king-
financing business, and to those who can ensure collection it is
lucrative indeed.

Economics professor Stuart Crane notes that there are two means
used to collateralize loans to governments and kings. Whenever a
business firm borrows big money its creditor obtains a voice in
management to protect his investment. Like a business, no
government can borrow big money unless willing to surrender to the
creditor some measure of sovereignty as collateral. Certainly,
international bankers who have loaned hundreds of billions of
dollars to governments around the world command considerable
influence in the policies of such goverments.

But the ultimate advantage that the creditor has over the
government or ruler is the threat that if the borrower steps out
of line the banker can finance an enemy or rival and can even
create an enemy by such means. Therefore, if you want to stay in
the king-financing business, it is wise to have an enemy or a
rival waiting in the wings to unseat every ruler to whom you lend.
If the king does'nt have an enemy, you must create one.

Pre-eminent in playing this game was the famous House of
Rothschild (German for Redshield, a name adopted by this family
for the red shield over the front door of their house). Its
founder, Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfurt,
Germany, kept one of his five sons at home to run the Frankfurt
bank, and sent the others to Paris, London, Vienna and Naples. The
Rothschilds became incredibly wealthy during the nineteenth
century by financing governments to war with one another.
According to Professor Stuart Crane:

"If you will look back at every war in Europe during
the Nineteenth Century, you will see that they always
ended with the establishment of a 'balance of power'.
With every re-shuffling there was a balance of power in
a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in
England, France or Austria. They grouped nations, so
that if any king stepped out of line a war would break
out and the war would be decided by which way the
financing went. Researching the debt positions of the
warring nations will usually indicate who was to be
punished."

In describing the characteristics of the Rothschilds and other
major international bankers, Professor Quigly tells us that they
remained different from ordinary bankers in several ways: they
were cosmopolitan and international; they were close to
governments and were particularly concerned with government debt,
including foreign government debts; these bankers came to be
called "international bankers". (Quigly,Tragedy and Hope, p.52)