Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,113 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,174,744
Pageviews Today: 2,883,668Threads Today: 741Posts Today: 12,328
11:25 PM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

VIDEO: Toben Extradition Trial

filmed outside the Court
User ID: 493937
United States
10/05/2008 04:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
VIDEO: Toben Extradition Trial
Dr. Fredrick Töben, an Australian citizen, seized while in transit on board at Heathrow, faces extradition to Germany under a European Arrest Warrant for an opinion crime.

Töben Extradition Trial

Lady Renouf

"we must stand firm !"

David Irving

" you cannnot be extradited for a political offence !"

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai9BYrbhJ9Q&eurl= [link to www.tellingfilms.co.uk]

Jailing Opinions Fredrick Töben Michèle Lady Renouf David Irving European Arrest Warrant Revisionism Human Rights


VIDEO: CENSORSHIP: A xxxxx Necessity

From: kps75



Comments by Video owner:

From: kps75

xxxs don't actually burn books. That's too 20th century. Now they order political deviants to to shut down their websites and put forth a concerted effort to censor ANYONE who dare speak the simple truth.

Censorship SCREAMS: "I can't convince you, I can't present any facts in opposition, or I am fearful of the truth being heard by the masses, so I'll silence you by force."

The greatest threat to our freedom to think, write, and speak freely is the Jewish power structure. Jewish censorship activities are necessitated by Jewish leaders' fear of exposure of their criminal and genocidal activities.

A government which censors the information available to its people, is a government which seeks to keep the people in a state of ignorance, and should not complain if the people have no loyalty to it.

In various countries across the globe, many Jewish supremacists have sought to impose their own special brand of censorship across the land. This is even true in America today, as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, an exclusively Jewish-organization, works to foist laws that suppress Free Speech if it is critical of them.
It is no exaggeration to suggest that many Jewish supremacists would like to see anyone who is critical of them in jail. Likewise, there are many Jews who would also like to see anyone who exposes the massive terror campaign going on in Palestine, committed by Jews for the most part, in jail.

This is probably the point where I'm expected to chime in
with the obligatory, "but not all Jews . . ." banter. However, I've grown so weary of Jewish excesses recently that I don't even feel that they deserve that; for, if there are some Jews who oppose this, they are so few in number as to hardly even be relevant to what is occurring on a worldwide scale. They certainly are doing nothing tangible to stop this censorship, caused mostly by Jews.

People Imprisoned around the Globe for Criticizing Jews Just ask Dr. Fredrick Toben of Australia. He questioned certain aspects of the Holocaust, suggesting that some of what Jews say are exaggerations. What Dr. Toben said was true, but Jews didn't like it. They didn't like it because it exposed them for the liars that they are. The Holocaust has always been useful for Jews as a money-making scheme, which it is, and as a device for inculcating a guilt-complex on unsuspecting Gentiles, making them more subservient to the Jews' needs through sympathy. As a result of Dr. Toben daring to question the Jewish-version of history, they worked to see him put in jail for a year. And they succeeded. Dr. Toben claims not to be anti-Semitic, and maybe he's telling the truth. But I certainly would be if I had to spend a year in jail for what he did. That appears to be the Jewish supremacist answer to all debates: If you can't beat them with facts and figures, put them in jail for daring to expose Jewish lies.

True or false, the holocaust story has had, and continues to have, big political ramifications. After the war, it was used to marshal popular support for establishing the state of Israel, and today the holocaust story continues to lend moral legitimacy to Israel.

Upon that legitimacy, hundreds of billions of US dollars have been transferred to Israel. The horror of the holocaust story has another important effect: It shields the political activity of Jews from public scrutiny. No need to belabor this point: one cannot critically comment upon the political activities of Jews or Israel as one might comment upon the activities of Catholics or the Vatican.

Those who are courageous enough to comment will certainly endure public branding: "Nazi!" "Jew-baiter!" "Anti semite!" But, perhaps most importantly, the holocaust story shows that the Jews are a special people, essentially different from the rest of humanity. Their suffering is unique in human history. No race, nowhere, at any time, as been subject to such persecution.

Theologically, one might say that the Jews have been sanctified by their suffering, as the Christian saints were sanctified by their suffering.

In the holocaust story, Hitler and the Jews are positioned as countervailing forces in a perfect polarity: At one pole, Hitler, the unique embodiment of Human Evil. At the other pole, those he tried to destroy, the Jews, the unique embodiment of Human Good.

But What If . . .

But what if the holocaust story is not true? Suppose the German National Socialists were not different in kind from others who have appeared in history throughout the millennia, and suppose that Hitler was not the Embodiment of Human Evil? What effect would that have on the polarity established by the holocaust story? Why, it might that mean the Jews are not the Embodiment of Human Good.

If the Holocaust story were shown to be hoax of the twentieth century, what of Israel, and what of the Manifest Destiny of the Jews?

Category: Nonprofits & Activism
censorship jews israel jewish boss zionist zionism scottroberts

a comment under video:

In 1920-1921, the history of the concepts found in the Protocols was traced back to the works of Goedsche and Jacques Crétineau-Joly by Lucien Wolf (an English Jewish journalist), and published in London in August 1921. But a dramatic expose occurred in the series of articles in The Times by its Constantinople reporter, Philip Graves, who discovered the plagiarism from the work of Maurice Joly.


Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 493937
United States
10/05/2008 04:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: VIDEO: Toben Extradition Trial
allow the truth.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 493937
United States
10/05/2008 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: VIDEO: Toben Extradition Trial

Courts 'say no to arrest warrant'

The British courts should refuse to act on a European arrest warrant requesting the extradition to Germany of a man accused of Holocaust denial, a senior politician said.

Australian citizen Frederick Toben was arrested on Wednesday at Heathrow, en route from the United States to Dubai, and has been remanded in custody awaiting an extradition hearing on October 17.

Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said that individuals should not be handed over to courts abroad for Holocaust denial, which is not a crime in the UK and raised issues of freedom of speech.


Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 493937
United States
10/05/2008 04:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: VIDEO: Toben Extradition Trial

Holocaust denier Dr Fredrick Toben should not be extradited, says Liberal Democrat MP

Germany's attempts to have a Holocaust denier extradited from Britain should be rebuffed, a senior MP has said.

By David Barrett, Home Affairs Correspondent

Last Updated: 10:35AM BST 05 Oct 2008

In comments which will reignite a row over controversial European Arrest Warrants, Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said that the arrest of Dr Fredrick Toben at Heathrow on Wednesday conflicted with Britain's tradition of free speech.

Mr Huhne said the affair exposed weaknesses in the system and called on the Government to lead a campaign to reform it. He is writing to Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, and Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, urging them to lobby Brussels for a rewrite of what he described as "rough edges" in the treaty which underpins the warranges.

He called for Dr Toben's case to be dropped and said the case demonstrated that the legislation wrongly allowed people to be arrested for actions which do not breach British law.

Dr Toben, a 64-year-old German academic, has used his Australian-based webiste to deny that the Holocaust took place on the scale accepted by mainstream historians. It is not a crime to express such opinions in the UK, although to do so in Germany and Austria is a specific offence.

The academic, who has now taken Australian nationality, is wanted by a district court in Mannheim, Germany, for posting information of an "anti-Semitic or revisionist nature" on the internet from 2002 onwards. He could face up to five years' imprisonment if convicted.

Mr Huhne said: "I think the time has come to ensure that the European Arrest Warrant's scope is effective. Some of the sloppy drafting does need to be tightened up. It was rushed through without proper thought as a knee-jerk reaction to terrorist offences.

"The case with Dr Toben exposes a problem in terms of freedom of speech and I come to this as a good, classic liberal.

"It is a fundamental part of our system that we believe in freedom of speech and, like Voltaire, I may disparage what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

The European Arrest Warrant allows swift and uncomplicated extradition from one country to another if a person is accused of an offence within a "core" list, including murder and terrorism.

The list also includes racism or xenophobia, offences which are handled differently by EU member states.

"I don't think it is appropriate for a member state to be pursuing an arrest warrant when it's not in a core category like that," said Mr Huhne, a former member of the European Parliament.

"I think it will be sensible for the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice to re-engage with this at European level to see if we can remove some of the rough edges."

Dr Toben attended a conference in Tehran in 2006 which questioned whether the Holocaust took place.

In 1999 he was convicted by a German court for breaching the country's Holocaust laws and imprisoned for nine months.

Appearing before City of Westminster Magistrates Court on Wednesday, Dr Toben said he did not consent to being extradited to Germany.

Claiming he was the victim of "legal persecution" he said: "It's a witch trial mentality in Germany concerning this matter, which is not the case in England yet.

"I beg you to let me leave the country, to kick me out, I promise never to return."

The arrest warrant was rushed in as part of the response to the September 11 terror attacks.

When the legislation went through Parliament, the then-Home Office minister Lord Filkin ( a jew )pledged that no-one would be extradited for conduct that was legal in Britain, if it took place in this country.

It is the German court's decision to pursue Dr Toben for comments made online while outside German territory which have led to the unusual circumstances of Dr Toben's arrest, and his remand in custody until Friday.

Indicating that he hoped to win cross-party support for a bid to reform the warrant system, Mr Huhne said: "I am absolutely and squarely against anti-Semitism.

"I am firmly anti-racist and I do not come at this in any way designed to undermine the Jewish community."

The arrest warrant, executed by the Metropolitan Police as Dr Toben landed at Heathrow while travelling from the US to Dubai, alleges: "From 2002 to this day the worldwide, internet publication of an anti-Semitic and/or revisionist nature deliberately contrary to historical truth, the said publications deny, approve or play down above all the mass murder of the Jews, planned and implemented, by the National Socialist rulers. The defender is committing the act in Australia, Germany and in other countries."


all truth is only as the controllers say is truth
( ed.)