Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 676 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 50,727
Pageviews Today: 153,715Threads Today: 268Posts Today: 3,906
11:06 AM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us
 New! GLP YOUTUBE CHANNEL | GLP Radio! | Contact
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 
Page 1, 2, 34, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Chemtrails: Where's the proof?

 RSS 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 493056
10/14/2008 10:03 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

It's easy to figure out what's true and what's not on GLP.

If The Guy or G. House is debunking it, it's definitely true.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:03 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

I saw a criss-crossed sky of chemtrails, and flying THROUGH the chemtrails was a jet leaving a CONTRAIL that dissipated and then disappeared behind the jet that WASN'T spraying.

It was as plain as the nose on my face, and until then, I also had my doubts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525598


Do you think the atmospheric conditions are the same all across the sky at all altitudes?

You're also assuming that some "spraying" was going on.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176444
10/14/2008 10:04 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Just to let you guys know, These two coconuts - The guy and G(gov.)house, show up like clockwork on all chemtrail threads. So obvious!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:04 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

If Chemtrails don't exist, why are they mentioned in HR2977?


Those lines were added to Kuciniches bill unkownst to him by on of his staffers. It embarrassed Kucinich and was removed.

That bill was not passed.

This is very old and you have been told the details repeatedly.

Standard tactic of lunatic fringers or propagandists.

Tell a lie often enough to make it seem like it's the truth.

It still isn't the truth.
 Quoting: G. House



Where is the proof that it embarassed Kucinich, G. House? Please provide evidence for your statement.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:04 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Again, nobody said the plane had to be 50 miles above, perhaps the layer of conduit material that is being sprayed works at different altitudes.

That's the problem with you shills, you're so adament on disproving every statement made, that you don't realize that disproving something doesn't make your statement or ideas anymore correct.

Saying that "A plane can't fly 50 miles above" doesn't disprove that fact that the plane MAY NOT NEED TO BE IN THE IONOSPHERE.

The ionosphere is used for military applications.

Conductive material is sprayed for certain applications.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542


Any material meant to affect the ionosphere would have to be injected either in or above it. Gravity, you know.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:07 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Do you think the atmospheric conditions are the same all across the sky at all altitudes?

You're also assuming that some "spraying" was going on.
 Quoting: The Guy



If all atmospheric conditions were the same, that doesn't prove that what he saw was not a "aerosol spraying" or a chemtrail.

He isn't making an assumption, it's a statement describing what he saw.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:08 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Because you're a shill who is adamant on spreading disinfo and distracting people?

If chemtrails didn't exist, people like you and G. House would be doing some other rudimentary task that doesn't require much cerebral processing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542


Prove it.

Before persistent contrails started becoming more common in autumn, like they always do, all I've had to debunk have been Punisher's threads. You guys are much better mental exercise, but at least as stubborn as he is.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:09 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Give us proof you don't get paid to post here


Even if I scanned my W-2 and posted it here, that wouldn't be proof that I don't.

okay, would it prove that you DO?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525598


No, but I can't prove that, lol!
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:09 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Again, nobody said the plane had to be 50 miles above, perhaps the layer of conduit material that is being sprayed works at different altitudes.

That's the problem with you shills, you're so adament on disproving every statement made, that you don't realize that disproving something doesn't make your statement or ideas anymore correct.

Saying that "A plane can't fly 50 miles above" doesn't disprove that fact that the plane MAY NOT NEED TO BE IN THE IONOSPHERE.

The ionosphere is used for military applications.

Conductive material is sprayed for certain applications.


Any material meant to affect the ionosphere would have to be injected either in or above it. Gravity, you know.
 Quoting: The Guy



You are wrong. Provide proof of your statement. Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it? Is that what you believe, The Guy?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 493056
10/14/2008 10:12 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Because you're a shill who is adamant on spreading disinfo and distracting people?

If chemtrails didn't exist, people like you and G. House would be doing some other rudimentary task that doesn't require much cerebral processing.


Prove it.

Before persistent contrails started becoming more common in autumn...
 Quoting: The Guy

You just did. You're a 100% Grade A government shill. Just like your butt-buddy G Shillhouse.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:12 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

You are wrong. Provide proof of your statement. Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it? Is that what you believe, The Guy?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542


Gravity causes things to be attracted toward the center of the Earth. Therefore, things fall down[/].
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525598
10/14/2008 10:12 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Do you think the atmospheric conditions are the same all across the sky at all altitudes?

You're also assuming that some "spraying" was going on.



If all atmospheric conditions were the same, that doesn't prove that what he saw was not a "aerosol spraying" or a chemtrail.

He isn't making an assumption, it's a statement describing what he saw.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542

I am SAYING that one jet with a CONTRAIL passed THROUGH (GET IT?SAME ALTITUDE AND CONDITIONS!) the CHEMTRAILS left by the aerosol spraying jets. not different times and places....SAME TIME SAME PLACE!
On a Bender
User ID: 526467
10/14/2008 10:12 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Okay people, time to lay the cards on the table. Whattayagot?

I have the fact that the phenomenon sometimes called "chemtrails" fits the description of contrails under certain conditions.

You believers claim that contrails that linger and spread aren't really contrails. Why? Do you believe the lie that contrails never do that? How do you expect solid particles to behave?
 Quoting: The Guy



chuckle
Free speech is not allowed on GLP, if the moderators or owner disagree with you... *POOF* ... I know from experience...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:12 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

You are wrong. Provide proof of your statement. Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it? Is that what you believe, The Guy?


Gravity causes things to be attracted toward the center of the Earth. Therefore, things fall down[/].
 Quoting: The Guy


Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it?
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:12 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

It's easy to figure out what's true and what's not on GLP.

If The Guy or G. House is debunking it, it's definitely true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 493056


So if someone who knows what he's talking about tells you you're wrong, it means you're right?
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
On a Bender
User ID: 526467
10/14/2008 10:14 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

You are wrong. Provide proof of your statement. Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it? Is that what you believe, The Guy?


Gravity causes things to be attracted toward the center of the Earth. Therefore, things fall down[/].
 Quoting: The Guy


You will never convince the believers in internet fairy tale stuff, damn they think the alien mother ship is coming today or something.

chuckle
Free speech is not allowed on GLP, if the moderators or owner disagree with you... *POOF* ... I know from experience...
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:14 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

If all atmospheric conditions were the same, that doesn't prove that what he saw was not a "aerosol spraying" or a chemtrail.

He isn't making an assumption, it's a statement describing what he saw.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542


It is an assumption, actually two. First, he's assuming the atmosphere is uniform in temperature, relative humidity, and pressure. Second, he's assuming that someone is spraying.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:15 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Prove it.

Before persistent contrails started becoming more common in autumn...

You just did. You're a 100% Grade A government shill. Just like your butt-buddy G Shillhouse.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 493056


What? I made an observation. I thought you were all for that.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:16 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

You are wrong. Provide proof of your statement. Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it? Is that what you believe, The Guy?


Gravity causes things to be attracted toward the center of the Earth. Therefore, things fall down[/].


You will never convince the believers in internet fairy tale stuff, damn they think the alien mother ship is coming today or something.

chuckle
 Quoting: On a Bender


Coming from an alcoholic shill who spends his life on Computers trolling those nutjobs...

chuckle
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:18 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

I am SAYING that one jet with a CONTRAIL passed THROUGH (GET IT?SAME ALTITUDE AND CONDITIONS!) the CHEMTRAILS left by the aerosol spraying jets. not different times and places....SAME TIME SAME PLACE!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525598


Contrails are translucent. It could have been above or below by several hundred feet, and you wouldn't be able to tell it from the ground.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:18 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

It is an assumption, actually two. First, he's assuming the atmosphere is uniform in temperature, relative humidity, and pressure. Second, he's assuming that someone is spraying.
 Quoting: The Guy


Maybe someone was spraying. Do you believe that planes through out history haven't sprayed the skies in aerosol operations?
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:19 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Do you really believe that you can't affect the ionosphere below it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542


Not unless you're shining microwaves at it, lol.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525598
10/14/2008 10:19 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

If all atmospheric conditions were the same, that doesn't prove that what he saw was not a "aerosol spraying" or a chemtrail.

He isn't making an assumption, it's a statement describing what he saw.


It is an assumption, actually two. First, he's assuming the atmosphere is uniform in temperature, relative humidity, and pressure. Second, he's assuming that someone is spraying.
 Quoting: The Guy

SHE isn't assuming a damn thing...why do you insist on overlooking that I said it was the SAME PLACE SAME ALTITUDE< SAME TIME!\


You're a fucking blabbering robotic idiot....I'm done with this thread....
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:21 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Maybe someone was spraying. Do you believe that planes through out history haven't sprayed the skies in aerosol operations?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542


Sure, there are well-documented examples. I'm looking for physical evidence that something like that is being done all the time worldwide now.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
The Guy Subscriber
Are you sure you want to know?
User ID: 349666
10/14/2008 10:23 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

SHE isn't assuming a damn thing...why do you insist on overlooking that I said it was the SAME PLACE SAME ALTITUDE< SAME TIME!


You're a fucking blabbering robotic idiot....I'm done with this thread....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525598


Because...humans...can't...judge...altitude...without ...tools.
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought--
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:25 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Anyway, you can reply to these fat shills like G. House all day long. SnakeAirlines, The Guy, and the rest of the paid geeks who spend their lives trolling chemtrail threads need to get lives and better hobbies.

G. House
User ID: 526364
10/14/2008 10:26 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

If Chemtrails don't exist, why are they mentioned in HR2977?


Those lines were added to Kuciniches bill unkownst to him by on of his staffers. It embarrassed Kucinich and was removed.

That bill was not passed.

This is very old and you have been told the details repeatedly.

Standard tactic of lunatic fringers or propagandists.

Tell a lie often enough to make it seem like it's the truth.

It still isn't the truth.



Where is the proof that it embarassed Kucinich, G. House? Please provide evidence for your statement.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 525542




Who wrote this? The original language for the bill was actually created by Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin. See, from Webre’s web site:

[link to www.exopolitics.com]

With Dr. Carol S. Rosin and many others, [Webre] is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban space-based weapons.




So what’s Kucinich’s involvement in this? It’s difficult to say. Kucinich is anti-war, so perhaps that’s his motivation. He does have a lot of new-age, UFO-believing, friends, but he’s also running for president. When he was made aware of the nature of the “exotic weapons” language in the bill, it was re-written, and when questioned about it, he said

“I’m not into that. Understand me. When I found out that was in there, I said, ‘Look, I’m not interested in going there.’”
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:27 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Sure, there are well-documented examples. I'm looking for physical evidence that something like that is being done all the time worldwide now.
 Quoting: The Guy


Thank you for proving aerosol crimes exist.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 500644
10/14/2008 10:27 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

Where is your proof that chemtrails don't exist?

Here is my proof and my personal chemtrail videos


[link to www.youtube.com]


[link to www.asp.bnl.gov]
The Department of Energy's Atmospheric Science Program has as its long-term goal developing comprehensive understanding of the atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and fate of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter. The current focus of the program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate: aerosol formation and evolution and aerosol properties that affect direct and indirect influences on climate and climate change.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 525542
10/14/2008 10:29 PM
Re: Chemtrails: Where's the proof?Quote

If Chemtrails don't exist, why are they mentioned in HR2977?


Those lines were added to Kuciniches bill unkownst to him by on of his staffers. It embarrassed Kucinich and was removed.

That bill was not passed.

This is very old and you have been told the details repeatedly.

Standard tactic of lunatic fringers or propagandists.

Tell a lie often enough to make it seem like it's the truth.

It still isn't the truth.



Where is the proof that it embarassed Kucinich, G. House? Please provide evidence for your statement.




Who wrote this? The original language for the bill was actually created by Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin. See, from Webre’s web site:

[link to www.exopolitics.com]

With Dr. Carol S. Rosin and many others, [Webre] is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban space-based weapons.




So what’s Kucinich’s involvement in this? It’s difficult to say. Kucinich is anti-war, so perhaps that’s his motivation. He does have a lot of new-age, UFO-believing, friends, but he’s also running for president. When he was made aware of the nature of the “exotic weapons” language in the bill, it was re-written, and when questioned about it, he said

“I’m not into that. Understand me. When I found out that was in there, I said, ‘Look, I’m not interested in going there.’”
 Quoting: G. House



Cool. Thanks, tubbo.

See ya next week when we're discussing chemtrails again.

wave
Page 1, 2, 34, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!
Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.38s (6 queries)